Dan S. Gombos

Retinoblastoma treated with primary chemotherapy alone: The significance of tumour size, location, and age

Aims: To evaluate how tumour size, retinal location, and patient age affect the outcome of retinoblastoma foci treated with chemotherapy. Methods: Retrospective review of retinoblastoma foci treated with primary chemotherapy alone. Individual tumours were coded with regard to their largest basal diameter, location within the eye (macula, macula to equator, equator to ora serrata), and patients age at diagnosis. Successfully treated tumours required no further intervention while those requiring additional treatment were coded as failures. Results: 56 (72%) tumours responded successfully to chemotherapy alone while 22 (28%) required additional therapy. 26 of 31 macular tumours (84%) and 30 of 47 extramacular tumours (64%) responded to chemotherapy (p <0.060). Relative to size, 46 of 60 tumours (77%) greater than 2 mm in basal diameter were successfully treated with chemotherapy, while only 10 of 18 tumours (56%) less than or equal to 2 mm responded (p <0.088). Among the eight tumour foci diagnosed in children less than 2 months of age, five (63%) failed to respond to chemotherapy alone (p <0.032). Conclusion: Retinoblastoma is more likely to respond to primary chemotherapy if it is located in the macula and if the patient is older than 2 months of age. Tumours measuring less than 2 mm in diameter may be less responsive to this treatment.

Pilot trial of sunitinib therapy in patients with von Hippel–Lindau disease

BACKGROUND Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease induces vascular neoplasms in multiple organs. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in VHL patients and examined the expression of candidate receptors in archived tissue. METHODS Patients with VHL were given four cycles of 50 mg sunitinib daily for 28 days, followed by 14 days off. Primary end point was toxicity. Modified RECIST were used for efficacy assessment. We evaluated 20 archival renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and 20 hemangioblastomas (HBs) for biomarker expression levels using laser-scanning cytometry (LSC). RESULTS Fifteen patients were treated. Grade 3 toxicity included fatigue in five patients. Dose reductions were needed in 10 patients. Eighteen RCC and 21 HB lesions were evaluable. Six of the RCCs (33%) responded partially, versus none of the HBs (P = 0.014). LSC revealed that mean levels of phosphorylated vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 were lower in HB than in RCC endothelium (P = 0.003) and mean phosphorylated fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate-2 (pFRS2) levels were higher in HB (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Sunitinib treatment in VHL patients showed acceptable toxicity. Significant response was observed in RCC but not in HB. Greater expression of pFRS2 in HB tissue than in RCC raises the hypothesis that treatment with fibroblast growth factor pathway-blocking agents may benefit patients with HB.

The topography of bilateral retinoblastoma lesions.

Purpose: The anatomic location of intraocular retinoblastoma foci was investigated in patients with bilateral retinoblastoma. The study was designed to evaluate the retinal topography of intraocular tumors and their time course of presentation. Methods: A retrospective study of 565 eyes with bilateral retinoblastoma was conducted. Data included patient age at detection of each tumor and tumor location within the retina. Intraocular location was characterized in three ways: 1) superior versus inferior retina; 2) nasal versus temporal retina; and 3) macular to peripheral retina, defined as four circular zones. Results: There was a direct correlation between patient age at tumor detection and retinal topography. This relationship followed a central-to-peripheral distribution, with macular tumors presenting earliest and anterior retinal tumors presenting last. Twenty-nine (100%) macular tumors were detected at the time of initial diagnosis, and none presented after 15.5 months of age. When controlled for surface area tumors were located equally in all circular zones. Conclusion: There is a time course in which tumors in different parts of the retina come to clinical presentation. All macular tumors in this study and the majority of tumors in the posterior pole were detected before age 24 months. The authors provide possible explanations for these findings and their implications for treatment.

Uveal melanoma: From diagnosis to treatment and the science in between

Melanomas of the choroid, ciliary body, and iris of the eye are collectively known as uveal melanomas. These cancers represent 5% of all melanoma diagnoses in the United States, and their age‐adjusted risk is 5 per 1 million population. These less frequent melanomas are dissimilar to their more common cutaneous melanoma relative, with differing risk factors, primary treatment, anatomic spread, molecular changes, and responses to systemic therapy. Once uveal melanoma becomes metastatic, therapy options are limited and are often extrapolated from cutaneous melanoma therapies despite the routine exclusion of patients with uveal melanoma from clinical trials. Clinical trials directed at uveal melanoma have been completed or are in progress, and data from these well designed investigations will help guide future directions in this orphan disease. Cancer 2016;122:2299–2312.

GPNMB expression in uveal melanoma: A potential for targeted therapy

Uveal melanoma is an aggressive disease without effective adjuvant therapy for metastases. Despite genomic differences between cutaneous and uveal melanomas, therapies based on shared biological factors could be effective against both tumor types. High expression of glycoprotein-NMB (GPNMB) in cutaneous melanomas led to the development of CDX-011 (glembatumumab vedotin), a fully human monoclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of GPNMB conjugated to the cytotoxic microtubule toxin monomethylauristatin E. Ongoing phase II trials suggest that CDX-011 has activity against advanced cutaneous melanomas. To determine the potential role of CDX-011 in uveal melanomas, we studied their GPNMB expression. Paraffin-embedded tissues from 22 uveal melanomas treated by enucleation from 2004–2007 at one institution were evaluated immunohistochemically for expression of GPNMB using biotinylated CDX-011 (unconjugated) antibody. Melanoma cells were evaluated for percentage and intensity of expression. Spectral imaging was used in one case with high melanin content. Clinical data were reviewed. Twelve women and 10 men with a median age of 58.7 years (range: 28–83 years) were included. Eighteen of 21 tumors evaluated immunohistochemically (85.7%) expressed GPNMB in 10–90% of tumor cells with variable intensity (5 tumors, 1+; 11, 2+; and 2, 3+). Eleven of 18 tumors (61.1%) expressed GPNMB in ≥50% of cells. Spectral imaging showed diffuse CDX-011 (unconjugated) reactivity in the remaining case. Uveal melanoma, like cutaneous melanoma, commonly expresses GPNMB. Ongoing clinical trials of CDX-011 should be extended to patients with metastatic uveal melanoma to determine potential efficacy in this subset of patients with melanoma.

Vitreous relapse following primary chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: is adjuvant diode laser a risk factor?

Aims: To evaluate rates of vitreous relapse among retinoblastoma patients treated with primary chemotherapy and assess diode laser as a potential risk factor for relapse. Methods: Retrospective review of all patients treated with primary chemotherapy at a large ocular oncology centre. Eyes that developed vitreous relapse were coded with regard to Reese-Ellsworth Group, laterality, time to relapse, type of relapse (vitreous base or non-vitreous base relapse), treatments used (including adjuvant diode laser), and ocular preservation. Individual tumour foci treated with laser hyperthermia were also coded for laser parameters including power settings, number of treatments, and concomitant administration of systemic chemotherapy (chemothermotherapy). Results: 15 of 106 eyes (14.15%) developed vitreous relapse over a 6 year period. Mean time to relapse was 7.2 months after chemotherapy was completed. Five cases (33%) were of the vitreous base variety. Ocular salvage was attempted in 11 cases using a variety of methods; one patient was lost to follow up. Six of the remaining 10 eyes (60%) were salvaged. Eight of 38 eyes (21%) treated with systemic chemotherapy and laser hyperthermia developed vitreous relapse compared with seven of 68 eyes (10%) treated with primary chemotherapy alone (p<0.005). Laser settings, number of hyperthermia treatments, and the concomitant use of systemic chemotherapy (chemothermotherapy) were not associated with higher rates of vitreous relapse. Conclusion: Nearly one in seven eyes with retinoblastoma treated with primary chemotherapy may develop vitreous relapse. The administration of diode laser hyperthermia appears to increase this risk. Despite additional therapy a number of these eyes succumb to enucleation.

Surveillance options for patients with uveal melanoma following definitive management

Even though less than 1% of uveal melanoma patients are found to have radiographic or clinical evidence of distant disease at the time of treatment for their intraocular disease, they carry a lifetime risk of disease recurrence, with approximately 50% of patients ultimately developing fatal metastases. Despite this significant risk, there is no consensus within the ophthalmologic or oncologic community regarding the role of surveillance for detection of metastatic disease in these patients. The lack of consensus is due to the notable absence of clear data regarding the best radiologic or serum surveillance modalities, the optimal frequency of testing, or the ideal length of follow-up. Given the ability to assess prognosis by cytogenetics, gene expression profiling, or other methods, questions remain about whether surveillance strategies should be tailored by level of risk. Importantly, no survival benefit from the early detection of asymptomatic disease in uveal melanoma has been documented, resulting in controversy over the value of routine surveillance and advocacy from some clinicians to forego surveillance altogether. However, there are several factors supporting surveillance: the patients enhanced emotional well-being, the potential to identify oligometastatic disease amenable to surgery or other local therapies, decreased morbidity/complications from advanced disease, and identification of patients eligible for clinical trials that assess novel therapies for advanced uveal melanoma. The selection of surveillance modality used varies according to local expertise and resources and may include serum markers (liver function tests and others) and/or imaging (chest x-ray, abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging).

The disappearing “melanoma”

Editor,—Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Accurate diagnosis relies upon evaluation by indirect ophthalmoscopy as well as on characteristic features present on ancillary tests such as ultrasonography and angiography. Masquerading lesions can occasionally provide diagnostic challenges. Common simulating lesions include choroidal naevi, metastases, haemangioma, osteoma, CHRPE, and disciform scar.1 We report the case of a patient with a lesion simulating an intraocular melanoma which resulted from the development of an orbital cyst that indented the globe. ### CASE REPORT A 49 year old white male was referred with a diagnosis of an intraocular melanoma. He complained of progressively decreasing vision in his right eye over the previous 1.5 years. His medical history was …

Disease control and toxicity outcomes using ruthenium eye plaque brachytherapy in the treatment of uveal melanoma

PURPOSE Ruthenium-106 ((106)Ru) eye plaques have the potential to achieve excellent tumor control with acceptable radiation toxicity. We evaluated our experience in the management of uveal melanoma treated with (106)Ru brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS The records of 40 patients with uveal melanoma treated with brachytherapy using (106)Ru plaques from 2003 to 2007 at University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed. Endpoints assessed included tumor control and toxicity. RESULTS Median ophthalmologic follow-up was 67 months. Actuarial 5-year rates of local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 97%, 94%, and 92%. There were 3 deaths, 2 related to melanoma. Fifteen patients experienced clinically significant visual loss; no patients were diagnosed with neovascular glaucoma, and 1 patient developed a clinically significant radiation-associated cataract. No patient required enucleation. CONCLUSIONS We report the largest published US cohort of patients treated with (106)Ru plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma. Tumor control was excellent, and toxicity was acceptably low. These data support the reintroduction of (106)Ru into clinical practice for ocular melanoma.

Management of Radiation-induced Severe Anophthalmic Socket Contracture in Patients with Uveal Melanoma

Purpose: High-dose radiotherapy can cause contracture of the anophthalmic socket, but the incidence of this complication in patients with enucleation for uveal melanoma has not been reported previously. The authors reviewed the surgical management and outcomes in terms of successful prosthesis wear in patients with severe contracture of the anophthalmic socket treated with high-dose radiotherapy for high-risk uveal melanoma, and they estimated the relative risk of this complication. Methods: The medical records of all consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective uveal-melanoma tissue-banking protocol at the authors’ institution who underwent enucleation between January 2003 and December 2010 were reviewed. Patients who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy of the enucleated socket were further studied. Results: Of the 68 patients enrolled in the prospective tissue-banking protocol, 12 had high-risk histologic features (e.g., extrascleral spread or vortex vein invasion) and were treated with 60 Gy of external beam radiotherapy after enucleation. Five of these patients (41.7%) experienced severe socket contracture precluding prosthesis wear. The median time to onset of contracture following completion of radiotherapy was 20 months. Three patients underwent surgery, which entailed scar tissue release, oral mucous membrane grafting, and socket reconstruction; 2 patients declined surgery. All 3 patients who had surgery experienced significant improvement of socket contracture that enabled patients to wear a prosthesis again. Conclusion: High-dose radiotherapy after enucleation in patients with uveal melanoma caused severe socket contracture and inability to wear a prosthesis in approximately 40% of patients. Surgical repair of the contracted socket using oral mucous membrane grafting can allow resumption of prosthesis wear.