Daniel E. Salazar

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the monoamine oxidase B inhibitor mofegiline assessed during a phase I dose tolerance trial

The safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single oral doses of up to 48 mg and daily (for 28 days) doses of up to 24 mg mofegiline were investigated in healthy male volunteers. Plasma pharmacokinetics indicated rapid absorption and elimination: time to reach maximum concentration occurred at about 1 hour; half‐life ranged from 1 to 3 hours. Maximal plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration‐time curve increased and oral clearance decreased disproportionately with dose. Mofegiline rapidly and markedly inhibited platelet monoamine oxidase B (MAOB) activity, which returned to baseline within 14 days. Urinary excretion of phenylethylamine increased proportionately with doses up to 24 mg. No changes in urinary elimination of catecholamines, blood pressure, heart rate, or ECG were observed. A classic maximum tolerated dose was not achieved in these studies. However, the 48 mg single dose and the 24 mg multiple daily dose far exceeded the dose (1 mg) that was associated with >90% platelet MAOB inhibition.

Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability, and Safety of Aripiprazole following Multiple Oral Dosing in Normal Healthy Volunteers

Two 14‐day, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind studies evaluated the fasting pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of aripiprazole, a new antipsychotic, in healthy male subjects. In Study 1, 37 subjects were randomized to aripiprazole 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, or placebo once daily. In Study 2, 11 subjects were randomized to aripiprazole, titrated from 10 to 30 mg/day, or placebo. Aripiprazole had linear pharmacokinetics over 5 to 30 mg/day, which were described by a two‐compartment open model, with first‐order absorption. In Study 1, mean elimination half‐life ranged from 47 to 68 hours with aripiprazole, with apparent systemic clearance (CL/F) of approximately 3.45 L/h. In Study 2, mean elimination half‐life was 59 hours (CL/F approximately 4.0 L/h). Adverse events were generally mild to moderate, were transient in nature, and commonly occurred within the first 3 days of dosing. Clinical laboratory assessments, electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram, and prolactin levels showed no clinically significant changes during the studies.

Coadministration of nefazodone and benzodiazepines: IV. A pharmacokinetic interaction study with lorazepam.

This study was conducted to determine the potential for an interaction between nefazodone (NEF), a new antidepressant, and lorazepam (LOR) after single- and multiple-dose administration in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study in healthy male volunteers. A total of 12 subjects per group received either placebo (PLA) twice daily, 2 mg of LOR twice daily, 200 mg of NEF twice daily, or the combination of 2 mg of LOR and 200 mg of NEF (LOR+NEF) twice daily for 7 days. Plasma samples were collected after dosing on day 1 and day 7 and before the morning dose on days 4, 5, and 6 for the determination of LOR, NEF, and NEF metabolites hydroxy (HO)-NEF, m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), and dione by validated high-performance liquid chromatography methods. Steady-state levels in plasma were reached by day 4 for LOR, NEF, HO-NEF, mCPP, and dione. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis showed that there was no effect of LOR on the single dose or steady-state pharmacokinetics of NEF, HO-NEF, or dione after coadministration. The steady-state mCPP Cmax values decreased 36% for the LOR+NEF group in comparison to that when NEF was given alone. There was no effect of NEF on the pharmacokinetics of LOR after coadministration. The absence of an interaction appears to be attributable to LORs metabolic clearance being dependant on conjugation rather than hydroxylation. Overall, no change in LOR or NEF dosage is necessary when the two drugs are coadministered.

Pharmacokinetics of Aripiprazole and Concomitant Lithium and Valproate

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of the antipsychotic aripiprazole when coadministered with lithium or valproate. Two open‐label, sequential treatment design studies were conducted in chronically institutionalized patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder requiring treatment with lithium (n = 12) or valproate (divalproex sodium) (n=10). Patients received aripiprazole 30 mg/day on days 1 to 14 and aripiprazole with concomitant therapy on days 15 to 36. Lithium was titrated from 900 mg until serum concentrations reached 1.0 to 1.4 mEq/L for at least 5 days. Valproate was titrated to 50 to 125 mg/L. Coadministration with lithium increased mean Cmax and AUC values of aripiprazole by about 19% and 15%, respectively, whereas the apparent oral clearance decreased by 15%. There was no effect on the steady‐state pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite of aripiprazole. Coadministration with valproate decreased the AUC and Cmax of aripiprazole by 24% and 26%, respectively, with minimal effects on the active metabolite. Therapeutic doses of lithium and divalproex had no clinically significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

An open-label study of aripiprazole: Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and effectiveness in children and adolescents with conduct disorder

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated flexible-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and effectiveness of aripiprazole in children and adolescents with conduct disorder (CD). METHODS This open-label, 15-day, three-center study with an optional 36-month extension enrolled a total of 23 patients: 12 children (6-12 years) and 11 adolescents (13-17 years) with CD and a score of 2-3 on the Rating of Aggression Against People and/or Property (RAAPP). Initially, the protocol used the following dosing: subjects <25 kg, 2 mg/day; subjects 25-50 kg, 5 mg/day; subjects >50-70 kg, 10 mg/day; and subjects >70 kg, 15 mg/day. Due to vomiting and sedation, this schedule was revised to: <25 kg, 1 mg/day; 25-50 kg, 2 mg/day; >50-70 kg, 5 mg/day; and >70 kg, 10 mg/day. RESULTS Aripiprazole pharmacokinetics were linear, and steady state appeared to be attained within 14 days. Both groups demonstrated improvements in RAAPP scores and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) scores. Adverse events were similar to the known profile for aripiprazole in adults. CONCLUSION The pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole in children and adolescents are linear and comparable with those in adults. Aripiprazole was generally well-tolerated in patients with CD, particularly after protocol adjustments, with improvements in aggressive behavior.

Pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole and concomitant carbamazepine.

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole when coadministered with carbamazepine using an open-label sequential treatment design in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Nine male patients were enrolled and received aripiprazole monotherapy (30 mg once daily) for 14 days, after which aripiprazole steady-state pharmacokinetics were assessed. Subjects were then administered carbamazepine together with aripiprazole for 4 to 6 weeks. The dose of carbamazepine was titrated to produce a trough serum concentration within the range of 8 to 12 mg/L. Aripiprazole pharmacokinetics were then assessed in the presence of carbamazepine. Six patients completed the study as designed. Coadministration with carbamazepine decreased the values of mean peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of aripiprazole by 66% and 71%, respectively (P = 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Similarly, coadministration with carbamazepine decreased the values of mean peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 24-hour dosing interval of the major active metabolite of aripiprazole, dehydroaripiprazole, by 68% and 69%, respectively (P < 0.001). Both aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole are substrates for the cytochrome P-450 3A4 enzyme which is known to be induced by carbamazepine dosed to steady state. Thus, therapeutic doses of carbamazepine had significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. When carbamazepine is added to aripiprazole therapy, aripiprazole dose should be doubled (to 20-30 mg/d). Additional dose increases should be based on clinical evaluation. When carbamazepine is withdrawn from combination therapy, aripiprazole dose should then be reduced.

Coadministration of nefazodone and benzodiazepines: I. Pharmacodynamic assessment.

One hundred two healthy men were evaluated in one of three studies conducted to evaluate the coadministration of nefazodone, 200 mg twice daily, and three benzodiazepines: triazolam, 0.25 mg; alprazolam, 1 mg twice daily; or lorazepam, 2 mg twice daily. In the first study, psychomotor performance, memory, and sedation were assessed at 0, 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, and 9 hours after single doses of triazolam alone and again after 7 days of nefazodone. Data from 6 of 12 subjects in this study were evaluable because of a dosing error in the other 6 subjects. In the subsequent two parallel design studies, groups of 12 volunteers received 7 days of either placebo; nefazodone, 200 mg; alprazolam, 1 mg twice daily; or alprazolam plus nefazodone or, in the second study, either placebo; nefazodone; lorazepam, 2 mg twice daily; or lorazepam plus nefazodone; the studies were identical, double-dummy, double-blind designs. Psychomotor performance, memory, and sedation were assessed at 0, 1, 3, and 8 hours after the 8 a.m. dose on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 of the studies. In all studies, blood samples were also obtained at testing times so that effect/concentration comparisons could be made and so full pharmacokinetic analyses could be done for separate studies. Nefazodone had no effect on psychomotor performance, memory, or sedation relative to placebo in any study. The mean maximum observed effect (MaxOE) on psychomotor performance and sedation were increased when triazolam was given after 7 days of nefazodone (p < 0.05); also, triazolam concentration was 60% higher at this time. Alprazolam and lorazepam impaired performance on day 1 (mean MaxOE, 34 and 30%, respectively) relative to placebo and nefazodone. By day 7 of alprazolam or lorazepam, psychomotor impairment decreased, indicating the development of tolerance. Alprazolam plus nefazodone increased psychomotor impairment (MaxOE, approximately 50%) and sedation relative to alprazolam alone on days 3, 5, and 7 (p < 0.05). Higher alprazolam concentrations explained the increased impairment in the alprazolam plus nefazodone treatment group; however, it is also possible that there was a delay in the development of tolerance. There were no differences in psychomotor impairment, memory, sedation, or lorazepam concentration detected between the lorazepam alone and lorazepam plus nefazodone treatments. This is consistent with the absence of a pharmacokinetic interaction between nefazodone and lorazepam. These results indicate that if the coadministration of a benzodiazepine is required in patients receiving nefazodone therapy, clinically significant interactions would be less likely with those eliminated by conjugative metabolism such as lorazepam. In cases where a benzodiazepine eliminated by oxidative metabolism is required, a reduction in initial dosage and careful clinical evaluation for signs of psychomotor impairment may be appropriate.

Brasofensine Treatment for Parkinson's Disease in Combination with Levodopa/Carbidopa

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties of the dopamine transporter antagonist brasofensine (BMS-204756) in patients with Parkinsons disease receiving levodopa/carbidopa treatment. METHODS: A 4-period crossover study was performed in 8 men (mean age 66 y) with moderate Parkinsons disease (Hoehn—Yahr stage II—IV). A dose escalation study was used in which each patient was given a single oral dose of brasofensine 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 mg, which was coadministered with the patients usual dose of levodopa/carbidopa. RESULTS: The maximum concentration (Cmax) values of brasofensine observed in plasma after oral administration were 0.35, 0.82, 2.14, and 3.27 ng/mL for the 0.5-, 1-, 2-, and 4-mg doses, respectively; these concentrations occurred 4 hours (time to Cmax) after administration in all cases. Exposure to brasofensine (based on AUC0-∞) increased at a rate greater than proportional to dose. Based on the motor performance subscale of the Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale, no change in patient disability was observed at any dose level. CONCLUSIONS: Brasofensine was safe and well tolerated in the patient cohort studied at daily doses of up to 4 mg. Adverse events were generally mild in intensity, and included headache, insomnia, phlebitis, dizziness, ecchymosis, and vomiting.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of buspirone during oral administration to children and adolescents with anxiety disorder and normal healthy adults.

A 21‐day, open‐label, multisite, dose escalation study comprising three demographic groups (children, adolescents, and adults) was performed to determine the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of orally administered buspirone. Thirteen children and 12 adolescents with anxiety disorder and 14 normal healthy adults were escalated from 5 to 30 mg buspirone bid over the 3‐week study. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that buspirone was rapidly absorbed in all study groups, reaching peak levels at about 1 hour after administration. Peak plasma buspirone concentrations (Cmax) were highest in children and lowest in adults at all three dose levels (7.5, 15, 30 mg bid). However, 1‐pyrimidinylpiperazine (1‐PP), the primary metabolite of buspirone, exhibited a different plasma concentration‐time profile; Cmax was significantly higher in children than in either adolescents or adults at all concentrations. In addition, TAUC0‐T for 1‐PP was significantly higher in the children cohort relative to adolescents and adults. Buspirone was generally safe and well tolerated at doses up to 30mgbid in adolescents and adults and most of the children. The most frequently reported adverse events in children and adolescents were lightheadedness (68%), headache (48%), and dyspepsia (20%); 2 children withdrew from the study at the higher doses (15 mg and 30 mg bid) due to adverse effects. In adults, the most common adverse effect was somnolence (21.4%); lightheadedness, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were also reported, although these were mild in intensity.

Pharmacokinetics of a Newly Identified Active Metabolite of Buspirone After Administration of Buspirone Over Its Therapeutic Dose Range

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of a newly identified active metabolite of buspirone, 6‐hydroxybuspirone (6OHB), over the therapeutic dose range of buspirone. A 26‐day, open‐label, nonrandomized, single‐sequence, dose‐escalation study in normal healthy volunteers was conducted (N = 13). Subjects received escalating doses of buspirone with each dose administered for 5 days starting at a dose of 5 mg twice daily and increasing up to 30 mg twice daily. Plasma concentrations of 6OHB were approximately 40‐fold greater than those of buspirone. 6OHB was rapidly formed following buspirone administration, and exposure increased proportionally with buspirone dose. Further research regarding the safety and efficacy of 6OHB itself is warranted.