Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Daniel D. Charlier is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Daniel D. Charlier.


Cell | 2010

Allostery and Intrinsic Disorder Mediate Transcription Regulation by Conditional Cooperativity

Abel Garcia-Pino; Sreeram S Balasubramanian; Lode Wyns; Ehud Gazit; Henri De Greve; Roy Rd Magnuson; Daniel D. Charlier; Nico A J van Nuland; Remy Loris

Regulation of the phd/doc toxin-antitoxin operon involves the toxin Doc as co- or derepressor depending on the ratio between Phd and Doc, a phenomenon known as conditional cooperativity. The mechanism underlying this observed behavior is not understood. Here we show that monomeric Doc engages two Phd dimers on two unrelated binding sites. The binding of Doc to the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain of Phd structures its N-terminal DNA-binding domain, illustrating allosteric coupling between highly disordered and highly unstable domains. This allosteric effect also couples Doc neutralization to the conditional regulation of transcription. In this way, higher levels of Doc tighten repression up to a point where the accumulation of toxin triggers the production of Phd to counteract its action. Our experiments provide the basis for understanding the mechanism of conditional cooperative regulation of transcription typical of toxin-antitoxin modules. This model may be applicable for the regulation of other biological systems.


Molecular Cell | 2009

Rejuvenation of CcdB-Poisoned Gyrase by an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Domain

Natalie De Jonge; Abel Garcia-Pino; Lieven Buts; Sarah Haesaerts; Daniel D. Charlier; Klaus Zangger; Lode Wyns; Henri De Greve; Remy Loris

Toxin-antitoxin modules are small regulatory circuits that ensure survival of bacterial populations under challenging environmental conditions. The ccd toxin-antitoxin module on the F plasmid codes for the toxin CcdB and its antitoxin CcdA. CcdB poisons gyrase while CcdA actively dissociates CcdB:gyrase complexes in a process called rejuvenation. The CcdA:CcdB ratio modulates autorepression of the ccd operon. The mechanisms behind both rejuvenation and regulation of expression are poorly understood. We show that CcdA binds consecutively to two partially overlapping sites on CcdB, which differ in affinity by six orders of magnitude. The first, picomolar affinity interaction triggers a conformational change in CcdB that initiates the dissociation of CcdB:gyrase complexes by an allosteric segmental binding mechanism. The second, micromolar affinity binding event regulates expression of the ccd operon. Both functions of CcdA, rejuvenation and autoregulation, are mechanistically intertwined and depend crucially on the intrinsically disordered nature of the CcdA C-terminal domain.


Journal of Bacteriology | 2000

Purification and Characterization of Sa-Lrp, a DNA-Binding Protein from the Extreme Thermoacidophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius Homologous to the Bacterial Global Transcriptional Regulator Lrp

Julius J. Enoru-Eta; Daniel Gigot; Thia-Lin Thia-Toong; Nicolas Glansdorff; Daniel D. Charlier

Archaea, constituting the third primary domain of life, harbor a basal transcription apparatus of the eukaryotic type, whereas curiously, a large fraction of the potential transcription regulation factors appear to be of the bacterial type. To date, little information is available on these predicted regulators and on the intriguing interplay that necessarily has to occur with the transcription machinery. Here, we focus on Sa-lrp of the extremely thermoacidophilic crenarchaeote Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, encoding an archaeal homologue of the Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein Lrp, a global transcriptional regulator and genome organizer. Sa-lrp was shown to produce a monocistronic mRNA that was more abundant in the stationary-growth phase and produced in smaller amounts in complex medium, this down regulation being leucine independent. We report on Sa-Lrp protein purification from S. acidocaldarius and from recombinant E. coli, both identified by N-terminal amino acid sequence determination. Recombinant Sa-Lrp was shown to be homotetrameric and to bind to its own control region; this binding proved to be leucine independent and was stimulated at high temperatures. Interference binding experiments suggested an important role for minor groove recognition in the Sa-Lrp-DNA complex formation, and mutant analysis indicated the importance for DNA binding of the potential helix-turn-helix motif present at the N terminus of Sa-Lrp. The DNA-binding capacity of purified Sa-Lrp was found to be more resistant to irreversible heat inactivation in the presence of L-leucine, suggesting a potential physiological role of the amino acid as a cofactor.


Molecular Microbiology | 2004

Ss‐LrpB, a novel Lrp‐like regulator of Sulfolobus solfataricus P2, binds cooperatively to three conserved targets in its own control region

Eveline Peeters; Thia-Lin Thia-Toong; Daniel Gigot; Dominique Maes; Daniel D. Charlier

Ss‐LrpB, a novel Lrp‐like DNA‐binding protein from the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus, was shown to bind cooperatively to three regularly spaced targets in its own control region, with as consensus the 15u2003bp palindrome 5′‐TTGYAW WWWWTRCAA‐3′. Binding to the border sites occurred with high affinity; the target in the middle proved to be a low affinity site which is stably bound only when both flanking sites are occupied. Ss‐LrpB contacts two major groove segments and the intervening minor groove of each site, all aligned on one face of the helix. The operator shows intrinsic bending and is increasingly deformed upon binding of Ss‐LrpB to one, two and three targets. Complex formation relies therefore on DNA conformability, protein–DNA and protein–protein contacts. Mobility‐shift assays and in gel footprinting indicate that Ss‐LrpB and the transcription factors TATA‐box binding protein (TBP) and transcription factor B (TFB) can bind simultaneously to the control region. Based on these findings we present a model for the construction of the higher order nucleoprotein complexes and a hypothesis for the autoregulatory process. The latter is based on the concentration‐dependent formation of distinct complexes exhibiting different stoichiometries and conformations, which could positively and negatively affect promoter activity.


Molecular Microbiology | 1997

The highly thermostable arginine repressor of Bacillus stearothermophilus: gene cloning and repressor–operator interactions

Michel Dion; Daniel D. Charlier; Haifeng Wang; Daniel Gigot; Alexey Savchenko; Jean-Noël Hallet; Nicolas Glansdorff; Vehary Sakanyan

We report here the cloning of the arginine repressor gene argR of Bacillus stearothermophilus and the characterization and purification to homogeneity of its product. The deduced amino acid sequence of the 16.8‐kDa ArgR subunit shares 72% identity with its mesophilic homologue AhrC of Bacilus subtilis. Sequence analysis of B. stearothermophilus ArgR and comparisons with mesophilic arginine repressors suggest that the thermostable repressor comprises an N‐terminal DNA‐binding and a C‐terminal oligomerization and arginine‐binding region. B. stearothermophilus ArgR has been overexpressed in E. coli and purified as a 48.0‐kDa trimeric protein. The repressor inhibits the expression of a B. stearothermophilus argC–lacZ fusion in E. coli cells. In the presence of arginine, the purified protein binds tightly and specifically to the argC operator, which largely overlaps the argC promoter. The purified B. stearothermophilus repressor proved to be very thermostable with a half‐life of approximatelyu200330u2003min at 90°C, whereas B. subtilis AhrC was largely inactivated at 65°C. Moreover, ArgR operator complexes were found to be remarkably thermostable and could be formed efficiently at up to 85°C, well above the optimal growth temperature of the moderate thermophile B. stearothermophilus. This pronounced resistance of the repressor–operator complexes to heat treatment suggests that the same type of regulatory mechanism could operate in extreme thermophiles.


Molecular Microbiology | 2002

High resolution contact probing of the Lrp-like DNA-binding protein Ss-Lrp from the hyperthermoacidophilic crenarchaeote Sulfolobus solfataricus P2.

Julius J. Enoru-Eta; Daniel Gigot; Nicolas Glansdorff; Daniel D. Charlier

Ss‐Lrp, from Sulfolobus solfataricus, is an archaeal homologue of the global bacterial regulator Lrp (Leucine‐responsive regulatory protein), which out of all genome‐encoded proteins is most similar to Escherichia coli Lrp (E‐value of 5.6 e−14). The recombinant protein has been purified as a 68u2003kDa homotetramer. The specific binding of Ss‐Lrp to its own control region is suggestive of negative autoregulation. A high resolution contact map of Ss‐Lrp binding was established by DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting, small non‐intercalating groove‐specific ligand‐binding interference, and various base‐specific premodification and base removal binding interference techniques. We show that Ss‐Lrp binds one face of the DNA helix and establishes the most salient contacts with two major groove segments and the intervening minor groove, in a region that overlaps the TATA‐box and BRE promoter elements. Therefore, Ss‐Lrp most likely exerts autoregulation by preventing promoter recognition by TBP and TFB. Moreover, the results demonstrate profound Ss‐Lrp induced structural alterations of sequence stretches flanking the core contact site, and reveal that the deformability of these regions significantly contributes to binding selectivity.


Gene | 1997

Cloning and identification of the Sulfolobus solfataricus lrp gene encoding an archaeal homologue of the eubacterial leucine-responsive global transcriptional regulator Lrp.

Daniel D. Charlier; Martine Roovers; Thia-Lin Thia-Toong; Virginie Durbecq; Nicolas Glansdorff

The lrp gene of the extreme thermophilic archaeon Sulfolofus solfataricus, encoding a homologue of the eubacterial global leucine-responsive regulatory protein, was identified by DNA sequencing and sequence comparisons on a 6.9-kb genomic fragment cloned into Escherichia coli. The S. solfataricus Lrp subunit is a 155-aa polypeptide that bears between 24.5 and 29% sequence identity with eubacterial regulatory proteins of the Lrp/AsnC family and 30.6% and 25.8% with the archaeal homologues of respectively Methanococcus jannaschii and Pyrococcus furiosus. Transcription initiation from the strong S. solfataricus lrp promoter was analyzed by primer extension mapping. The abundance of the S. solfataricus lrp messenger strongly suggests that this protein might function in archaea as a global transcriptional regulator and genome organizer, as proposed for E. coli Lrp, rather than as a local, specific regulatory protein. Our findings suggest the presence of a eubacterial type of regulatory mechanism in archaea, a situation that is noteworthy indeed, since the transcriptional machinery of archaea is more closely related to that of eukaryotes, whereas these latter apparently do not possess a homologue of Lrp.


Molecular Genetics and Genomics | 1993

Integration Host Factor (IHF) modulates the expression of the pyrimidine-specific promoter of the carAB operons of Escherichia coli K12 and Salmonella typhimurium LT2

Daniel D. Charlier; Martine Roovers; Daniel Gigot; Nadine Huysveld; André Pierard; Nicolas Glansdorff

SummaryWe report the identification of Integration Host Factor (IHF) as a new element involved in modulation of P1, the upstream pyrimidine-specific promoter of the Escherichia coli K12 and Salmonella typhimurium carAB operons. Band-shift assays, performed with S-30 extracts of the wild type and a himA, hip double mutant or with purified IHF demonstrate that, in vitro, this factor binds to a region 300 by upstream of the transcription initiation site of P1 in both organisms. This was confirmed by deletion analysis of the target site. DNase I, hydroxyl radical and dimethylsulphate footprinting experiments allowed us to allocate the IHF binding site to a 38 bp, highly A + T-rich stretch, centred around nucleotide −305 upstream of the transcription initiation site. Protein-DNA contacts are apparently spread over a large number of bases and are mainly located in the minor groove of the helix. Measurements of carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase (CPSase) and β-galactosidase specific activities from car-lacZ fusion constructs of wild type or IHF target site mutants introduced into several genetic backgrounds affected in the himA gene or in the pyrimidine-mediated control of P1 (carP6 or pyrH±), or in both, indicate that, in vivo, IHF influences P1 activity as well as its control by pyrimidines. IHF stimulates P1 promoter activity in minimal medium, but increases the repressibility of this promoter by pyrimidines. These antagonistic effects result in a two- to threefold reduction in the repressibility of promoter P 1 by pyrimidines in the absence of IHF binding. IHF thus appears to be required for maximal expression as well as for establishment of full repression. IHF could exert this function by modulating the binding of a pyrimidine-specific regulatory molecule.


Journal of Molecular Biology | 2003

Regulation of arginine biosynthesis in the psychropiezophilic bacterium Moritella profunda: in vivo repressibility and in vitro repressor-operator contact probing

Ying Y. Xu; Yuan Y. Sun; Nadine Huysveld; Daniel Gigot; Nicolas Glansdorff; Daniel D. Charlier

We report the cloning of the arginine repressor gene from the psychropiezophilic Gram-negative bacterium Moritella profunda, the purification of its product (ArgR(Mp)), the identification of the operator in the bipolar argECBFGH(A) operon, in vivo repressibility studies, and an in vitro analysis of the repressor-operator interaction, including binding to mutant and heterologous arginine operators. The ArgR(Mp) subunit shows about 70% amino acid sequence identity with Escherichia coli ArgR (ArgR(Ec)). Binding of purified hexameric ArgR(Mp) to the control region of the divergent operon proved to be arginine-dependent, sequence-specific, and significantly more sensitive to heat than complex formation with ArgR(Ec). ArgR(Mp) binds E.coli arginine operators very efficiently, but hardly recognizes the operator from Bacillus stearothermophilus or Thermotoga maritima. ArgR(Mp) binds to a single site overlapping the -35 element of argC(P), but not argE(P). Therefore, the arrangement of promoter and operator sites in the bipolar argECBFGH(A) operon of M.profunda is very different from the organization of control elements in the bipolar argECBH operon of E.coli, where both promoters overlap the common operator and are equally repressible. We demonstrate that M.profunda argC(P) is about 44-fold repressible, whereas argE(P) is fully constitutive. A high-resolution contact map of the ArgR(Mp)-operator interaction was established by enzymatic and chemical footprinting, missing contact and base-specific premodification binding interference studies. The results indicate that the argC operator consists of two ARG box-like sequences (18bp imperfect palindromes) separated by 3bp. ArgR(Mp) binds to one face of the DNA helix and establishes contacts with two major groove segments and the intervening minor groove of each ARG box, whereas the minor groove segment facing the repressor at the center of the operator remains largely uncontacted. This pattern is reminiscent of complex formation with the repressors of E.coli and B.stearothermophilus, and suggests that each ARG box is contacted by two ArgR subunits belonging to opposite trimers. Moreover, the premodification interference patterns and mutant studies clearly indicate that the inner, center proximal halves of each ARG box in the M.profunda argC operator are more important for complex formation and repression than the outermost halves. A close inspection of sequence conservation and of single base-pair O(c)-type mutations indicate that the same conclusion can be generalized to E.coli operators.


Molecular Genetics and Genomics | 1980

The structure of unstable constitutive revertants of mutant galOP-308::IS2-I.

Hajo Delius; Daniel D. Charlier; Jürgen Besemer

SummaryThe isolation and characterization of three unstable and constitutive revertants of mutant galOP-308 of E. coli is described. In this mutant an IS2 element is integrated between the promoter and the first structural gene of the galactose operon, and exerts a strong polar effect on the expression of the three galactose genes. In the three revertants under investigation it was observed that relief of polarity and constitutive expression of the gal-operon were accompanied by the deletion of 90% of the IS2 sequence and of various lengths of the ajdacent sequences including the gal-promoter. We conclude from this result that the transcription termination signals causing strong polarity were located on the deleted part of IS2, and that in our revertants the galactose genes are now under the control of a new promoter which is apparently unstable.

Collaboration


Dive into the Daniel D. Charlier's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Gigot

Université libre de Bruxelles

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nadine Huysveld

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Abdelaziz Kholti

Université libre de Bruxelles

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dominique Maes

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martine Roovers

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Abel Garcia-Pino

Université libre de Bruxelles

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

André Pierard

Université libre de Bruxelles

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge