Dan Hultmark

Immune pathways and defence mechanisms in honey bees Apis mellifera.

Social insects are able to mount both group‐level and individual defences against pathogens. Here we focus on individual defences, by presenting a genome‐wide analysis of immunity in a social insect, the honey bee Apis mellifera. We present honey bee models for each of four signalling pathways associated with immunity, identifying plausible orthologues for nearly all predicted pathway members. When compared to the sequenced Drosophila and Anopheles genomes, honey bees possess roughly one‐third as many genes in 17 gene families implicated in insect immunity. We suggest that an implied reduction in immune flexibility in bees reflects either the strength of social barriers to disease, or a tendency for bees to be attacked by a limited set of highly coevolved pathogens.

Drosophila immunity : paths and patterns.

Flies respond to infection with both humoral and cellular immune defenses, including a powerful set of inducible peptide antibiotics as well as actively proliferating and differentiating blood cells. The system that activates these responses is related to that of the innate immune defense in humans. A key role in Drosophila immunity is played by the recently discovered peptidoglycan recognition proteins. These pattern recognition molecules relay signals via two main signaling pathways. The imd/Relish pathway is responsible for the main part of the humoral response. The Toll/Dif pathway activates the blood cells and induces the antifungal peptide Drosomycin.

Relish, a central factor in the control of humoral but not cellular immunity in Drosophila.

The NF-kappa B-like Relish gene is complex, with four transcripts that are all located within an intron of the Nmdmc gene. Using deletion mutants, we show that Relish is specifically required for the induction of the humoral immune response, including both antibacterial and antifungal peptides. As a result, the Relish mutants are very sensitive to infection. A single cell of E. cloacae is sufficient to kill a mutant fly, and the mutants show increased susceptibility to fungal infection. In contrast, the blood cell population, the hematopoietic organs, and the phagocytic, encapsulation, and melanization responses are normal. Our results illustrate the importance of the humoral response in Drosophila immunity and demonstrate that Relish plays a key role in this response.

Immune reactions in Drosophila and other insects: a model for innate immunity

All insects defend themselves against bacteria and parasites, using cellular and humoral systems that are rapidly activated in infected animals. Among the induced effector molecules are antibacterial proteins and peptides such as cecropins, attacins, lysozymes and insect defensins, the genes for many of which have now been cloned. The induction of this system, which lacks clonally selected receptors like those of vertebrate B and T cells, may provide a model for innate immune reactions in other animals, including vertebrates.

Insect immunity. Attacins, a family of antibacterial proteins from Hyalophora cecropia

Six closely related antibacterial proteins, attacins A‐F, were isolated from the hemolymph of immunized pupae of the Cecropia moth, Hyalophora cecropia. Chromatofocusing separated attacins A‐F, with isoelectric points between 5.7 and 8.3. Immunological experiments show that the attacins constitute antibacterially active forms of the previously isolated inducible immune protein P5. Their mol. wts., 20‐23 K, are similar to that of protein P5, but significantly lower than 28 K found for preP5 synthesized in vitro (see accompanying paper). The six attacins can be divided into two groups according to their amino acid composition and amino‐terminal sequences, attacins A‐D constitute a basic group and attacins E and F an acidic one. Within each group the forms are very similar. The attacins efficiently killed Escherichia coli and two other Gram‐negative bacteria isolated from the gut of a silk worm but they did not act on other Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria tested. Only growing cells of E. coli were attacked; cells suspended in phosphate buffer were inert. Besides the cecropins and lysozyme, the attacins represent a third class of antibacterial proteins in the humoral immune system of H. cecropia.

Dynamic evolution of the innate immune system in Drosophila

The availability of complete genome sequence from 12 Drosophila species presents the opportunity to examine how natural selection has affected patterns of gene family evolution and sequence divergence among different components of the innate immune system. We have identified orthologs and paralogs of 245 Drosophila melanogaster immune-related genes in these recently sequenced genomes. Genes encoding effector proteins, and to a lesser extent genes encoding recognition proteins, are much more likely to vary in copy number across species than genes encoding signaling proteins. Furthermore, we can trace the apparent recent origination of several evolutionarily novel immune-related genes and gene families. Using codon-based likelihood methods, we show that immune-system genes, and especially those encoding recognition proteins, evolve under positive darwinian selection. Positively selected sites within recognition proteins cluster in domains involved in recognition of microorganisms, suggesting that molecular interactions between hosts and pathogens may drive adaptive evolution in the Drosophila immune system.

Caspase-mediated processing of the Drosophila NF-kappaB factor Relish.

The NF-κB-like transcription factor Relish plays a central role in the innate immune response of Drosophila. Unlike other NF-κB proteins, Relish is activated by endoproteolytic cleavage to generate a DNA-binding Rel homology domain and a stable IκB-like fragment. This signal-induced endoproteolysis requires the activity of several gene products, including the IκB kinase complex and the caspase Dredd. Here we used mutational analysis and protein microsequencing to demonstrate that a caspase target site, located in the linker region between the Rel and the IκB-like domain, is the site of signal-dependent cleavage. We also show physical interaction between Relish and Dredd, suggesting that Dredd indeed is the Relish endoprotease. In addition to the caspase target site, the C-terminal 107 aa of Relish are required for endoproteolysis and signal-dependent phosphorylation by the Drosophila IκB kinase β. Finally, an N-terminal serine-rich region in Relish and the PEST domain were found to negatively regulate Relish activation.

Activation of the Drosophila NF‐κB factor Relish by rapid endoproteolytic cleavage

The Rel/NF‐κB transcription factor Relish plays a key role in the humoral immune response in Drosophila. We now find that activation of this innate immune response is preceded by rapid proteolytic cleavage of Relish into two parts. An N‐terminal fragment, containing the DNA‐binding Rel homology domain, translocates to the nucleus where it binds to the promoter of the Cecropin A1 gene and probably to the promoters of other antimicrobial peptide genes. The C‐terminal IκB‐like fragment remains in the cytoplasm. This endoproteolytic cleavage does not involve the proteasome, requires the DREDD caspase, and is different from previously described mechanisms for Rel factor activation.

The cecropin locus in Drosophila; a compact gene cluster involved in the response to infection.

Cecropins are antibacterial peptides that are synthesized in insects as a response to infection. As a first step towards a molecular study of the induction of this response, we have isolated genomic clones that cover the cecropin locus in Drosophila melanogaster. This locus was found to be unique, and it was mapped cytologically to the chromosomal location 99E. Sequence analysis showed it to be unusually compact, with three expressed genes and two pseudogenes within less than 4 kb of DNA, and with another homologous region less than 4 kb away. Two of the genes, A1 and A2, encode a product that is identical to the major cecropin from Sarcophaga peregrina, while the cecropin encoded by the B gene differs in five positions. Cecropin transcripts appear within an hour after bacteria have been injected into the hemocoel, reach a maximum after 2‐6 h, and have almost disappeared again after 24 h. The B gene is induced in parallel with the A genes, but on a lower level. The cecropin genes were also induced when the flies were kept on food with the Drosophila pathogenic bacterium Serratia marcescens Db10 or its non‐pathogenic derivative Db1140.

Nimrod, a Putative Phagocytosis Receptor with EGF Repeats in Drosophila Plasmatocytes

The hemocytes, the blood cells of Drosophila, participate in the humoral and cellular immune defense reactions against microbes and parasites [1-8]. The plasmatocytes, one class of hemocytes, are phagocytically active and play an important role in immunity and development by removing microorganisms as well as apoptotic cells. On the surface of circulating and sessile plasmatocytes, we have now identified a protein, Nimrod C1 (NimC1), which is involved in the phagocytosis of bacteria. Suppression of NimC1 expression in plasmatocytes inhibited the phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus. Conversely, overexpression of NimC1 in S2 cells stimulated the phagocytosis of both S. aureus and Escherichia coli. NimC1 is a 90-100 kDa single-pass transmembrane protein with ten characteristic EGF-like repeats (NIM repeats). The nimC1 gene is part of a cluster of ten related nimrod genes at 34E on chromosome 2, and similar clusters of nimrod-like genes are conserved in other insects such as Anopheles and Apis. The Nimrod proteins are related to other putative phagocytosis receptors such as Eater and Draper from D. melanogaster and CED-1 from C. elegans. Together, they form a superfamily that also includes proteins that are encoded in the human genome.