Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Daniel A. Geller is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Daniel A. Geller.


Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica | 2004

Long‐term outcome of pediatric obsessive–compulsive disorder: a meta‐analysis and qualitative review of the literature

S. E. Stewart; Daniel A. Geller; Michael A. Jenike; David L. Pauls; David Shaw; Benjamin Mullin; Stephen V. Faraone

Objective:  To review the extant literature on the long‐term outcome of child/adolescent‐onset obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD).


Nature Medicine | 1998

p53 and vascular endothelial growth factor regulate tumor growth of NOS2-expressing human carcinoma cells.

Ambs S; Merriam Wg; Ogunfusika Mo; Bennett Wp; Ishibe N; Hussain Sp; Tzeng Ee; Daniel A. Geller; Timothy R. Billiar; Curtis C. Harris

The finding of frequent nitric oxide synthase expression in human cancers indicates that nitric oxide has a pathophysiological role in carcinogenesis. To determine the role of nitric oxide in tumor progression, we generated human carcinoma cell lines that produced nitric oxide constitutively. Cancer cells expressing inducible nitric oxide synthase that had wild-type p53 had reduced tumor growth in athymic nude mice, whereas those with mutated p53 had accelerated tumor growth associated with increased vascular endothelial growth factor expression and neovascularization. Our data indicate that tumor-associated nitric oxide production may promote cancer progression by providing a selective growth advantage to tumor cells with mutant p53, and that inhibitors of inducible nitric oxide synthase may have therapeutic activity in these tumors.


Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 1998

Is Juvenile Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder a Developmental Subtype of the Disorder? A Review of the Pediatric Literature

Daniel A. Geller; Joseph Biederman; Janice Jones; Kenneth S. Park; Suzanne Schwartz; Stephanie Shapiro; Barbara J. Coffey

OBJECTIVE To examine the clinical correlates of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in children and adolescents. METHOD A systematic review of the extant literature on juvenile OCD was conducted examining age at onset, gender distribution, symptom phenomenology, psychiatric comorbidity, neurological and perinatal history, family psychiatric history, cognitive and neuropsychological profiles, and treatment and outcome in juvenile OCD subjects. RESULTS Juvenile OCD was associated with a unique peak of age at onset indicating a bimodal incidence of the disorder, male preponderance, a distinct pattern of comorbidity with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other developmental disorders as well as frequent associated neuropsychological deficits, an increased familial loading for OCD, and frequent absence of insight. CONCLUSION These findings show that juvenile OCD is associated with a unique set of correlates that appear to differ from findings reported in studies of adult OCD subjects. Although in need of confirmation, these findings suggest that juvenile OCD may be a developmental subtype of the disorder. Since juvenile OCD is likely to continue into adulthood, these findings stress the importance of considering age at onset in clinical and research studies of adults with OCD.


Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 2001

Fluoxetine treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents : A placebo-controlled clinical trial

Daniel A. Geller; Sharon L. Hoog; John H. Heiligenstein; Randall K. Ricardi; Roy N. Tamura; Stacy Kluszynski; Jennie G. Jacobson

OBJECTIVE This study assesses the efficacy and tolerability of fluoxetine in the acute treatment of child and adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) during a 13-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHOD Eligible patients aged 7 to 17 (N = 103) were randomized at a ratio of 2:1 to receive either fluoxetine or placebo. Dosing was initiated at 10 mg daily for 2 weeks, then increased to 20 mg daily. After 4 weeks of treatment, and again after 7 weeks of treatment, non-responders could have their dosage increased by 20 mg daily, for a maximum possible dosage of 60 mg daily. Primary measure of efficacy was improvement in OCD symptoms as measured by the Childrens Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS). All analyses were intent-to-treat. RESULTS Fluoxetine was associated with significantly greater improvement in OCD as assessed by the CY-BOCS (p = .026) and other measures than was placebo. Fluoxetine was well tolerated and had a rate of discontinuation for adverse events similar to that of placebo (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS Fluoxetine 20 to 60 mg daily was effective and well tolerated for treatment of OCD in this pediatric population.


Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease | 2001

Developmental aspects of obsessive compulsive disorder: findings in children, adolescents, and adults.

Daniel A. Geller; Joseph Biederman; Stephen V. Faraone; Anat Agranat; Kathleen Cradock; Lisa Hagermoser; Grace S. Kim; Jean A. Frazier; Barbara J. Coffey

Although juvenile obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is increasingly recognized as a putative developmental subtype of the disorder, comparisons among children, adolescents, and adults with OCD have been lacking. We aimed to evaluate clinical correlates of OCD in three developmentally distinct groups. Subjects comprised children, adolescents, and adults meeting DSM-III-R and DSM-IV criteria for OCD referred to separate specialized OCD clinics. All subjects were systematically evaluated with structured diagnostic interviews and clinical assessments by OCD experts. Specific clinical correlates and symptom profiles were associated with the disorder in different age groups. These findings support a hypothesis of developmental discontinuity between juvenile and adult OCD and identify age specific correlates of the disorder across the life cycle. Further work is needed to validate whether juvenile-onset OCD represents a true developmental subtype of the disorder.


Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 1996

Comorbidity of Juvenile Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder with Disruptive Behavior Disorders

Daniel A. Geller; Joseph Biederman; Susan Griffin; Janice Jones; Todd R. Lefkowitz

OBJECTIVE To examine the full spectrum of psychiatric comorbidity in juvenile obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in a naturalistic manner when no exclusionary criteria are used for sample selection. METHOD Consecutive referrals to a specialized pediatric OCD clinic were evaluated by means of structured diagnostic interviews and rating scales. No exclusionary criteria were used for sample selection. Findings were compared with those of previously published reports of juvenile OCD. RESULTS Compared with previous studies, our sample of juveniles with OCD had high rates of comorbidity not only with tic, mood, and anxiety disorders but also with disruptive behavior disorders. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that in the naturalistic setting, juvenile OCD is heavily comorbid with both internalizing and externalizing disorders. The presence of such a complex comorbid state has important clinical and research implications and stresses the relevance of limiting exclusionary criteria in studies of juvenile OCD.


Nature Reviews Neuroscience | 2014

Obsessive-compulsive disorder: an integrative genetic and neurobiological perspective

David L. Pauls; Amitai Abramovitch; Scott L. Rauch; Daniel A. Geller

Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by repetitive thoughts and behaviours that are experienced as unwanted. Family and twin studies have demonstrated that OCD is a multifactorial familial condition that involves both polygenic and environmental risk factors. Neuroimaging studies have implicated the cortico–striato–thalamo–cortical circuit in the pathophysiology of the disorder, which is supported by the observation of specific neuropsychological impairments in patients with OCD, mainly in executive functions. Genetic studies indicate that genes affecting the serotonergic, dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems, and the interaction between them, play a crucial part in the functioning of this circuit. Environmental factors such as adverse perinatal events, psychological trauma and neurological trauma may modify the expression of risk genes and, hence, trigger the manifestation of obsessive–compulsive behaviours.


Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry | 1998

Disentangling the Overlap between Tourette's Disorder and ADHD

Thomas J. Spencer; Joseph Biederman; Margaret Harding; Deborah O'donnell; Timothy E. Wilens; Stephen V. Faraone; Barbara J. Coffey; Daniel A. Geller

OBJECTIVE To identify similarities and differences in neuropsychiatric correlates in children with Tourettes syndrome (TS) and those with ADHD. METHOD The sample consisted of children with Tourettes syndrome with ADHD (N = 79), children with Tourettes syndrome without ADHD (N = 18), children with ADHD (N = 563), psychiatrically referred children (N = 212), and healthy controls (N = 140). RESULTS Disorders specifically associated with Tourettes syndrome were obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and simple phobias. Rates of other disorders, including other disruptive behavioral, mood, and anxiety disorders, neuropsychologic correlates, and social and school functioning were indistinguishable in children with Tourettes and ADHD. However, children with Tourettes syndrome plus ADHD had more additional comorbid disorders overall and lower psychosocial function than children with ADHD. CONCLUSIONS These findings confirm previously noted associations between Tourettes syndrome and OCD but suggest that disruptive behavioral, mood, and anxiety disorders as well as cognitive dysfunctions may be accounted for by comorbidity with ADHD. However, Tourettes syndrome plus ADHD appears to be a more severe condition than ADHD alone.


