Damien Burlet-Vienney

The Need for a Comprehensive Approach to Managing Confined Space Entry: Summary of the Literature and Recommendations for Next Steps

Despite all the regulatory and standard-setting efforts that have been made in North America, judging from the most recent statistics many fatal incidents related to work in confined spaces still occur. In Canada, fatal incidents in the province of Quebec reveal failures in and absence of the identification and preparation of work situations in confined spaces and in risk management. In this study, we performed a literature review consisting of 77 documents on existing hazards and risk assessment for confined spaces. Moreover, we formulated proposals regarding the design of specific and improved tools for assessing such risks. We found that atmospheric hazards monopolized attention in the literature on confined spaces, while risk estimation specific to confined space interventions received little practical coverage overall, apart from atmospheric hazards. The parameters used to establish classes or groupings of confined spaces in existing tools were imprecise. The development of a risk analysis process that is (i) more systematic and based on the concepts recognized in risk management standards, (ii) multidisciplinary, and (iii) adapted to the specific characteristics of confined spaces is therefore needed. Such a process will better support managers and occupational health and safety (OH&S) personnel in their efforts to prioritize and reduce risks. Suggestions on such a risk analysis tool and categorization of interventions in confined spaces are proposed in this article. Lastly, risk analysis tools adapted to confined space interventions are needed to ensure the inherently safe design of these spaces.

Study on Lockout Procedures for the Safety of Workers Intervening on Equipment in the Municipal Sector in Québec

In Québec, workers intervening in hazardous zones of machines, equipment and processes during maintenance, repairs and unjamming activities have to apply lockout procedures. Lockout procedures involve shutting down the equipment, isolating it, applying individual locks, releasing residual energies and verifying the absence of energies. Lockout has mostly been linked to industrial sectors. However, the municipal sector also faces challenges when it comes to controlling hazardous energies. The objectives of this research are to study serious accidents linked to our subject, study the application of lockout in different municipalities in Québec, identify the specificities for the municipal sector and propose some means to support the application of lockout. We will show that lockout procedures are required in different locations in municipalities and that they are currently being implemented in the municipal sector in Québec. Moreover, we propose a model which aims at facilitating the implementation of lockout procedures in the municipal sector.

Experience Feedback on Implementing and Using Human-Robot Collaboration in the Workplace

With the rise of collaborative robotics, workers are exposed to new risks, not necessarily because of the creation of new hazards, but due to the duration of their exposure to some well-known hazards associated with robots in general (e.g., risk of collision). The total or partial absence of fences at all times allows collaborative robots and humans to share the same workspace even in production, which increases exposure to those risks. To manage the risks, designers follow inherently safe design requirements to make the robot safe for use. However, when the designer delivers the cobot to the user, there is still a residual risk that needs to be managed in the future workspace. This paper presents experience feedback on six cobotic applications in four companies. Observations revolving around residual risk management are presented. Based on the observations, preliminary recommendations are made to help stakeholders with the implementation and use of cobots.

Risk analysis for confined space entries: Critical analysis of four tools applied to three risk scenarios

ABSTRACT Investigation reports of fatal confined space accidents nearly always point to a problem of identifying or underestimating risks. This paper compares 4 different risk analysis tools developed for confined spaces by applying them to 3 hazardous scenarios. The tools were namely 1. a checklist without risk estimation (Tool A), 2. a checklist with a risk scale (Tool B), 3. a risk calculation without a formal hazard identification stage (Tool C), and 4. a questionnaire followed by a risk matrix (Tool D). Each tools structure and practical application were studied. Tools A and B gave crude results comparable to those of more analytic tools in less time. Their main limitations were lack of contextual information for the identified hazards and greater dependency on the users expertise and ability to tackle hazards of different nature. Tools C and D utilized more systematic approaches than tools A and B by supporting risk reduction based on the description of the risk factors. Tool D is distinctive because of 1. its comprehensive structure with respect to the steps suggested in risk management, 2. its dynamic approach to hazard identification, and 3. its use of data resulting from the risk analysis.