Daniel B. Brown

Venous thrombosis associated with the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters.

PURPOSE Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) have become an essential component of the management of an increasing number of patients, including patients who may require hemodialysis. Reported symptomatic venous thrombosis rates associated with PICC lines are based on clinical signs and symptoms and range from 1% to 4%. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the true rate of thrombosis of upper extremity veins after the placement of PICCs and the potential impact on future access in hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed. Patients who had (i) normal findings during initial venography, (ii) PICC placement, and (iii) who underwent subsequent repeated venography were included. Age, sex, vein cannulated, catheter size, location, and incidence of thrombosis were analyzed. RESULTS Three hundred fifty-four PICCs were placed in 119 patients. Of the 144 extremities, 137 had normal findings during initial venography. Of the 137 extremities, 32 developed thrombosis of the cannulated vein (or central veins) after initial PICC placement (23.3%). When all extremities with multiple PICC lines placed were considered, 52 developed thrombosis, for an overall thrombosis rate of 38%. The incidence of thrombosis by site was cephalic 57%, basilic 14%, and brachial 10%. No significant differences were noted in the rates of thrombosis by age, sex, or catheter size. CONCLUSIONS There is a relatively high rate of venous thrombosis associated with PICCs, particularly cephalic thrombus. Because of the high rate of thrombosis associated with these catheters, an alternative mode of access should be considered in current or potential hemodialysis patients. All patients with a history of PICC line placement requiring dialysis access should undergo upper extremity venography prior to the placement of permanent access.

Outcomes of neoadjuvant transarterial chemoembolization to downstage hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation.

Purpose:To evaluate outcomes of downstaging patients with advanced (American liver tumor study group stage III/IV) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to allow eligibility for orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). Methods:From 1999 to 2006, 202 patients with HCC were referred for transplant evaluation. Seventy-six (37.6%) patients with stage III/IV HCC were potential transplant candidates if downstaging was achieved by TACE. OLT was considered based on follow-up imaging findings. The number of patients who were successfully downstaged within the Milan criteria, tumor response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, findings at explant, and outcomes after transplant were tracked. Results:Eighteen of 76 (23.7%) patients had adequate downstaging to qualify for OLT under the Milan criteria. By Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, 27/76 (35.5%) patients had a partial response, 22/76 (29%) had stable disease, and 27/76 (35.5%) had progressive disease. Seventeen of 76 (22.4%) patients who met other qualifications underwent OLT after successful downstaging (13/38 stage III;4/38 stage IV). Explant review demonstrated 28 identifiable tumors in which post-TACE necrosis was greater than 90% in 21 (75%). At a median of 19.6 months (range 3.6–104.7), 16/17 (94.1%) patients who underwent OLT are alive. One patient expired 11 months after OLT secondary to medical comorbidities. One of 17 (6%) OLT patients had recurrent HCC. This patient underwent resection of a pulmonary metastasis and is alive, 63.6 months from OLT. Conclusion:Selected patients with stage III/IV HCC can be downstaged to Milan criteria with TACE. Importantly, patients who are successfully downstaged and transplanted have excellent midterm disease-free and overall survival, similar to stage II HCC.

Transcatheter Therapy for Hepatic Malignancy: Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria

The field of interventional oncology includes tumor ablation as well as the use of transcatheter therapies such as embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization. Terminology and reporting standards for tumor ablation have been developed. The development of standardization of terminology and reporting criteria for transcatheter therapies should provide a similar framework to facilitate the clearest communication among investigators and provide the greatest flexibility in comparing established and emerging technologies. An appropriate vehicle for reporting the various aspects of catheter directed therapy is outlined, including classification of therapies and procedure terms, appropriate descriptors of imaging guidance, and terminology to define imaging and pathologic findings. Methods for standardizing the reporting of outcomes toxicities, complications, and other important aspects that require attention when reporting clinical results are addressed. It is the intention of the group that adherence to the recommendations will facilitate achievement of the groups main objective: improved precision and communication for reporting the various aspects of transcatheter management of hepatic malignancy that will translate to more accurate comparison of technologies and results and, ultimately, to improved patient outcomes.

Long-Term Outcome After Chemoembolization and Embolization of Hepatic Metastatic Lesions from Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVE Hepatic artery chemoembolization and hepatic artery embolization (HAE) are accepted treatments of patients with hepatic metastasis from neuroendocrine tumors. Long-term outcome data are limited. We present our experience in the use of hepatic artery chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with hepatic metastasis from neuroendocrine tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-six patients with carcinoid (n = 31) or islet cell (n = 15) tumors were treated. Overall and progression-free survival times starting with the first treatment were calculated. Potential factors affecting survival, including presence of extrahepatic disease and resection of the primary lesion, were analyzed. Relief of symptoms was subjectively determined for tumors with hormonal secretion. RESULTS The 46 patients underwent 93 hepatic artery chemoembolization or HAE sessions. The mean overall survival time for the entire group was 1,273 +/- 185 days. The mean overall survival times for the carcinoid (1,255 +/- 163 days) and islet cell tumor (1,311 +/- 403 days) subgroups were similar (p = 0.66). The progression-free survival times for the carcinoid (602 +/- 144 days) and islet cell (501 +/- 107 days) tumor subgroups also were similar (p = 0.72). The survival time of patients without known extrahepatic metastasis (n = 18; 1,571 +/- 291 days) trended toward significance compared with that of patients with known extrahepatic disease (n = 26; 770 +/- 112 days; p = 0.08). Resection of the primary tumor in 19 of 46 patients did not affect survival (resection survival, 1,558 +/- 400 days; nonresection survival, 1,000 +/- 179 days; p = 0.44). Twenty of 25 patients with hormonally active tumors had relief of symptoms after one cycle of treatment. The 30-day mortality was 4.3%. CONCLUSION The overall survival time after hepatic artery chemoembolization or HAE among patients with neuroendocrine tumors is approximately 3.5 years. The progression-free survival time approaches 1.5 years. The presence of extrahepatic metastasis or an unresected primary tumor should not limit the use of hepatic artery chemoembolization or HAE.

Research Reporting Standards for Radioembolization of Hepatic Malignancies

Primary Liver Tumors Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the liver; its incidence is increasing worldwide. It ranks as the sixth most common tumor and third most common cause of cancer-related mortality (1,2). Primary liver tumors include HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surgical resection is preferred over transplantation and is considered potentially curative in patients with resectable HCC and normal liver function (3). Transplantation is considered the gold standard for patients with unresectable HCC and whose disease is within the Milan criteria (4). Resection and transplantation have limited roles, given advanced disease (chronic liver disease and/or tumor extent) at presentation and limited organ availability (5–7). Chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation represent standard therapies in treating patients and serve as a bridge to transplantation in selected patients (8,9). Radioembolization has an emerging role in “bridging” patients within criteria by delaying tumor progression. It has also been shown to downstage disease beyond the Milan, to within, transplant criteria (10–12). A recent study has demonstrated that radioembolization leads to longer time-to-progression and better toxicity profile when compared with chemoembolization (13). Patients with macrovascular tumor involvement have also exhibited evidence of clinical benefit after radioembolization (14).

Society of Interventional Radiology Position Statement on Chemoembolization of Hepatic Malignancies

PRIMARY and secondary malignancies in the liver present one of the most challenging problems in clinical oncology. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common fatal malignancies worldwide, with more than 530,000 new cases diagnosed annually (1). The prevalence of hepatoma in the United States is rapidly increasing as a result of the spread of chronic infection with hepatitis C. Currently 10,000–15,000 cases of HCC are diagnosed annually in the United States. It is estimated that this number will more than double to 34,000 cases of HCC per year by 2019 (2). Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, with liver metastases accounting for approximately half these deaths. More than 56,000 patients died from colon cancer in 2002 and it is predicted that there will be more than 145,000 new cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed in the United States in 2005 (3). Other tumors that frequently develop fatal hepatic metastases despite a treatable primary tumor include ocular melanoma, neuroendocrine tumors, and gastrointestinal sarcoma. Chemoembolization combines hepatic artery embolization with simultaneous infusion of a concentrated dose of chemotherapeutic drugs followed by embolization particles. Hepatic artery embolization refers to infusion of particles into tumor-feeding arteries without chemotherapeutic agents. Embolization by either technique renders the tumor ischemic, depriving it of nutrients and oxygen. When chemotherapy is used, tumor drug concentrations are one to two orders of magnitude greater than are achieved by infusion alone, and the dwell time of the chemotherapy agent is markedly prolonged, with measurable drug levels present as long as 1 month later (4–7). Because most of the drug is retained in the liver, systemic toxicity is reduced (8). Embolization and chemoembolization lead to ischemia of the tumor by blockade of the nutrient supply. An advantage of embolization is that the ischemia induced by embolization helps to overcome drug resistance by causing metabolically active cell membrane pumps to fail, thereby increasing intracellular retention of the chemotherapeutic drugs (9). Recent research has demonstrated that ischemia can increase angiogenesis in tumor cells, possibly spurring tumor growth (10–12). These molecular changes raise questions about whether chemoembolization or hepatic arterial embolization is the better method to perform endovascular hepatic arterial therapy. To date, no study has demonstrated a difference in survival between the two techniques (10,13).

Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis and early stent placement for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis

PURPOSE To evaluate an approach to the treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) that included pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis with reteplase and the Helix mechanical thrombectomy device, followed by early stent placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS During 3-year period, 23 symptomatic limbs in 18 patients with iliofemoral DVT were treated with reteplase catheter-directed thrombolysis. After an initial infusion of 8 to 16 hours, any residual acute thrombus over a long segment (> 10 cm) was treated by maceration with use of the Helix thrombectomy device. Residual short-segment (< 10 cm) iliac vein thrombus and/or stenosis were treated with stent placement. Technical success, clinical success, complications, thrombolytic infusion time, total thrombolytic agent dose, fibrinogen level changes, and late limb status were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Technical success was achieved in 23 of 23 limbs (100%). Clinical success was achieved in 22 of 23 limbs (96%). Complete or partial thrombolysis was observed in 19 of 23 limbs (83%). Major bleeding was observed in one patient (6%) and necessitated blood transfusion. Mean per-limb thrombolytic infusion time and total dose were 19.6 hours +/- 8.1 and 13.8 U +/- 5.3 reteplase, respectively. Mean serum fibrinogen nadir and percentage drop in serum fibrinogen were 282 mg/dL +/- 167 and 47% +/- 24%, respectively. Late (mean, 19.8 +/- 11.6 months) modified Venous Disability Scores were 0 (none) for six limbs, 1 (mild) for 10 limbs, 2 (moderate) for two limbs, and 3 (severe) for no limbs. CONCLUSION In a preliminary experience, pharmacomechanical catheter-directed iliofemoral DVT thrombolysis with early stent placement was safe and effective.

Hepatic arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of survival rates with different embolic agents.

PURPOSE The optimal embolic agent for transhepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been identified. This study reports outcomes of TACE for HCC with Gelfoam powder and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-one patients underwent 152 TACE sessions with Gelfoam powder (n = 41) or polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and Ethiodol (n = 40) as the embolic agent. Chemotherapeutic drugs were the same for all patients (50 mg cisplatin, 20 mg doxorubicin, 10 mg mitomycin-c). The groups were compared based on number of TACE sessions, maximum tumor size, bilirubin level, aspartate and alanine aminotransferase levels, Child-Pugh score, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, and hepatitis B or C virus positivity. The number of cases of each Child class in each group was also evaluated. Survival starting from the first TACE session was calculated according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. Forty-eight patients died during the study period, 19 received transplants, and 14 were alive at the end of the study period. RESULTS The groups were statistically similar in all categories regarding liver function, Child-Pugh score, tumor size, hepatitis status, and percentage of patients with Child class A, B, and C disease. The number of TACE sessions was significantly greater for the Gelfoam powder group (mean, 2.2) versus the PVA group (mean, 1.6; P = .01). Overall survival was similar between groups whether patients who received transplants were included in the analysis (mean, 659 days +/- 83 with Gelfoam powder vs 565 days +/- 71 with PVA; P = .42) or were excluded (mean, 519 days +/- 80 with Gelfoam powder vs 511 days +/- 75 with PVA; P = .93). CONCLUSION In similar patient groups, survival after treatment of HCC with TACE with Gelfoam powder or PVA and Ethiodol was similar.

Society of Interventional Radiology Position Statement on Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Liver Tumors

Focal tumor ablation--whether applied percutanously, laparoscopically, or by means of open surgery--is an effective therapy for selected liver tumors. The choice of liver ablation as well as the choice between percutaneous and surgical approaches is dependent on tumor factors, patient factors, and other viable treatment options. Currently, the largest cumulative reported experience is with radiofrequency (RF) ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal metastases. This document is a position statement of the Interventional Oncology Task Force and the Standards Division of the Society of Interventional Radiology regarding the use of percutaneous RF ablation for the treatment of liver tumors.

Hepatic Arterial Chemoembolization for Management of Metastatic Melanoma

OBJECTIVE Hepatic arterial chemoembolization is an accepted therapy for stage 4 melanoma with liver-dominant metastasis. However, the reports of outcomes are limited. We present our outcomes with hepatic arterial chemoembolization for metastasis of stage 4 melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty patients with liver-dominant metastasis of ocular or cutaneous melanoma were treated with hepatic arterial chemoembolization. Overall survival and progression-free survival rates were calculated from the first treatment. Patients with intrahepatic tumor progression were treated with additional hepatic arterial chemoembolization. Both overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Tumor pattern on angiography was characterized as either nodular or infiltrative on the basis of angiographic appearance. RESULTS The 20 patients underwent 46 hepatic arterial chemoembolization sessions (mean, 2.4 sessions; range, 1-5). The mean and median overall survival times were 334 +/- 71 and 271 days, respectively. There were no deaths within 30 days of treatment. Thirteen of the 20 patients had progression of disease. The mean and median progression-free survival times for these patients were 231 +/- 42 and 185 days, respectively. Patients with lesions that had a nodular angiographic appearance had longer progression-free survival than patients with lesions that had an infiltrative appearance (mean progression-free survival time, 249 vs 63 days). Patients with lesions that had a nodular angiographic appearance also survived significantly longer than those with lesions that had an infiltrative angiographic pattern (mean overall survival time, 621 vs 114 days; p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION Hepatic arterial chemoembolization for liver-dominant metastasis of stage 4 melanoma is a safe treatment that results in longer survival than has occurred among historical controls. Patients with lesions that have a nodular tumor appearance on angiography survive significantly longer than patients with lesions that have an infiltrative appearance on angiography.