Biological Psychiatry | 2010

A Preliminary Study of D-Cycloserine Augmentation of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Eric A. Storch; Tanya K. Murphy; Wayne K. Goodman; Gary R. Geffken; Adam B. Lewin; Aude Henin; Jamie A. Micco; Susan Sprich; Sabine Wilhelm; Michael A. Bengtson; Daniel A. Geller

BACKGROUND Research on the neural circuitry underlying fear extinction has led to the examination of D-cycloserine (DCS), a partial agonist at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in the amygdala, as a method to enhance exposure therapy outcome. Preliminary results have supported the use of DCS to augment exposure therapy in adult anxiety disorders; however, no data have been reported in any childhood anxiety disorder. Thus, we sought to preliminarily examine whether weight-adjusted DCS doses (25 or 50 mg) enhanced the overall efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). METHOD Participants were 30 youth (aged 8-17) with a primary diagnosis of OCD. The study design was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled augmentation trial examining CBT + DCS versus CBT + Placebo (15 youth per group). All patients received seven exposure and response prevention sessions paired with DCS or placebo taken 1 hour before sessions. RESULTS Although not significantly different, compared with the CBT + Placebo group, youth in the CBT + DCS arm showed small-to-moderate treatment effects (d = .31-.47 on primary outcomes). No adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS These results complement findings in adult OCD and non-OCD anxiety disorders and provide initial support for a more extensive study of DCS augmentation of CBT among youth with OCD.


Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology | 2003

Impact of comorbidity on treatment response to paroxetine in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: is the use of exclusion criteria empirically supported in randomized clinical trials?

Daniel A. Geller; Joseph Biederman; S. Evelyn Stewart; Benjamin Mullin; Colleen Farrell; Karen Dineen Wagner; Graham J. Emslie; David J. Carpenter

OBJECTIVE To examine the influence of psychiatric comorbidity on response and relapse rates in children and adolescents treated with paroxetine for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). METHODS Patients responding following 16 weeks of treatment (phase I) were randomized to continued paroxetine or to placebo for 16 additional weeks (phase II). OCD response (phase I) and relapse (phase II) criteria were based on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale and the Childrens Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. The presence of OCD and other psychiatric disorders was ascertained using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version interview. RESULTS At entry, 193 of 335 (57.6%) patients had at least one psychiatric disorder in addition to OCD, and 102 of 335 (30.4%) had multiple other disorders. Although the response rate to paroxetine in the overall population was high (71%), the response rates in patients with comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, tic disorder, or oppositional defiant disorder (56%, 53%, and 39%, respectively) were significantly less than in patients with OCD only (75%) (intent-to-treat population, last observation carried forward analysis, p < 0.05). Psychiatric comorbidity was associated with a greater rate of relapse in the total patient population (46% for one or more comorbid disorders [p = 0.04] and 56% for two or more comorbid disorders [p < 0.05] vs. 32% for no comorbidity). CONCLUSIONS The results of these post hoc analyses show that comorbid illness adversely impacted response to pharmacotherapy with paroxetine in pediatric OCD and significantly increased risk of relapse following withdrawal from treatment. Continued paroxetine treatment reduced the relapse rates in all groups compared with placebo, including those with comorbid illness. Because pediatric OCD is frequently comorbid with other psychiatric disorders, results of randomized, controlled pediatric OCD trials that use multiple exclusion criteria may not generalize to more naturalistic OCD samples.

Collaboration


Dive into the Daniel A. Geller's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara J. Coffey

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Evelyn Stewart

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric A. Storch

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen V. Faraone

State University of New York Upstate Medical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tanya K. Murphy

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adam B. Lewin

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge