Dan M. Waid
University of Colorado Denver
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dan M. Waid.
European Journal of Immunology | 2004
Dan M. Waid; Gisela M. Vaitaitis; David Wagner
The generation of auto‐aggressive T cells involves failure of central or peripheral tolerance. We previously demonstrated that peripheral CD4loCD40+ T cells give rise to pathogenic T cells in the non‐obese diabetic (NOD) model. Here we show that peripheral CD4+CD40+ T cells from diabetic or pre‐diabetic NOD mice induce insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus. Consistent with breach of peripheral tolerance, CD4loCD40+ T cells expand with age in NOD mice but not in MHC‐matched non‐obese resistant (NOR) or BALB/c controls. Suggestive of a causal role for CD40 in autoimmunity, blocking CD40–CD154 interactions early during NOD development prevents autoaggressive T cell expansion while promoting increases in CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Importantly, CD40 signals promote expansion of Vα3.2+ and Vα8.3+ T cells. Furthermore, peripheral Vα3.2+CD40+ T cells induce diabetes in NOD.scid recipients while Vα8.3+ T cells or Vα3.2+‐depleted T cell populations do not. This is the first demonstration that primary T cells transfer disease with the kinetics of auto‐aggressive T cell clones and that specific TCR Vα expansion promotes diabetes.
Journal of Leukocyte Biology | 2008
Dan M. Waid; Gisela M. Vaitaitis; Nathan D. Pennock; David Wagner
Although regulatory T cells (Tregs) are well described, identifying autoaggressive effector T cells has proven more difficult. However, we identified CD4loCD40+ (Th40) cells as being necessary and sufficient for diabetes in the NOD mouse model. Importantly, these cells are present in pancreata of prediabetic and diabetic NOD mice, and Th40 cells but not CD4+CD40– T cells transfer progressive insulitis and diabetes to NOD.scid recipients. Nonobese‐resistant (NOR) mice have the identical T cell developmental background as NOD mice, yet they are diabetes‐resistant. The seminal issue is how NOR mice remain tolerant to diabetogenic self‐antigens. We show here that autoaggressive T cells develop in NOR mice and are confined to the Th40 subset. However, NOR mice maintain Treg numbers equivalent to their Th40 numbers. NOD mice have statistically equal numbers of CD4+CD25+forkhead box P3+intrinsic Tregs compared with NOR or nonautoimmune BALB/c mice, and NOD Tregs are equally as suppressive as NOR Tregs. A critical difference is that NOD mice develop expanded numbers of Th40 cells. We suggest that a determinant factor for autoimmunity includes the Th40:Treg ratio. Mechanistically, NOD Th40 cells have low susceptibility to Fas‐induced cell death and unlike cells from NOR and BALB/c mice, have predominantly low Fas expression. CD40 engagement of Th40 cells induces Fas expression but further confers resistance to Fas‐mediated cell death in NOD mice. A second fundamental difference is that NOD Th40 cells undergo much more rapid homeostatic expansion than Th40 cells from NOR mice.
Cytometry Part A | 2008
Janet Siebert; Margaret Inokuma; Dan M. Waid; Nathan D. Pennock; Gisela M. Vaitaitis; Mary L. Disis; John F. Dunne; David Wagner; Holden T. Maecker
Understanding cytokine profiles of disease states has provided researchers with great insight into immunologic signaling associated with disease onset and progression, affording opportunities for advancement in diagnostics and therapeutic intervention. Multiparameter flow cytometric assays support identification of specific cytokine secreting subpopulations. Bead‐based assays provide simultaneous measurement for the production of ever‐growing numbers of cytokines. These technologies demand appropriate analytical techniques to extract relevant information efficiently. We illustrate the power of an analytical workflow to reveal significant alterations in T‐cell cytokine expression patterns in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and breast cancer. This workflow consists of population‐level analysis, followed by donor‐level analysis, data transformation such as stratification or normalization, and a return to population‐level analysis. In the T1D study, T‐cell cytokine production was measured with a cytokine bead array. In the breast cancer study, intracellular cytokine staining measured T cell responses to stimulation with a variety of antigens. Summary statistics from each study were loaded into a relational database, together with associated experimental metadata and clinical parameters. Visual and statistical results were generated with custom Java software. In the T1D study, donor‐level analysis led to the stratification of donors based on unstimulated cytokine expression. The resulting cohorts showed statistically significant differences in poststimulation production of IL‐10, IL‐1β, IL‐8, and TNFβ. In the breast cancer study, the differing magnitude of cytokine responses required data normalization to support statistical comparisons. Once normalized, data showed a statistically significant decrease in the expression of IFNγ on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells when stimulated with tumor‐associated antigens (TAAs) when compared with an infectious disease antigen stimulus, and a statistically significant increase in expression of IL‐2 on CD8+ T cells. In conclusion, the analytical workflow described herein yielded statistically supported and biologically relevant findings that were otherwise unapparent.
European Journal of Immunology | 2012
Jessica Carter; Gisela M. Vaitaitis; Dan M. Waid; David Wagner
Biomarkers defining pathogenic effector T (Teff) cells slowly have been forthcoming and towards this we identified CD4+ T cells that express CD40 (CD4+CD40+) as pathogenic in the NOD type 1 diabetes (T1D) model. CD4+CD40+ T cells rapidly and efficiently transfer T1D to NOD.scid recipients. To study the origin of CD4+CD40+ T cells and disease pathogenesis, we employed a dual transgenic model expressing OVA323–339 peptide as a neo‐self antigen on islet β cells and medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs) and a transgenic TCR recognizing the OVA323–339 peptide. CD4+CD40+ T cells and Treg cells each recognizing the cognate neo‐antigen, rather than being deleted through central tolerance, drastically expanded in the thymus. In pancreatic lymph nodes of DO11.RIPmOVA mice, CD4+CD40+ T cells and Treg cells are expanded in number compared with DO11 mice and importantly, Treg cells remain functional throughout the disease process. When exposed to neo‐self antigen, CD4+CD40+ T cells do not express the auto‐regulatory CTLA‐4 molecule while naïve CD4+CD40+ T cells do. DO11.RIPmOVA mice develop autoimmune‐type diabetes. CD40 engagement has been shown to prevent CTLA‐4 expression and injecting anti‐CD40 in DO11.RIPmOVA mice significantly exacerbates disease. These data suggest a unique means by which CD4+CD40+ T cells thwart tolerance.
Journal of Neuroimmunology | 2014
Dan M. Waid; Teri Schreiner; Gisela M. Vaitaitis; Jessica Carter; John R. Corboy; David Wagner
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory, neurodegenerative disease. Diagnosis is very difficult requiring defined symptoms and multiple CNS imaging. A complicating issue is that almost all symptoms are not disease specific for MS. Autoimmunity is evident, yet the only immune-related diagnostic tool is cerebral-spinal fluid examination for oligoclonal bands. This study addresses the impact of Th40 cells, a pathogenic effector subset of helper T cells, in MS. MS patients including relapsing/remitting MS, secondary progressive MS and primary progressive MS were examined for Th40 cell levels in peripheral blood and, similar to our findings in autoimmune type 1 diabetes, the levels were significantly (p<0.0001) elevated compared to controls including healthy non-autoimmune subjects and another non-autoimmune chronic disease. Classically identified Tregs were at levels equivalent to non-autoimmune controls but the Th40/Treg ratio still predicted autoimmunity. The cohort displayed a wide range of HLA haplotypes including the GWAS identified predictive HLA-DRB1*1501 (DR2). However half the subjects did not carry DR2 and regardless of HLA haplotype, Th40 cells were expanded during disease. In RRMS Th40 cells demonstrated a limited TCR clonality. Mechanistically, Th40 cells demonstrated a wide array of response to CNS associated self-antigens that was dependent upon HLA haplotype. Th40 cells were predominantly memory phenotype producing IL-17 and IFNγ with a significant portion producing both inflammatory cytokines simultaneously suggesting an intermediary between Th1 and Th17 phenotypes.
PLOS ONE | 2017
Gisela M. Vaitaitis; Martin G. Yussman; Dan M. Waid; David H. Wagner
CD40-CD154 interaction is critically involved in autoimmune diseases, and CD4 T cells play a dominant role in the Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of Multiple Sclerosis (MS). CD4 T cells expressing CD40 (Th40) are pathogenic in type I diabetes but have not been evaluated in EAE. We demonstrate here that Th40 cells drive a rapid, more severe EAE disease course than conventional CD4 T cells. Adoptively transferred Th40 cells are present in lesions in the CNS and are associated with wide spread demyelination. Primary Th40 cells from EAE-induced donors adoptively transfer EAE without further in-vitro expansion and without requiring the administration of the EAE induction regimen to the recipient animals. This has not been accomplished with primary, non-TCR-transgenic donor cells previously. If co-injection of Th40 donor cells with Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) in the recipient animals is done, the disease course is more severe. The CFA component of the EAE induction regimen causes generalized inflammation, promoting expansion of Th40 cells and infiltration of the CNS, while MOG-antigen shapes the antigen-specific TCR repertoire. Those events are both necessary to precipitate disease. In MS, viral infections or trauma may induce generalized inflammation in susceptible individuals with subsequent disease onset. It will be important to further understand the events leading up to disease onset and to elucidate the contributions of the Th40 T cell subset. Also, evaluating Th40 levels as predictors of disease onset would be highly useful because if either the generalized inflammation event or the TCR-honing can be interrupted, disease onset may be prevented.
Immunology | 2017
Gisela M. Vaitaitis; Dan M. Waid; Martin Yussman; David Wagner
CD40 plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes (T1D). The mechanism of action, however, is undetermined, probably because CD40 expression has been grossly underestimated. CD40 is expressed on numerous cell types that now include T cells and pancreatic β cells. CD40+ CD4+ cells [T helper type 40 (TH40)] prove highly pathogenic in NOD mice and in translational human T1D studies. We generated BDC2.5.CD40−/− and re‐derived NOD.CD154−/− mice to better understand the CD40 mechanism of action. Fully functional CD40 expression is required not only for T1D development but also for insulitis. In NOD mice, TH40 cell expansion in pancreatic lymph nodes occurs before insulitis and demonstrates an activated phenotype compared with conventional CD4+ cells, apparently regardless of antigen specificity. TH40 T‐cell receptor (TCR) usage demonstrates increases in several Vα and Vβ species, particularly Vα3.2+ that arise early and are sustained throughout disease development. TH40 cells isolated from diabetic pancreas demonstrate a relatively broad TCR repertoire rather than restricted clonal expansions. The expansion of the Vα/Vβ species associated with diabetes depends upon CD40 signalling; NOD.CD154−/− mice do not expand the same TCR species. Finally, CD40‐mediated signals significantly increase pro‐inflammatory Th1‐ and Th17‐associated cytokines whereas CD28 co‐stimulus alternatively promotes regulatory cytokines.
Clinical Immunology | 2007
Dan M. Waid; Rebecca Wagner; Amy L. Putnam; Gisela M. Vaitaitis; Nathan D. Pennock; David C. Calverley; Peter A. Gottlieb; David H. Wagner
Current Immunology Reviews | 2010
Gisela M. Vaitaitis; Dan M. Waid; David H. Wagner
Journal of Immunology | 2015
David Wagner; Gisela M. Vaitaitis; Dan M. Waid