Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Daniel B. Fried is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Daniel B. Fried.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2004

Systematic Review Evaluating the Timing of Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Combined Modality Therapy for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Daniel B. Fried; David E. Morris; Charles Poole; Julian G. Rosenman; Jan Halle; Frank C. Detterbeck; Thomas A. Hensing; Mark A. Socinski

PURPOSEnWe employed meta-analytic techniques to evaluate early (E) versus late (L) timing of thoracic radiation therapy (RT) in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). In addition, we assessed the impact of radiation fractionation and chemotherapeutic regimen on timing.nnnMETHODSnRandomized trials published after 1985 addressing timing of RT relative to chemotherapy in LS-SCLC were included. Trials were analyzed by risk ratio (RR), risk difference, and number-needed-to-treat methods.nnnRESULTSnOverall survival (OS) RRs for all studies were 1.17 at 2 years (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.35; P = .03) and 1.13 at 3 years (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.39; P = .2), indicating a significantly increased 2-year survival for ERT versus LRT patients and suggestive of a similar trend at 3 years. Subset analysis of studies using hyperfractionated RT revealed OS RR for ERT versus LRT of 1.44 (95% CI, 1.17 to 1.77; P = .001) and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.90; P = .04) at 2 and 3 years, respectively, indicating a survival benefit of ERT versus LRT. Studies using once-daily fractionation showed no difference in 2- and 3-year OS RRs for ERT compared with LRT. Studies using platinum-based chemotherapy had OS RRs of 1.30 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.53; P = .002) and 1.35 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.70; P = .01) at 2 and 3 years, respectively, favoring ERT. Studies using nonplatinum-based chemotherapy regimens had nonsignificant differences in OS.nnnCONCLUSIONnA small but significant improvement in 2-year OS for ERT versus LRT in LS-SCLC was observed, similar to the benefit of adding RT to chemotherapy or prophylactic cranial irradiation. A greater difference was evident for hyperfractionated RT and platinum-based chemotherapy.


Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2007

Third-generation chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Maria Q. Baggstrom; Thomas E. Stinchcombe; Daniel B. Fried; Charles Poole; Thomas A. Hensing; Mark A. Socinski

Purpose: To estimate the efficacy of third-generation (3G) chemotherapy agents (paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and irinotecan) on response and survival in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A meta-analysis was performed using trials identified through MEDLINE. Results on tumor response and survival were collected from randomized trials comparing 3G monotherapy versus best supportive care (BSC), 3G monotherapy versus second-generation (2G) platinum-based regimens, and 3G platinum-based regimens versus 2G platinum-based regimens. Results: Of the 2480 citations screened, 20 randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 19 trials were used in the analyses. The data from two, three-arm trials were used in two different comparisons. Five trials (n = 1029 patients) compared 3G monotherapy with BSC. The summary risk difference (RD) for 1-year survival favored 3G agents by 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2%, 12%). Four trials (n = 871 patients) compared treatment with 3G monotherapy versus 2G platinum-based regimens. The response RD was −6% (95% CI: −11%, 0%), and the 1-year survival rate RD was 3% (95% CI: −3%, 10%), suggesting that despite a slightly higher response rate for 2G platinum-based regimens relative to 3G monotherapy, there is equivalency in survival. Twelve trials (n = 3995) compared 3G versus 2G platinum-based regimens. The RD for response was 12% (95% CI: 10%, 15%). A RD for 1-year was not calculated, because of heterogeneity among the trials. A subset analysis of 3G versus 2G platinum-based doublets revealed a 1-year survival-rate RD of 6% (95% CI: 2%, 10%), favoring 3G platinum-based regimens without evidence of heterogeneity. Conclusions: 3G agents have been a significant advance in the treatment of NSCLC.


Oncogene | 1997

Alterations of the p16 gene in head and neck cancer: frequency and association with p53, PRAD-1 and HPV

Andrew F. Olshan; Mark C. Weissler; Hong Pei; Kathleen Conway; Steven Anderson; Daniel B. Fried; Wendell G. Yarbrough

Alterations, especially homozygous deletions, of the putative tumor suppressor gene, p16 (p16INK4A, MTS1, CDKN2) have been found in tumor cell lines from a variety of neoplasms. Recent studies have reported frequent p16 gene deletions in cell lines from squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN), although the prevalence of alterations was variable in primary tumors. This study determined the prevalence of point mutations and deletions of the p16 gene in 33 SCCHN. In addition, the association of p16 gene alterations and abnormalities of p53, PRAD-1 (cyclin D1), and the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) was examined. We found an overall prevalence of p16 alterations of 36% (nine deletions, three single base substitutions, including one polymorphism). Seven tumors (of 29, 24%) had an alteration of p16 and p53; five (of 33, 15%) had alterations of p16 and PRAD-1; three (of 29, 10%) had alterations of all three genes. In addition, of the five tumors with human papillomavirus detected, only one also had a p16 gene alteration. The results indicate a potentially important role for the p16 gene in head and neck tumorigenesis. In addition, the presence of tumors with multiple somatic gene alterations suggest a possible interaction in the dysregulation of the cell cycle.


Cancer | 2011

Age-Related Disparities in the Use of Radiotherapy for Treatment of Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Janet K. Horton; John F. Gleason; Heidi D. Klepin; Scott Isom; Daniel B. Fried; Ann M. Geiger

Many elderly patients with cancer experience increased cancer‐related morbidity and mortality compared with younger patients. In soft tissue sarcoma, adjuvant radiotherapy is an integral part of definitive therapy for limb preservation. The authors of this report hypothesized that age‐related disparities exist in the use of radiation.


Current Opinion in Oncology | 2006

Current and evolving treatment options for limited stage small cell lung cancer

Carrie B. Lee; David E. Morris; Daniel B. Fried; Mark A. Socinski

Purpose of review About one-third of small cell lung cancer cases are classified as limited stage. Trials have attempted to establish the most effective, least toxic regimen of combined modality treatment. Recently, issues like the role of the positron emission tomography scan, elderly patient management and the timing and delivery of radiotherapy have been addressed. Several targeted agents have also been evaluated. This review will highlight the data that have greatly impacted on the standard of limited stage small cell lung cancer care. Recent findings Trials have concluded that small cell lung cancer is fluorodeoxy-D-glucose avid and that positron emission tomography has potential for utility in staging and radiation therapy planning, though it is not recommended. Recent trials confirm no benefit to adding chemotherapeutic agents to standard cisplatin and etoposide. To date, all targeted therapies have failed to show impressive results. Two analyses of outcomes in elderly patients argue that combined modality therapy should be considered, with patients carefully monitored. Two meta-analyses demonstrate thoracic radiotherapy should be delivered, with increased dose and schedule intensity. Summary Current data demonstrate that combined modality therapy with early administration of thoracic radiotherapy remains the care standard in limited stage small cell lung cancer care. Cisplatin and etoposide continue to be the chosen cytotoxic agents. Targeted therapies and advances in the radiotherapy technological aspects represent opportunities for improved outcomes in the future management of this aggressive disease.


Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 1995

Ha-ras rare alleles in breast cancer susceptibility

Kathleen Conway; Sharon N. Edmiston; Daniel B. Fried; Barbara S. Hulka; Peter Garrett; Edison T. Liu

SummaryOver the last several years, evidence has accumulated to support the idea that rare Ha-ras polymorphisms are associated with inherited susceptibility to certain human cancers. A recent epidemiologic study conducted at our institution found a significant association specifically with breast cancer, although the mechanism underlying this relationship remains unclear. We have proposed that rare Ha-ras alleles are markers of a genomic instability that predisposes to breast cancer. To address this hypothesis, we are investigating the relationship between the presence of rare alleles and another form of instability, gene amplification, and are developing new methodologies both to improve VNTR allele length detection and to characterize the internal repeat sequence variations of the various alleles. These studies should enable us to more clearly define the role of this region in cancer development by delineating VNTR structure and function and the mechanisms of rare allele generation. Ultimately, we hope to identify VNTR characteristics that will permit more accurate cancer risk assessment.


Oncologist | 2006

Combined Modality Therapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Thomas E. Stinchcombe; Daniel B. Fried; David E. Morris; Mark A. Socinski


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 1992

Relationship of maternal smoking during pregnancy to placenta previa.

Jun Zhang; Daniel B. Fried


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2003

A meta-analysis evaluating the timing of thoracic radiation therapy in combined modality therapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer

Daniel B. Fried; David E. Morris; Thomas A. Hensing; Charles Poole; Jan Halle; Julian G. Rosenman; Mark A. Socinski


Archive | 2011

Tethered and/or visually coded brachytherapy devices and related methods

Andrew Karim Kader; Daniel B. Fried

Collaboration


Dive into the Daniel B. Fried's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David E. Morris

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julian G. Rosenman

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark C. Weissler

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bhishamjit S. Chera

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles Poole

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carol G. Shores

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan Halle

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge