Damiano Gianelle
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Damiano Gianelle.
Nature | 2010
Martin Jung; Markus Reichstein; Philippe Ciais; Sonia I. Seneviratne; Justin Sheffield; Michael L. Goulden; Gordon B. Bonan; Alessandro Cescatti; Jiquan Chen; Richard de Jeu; A. Johannes Dolman; Werner Eugster; Dieter Gerten; Damiano Gianelle; Nadine Gobron; Jens Heinke; John S. Kimball; Beverly E. Law; Leonardo Montagnani; Qiaozhen Mu; Brigitte Mueller; Keith W. Oleson; Dario Papale; Andrew D. Richardson; Olivier Roupsard; Steve Running; Enrico Tomelleri; Nicolas Viovy; Ulrich Weber; Christopher A. Williams
More than half of the solar energy absorbed by land surfaces is currently used to evaporate water. Climate change is expected to intensify the hydrological cycle and to alter evapotranspiration, with implications for ecosystem services and feedback to regional and global climate. Evapotranspiration changes may already be under way, but direct observational constraints are lacking at the global scale. Until such evidence is available, changes in the water cycle on land—a key diagnostic criterion of the effects of climate change and variability—remain uncertain. Here we provide a data-driven estimate of global land evapotranspiration from 1982 to 2008, compiled using a global monitoring network, meteorological and remote-sensing observations, and a machine-learning algorithm. In addition, we have assessed evapotranspiration variations over the same time period using an ensemble of process-based land-surface models. Our results suggest that global annual evapotranspiration increased on average by 7.1 ± 1.0 millimetres per year per decade from 1982 to 1997. After that, coincident with the last major El Niño event in 1998, the global evapotranspiration increase seems to have ceased until 2008. This change was driven primarily by moisture limitation in the Southern Hemisphere, particularly Africa and Australia. In these regions, microwave satellite observations indicate that soil moisture decreased from 1998 to 2008. Hence, increasing soil-moisture limitations on evapotranspiration largely explain the recent decline of the global land-evapotranspiration trend. Whether the changing behaviour of evapotranspiration is representative of natural climate variability or reflects a more permanent reorganization of the land water cycle is a key question for earth system science.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
Martin Jung; Markus Reichstein; Hank A. Margolis; Alessandro Cescatti; Andrew D. Richardson; M. Altaf Arain; Almut Arneth; Christian Bernhofer; Damien Bonal; Jiquan Chen; Damiano Gianelle; Nadine Gobron; Gerald Kiely; Werner L. Kutsch; Gitta Lasslop; Beverly E. Law; Anders Lindroth; Lutz Merbold; Leonardo Montagnani; E.J. Moors; Dario Papale; Matteo Sottocornola; Francesco Primo Vaccari; Christopher A. Williams
We upscaled FLUXNET observations of carbon dioxide, water, and energy fluxes to the global scale using the machine learning technique, model tree ensembles (MTE). We trained MTE to predict site-level gross primary productivity (GPP), terrestrial ecosystem respiration (TER), net ecosystem exchange (NEE), latent energy (LE), and sensible heat (H) based on remote sensing indices, climate and meteorological data, and information on land use. We applied the trained MTEs to generate global flux fields at a 0.5 degrees x 0.5 degrees spatial resolution and a monthly temporal resolution from 1982 to 2008. Cross-validation analyses revealed good performance of MTE in predicting among-site flux variability with modeling efficiencies (MEf) between 0.64 and 0.84, except for NEE (MEf = 0.32). Performance was also good for predicting seasonal patterns (MEf between 0.84 and 0.89, except for NEE (0.64)). By comparison, predictions of monthly anomalies were not as strong (MEf between 0.29 and 0.52). Improved accounting of disturbance and lagged environmental effects, along with improved characterization of errors in the training data set, would contribute most to further reducing uncertainties. Our global estimates of LE (158 +/- 7 J x 10(18) yr(-1)), H (164 +/- 15 J x 10(18) yr(-1)), and GPP (119 +/- 6 Pg C yr(-1)) were similar to independent estimates. Our global TER estimate (96 +/- 6 Pg C yr(-1)) was likely underestimated by 5-10%. Hot spot regions of interannual variability in carbon fluxes occurred in semiarid to semihumid regions and were controlled by moisture supply. Overall, GPP was more important to interannual variability in NEE than TER. Our empirically derived fluxes may be used for calibration and evaluation of land surface process models and for exploratory and diagnostic assessments of the biosphere.
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing | 2008
Michele Dalponte; Lorenzo Bruzzone; Damiano Gianelle
In this paper, we propose an analysis on the joint effect of hyperspectral and light detection and ranging (LIDAR) data for the classification of complex forest areas. In greater detail, we present: 1) an advanced system for the joint use of hyperspectral and LIDAR data in complex classification problems; 2) an investigation on the effectiveness of the very promising support vector machines (SVMs) and Gaussian maximum likelihood with leave-one-out-covariance algorithm classifiers for the analysis of complex forest scenarios characterized from a high number of species in a multisource framework; and 3) an analysis on the effectiveness of different LIDAR returns and channels (elevation and intensity) for increasing the classification accuracy obtained with hyperspectral images, particularly in relation to the discrimination of very similar classes. Several experiments carried out on a complex forest area in Italy provide interesting conclusions on the effectiveness and potentialities of the joint use of hyperspectral and LIDAR data and on the accuracy of the different classification techniques analyzed in the proposed system. In particular, the elevation channel of the first LIDAR return was very effective for the separation of species with similar spectral signatures but different mean heights, and the SVM classifier proved to be very robust and accurate in the exploitation of the considered multisource data.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014
Luis Guanter; Yongguang Zhang; Martin Jung; Joanna Joiner; Maximillian Voigt; Joseph A. Berry; Christian Frankenberg; Alfredo R. Huete; Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada; Jung-Eun Lee; M. Susan Moran; Guillermo E. Ponce-Campos; Christian Beer; Gustavo Camps-Valls; Nina Buchmann; Damiano Gianelle; Katja Klumpp; Alessandro Cescatti; John M. Baker; Timothy J. Griffis
Significance Global food and biofuel production and their vulnerability in a changing climate are of paramount societal importance. However, current global model predictions of crop photosynthesis are highly uncertain. Here we demonstrate that new space-based observations of chlorophyll fluorescence, an emission intrinsically linked to plant biochemistry, enable an accurate, global, and time-resolved measurement of crop photosynthesis, which is not possible from any other remote vegetation measurement. Our results show that chlorophyll fluorescence data can be used as a unique benchmark to improve our global models, thus providing more reliable projections of agricultural productivity and climate impact on crop yields. The enormous increase of the observational capabilities for fluorescence in the very near future strengthens the relevance of this study. Photosynthesis is the process by which plants harvest sunlight to produce sugars from carbon dioxide and water. It is the primary source of energy for all life on Earth; hence it is important to understand how this process responds to climate change and human impact. However, model-based estimates of gross primary production (GPP, output from photosynthesis) are highly uncertain, in particular over heavily managed agricultural areas. Recent advances in spectroscopy enable the space-based monitoring of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) from terrestrial plants. Here we demonstrate that spaceborne SIF retrievals provide a direct measure of the GPP of cropland and grassland ecosystems. Such a strong link with crop photosynthesis is not evident for traditional remotely sensed vegetation indices, nor for more complex carbon cycle models. We use SIF observations to provide a global perspective on agricultural productivity. Our SIF-based crop GPP estimates are 50–75% higher than results from state-of-the-art carbon cycle models over, for example, the US Corn Belt and the Indo-Gangetic Plain, implying that current models severely underestimate the role of management. Our results indicate that SIF data can help us improve our global models for more accurate projections of agricultural productivity and climate impact on crop yields. Extension of our approach to other ecosystems, along with increased observational capabilities for SIF in the near future, holds the prospect of reducing uncertainties in the modeling of the current and future carbon cycle.
Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2009
Christian Beer; Philippe Ciais; Markus Reichstein; Dennis D. Baldocchi; Beverly E. Law; D. Papale; J. F. Soussana; C. Ammann; Nina Buchmann; Dorothea Frank; Damiano Gianelle; Ivan A. Janssens; Alexander Knohl; Barbara Köstner; E.J. Moors; Olivier Roupsard; Hans Verbeeck; Timo Vesala; Christopher A. Williams; G. Wohlfahrt
Half-hourly measurements of the net exchanges of carbon dioxide and water vapor between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere provide estimates of gross primary production (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) at the ecosystem level and on daily to annual timescales. The ratio of these quantities represents ecosystem water use efficiency. Its multiplication with mean daylight vapor pressure deficit (VPD) leads to a quantity which we call “inherent water use efficiency” (IWUE*). The dependence of IWUE* on environmental conditions indicates possible adaptive adjustment of ecosystem physiology in response to a changing environment. IWUE* is analyzed for 43 sites across a range of plant functional types and climatic conditions. IWUE* increases during short-term moderate drought conditions. Mean annual IWUE* varied by a factor of 3 among all sites. This is partly explained by soil moisture at field capacity, particularly in deciduous broad-leaved forests. Canopy light interception sets the upper limits to canopy photosynthesis, and explains half the variance in annual IWUE* among herbaceous ecosystems and evergreen needle-leaved forests. Knowledge of IWUE* offers valuable improvement to the representation of carbon and water coupling in ecosystem process models
Science | 2016
Jingjing Liang; Thomas W. Crowther; Nicolas Picard; Susan K. Wiser; Mo Zhou; Giorgio Alberti; Ernst-Detlef Schulze; A. David McGuire; Fabio Bozzato; Hans Pretzsch; Sergio de-Miguel; Alain Paquette; Bruno Hérault; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Christopher B. Barrett; Henry B. Glick; Geerten M. Hengeveld; Gert-Jan Nabuurs; Sebastian Pfautsch; Hélder Viana; Alexander C. Vibrans; Christian Ammer; Peter Schall; David David Verbyla; Nadja M. Tchebakova; Markus Fischer; James V. Watson; Han Y. H. Chen; Xiangdong Lei; Mart-Jan Schelhaas
Global biodiversity and productivity The relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem productivity has been explored in detail in herbaceous vegetation, but patterns in forests are far less well understood. Liang et al. have amassed a global forest data set from >770,000 sample plots in 44 countries. A positive and consistent relationship can be discerned between tree diversity and ecosystem productivity at landscape, country, and ecoregion scales. On average, a 10% loss in biodiversity leads to a 3% loss in productivity. This means that the economic value of maintaining biodiversity for the sake of global forest productivity is more than fivefold greater than global conservation costs. Science, this issue p. 196 Global forest inventory records suggest that biodiversity loss would result in a decline in forest productivity worldwide. INTRODUCTION The biodiversity-productivity relationship (BPR; the effect of biodiversity on ecosystem productivity) is foundational to our understanding of the global extinction crisis and its impacts on the functioning of natural ecosystems. The BPR has been a prominent research topic within ecology in recent decades, but it is only recently that we have begun to develop a global perspective. RATIONALE Forests are the most important global repositories of terrestrial biodiversity, but deforestation, forest degradation, climate change, and other factors are threatening approximately one half of tree species worldwide. Although there have been substantial efforts to strengthen the preservation and sustainable use of forest biodiversity throughout the globe, the consequences of this diversity loss pose a major uncertainty for ongoing international forest management and conservation efforts. The forest BPR represents a critical missing link for accurate valuation of global biodiversity and successful integration of biological conservation and socioeconomic development. Until now, there have been limited tree-based diversity experiments, and the forest BPR has only been explored within regional-scale observational studies. Thus, the strength and spatial variability of this relationship remains unexplored at a global scale. RESULTS We explored the effect of tree species richness on tree volume productivity at the global scale using repeated forest inventories from 777,126 permanent sample plots in 44 countries containing more than 30 million trees from 8737 species spanning most of the global terrestrial biomes. Our findings reveal a consistent positive concave-down effect of biodiversity on forest productivity across the world, showing that a continued biodiversity loss would result in an accelerating decline in forest productivity worldwide. The BPR shows considerable geospatial variation across the world. The same percentage of biodiversity loss would lead to a greater relative (that is, percentage) productivity decline in the boreal forests of North America, Northeastern Europe, Central Siberia, East Asia, and scattered regions of South-central Africa and South-central Asia. In the Amazon, West and Southeastern Africa, Southern China, Myanmar, Nepal, and the Malay Archipelago, however, the same percentage of biodiversity loss would lead to greater absolute productivity decline. CONCLUSION Our findings highlight the negative effect of biodiversity loss on forest productivity and the potential benefits from the transition of monocultures to mixed-species stands in forestry practices. The BPR we discover across forest ecosystems worldwide corresponds well with recent theoretical advances, as well as with experimental and observational studies on forest and nonforest ecosystems. On the basis of this relationship, the ongoing species loss in forest ecosystems worldwide could substantially reduce forest productivity and thereby forest carbon absorption rate to compromise the global forest carbon sink. We further estimate that the economic value of biodiversity in maintaining commercial forest productivity alone is
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing | 2013
Michele Dalponte; Hans Ole Ørka; Terje Gobakken; Damiano Gianelle; Erik Næsset
166 billion to
Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2011
Wenping Yuan; Yiqi Luo; Xianglan Li; Shuguang Liu; Guirui Yu; Tao Zhou; Michael Bahn; Andy Black; Ankur R. Desai; Alessandro Cescatti; Barbara Marcolla; C.M.J. Jacobs; Jiquan Chen; Mika Aurela; Christian Bernhofer; Bert Gielen; Gil Bohrer; David R. Cook; Danilo Dragoni; Allison L. Dunn; Damiano Gianelle; Thomas Grünwald; Andreas Ibrom; Monique Y. Leclerc; Anders Lindroth; Heping Liu; Luca Belelli Marchesini; Leonardo Montagnani; Gabriel Pita; Mirco Rodeghiero
490 billion per year. Although representing only a small percentage of the total value of biodiversity, this value is two to six times as much as it would cost to effectively implement conservation globally. These results highlight the necessity to reassess biodiversity valuation and the potential benefits of integrating and promoting biological conservation in forest resource management and forestry practices worldwide. Global effect of tree species diversity on forest productivity. Ground-sourced data from 777,126 global forest biodiversity permanent sample plots (dark blue dots, left), which cover a substantial portion of the global forest extent (white), reveal a consistent positive and concave-down biodiversity-productivity relationship across forests worldwide (red line with pink bands representing 95% confidence interval, right). The biodiversity-productivity relationship (BPR) is foundational to our understanding of the global extinction crisis and its impacts on ecosystem functioning. Understanding BPR is critical for the accurate valuation and effective conservation of biodiversity. Using ground-sourced data from 777,126 permanent plots, spanning 44 countries and most terrestrial biomes, we reveal a globally consistent positive concave-down BPR, showing that continued biodiversity loss would result in an accelerating decline in forest productivity worldwide. The value of biodiversity in maintaining commercial forest productivity alone—US
Rangeland Ecology & Management | 2010
Tagir G. Gilmanov; Luis Miguel Igreja Aires; Zoltán Barcza; V. S. Baron; L. Belelli; Jason Beringer; David P. Billesbach; Damien Bonal; James A. Bradford; Eric Ceschia; David R. Cook; Chiara A. R. Corradi; Albert B. Frank; Damiano Gianelle; Cristina Gimeno; T. Gruenwald; Haiqiang Guo; Niall P. Hanan; László Haszpra; J. Heilman; A. Jacobs; Michael Jones; Douglas A. Johnson; Gerard Kiely; Shenggong Li; Vincenzo Magliulo; E.J. Moors; Zoltán Nagy; M. Nasyrov; Clenton E. Owensby
166 billion to 490 billion per year according to our estimation—is more than twice what it would cost to implement effective global conservation. This highlights the need for a worldwide reassessment of biodiversity values, forest management strategies, and conservation priorities.
Ecosystems | 2008
Georg Wohlfahrt; Margaret Anderson-Dunn; Michael Bahn; Manuela Balzarolo; Frank Berninger; Claire Campbell; Arnaud Carrara; Alessandro Cescatti; Torben R. Christensen; Sabina Dore; Werner Eugster; Thomas Friborg; Markus Furger; Damiano Gianelle; Cristina Gimeno; K.J. Hargreaves; Pertti Hari; Alois Haslwanter; Torbjörn Johansson; Barbara Marcolla; C. Milford; Zoltán Nagy; E. Nemitz; Nele Rogiers; M. J. Sanz; Rolf T. W. Siegwolf; Sanna Susiluoto; Mark A. Sutton; Zoltán Tuba; Francesca Ugolini
Tree species mapping in forest areas is an important topic in forest inventory. In recent years, several studies have been carried out using different types of hyperspectral sensors under various forest conditions. The aim of this work was to evaluate the potential of two high spectral and spatial resolution hyperspectral sensors (HySpex-VNIR 1600 and HySpex-SWIR 320i), operating at different wavelengths, for tree species classification of boreal forests. To address this objective, many experiments were carried out, taking into consideration: 1) three classifiers (support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), and Gaussian maximum likelihood); 2) two spatial resolutions (1.5 m and 0.4 m pixel sizes); 3) two subsets of spectral bands (all and a selection); and 4) two spatial levels (pixel and tree levels). The study area is characterized by the presence of four classes 1) Norway spruce, 2) Scots pine, together with 3) scattered Birch and 4) other broadleaves. Our results showed that: 1) the HySpex VNIR 1600 sensor is effective in boreal tree species classification with kappa accuracies over 0.8 (with Pine and Spruce reaching producers accuracies higher than 95%); 2) the role of the HySpex-SWIR 320i is limited, and its bands alone are able to properly separate only Pine and Spruce species; 3) the spatial resolution has a strong effect on the classification accuracy (an overall decrease of more than 20% between 0.4 m and 1.5 m spatial resolution); and 4) there is no significant difference between SVM or RF classifiers.