Dana M. Hayden

Fecal Incontinence: Etiology, Evaluation, and Treatment

Fecal incontinence is a debilitating problem facing ~2.2% of the U.S. general population over 65 years of age. Etiologic factors include traumatic, neurologic, congenital, and iatrogenic. Most commonly, obstetric trauma causes fecal incontinence as well as poorly performed anorectal surgery or pelvic radiation. Several severity scores and quality of life indexes have been developed to quantify incontinent symptoms. There are several nonsurgical and surgical options for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Biofeedback is among the most successful nonoperative strategies. Depending on the cause, anal sphincter repair, artificial bowel sphincter, and sacral nerve stimulation are used to treat fecal incontinence with some success. Unfortunately, fecal incontinence is an extremely difficult problem to manage: there has not been one, single treatment option that has proven to be both safe and effective in long-term studies.

Tumor scatter after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: are we dealing with an invisible margin?

BACKGROUND: After the impressive response of rectal cancers to neoadjuvant therapy, it seems reasonable to ask: can we can excise the small ulcer locally or avoid a radical resection if there is no gross residual tumor? Does gross response reflect what happens to tumor cells microscopically after radiation? OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify microscopic tumor cell response to radiation. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. SETTING: This investigation was conducted at a single tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Patients were selected who had elective radical resection for rectal cancer after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation performed by 2 colorectal surgeons between 2006 and 2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was tumor presence after radiation therapy RESULTS: Of the 75 patients, 20 patients were complete responders and 55 had residual cancer. Of these patients, 28 had no tumor cells seen outside the gross ulcer, and 27 (49.1%) had tumor outside the visible ulcer or microscopic tumor present with no overlying ulcer. Of these tumors, 81.5% were skewed away from the ulcer center. The mean distance of distal scatter was 1.0 cm from the visible ulcer edge to a maximum of 3 cm; 3 patients had tumor cells more than 2 cm distal to the visible ulcer edge. Tumor scatter outside the ulcer was not associated with poor prognostic factors, such as nodal and distant disease, perineural invasion, or mucin; however, it was associated with lymphovascular invasion (&khgr;2 = 4.12, p = 0.038) LIMITATIONS: There was limited access to clinical information gathered outside our institution. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that 1) after radiation, the gross ulcer cannot be used to determine the sole area of potential residual tumor, 2) cancer cells may be found up to 3 cm distally from the gross ulcer, so the traditional 2-cm margin may not be adequate, and 3) local excision of the ulcer or no excision after apparent complete response appears to be insufficient treatment for rectal cancer.

Patient factors may predict anastomotic complications after rectal cancer surgery: Anastomotic complications in rectal cancer.

Purpose Anastomotic complications following rectal cancer surgery occur with varying frequency. Preoperative radiation, BMI, and low anastomoses have been implicated as predictors in previous studies, but their definitive role is still under review. The objective of our study was to identify patient and operative factors that may be predictive of anastomotic complications. Methods A retrospective review was performed on patients who had sphincter-preservation surgery performed for rectal cancer at a tertiary medical center between 2005 and 2011. Results 123 patients were included in this study, mean age was 59 (26–86), 58% were male. There were 33 complications in 32 patients (27%). Stenosis was the most frequent complication (24 of 33). 11 patients required mechanical dilatation, and 4 had operative revision of the anastomosis. Leak or pelvic abscess were present in 9 patients (7.3%); 4 were explored, 2 were drained and 3 were managed conservatively. 4 patients had permanent colostomy created due to anastomotic complications. Laparoscopy approach, BMI, age, smoking and tumor distance from anal verge were not significantly associated with anastomotic complications. After a multivariate analysis chemoradiation was significantly associated with overall anastomotic complications (Wall = 0.35, p = 0.05), and hemoglobin levels were associated with anastomotic leak (Wald = 4.09, p = 0.04). Conclusion Our study identifies preoperative anemia as possible risk factor for anastomotic leak and neoadjuvant chemoradiation may lead to increased risk of complications overall. Further prospective studies will help to elucidate these findings as well as identify amenable factors that may decrease risk of anastomotic complications after rectal cancer surgery.

Rectal Prolapse: Current Evaluation, Management, and Treatment of a Historically Recurring Disorder

Although rectal prolapse occurs mostly in elderly females, this disorder affects patients of both genders and all ages. The surgical approach is guided by a thorough history and physical examination, specifically addressing the presence of fecal incontinence or constipation as well as medical fitness. Adjunctive testing may be helpful for patients with lifelong constipation. Surgical treatments vary by approach (transabdominal vs. perineal) and method of rectal fixation and mobilization. Although the transabdominal approach is associated with lower recurrence, it is plagued by more complications, longer hospitalization, and need for general anesthesia. Yet it remains the preferred approach for medically fit patients for initial or recurrent repair.

Are our publications failing the inspection?: a review of the publications in rectal cancer surgery between 2002 and 2012.

BACKGROUND: Quality of publications is considered a subjective measurement, and more weight is placed on prospective studies, especially randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the type of publications and evaluates the quality of randomized clinical trials and review articles using an objective measurement. DATA SOURCES: Medline (PubMed) is the data source for this work. STUDY SELECTION: We used the terms “rectal neoplasms/surgery” and the filters “10 years,” “humans,” and “English.” MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured compliance with checklist items. Randomized clinical trials were reviewed using the Consolidates Standards of Reporting Trials statement; systematic reviews/meta-analyses were reviewed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RESULTS: A total of 3603 articles were identified: 20.8% were case report/series, 20.5% were retrospective cohorts, 14.0% were reviews or meta-analyses, 16.4% were prospective cohorts, 14.0% were other types of articles (comments, letters, or editorials), 5.5% were clinical trials (phase I/II), 4.2% were randomized clinical trials, and 4.4% were cross-sectional studies. We reviewed 108 randomized clinical trials; the maximum score possible was 74.0, the average score was 44.6 (range, 20.0-64.0), 4 (3.7%) were graded as “excellent,” 21 (19.4%) were “good,” 44 (40.7%) were “deficient,” and 39 (36.1%) were graded as “fail.” The predictors of higher scores for randomized clinical trials were year of publication after 2007 (p = 0.00), higher impact factor (p = 0.03), and declared funding (p = 0.01). Twenty-nine meta-analyses were reviewed; the average score was 19.64 (range, 12.0-25.0); 5 articles (17.2%) were graded as “excellent,” 12 (41.4%) were “good,” 10 (34.5%) were “deficient,” and 2 (6.9%) were “fail.” LIMITATIONS: Only 1 electronic database was used, so we lacked a validated score. In addition, the search terms did not include “colorectal.” CONCLUSIONS: A total of 20.8% of the articles published were case reports and 25.0% of the articles were prospective or clinical trials. Although randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews provide the highest level of evidence, publications with missing data limit replication of the study and affect the generalizability of results to other populations. To improve the quality of our publications, authors, reviewers, and journal editors should consider the endorsement of standardize checklists.

Recurrent retrorectal teratoma.

Retrorectal tumors are a rare group of neoplasms that occur most commonly in the neonatal and infant population. They vary in presentation, but teratomas are the most common and often present as a protruding mass from the sacrococcygeal region. Immediate surgical resection is indicated when found and coccygectomy is performed to prevent recurrence. When teratomas recur, the patients most often have vague symptoms and the tumors usually have malignant transformation. Here, we present the case of a young woman who underwent surgical resection of a sacrococcygeal teratoma at 3 days of age where the coccyx was not removed. She presented at 31 years of age with lower extremity paresthesias and radiography revealed a cystic mass extending from the sacrum. After resection, pathology revealed a recurrent teratoma with nests of adenocarcinoma.

Sexual Dysfunction and Intimacy for Ostomates

Abstract Sex and intimacy presents special challenges for the ostomate. Since some colorectal surgery patients will require either temporary or permanent stomas, intimacy and sexuality is a common issue for ostomates. In addition to the stoma, nerve damage, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are often used in conjunction with stoma creation for cancer patients, thereby adding physiological dysfunction to the personal psychological impact of the stoma, leading to sexual dysfunction. The purpose of this paper is to describe the prevalence, etiology, and the most common types of sexual dysfunction in men and women after colorectal surgery and particularly those patients with stomas. In addition, treatment strategies for sexual dysfunction will also be described.

Functional Complications After Colon and Rectal Surgery

Although colorectal surgeons are adept at discussing potential complications of colorectal surgery, they may not be as thorough in the discussion of functional outcomes. Bowel dysfunction after low colorectal or coloanal anastomoses is extremely common and underappreciated. Low anterior resection syndrome can occur in up to 80 % of patients, including symptoms of urgency, stool fragmentation, incontinence, and frequency. Sexual dysfunction, urinary symptoms, and stool leakage (causing difficult hygiene and perianal skin irritation) can also cause a significant decrease in quality of life. The etiology of these functional outcomes includes damage to the pelvic nerves or sphincter complex, resection of all or a portion of the rectum, as well as disturbances in motility and radiotherapy damage. Treatment includes medical and dietary measures including utilization of colonic irrigation and improved perianal cleaning and bowel habits as well as pelvic floor physical therapy. Novel treatments for functional problems after colorectal surgery are currently being investigated.

Crohn’s Disease

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting approximately 500,000 individuals in the USA. It is characterized by focal, asymmetric, transmural inflammation that may involve any part of the gastrointestinal tract. The disease is more frequent in females and has a bimodal distribution; it is most frequently diagnosed between 15 and 35 years old with a secondary peak between ages 60 and 80. Its pathogenesis is not well understood, but it appears to be multifactorial; recent data suggest that CD involves a genetic predisposition and dysregulation of the inflammatory response and may be triggered by environmental factors (smoking, oral contraceptives, and anti-inflammatory drugs). The disease is more common in urban areas in Europe, the UK, and the USA, with a predisposition among Jewish populations; the prevalence is lower in non-Jewish white, African American, Hispanic, and Asian populations.

680 Hospital Readmission for Fluid and Electrolyte Abnormalities Following Ileostomy Construction: Preventable or Unpredictable?

Background Ileostomy creation has complications, including rehospitalization for fluid and electrolyte abnormalities. Although studies have identified predictors of this morbidity, readmission rates remain high.