Damián Bendersky

Is Spinal Cord Stimulation Safe? A Review of Its Complications

OBJECTIVE We aim to evaluate the complications of spinal cord stimulation (SCS). METHODS This article is a nonsystematic review of literature about the safety of SCS. The complications of this technique are described, focusing the analysis in their prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. RESULTS Electrode migration is the most common complication of SCS and it is more frequent with percutaneous electrodes than with paddle-type ones. Lead migration may be solved by reprogramming the stimulator, but if it fails, surgical repositioning is mandatory. Several anchoring techniques are described in the text. Infection is a potentially reducible complication associated with the surgical procedure and the reported infection rates are comparable with those of several neuromodulation devices. Recommendations for the prevention of SCS device infections are listed in the article. Other complications were reviewed such as electrode fracture, extension wire or implantable pulse generator failures, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, pain over the stimulator, and spinal epidural hematoma, among others. CONCLUSION In spite of the existence of several complications, SCS may be seen as a safe technique. Furthermore, the incidence of life-threatening complications is low. The physician must be alert to recognize them during the follow-up. Complications may be avoided or at least diminished by performing a proper and strict aseptic surgical technique as well as carrying out an accurate patient selection before the implantation, according to the recommendations published in the literature.

Sternberg's canal as a cause of encephalocele within the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus: A report of two cases

Background: Intrasphenoidal encephaloceles are extremely rare findings. Sternbergs canal is a lateral craniopharyngeal canal resulting from incomplete fusion of the greater wings of the sphenoid bone with the basisphenoid. It acts as a weak spot of the skull base, which may lead to develop a temporal lobe encephalocele protruding into the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus (SS). Case Description: We present two cases of intrasphenoidal encephalocele due to persistence of the lateral craniopharyngeal canal. The first case presented with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea and the second one was referred to the neurosurgical department with CSF rhinorrhea and meningitis. Radiological investigations consisted of computed tomography (CT) scan, CT cisternography and magnetic resonance images in both cases. These imaging studies identified a herniated temporal lobe through a bony defect which communicates the middle cranial fossa with the lateral recess of the SS. Both patients underwent a transcranial repair of the encephalocele because of the previous failure of the endoscopic surgery. There was no complication related to the surgical procedure and no recurrence of CSF leakage occurred 2 and 3 years after surgery, respectively. Conclusion: Encephalocele within the lateral recess of the SS is a rare entity which must be suspected in patients who present with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea. Congenital intrasphenoidal encephaloceles, which are located medial to the foramen rotundum, seem to be due to persistence of the Sternbergs canal. Transcranial approach is a good option when a transnasal approach had failed previously.

Dorsal column stimulator applications

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used to treat neuropathic pain since 1967. Following that, technological progress, among other advances, helped SCS become an effective tool to reduce pain. Methods: This article is a non-systematic review of the mechanism of action, indications, results, programming parameters, complications, and cost-effectiveness of SCS. Results: In spite of the existence of several studies that try to prove the mechanism of action of SCS, it still remains unknown. The mechanism of action of SCS would be based on the antidromic activation of the dorsal column fibers, which activate the inhibitory interneurons within the dorsal horn. At present, the indications of SCS are being revised constantly, while new applications are being proposed and researched worldwide. Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is the most common indication for SCS, whereas, the complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is the second one. Also, this technique is useful in patients with refractory angina and critical limb ischemia, in whom surgical or endovascular treatment cannot be performed. Further indications may be phantom limb pain, chronic intractable pain located in the head, face, neck, or upper extremities, spinal lumbar stenosis in patients who are not surgical candidates, and others. Conclusion: Spinal cord stimulation is a useful tool for neuromodulation, if an accurate patient selection is carried out prior, which should include a trial period. Undoubtedly, this proper selection and a better knowledge of its underlying mechanisms of action, will allow this cutting edge technique to be more acceptable among pain physicians.

Unsuccessful pulsed radiofrequency of the sphenopalatine ganglion in patients with chronic cluster headache and subsequent successful thermocoagulation.

We present the results of pulsed and continuous radiofrequency (CRF) of the sphenopalatine ganglion in a case series of 3 patients with chronic cluster headache (CCH). Three patients were referred to our neurosurgical department because of CCH, which was refractory to pharmacological treatment. They underwent pulsed radiofrequency of the sphenopalatine ganglion (PRF‐SPG), and the procedure was performed through an infrazygomatic approach. In the PRF procedures, we applied 2 cycles of PRF at 42°C and 45 V for 120 seconds, with a pulse frequency of 2 Hz and a pulse width of 20 ms. In those procedures where thermocoagulation was carried out, 2 CRF lesions at 80°C for 90 seconds each were performed. Following corticosteroid and local anesthetic (40 mg of methylprednisolone and 1 mL of 1% lidocaine) injection, 2 patients had no pain relief at all, whereas the third one experienced a partial response, which lasted only 1 month and his pain then returned to its baseline level. Thus, this outcome was assessed as a nonsustained partial response. Therefore, all of them underwent a CRF lesioning of the SPG, and after this procedure, they achieved complete pain relief until the end of the follow‐up period. Furthermore, the associated autonomic manifestations disappeared. The 3 patients presented in this case series failed to achieve adequate pain relief after PRF‐SPG. However, these same patients subsequently underwent a successful CRF of the SPG.

Multicentric extramedullary myxopapillary ependymomas: Two case reports and literature review.

Background: Ependymoma has been described typically as an intramedullary tumor derived from ependymal cells. Intradural extramedullary presentation is rarely described and almost always as a unique lesion. Myxopapillary ependymoma is a histological variant that distinguishes from the ordinary type of ependymoma because of its generally better prognosis. We present two cases of multicentric extramedullary myxopapillary ependymomas. Case Description: Case 1 was a 30-year-old man with progressive paresthesia and paresis in the lower limbs, urinary sphincter disturbances, gait instability, ataxia, and chronic low back pain with multiple intradural extramedullary lesions at C2-C3, D2-D4-D5, and D12-L1. Case 2 was a 32-year-old man, presented with low back pain and mild paresthesia in the right lower limb. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed multiple intradural extramedullary lesions with homogeneous enhancement after gadolinium injection at C7, D2, D4, D5, D8, D10, D11, L1, L3, L5, S1, and S2. Complete tumor resection of the approached tumors was archived in both cases. Histological studies confirm myxopapillary ependymomas. Patients neurologic outcome was good and no residual tumor was present at MRI control at 10 years in case 1 and 12 months in case 2. Conclusions: We report the first two cases of multicentric extramedullary myxopapillary ependymomas, this etiology must be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of intradural extramedullary tumors.

Ectopic prolactinoma within the sphenoidal sinus associated with empty sella

Background: Pituitary adenomas are a common cause of endocrinal dysfunction, which comprise 10–20% of all intracranial tumors. Although almost all of them arise within the sella turcica, there are some rare cases in which a pituitary adenoma is located outside the intrasellar region, so it is defined as an ectopic pituitary adenoma (EPA). Case Description: We described a case of a 31-year-old male with a serum prolactin (PRL) value of 240 ng/ml Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a space-occupying mass within the sphenoid sinus (SS) which partially enhanced by gadolinium. MRI did not reveal any sellar floor defect and an empty sella was detected. As dopamine agonist treatment had failed in lowering the serum PRL level, he underwent surgical treatment. A transsphenoidal approach without opening the sellar floor was performed using an operating microscope and the lesion within the SS was completely removed. Conclusion: Although intrasphenoidal EPAs are rare findings, the presence of an endocrine disorder related to pituitary hormones, and a space-occupying mass within the SS associated with either a normal sellar pituitary gland or an empty sella must lead us to suspect this diagnosis.

Massive subarachnoid pneumocephalus after a stereotactic brain biopsy

Sir, Image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy (SBB) is a common and generally safe procedure with a morbidity of 3-5% and a mortality of 0-7%.[1] The most frequent complications include hemorrhage and infection. Pneumocephalus is a common consequence of craniotomies in neurosurgical practice[2] but not following SBB. We could not find a case of tension pneumocephalus (TP) following SBB in the review of English literature.

The use of neuromodulation for the treatment of tremor

BACKGROUND Tremor may be a disabling disorder and pharmacologic treatment is the first-line therapy for these patients. Nevertheless, this treatment may lead to a satisfactory tremor reduction in only 50% of patients with essential tremor. Thalamotomy was the treatment of choice for tremor refractory to medical therapy until deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermedius nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus has started being used. Nowadays, thalamotomy is rarely performed. METHODS This article is a non-systematic review of the indications, results, programming parameters and surgical technique of DBS of the Vim for the treatment of tremor. RESULTS In spite of the fact that it is possible to achieve similar clinical results using thalamotomy or DBS of the Vim, the former causes more adverse effects than the latter. Furthermore, DBS can be used bilaterally, whereas thalamotomy has a high risk of causing disartria when it is performed in both sides. DBS of the Vim achieved an adequate tremor improvement in several series of patients with tremor caused by essential tremor, Parkinsons disease or multiple sclerosis. Besides the Vim, there are other targets, which are being used by some authors, such as the zona incerta and the prelemniscal radiations. CONCLUSION DBS of the Vim is a useful treatment for disabling tremor refractory to medical therapy. It is essential to carry out an accurate patient selection as well as to use a proper surgical technique. The best stereotactic target for tremor is still unknown, although the Vim is the most used one.

El uso de la neuromodulación para el tratamiento del temblor

BACKGROUND Tremor may be a disabling disorder and pharmacologic treatment is the first-line therapy for these patients. Nevertheless, this treatment may lead to a satisfactory tremor reduction in only 50% of patients with essential tremor. Thalamotomy was the treatment of choice for tremor refractory to medical therapy until deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermedius nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus has started being used. Nowadays, thalamotomy is rarely performed. METHODS This article is a non-systematic review of the indications, results, programming parameters and surgical technique of DBS of the Vim for the treatment of tremor. RESULTS In spite of the fact that it is possible to achieve similar clinical results using thalamotomy or DBS of the Vim, the former causes more adverse effects than the latter. Furthermore, DBS can be used bilaterally, whereas thalamotomy has a high risk of causing disartria when it is performed in both sides. DBS of the Vim achieved an adequate tremor improvement in several series of patients with tremor caused by essential tremor, Parkinsons disease or multiple sclerosis. Besides the Vim, there are other targets, which are being used by some authors, such as the zona incerta and the prelemniscal radiations. CONCLUSION DBS of the Vim is a useful treatment for disabling tremor refractory to medical therapy. It is essential to carry out an accurate patient selection as well as to use a proper surgical technique. The best stereotactic target for tremor is still unknown, although the Vim is the most used one.

El uso de la neuromodulación para el tratamiento del temblor The use of neuromodulation for the treatment of tremor

BACKGROUND Tremor may be a disabling disorder and pharmacologic treatment is the first-line therapy for these patients. Nevertheless, this treatment may lead to a satisfactory tremor reduction in only 50% of patients with essential tremor. Thalamotomy was the treatment of choice for tremor refractory to medical therapy until deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermedius nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus has started being used. Nowadays, thalamotomy is rarely performed. METHODS This article is a non-systematic review of the indications, results, programming parameters and surgical technique of DBS of the Vim for the treatment of tremor. RESULTS In spite of the fact that it is possible to achieve similar clinical results using thalamotomy or DBS of the Vim, the former causes more adverse effects than the latter. Furthermore, DBS can be used bilaterally, whereas thalamotomy has a high risk of causing disartria when it is performed in both sides. DBS of the Vim achieved an adequate tremor improvement in several series of patients with tremor caused by essential tremor, Parkinsons disease or multiple sclerosis. Besides the Vim, there are other targets, which are being used by some authors, such as the zona incerta and the prelemniscal radiations. CONCLUSION DBS of the Vim is a useful treatment for disabling tremor refractory to medical therapy. It is essential to carry out an accurate patient selection as well as to use a proper surgical technique. The best stereotactic target for tremor is still unknown, although the Vim is the most used one.