Dana Katz
University of Pennsylvania
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dana Katz.
American Journal of Bioethics | 2010
Dana Katz; Arthur L. Caplan; Jon F. Merz
Much attention has been focused in recent years on the ethical acceptability of physicians receiving gifts from drug companies. Professional guidelines recognize industry gifts as a conflict of interest and establish thresholds prohibiting the exchange of large gifts while expressly allowing for the exchange of small gifts such as pens, note pads, and coffee. Considerable evidence from the social sciences suggests that gifts of negligible value can influence the behavior of the recipient in ways the recipient does not always realize. Policies and guidelines that rely on arbitrary value limits for gift-giving or receipt should be reevaluated.
American Journal of Bioethics | 2003
Dana Katz; Arthur L. Caplan; Jon F. Merz
Much attention has been focused in recent years on the ethical acceptability of physicians receiving gifts from drug companies. Professional guidelines recognize industry gifts as a conflict of interest and establish thresholds prohibiting the exchange of large gifts while expressly allowing for the exchange of small gifts such as pens, note pads, and coffee. Considerable evidence from the social sciences suggests that gifts of negligible value can influence the behavior of the recipient in ways the recipient does not always realize. Policies and guidelines that rely on arbitrary value limits for gift-giving or receipt should be reevaluated.
American Journal of Bioethics | 2002
Dana Katz; J. R. Neuberger
paired. If one argues that this incompetence is speciacally related to heroin, then addicts cannot be charged with any crime related to the procurement or use of the drug. But if a heroin addict murders his dealer, is he mentally incompetent at the time of the murder? Further, if one gives in to the author’s argument, then one must assume that a heroin addict’s incompetence is permanent, since, as in all clinical trials, consent can be withdrawn at any time and there is no evidence that this happened in the Swiss trial. This brings us not to Cynthia’s dilemma but to the dilemma of Cynthia. Was Cynthia competent to enter into a discussion with the author? Would we all be in a state of incompetence because we love something too much? Mea culpa. The lesson here, it would appear, is that it is generally a bad idea to enter into a philosophical discussion with an addict whose competency may be in doubt.
JAMA | 2003
Dana Katz; Peter R Mansfield; Robert Goodman; Leonore Tiefer; Jon F. Merz
JAMA | 2003
Dana Katz; Peter R Mansfield; Robert Goodman; Leonore Tiefer; Jon F. Merz
Encyclopedia of Ethical, Legal and Policy Issues in Biotechnology | 2002
Dana Katz; Jon F. Merz
American Journal of Bioethics | 2004
Dana Katz
Archive | 2003
Dana Katz; Arthur L. Caplan; Jon F. Merz
JAMA | 2003
Dana Katz; Peter R Mansfield; Robert R. Goodman; Leonore Tiefer; Jon F. Merz; Michael S. Goldrich; Gary A. Tarshis; Michael Tansey; Louis Bergeron; Chris McCoy; Lauren Oshman; Jason Dana; George Loewenstein
JAMA | 2003
Dana Katz; Peter R Mansfield; Robert Goodman; Leonore Tiefer; Jon F. Merz; Michael S. Goldrich; Gary A. Tarshis; Michael Tansey; Louis Bergeron; Chris McCoy; Lauren Oshman; Jason Dana; George Loewenstein