Daniel C. Johnson
University of North Carolina at Wilmington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Daniel C. Johnson.
Journal of Research in Music Education | 2011
Daniel C. Johnson
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of critical thinking instruction on music listening skills of fifth-grade students as measured by written responses to music listening. The researcher compared instruction that included opportunities for critical thinking (Critical Thinking Instruction, CTI) with parallel instruction without critical thinking opportunities (Activity-Based Instruction, ABI). The same music teacher delivered both instructional treatments concurrently in a series of sixteen 45-minute classroom lessons. Two randomly assigned, intact classes of participants (n = 41 and 40) made up the CTI and ABI treatment groups, respectively. Three independent judges scored participants’ pretest and posttest responses using a researcher-designed instrument. Using a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), the researcher found a significant test by treatment interaction. The post hoc analysis indicated that while the CTI participants scored higher on the posttest as compared with the pretest, ABI participants demonstrated no significant differences by test. Readers should note the larger than expected standard deviations when considering the positive effects of the CTI treatment. Implications include recommendations for future research and for designing music listening lessons to incorporate critical thinking skills in classroom music instruction.
International Journal of Music Education | 2017
Daniel C. Johnson; Wendy K. Matthews
The purpose of this descriptive study was to explore experienced general music teachers’ decision-making processes. Participants included seven experienced, American general music teachers who contributed their views during two phases of data collection: (1) responses to three classroom scenarios; and (2) in-depth, semi-structured, follow-up interviews. Analysis using a constructivist approach revealed that participants reported making distinct decisions during the planning, instruction, and reflection stages of teaching. During planning, their focus was on developing clear goals and objectives, encouraging a life-long love of music, and fostering responsible citizenship. During instruction, they made decisions guided by specific formal and informal methodologies to build on previously taught concepts and to support classroom management. After instruction, participants’ responses highlighted the importance of being flexible, their own professional development, and student assessment. While other studies have examined general music teachers’ instructional processes in methodology-specific practices, this study offers insights from experienced general music teachers regarding their decision-making processes when responding to classroom scenarios. Implications for future research include improving in-service teachers’ self-awareness, advancing professional development for experienced teachers, and enhancing the effectiveness of music teacher education programs.
Arts Education Policy Review | 2018
Daniel C. Johnson; Ann Marie Stanley; H. Ellie Falter; Jennifer L. R. Greene; Haley L. Moore; Stacy A. Paparone; Jacqueline C. Smith; Alden H. Snell
Abstract The purpose of this article is to make policy recommendations based on the authors’ experiences with, and research about, reflective, differentiated, and teacher-generated music teacher professional development (PD). By doing so, we argue for a bottom-up process that capitalizes on our music teacher and music teacher educator expertise along with the research literature in music teacher PD. We explore music teachers’ PD needs considering four career stages to explain how knowledge generated at each level informs our understanding of differentiated PD. From preservice music teachers and music teacher candidates, to in-service and veteran teachers, our discussion explores meaningful and effective ways to engage in deep, reflective thinking about the music teaching and learning process. Accordingly, we provide specific policy recommendations for music teachers at each career stage so that they might take greater ownership of their own learning, growth, and development through local, reflective, self-initiated, and differentiated PD opportunities.
Education 3-13 | 2017
Daniel C. Johnson; Martin Fautley
ABSTRACT Despite ostensibly sharing a common language, music education terminology as used in England and the United States has many different practical meanings and corresponding connotations. In this comparative study, the authors consider these differences in relation to whole-class learning of instrumental music, a comparative newcomer to the English system but well established in the US context. The authors describe and discuss learning instrumental music in each of these jurisdictions along with the concomitant assessment practices. Among the dissimilar educational requirements are composing in the UK as compared to civic engagement in the US. This and other differences result in educators conceptualising teaching and learning in substantially different ways and, more importantly, in maintaining contrasting underlying assumptions. The authors conclude that international collaboration and analysis of this topic need to account for these differences when comparing and contrasting instrumental music education programmes.
Archive | 2013
Daniel C. Johnson
The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review | 2008
Daniel C. Johnson
The International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review | 2006
Daniel C. Johnson
The International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review | 2006
Daniel C. Johnson
The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education | 2017
Daniel C. Johnson
Archive | 2017
Daniel C. Johnson