Daniel C. Casey
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Daniel C. Casey.
The Lancet | 2015
John N Newton; Adam D M Briggs; Christopher J L Murray; Daniel Dicker; Kyle Foreman; Haidong Wang; Mohsen Naghavi; Mohammad H. Forouzanfar; Summer Lockett Ohno; Ryan M. Barber; Theo Vos; Jeffrey D. Stanaway; Jürgen C. Schmidt; Andrew Hughes; Derek F J Fay; R. Ecob; C. Gresser; Martin McKee; Harry Rutter; I. Abubakar; R. Ali; H R Anderson; Amitava Banerjee; Derrick Bennett; Eduardo Bernabé; Kamaldeep Bhui; Stan Biryukov; Rupert Bourne; Carol Brayne; Nigel Bruce
Summary Background In the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (GBD 2013), knowledge about health and its determinants has been integrated into a comparable framework to inform health policy. Outputs of this analysis are relevant to current policy questions in England and elsewhere, particularly on health inequalities. We use GBD 2013 data on mortality and causes of death, and disease and injury incidence and prevalence to analyse the burden of disease and injury in England as a whole, in English regions, and within each English region by deprivation quintile. We also assess disease and injury burden in England attributable to potentially preventable risk factors. England and the English regions are compared with the remaining constituent countries of the UK and with comparable countries in the European Union (EU) and beyond. Methods We extracted data from the GBD 2013 to compare mortality, causes of death, years of life lost (YLLs), years lived with a disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) in England, the UK, and 18 other countries (the first 15 EU members [apart from the UK] and Australia, Canada, Norway, and the USA [EU15+]). We extended elements of the analysis to English regions, and subregional areas defined by deprivation quintile (deprivation areas). We used data split by the nine English regions (corresponding to the European boundaries of the Nomenclature for Territorial Statistics level 1 [NUTS 1] regions), and by quintile groups within each English region according to deprivation, thereby making 45 regional deprivation areas. Deprivation quintiles were defined by area of residence ranked at national level by Index of Multiple Deprivation score, 2010. Burden due to various risk factors is described for England using new GBD methodology to estimate independent and overlapping attributable risk for five tiers of behavioural, metabolic, and environmental risk factors. We present results for 306 causes and 2337 sequelae, and 79 risks or risk clusters. Findings Between 1990 and 2013, life expectancy from birth in England increased by 5·4 years (95% uncertainty interval 5·0–5·8) from 75·9 years (75·9–76·0) to 81·3 years (80·9–81·7); gains were greater for men than for women. Rates of age-standardised YLLs reduced by 41·1% (38·3–43·6), whereas DALYs were reduced by 23·8% (20·9–27·1), and YLDs by 1·4% (0·1–2·8). For these measures, England ranked better than the UK and the EU15+ means. Between 1990 and 2013, the range in life expectancy among 45 regional deprivation areas remained 8·2 years for men and decreased from 7·2 years in 1990 to 6·9 years in 2013 for women. In 2013, the leading cause of YLLs was ischaemic heart disease, and the leading cause of DALYs was low back and neck pain. Known risk factors accounted for 39·6% (37·7–41·7) of DALYs; leading behavioural risk factors were suboptimal diet (10·8% [9·1–12·7]) and tobacco (10·7% [9·4–12·0]). Interpretation Health in England is improving although substantial opportunities exist for further reductions in the burden of preventable disease. The gap in mortality rates between men and women has reduced, but marked health inequalities between the least deprived and most deprived areas remain. Declines in mortality have not been matched by similar declines in morbidity, resulting in people living longer with diseases. Health policies must therefore address the causes of ill health as well as those of premature mortality. Systematic action locally and nationally is needed to reduce risk exposures, support healthy behaviours, alleviate the severity of chronic disabling disorders, and mitigate the effects of socioeconomic deprivation. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Public Health England.
Archive | 2015
John N Newton; Adam D M Briggs; Christopher J. L. Murray; Daniel Dicker; Kyle Foreman; Haidong Wang; Mohsen Naghavi; Mohammad H. Forouzanfar; Summer Lockett Ohno; Ryan M. Barber; Theo Vos; Jeffrey D. Stanaway; Jürgen C. Schmidt; Andrew J. Hughes; Derek F J Fay; Russell Ecob; Charis Gresser; Martin McKee; Harry Rutter; Ibrahim Abubakar; Raghib Ali; H. Ross Anderson; Amitava Banerjee; Derrick Bennett; Eduardo Bernabé; Kamaldeep Bhui; Stanley M Biryukov; Rupert Bourne; Carol Brayne; Nigel Bruce
Summary Background In the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (GBD 2013), knowledge about health and its determinants has been integrated into a comparable framework to inform health policy. Outputs of this analysis are relevant to current policy questions in England and elsewhere, particularly on health inequalities. We use GBD 2013 data on mortality and causes of death, and disease and injury incidence and prevalence to analyse the burden of disease and injury in England as a whole, in English regions, and within each English region by deprivation quintile. We also assess disease and injury burden in England attributable to potentially preventable risk factors. England and the English regions are compared with the remaining constituent countries of the UK and with comparable countries in the European Union (EU) and beyond. Methods We extracted data from the GBD 2013 to compare mortality, causes of death, years of life lost (YLLs), years lived with a disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) in England, the UK, and 18 other countries (the first 15 EU members [apart from the UK] and Australia, Canada, Norway, and the USA [EU15+]). We extended elements of the analysis to English regions, and subregional areas defined by deprivation quintile (deprivation areas). We used data split by the nine English regions (corresponding to the European boundaries of the Nomenclature for Territorial Statistics level 1 [NUTS 1] regions), and by quintile groups within each English region according to deprivation, thereby making 45 regional deprivation areas. Deprivation quintiles were defined by area of residence ranked at national level by Index of Multiple Deprivation score, 2010. Burden due to various risk factors is described for England using new GBD methodology to estimate independent and overlapping attributable risk for five tiers of behavioural, metabolic, and environmental risk factors. We present results for 306 causes and 2337 sequelae, and 79 risks or risk clusters. Findings Between 1990 and 2013, life expectancy from birth in England increased by 5·4 years (95% uncertainty interval 5·0–5·8) from 75·9 years (75·9–76·0) to 81·3 years (80·9–81·7); gains were greater for men than for women. Rates of age-standardised YLLs reduced by 41·1% (38·3–43·6), whereas DALYs were reduced by 23·8% (20·9–27·1), and YLDs by 1·4% (0·1–2·8). For these measures, England ranked better than the UK and the EU15+ means. Between 1990 and 2013, the range in life expectancy among 45 regional deprivation areas remained 8·2 years for men and decreased from 7·2 years in 1990 to 6·9 years in 2013 for women. In 2013, the leading cause of YLLs was ischaemic heart disease, and the leading cause of DALYs was low back and neck pain. Known risk factors accounted for 39·6% (37·7–41·7) of DALYs; leading behavioural risk factors were suboptimal diet (10·8% [9·1–12·7]) and tobacco (10·7% [9·4–12·0]). Interpretation Health in England is improving although substantial opportunities exist for further reductions in the burden of preventable disease. The gap in mortality rates between men and women has reduced, but marked health inequalities between the least deprived and most deprived areas remain. Declines in mortality have not been matched by similar declines in morbidity, resulting in people living longer with diseases. Health policies must therefore address the causes of ill health as well as those of premature mortality. Systematic action locally and nationally is needed to reduce risk exposures, support healthy behaviours, alleviate the severity of chronic disabling disorders, and mitigate the effects of socioeconomic deprivation. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Public Health England.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2016
Peter W. Gething; Daniel C. Casey; Daniel J. Weiss; Donal Bisanzio; Samir Bhatt; Ewan Cameron; Katherine E. Battle; Ursula Dalrymple; Jennifer Rozier; Puja C Rao; Michael Kutz; Ryan M. Barber; Chantal Huynh; Katya A. Shackelford; Matthew M. Coates; Grant Nguyen; Maya Fraser; Rachel Kulikoff; Haidong Wang; Mohsen Naghavi; David L. Smith; Christopher J. L. Murray; Simon I. Hay; Stephen S Lim
BACKGROUND Malaria control has not been routinely informed by the assessment of subnational variation in malaria deaths. We combined data from the Malaria Atlas Project and the Global Burden of Disease Study to estimate malaria mortality across sub-Saharan Africa on a grid of 5 km2 from 1990 through 2015. METHODS We estimated malaria mortality using a spatiotemporal modeling framework of geolocated data (i.e., with known latitude and longitude) on the clinical incidence of malaria, coverage of antimalarial drug treatment, case fatality rate, and population distribution according to age. RESULTS Across sub-Saharan Africa during the past 15 years, we estimated that there was an overall decrease of 57% (95% uncertainty interval, 46 to 65) in the rate of malaria deaths, from 12.5 (95% uncertainty interval, 8.3 to 17.0) per 10,000 population in 2000 to 5.4 (95% uncertainty interval, 3.4 to 7.9) in 2015. This led to an overall decrease of 37% (95% uncertainty interval, 36 to 39) in the number of malaria deaths annually, from 1,007,000 (95% uncertainty interval, 666,000 to 1,376,000) to 631,000 (95% uncertainty interval, 394,000 to 914,000). The share of malaria deaths among children younger than 5 years of age ranged from more than 80% at a rate of death of more than 25 per 10,000 to less than 40% at rates below 1 per 10,000. Areas with high malaria mortality (>10 per 10,000) and low coverage (<50%) of insecticide-treated bed nets and antimalarial drugs included much of Nigeria, Angola, and Cameroon and parts of the Central African Republic, Congo, Guinea, and Equatorial Guinea. CONCLUSIONS We estimated that there was an overall decrease of 57% in the rate of death from malaria across sub-Saharan Africa over the past 15 years and identified several countries in which high rates of death were associated with low coverage of antimalarial treatment and prevention programs. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others.).
The Lancet | 2017
Nick Golding; Roy Burstein; Joshua Longbottom; Annie J Browne; Aaron Osgood-Zimmerman; Lucas Earl; Samir Bhatt; Ewan Cameron; Daniel C. Casey; Laura Dwyer-Lindgren; Tamer H. Farag; Abraham D. Flaxman; Maya Fraser; Peter W. Gething; Harry S. Gibson; Nicholas Graetz; L Kendall Krause; Xie Rachel Kulikoff; Stephen S Lim; Bonnie Mappin; Chloe Morozoff; Robert C Reiner; Amber Sligar; David L. Smith; Haidong Wang; Daniel J Weiss; Christopher J L Murray; Catherine L. Moyes; Simon I. Hay
Summary Background During the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) era, many countries in Africa achieved marked reductions in under-5 and neonatal mortality. Yet the pace of progress toward these goals substantially varied at the national level, demonstrating an essential need for tracking even more local trends in child mortality. With the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015, which established ambitious targets for improving child survival by 2030, optimal intervention planning and targeting will require understanding of trends and rates of progress at a higher spatial resolution. In this study, we aimed to generate high-resolution estimates of under-5 and neonatal all-cause mortality across 46 countries in Africa. Methods We assembled 235 geographically resolved household survey and census data sources on child deaths to produce estimates of under-5 and neonatal mortality at a resolution of 5 × 5 km grid cells across 46 African countries for 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015. We used a Bayesian geostatistical analytical framework to generate these estimates, and implemented predictive validity tests. In addition to reporting 5 × 5 km estimates, we also aggregated results obtained from these estimates into three different levels—national, and subnational administrative levels 1 and 2—to provide the full range of geospatial resolution that local, national, and global decision makers might require. Findings Amid improving child survival in Africa, there was substantial heterogeneity in absolute levels of under-5 and neonatal mortality in 2015, as well as the annualised rates of decline achieved from 2000 to 2015. Subnational areas in countries such as Botswana, Rwanda, and Ethiopia recorded some of the largest decreases in child mortality rates since 2000, positioning them well to achieve SDG targets by 2030 or earlier. Yet these places were the exception for Africa, since many areas, particularly in central and western Africa, must reduce under-5 mortality rates by at least 8·8% per year, between 2015 and 2030, to achieve the SDG 3.2 target for under-5 mortality by 2030. Interpretation In the absence of unprecedented political commitment, financial support, and medical advances, the viability of SDG 3.2 achievement in Africa is precarious at best. By producing under-5 and neonatal mortality rates at multiple levels of geospatial resolution over time, this study provides key information for decision makers to target interventions at populations in the greatest need. In an era when precision public health increasingly has the potential to transform the design, implementation, and impact of health programmes, our 5 × 5 km estimates of child mortality in Africa provide a baseline against which local, national, and global stakeholders can map the pathways for ending preventable child deaths by 2030. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Addiction | 2016
Emilie Elisabet Agardh; Anna-Karin Danielsson; Mats Ramstedt; Astrid Ledgaard Holm; Finn Diderichsen; Knud Juel; Stein Emil Vollset; Ann Kristin Knudsen; Jonas Minet Kinge; Richard A. White; Vegard Skirbekk; Pia Mäkelä; Mohammad H. Forouzanfar; Matthew M. Coates; Daniel C. Casey; Mohesen Naghavi; Peter Allebeck
Abstract Aims (1) To compare alcohol‐attributed disease burden in four Nordic countries 1990–2013, by overall disability‐adjusted life years (DALYs) and separated by premature mortality [years of life lost (YLL)] and health loss to non‐fatal conditions [years lived with disability (YLD)]; (2) to examine whether changes in alcohol consumption informs alcohol‐attributed disease burden; and (3) to compare the distribution of disease burden separated by causes. Design A comparative risk assessment approach. Setting Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland. Participants Male and female populations of each country. Measurements Age‐standardized DALYs, YLLs and YLDs per 100 000 with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs). Findings In Finland, with the highest burden over the study period, overall alcohol‐attributed DALYs were 1616 per 100 000 in 2013, while in Norway, with the lowest burden, corresponding estimates were 634. DALYs in Denmark were 1246 and in Sweden 788. In Denmark and Finland, changes in consumption generally corresponded to changes in disease burden, but not to the same extent in Sweden and Norway. All countries had a similar disease pattern and the majority of DALYs were due to YLLs (62–76%), mainly from alcohol use disorder, cirrhosis, transport injuries, self‐harm and violence. YLDs from alcohol use disorder accounted for 41% and 49% of DALYs in Denmark and Finland compared to 63 and 64% in Norway and Sweden 2013, respectively. Conclusions Finland and Denmark has a higher alcohol‐attributed disease burden than Sweden and Norway in the period 1990–2013. Changes in consumption levels in general corresponded to changes in harm in Finland and Denmark, but not in Sweden and Norway for some years. All countries followed a similar pattern. The majority of disability‐adjusted life years were due to premature mortality. Alcohol use disorder by non‐fatal conditions accounted for a higher proportion of disability‐adjusted life years in Norway and Sweden, compared with Finland and Denmark.
Nature | 2018
Aaron Osgood-Zimmerman; Anoushka Millear; R W Stubbs; Chloe Shields; B V Pickering; Lucas Earl; Nicholas Graetz; D K Kinyoki; Sarah E Ray; Samir Bhatt; Annie J Browne; Roy Burstein; Ewan Cameron; Daniel C. Casey; Aniruddha Deshpande; Peter W. Gething; Harry S. Gibson; Nathaniel J Henry; M Herrero; L K Krause; Ian Letourneau; A J Levine; Patrick Y Liu; Joshua Longbottom; B K Mayala; Jonathan F Mosser; Abdisalan M. Noor; David M Pigott; E G Piwoz; Puja Rao
Insufficient growth during childhood is associated with poor health outcomes and an increased risk of death. Between 2000 and 2015, nearly all African countries demonstrated improvements for children under 5 years old for stunting, wasting, and underweight, the core components of child growth failure. Here we show that striking subnational heterogeneity in levels and trends of child growth remains. If current rates of progress are sustained, many areas of Africa will meet the World Health Organization Global Targets 2025 to improve maternal, infant and young child nutrition, but high levels of growth failure will persist across the Sahel. At these rates, much, if not all of the continent will fail to meet the Sustainable Development Goal target—to end malnutrition by 2030. Geospatial estimates of child growth failure provide a baseline for measuring progress as well as a precision public health platform to target interventions to those populations with the greatest need, in order to reduce health disparities and accelerate progress.
Nature | 2018
Nicholas Graetz; Joseph I. Friedman; Aaron Osgood-Zimmerman; Roy Burstein; Molly H Biehl; Chloe Shields; Jonathan F Mosser; Daniel C. Casey; Aniruddha Deshpande; Lucas Earl; Robert C Reiner; Sarah E Ray; A J Levine; R W Stubbs; B K Mayala; Joshua Longbottom; Annie J Browne; Samir Bhatt; Daniel J. Weiss; Peter W. Gething; Ali H. Mokdad; Stephen S Lim; Murray Cjl.; Emmanuela Gakidou; Simon I. Hay
Educational attainment for women of reproductive age is linked to reduced child and maternal mortality, lower fertility and improved reproductive health. Comparable analyses of attainment exist only at the national level, potentially obscuring patterns in subnational inequality. Evidence suggests that wide disparities between urban and rural populations exist, raising questions about where the majority of progress towards the education targets of the Sustainable Development Goals is occurring in African countries. Here we explore within-country inequalities by predicting years of schooling across five by five kilometre grids, generating estimates of average educational attainment by age and sex at subnational levels. Despite marked progress in attainment from 2000 to 2015 across Africa, substantial differences persist between locations and sexes. These differences have widened in many countries, particularly across the Sahel. These high-resolution, comparable estimates improve the ability of decision-makers to plan the precisely targeted interventions that will be necessary to deliver progress during the era of the Sustainable Development Goals.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2018
Robert C Reiner; Nicholas Graetz; Daniel C. Casey; Christopher Troeger; Gregory M. Garcia; Jonathan F Mosser; Aniruddha Deshpande; Scott J Swartz; Sarah E Ray; Brigette F. Blacker; Puja C Rao; Aaron Osgood-Zimmerman; Roy Burstein; David M Pigott; Ian M. Davis; Ian Letourneau; Lucas Earl; Jennifer M. Ross; Ibrahim Khalil; Tamer H. Farag; Oliver J. Brady; Moritz U. G. Kraemer; David L. Smith; Samir Bhatt; Daniel J. Weiss; Peter W. Gething; Nicholas J Kassebaum; Ali H. Mokdad; Christopher J. L. Murray; Simon I. Hay
Background Diarrheal diseases are the third leading cause of disease and death in children younger than 5 years of age in Africa and were responsible for an estimated 30 million cases of severe diarrhea (95% credible interval, 27 million to 33 million) and 330,000 deaths (95% credible interval, 270,000 to 380,000) in 2015. The development of targeted approaches to address this burden has been hampered by a paucity of comprehensive, fine‐scale estimates of diarrhea‐related disease and death among and within countries. Methods We produced annual estimates of the prevalence and incidence of diarrhea and diarrhea‐related mortality with high geographic detail (5 km2) across Africa from 2000 through 2015. Estimates were created with the use of Bayesian geostatistical techniques and were calibrated to the results from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016. Results The results revealed geographic inequality with regard to diarrhea risk in Africa. Of the estimated 330,000 childhood deaths that were attributable to diarrhea in 2015, more than 50% occurred in 55 of the 782 first‐level administrative subdivisions (e.g., states). In 2015, mortality rates among first‐level administrative subdivisions in Nigeria differed by up to a factor of 6. The case fatality rates were highly varied at the national level across Africa, with the highest values observed in Benin, Lesotho, Mali, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone. Conclusions Our findings showed concentrated areas of diarrheal disease and diarrhea‐related death in countries that had a consistently high burden as well as in countries that had considerable national‐level reductions in diarrhea burden. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.)
WOS | 2016
Emilie Elisabet Agardh; Anna-Karin Danielsson; Mats Ramstedt; Astrid Ledgaard Holm; Finn Diderichsen; Knud Juel; Stein Emil Vollset; Ann Kristin Knudsen; Jonas Minet Kinge; Rick White; Vegard Skirbekk; Pia Mäkelä; Mohammad H. Forouzanfar; Matthew M. Coates; Daniel C. Casey; Mohesen Naghavi; Peter Allebeck
Abstract Aims (1) To compare alcohol‐attributed disease burden in four Nordic countries 1990–2013, by overall disability‐adjusted life years (DALYs) and separated by premature mortality [years of life lost (YLL)] and health loss to non‐fatal conditions [years lived with disability (YLD)]; (2) to examine whether changes in alcohol consumption informs alcohol‐attributed disease burden; and (3) to compare the distribution of disease burden separated by causes. Design A comparative risk assessment approach. Setting Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland. Participants Male and female populations of each country. Measurements Age‐standardized DALYs, YLLs and YLDs per 100 000 with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs). Findings In Finland, with the highest burden over the study period, overall alcohol‐attributed DALYs were 1616 per 100 000 in 2013, while in Norway, with the lowest burden, corresponding estimates were 634. DALYs in Denmark were 1246 and in Sweden 788. In Denmark and Finland, changes in consumption generally corresponded to changes in disease burden, but not to the same extent in Sweden and Norway. All countries had a similar disease pattern and the majority of DALYs were due to YLLs (62–76%), mainly from alcohol use disorder, cirrhosis, transport injuries, self‐harm and violence. YLDs from alcohol use disorder accounted for 41% and 49% of DALYs in Denmark and Finland compared to 63 and 64% in Norway and Sweden 2013, respectively. Conclusions Finland and Denmark has a higher alcohol‐attributed disease burden than Sweden and Norway in the period 1990–2013. Changes in consumption levels in general corresponded to changes in harm in Finland and Denmark, but not in Sweden and Norway for some years. All countries followed a similar pattern. The majority of disability‐adjusted life years were due to premature mortality. Alcohol use disorder by non‐fatal conditions accounted for a higher proportion of disability‐adjusted life years in Norway and Sweden, compared with Finland and Denmark.
Addiction | 2016
Emilie Elisabet Agardh; Anna-Karin Danielsson; Mats Ramstedt; Astrid Ledgaard Holm; Finn Diderichsen; Knud Juel; Stein Emil Vollset; Ann Kristin Knudsen; Jonas Minet Kinge; Richard A. White; Vegard Skirbekk; Pia Mäkelä; Mohammad H. Forouzanfar; Matthew M. Coates; Daniel C. Casey; Mohesen Naghavi; Peter Allebeck
Abstract Aims (1) To compare alcohol‐attributed disease burden in four Nordic countries 1990–2013, by overall disability‐adjusted life years (DALYs) and separated by premature mortality [years of life lost (YLL)] and health loss to non‐fatal conditions [years lived with disability (YLD)]; (2) to examine whether changes in alcohol consumption informs alcohol‐attributed disease burden; and (3) to compare the distribution of disease burden separated by causes. Design A comparative risk assessment approach. Setting Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland. Participants Male and female populations of each country. Measurements Age‐standardized DALYs, YLLs and YLDs per 100 000 with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs). Findings In Finland, with the highest burden over the study period, overall alcohol‐attributed DALYs were 1616 per 100 000 in 2013, while in Norway, with the lowest burden, corresponding estimates were 634. DALYs in Denmark were 1246 and in Sweden 788. In Denmark and Finland, changes in consumption generally corresponded to changes in disease burden, but not to the same extent in Sweden and Norway. All countries had a similar disease pattern and the majority of DALYs were due to YLLs (62–76%), mainly from alcohol use disorder, cirrhosis, transport injuries, self‐harm and violence. YLDs from alcohol use disorder accounted for 41% and 49% of DALYs in Denmark and Finland compared to 63 and 64% in Norway and Sweden 2013, respectively. Conclusions Finland and Denmark has a higher alcohol‐attributed disease burden than Sweden and Norway in the period 1990–2013. Changes in consumption levels in general corresponded to changes in harm in Finland and Denmark, but not in Sweden and Norway for some years. All countries followed a similar pattern. The majority of disability‐adjusted life years were due to premature mortality. Alcohol use disorder by non‐fatal conditions accounted for a higher proportion of disability‐adjusted life years in Norway and Sweden, compared with Finland and Denmark.