Dan Venables
University of Manchester
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dan Venables.
Aging & Mental Health | 2006
Dan Venables; Siobhan Reilly; David Challis; Jane Hughes; Michele Abendstern
Current policy in England emphasises both the importance of caring for highly dependent older people for as long as possible in their own homes, and the development of specialist care services for people with dementia. However, the differences between specialist and generic home care services for people with dementia are poorly understood. This cross-sectional postal survey describes the standards of home care services for people with dementia in the North West of England, and investigates the differences in quality standards between specialist and generic home care services. Forty-six percent of identified services provided information on a range of quality indicators. Most services provided only a few of the indicators utilized by the study, and there was little evidence of services adopting national minimum standards. Few differences were found between the two service types, although generic services appeared to offer a greater degree of flexibility than specialist services. These results help to inform the understanding of home care service mix and provision, and the uptake of national minimum standards. They provide key material for shaping the future provision of home care for older people with dementia.
Ageing & Society | 2006
Siobhan Reilly; Michele Abendstern; Jane Hughes; David Challis; Dan Venables; Irene Pedersen
There has been debate for some years as to whether the best model of care for people with dementia emphasises specialist facilities or integrated service provision. Although the United Kingdom National Service Framework for Older People recommended that local authority social services departments encourage the development of specialist residential care for people with dementia, uncertainty continues as to the benefits of particular care regimes, partly because research evidence is limited. This paper examines a large number of ‘performance measures’ from long-term care facilities in North West England that have residents with dementia. Of the 287 in the survey, 56 per cent described themselves as specialist services for elderly people with mental ill-health problems (known familiarly as ‘EMI homes’). It was envisaged that EMI homes would score higher than non-EMI homes on several measures of service quality for people with dementia that were developed from research evidence and policy documents. The analysis, however, found that EMI homes performed better than non-EMI homes on only a few measures. While both home types achieved good results on some standards, on others both performed poorly. Overall, EMI and non-EMI homes offered a similar service.
Care Management Journals | 2005
Dan Venables; Jane Hughes; Karen Stewart; David Challis
Since 1989, government policy in the United Kingdom has advocated that social services providers develop care management systems in order to deliver coordinated and individually tailored packages of care to all user groups. This cross-sectional postal survey describes national variations in care management arrangements for people with mental health problems in England on 14 key indicators developed from previous research. One hundred and one social services providers (response rate: 77%) completed two questionnaires: The first related to care management arrangements for all user groups, and the second related specifically to arrangements for people with mental health problems. Significant national variation was found. Furthermore, there was little evidence of integration between health and social care, of care management being delivered through specialist multidisciplinary mental health teams, and of selective arrangements targeted at those most in need. The results are discussed in the context of apparently widespread disparity between existing care management arrangements and government policy guidance.
Age and Ageing | 2004
David Challis; Paul Clarkson; Janine Williamson; Jane Hughes; Dan Venables; Alistair Burns; Ashley Weinberg
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2006
Michele Abendstern; Siobhan Reilly; Jane Hughes; Dan Venables; David Challis
Psychological Medicine | 2006
Paul Clarkson; Dan Venables; Jane Hughes; Alistair Burns; David Challis
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2006
Siobhan Reilly; Dan Venables; Jane Hughes; David Challis; Michele Abendstern
Ageing & Society | 2006
Dan Venables; Paul Clarkson; Jane Hughes; Alistair Burns; David Challis
Aging & Mental Health | 2006
Dan Venables; Siobhan Reilly; Jane Hughes; David Challis; Michele Abendstern
Journal of case management | 2006
Dan Venables; Jane Hughes; Siobhan Reilly; Karen Stewart; David Challis