Damon Maes

Body Temperature, Autonomic Responses, and Acute Mountain Sickness

A few studies have reported increased body temperature (T(o)) associated with acute mountain sickness (AMS), but these usually include exercise, varying environmental conditions over days, and pulmonary edema. We wished to determine whether T(o) would increase with AMS during early exposure to simulated altitude at rest. Ninety-four exposures of 51 men and women to reduced P(B) (423 mmHg = 16,000 ft = 4850 m) were carried out for 8 to 12 h. AMS was evaluated by LL and AMS-C scores near end of exposure, and T(o) was measured by oral digital thermometer before altitude and after 1 (A1), 6 (A6), and last (A12) h at simulated altitude. Other measurements included ventilation, O(2) consumption and autonomic indicators of plasma catecholamines, HR, and HR variability. Average T(o) increased by 0.5 degrees F from A1 to A12 in all subjects (p < 0.001). Comparison between 16 subjects with lowest AMS scores (mean LL = 1.0, range = 0 to 2.5) and 16 other subjects with highest AMS scores (mean LL = 7.4, range = 5 to 11) demonstrated a transient decline in T(o) from A1 to A6 in AMS, in contrast to a rise in non-AMS (p = 0.001). Catecholamines, HR, and HR variability (increased low F/high F ratio) indicated significant elevation of sympathetic activity in AMS, where T(o) fell, but no change in metabolic rate. The apparently greater heat loss during early AMS suggests increased hypoxic vasodilation in spite of enhanced sympathetic drive. Greater hypoxic vasodilation and elevated HR in AMS in the absence of other changes suggest that augmentation of beta-adrenergic tone may be involved in early AMS pathophysiology.

Hypoxemia and acute mountain sickness: which comes first?

Hypoxemia is usually associated with acute mountain sickness (AMS), but most studies have varied in time and magnitude of altitude exposure, exercise, diet, environmental conditions, and severity of pulmonary edema. We wished to determine whether hypoxemia occurred early in subjects who developed subsequent AMS while resting at a simulated altitude of 426 mmHg (approximately 16,000 ft or 4880 m). Exposures of 51 men and women were carried out for 8 to 12 h. AMS was determined by Lake Louise (LL) and AMS-C scores near the end of exposure, with spirometry and gas exchange measured the day before (C) and after 1 (A1), 6 (A6), and last (A12) h at simulated altitude and arterial blood at C, A1, and A12. Responses of 16 subjects having the lowest AMS scores (nonAMS: mean LL=1.0, range=0-2.5) were compared with the 16 having the highest scores (+AMS: mean LL=7.4, range=5-11). Total and alveolar ventilation responses to altitude were not different between groups. +AMS had significantly lower PaO2 (4.6 mmHg) and SaO2 (4.8%) at A1 and 3.3 mmHg and 3.1% at A12. Spirometry changes were similar at A1, but at A6 and A12 reduced vital capacity (VC) and increased breathing frequency suggested interstitial pulmonary edema in +AMS. The early hypoxemia in +AMS appears to be the result of diffusion impairment or venous admixture, perhaps due to a unique autonomic response affecting pulmonary perfusion. Early hypoxemia may be useful to predict AMS susceptibility.

EXERCISE EXACERBATES ACUTE MOUNTAIN SICKNESS AT SIMULATED HIGH ALTITUDE.

We hypothesized that exercise would cause greater severity and incidence of acute mountain sickness (AMS) in the early hours of exposure to altitude. After passive ascent to simulated high altitude in a decompression chamber [barometric pressure = 429 Torr, approximately 4,800 m (J. B. West, J. Appl. Physiol. 81: 1850-1854, 1996)], seven men exercised (Ex) at 50% of their altitude-specific maximal workload four times for 30 min in the first 6 h of a 10-h exposure. On another day they completed the same protocol but were sedentary (Sed). Measurements included an AMS symptom score, resting minute ventilation (VE), pulmonary function, arterial oxygen saturation (Sa(O(2))), fluid input, and urine volume. Symptoms of AMS were worse in Ex than Sed, with peak AMS scores of 4.4 +/- 1.0 and 1.3 +/- 0.4 in Ex and Sed, respectively (P < 0.01); but resting VE and Sa(O(2)) were not different between trials. However, Sa(O(2)) during the exercise bouts in Ex was at 76.3 +/- 1.7%, lower than during either Sed or at rest in Ex (81.4 +/- 1.8 and 82.2 +/- 2.6%, respectively, P < 0.01). Fluid intake-urine volume shifted to slightly positive values in Ex at 3-6 h (P = 0.06). The mechanism(s) responsible for the rise in severity and incidence of AMS in Ex may be sought in the observed exercise-induced exaggeration of arterial hypoxemia, in the minor fluid shift, or in a combination of these factors.