Daniel Höller
University of Ulm
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Daniel Höller.
european conference on artificial intelligence | 2014
Daniel Höller; Gregor Behnke; Pascal Bercher; Susanne Biundo
Theoretical results on HTN planning are mostly related to the plan existence problem. In this paper, we study the structure of the generated plans in terms of the language they produce. We show that such languages are always context-sensitive. Furthermore we identify certain subclasses of HTN planning problems which generate either regular or context-free languages. Most importantly we have discovered that HTN planning problems, where preconditions and effects are omitted, constitute a new class of languages that lies strictly between the context-free and context-sensitive languages.
Künstliche Intelligenz | 2016
Susanne Biundo; Daniel Höller; Bernd Schattenberg; Pascal Bercher
Companion-technology is an emerging field of cross-disciplinary research. It aims at developing technical systems that appear as “Companions” to their users. They serve as co-operative agents assisting in particular tasks or, in a more general sense, even give companionship to humans. Overall, Companion-technology enables technical systems to smartly adapt their services to individual users’ current needs, their requests, situation, and emotion. We give an introduction to the field, discuss the most relevant application areas that will benefit from its developments, and review the related research projects.
Künstliche Intelligenz | 2016
Pascal Bercher; Daniel Höller
David E. Smith is a senior Researcher in the Intelligent Systems Division at NASA Ames Research Center. He received his Ph.D. in 1985 from Stanford University, and spent time as a Research Associate at Stanford, a Scientist at the Rockwell Palo Alto Science Center, and a Visiting Scholar at the University of Washington before joining NASA in 1997. Beginning in 1999, he served as the lead of the 18 member planning and scheduling group at NASA Ames for 6 years before abdicating to devote more time to research. Much of his research has focused on pushing the boundaries of AI planning technology to handle richer models of time, concurrency, exogenous events, uncertainty, and oversubscription. Smith served as an Associate Editor for the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) from 2001–2004, and as Guest Editor for the JAIR Special Issue and Special Track on the 3rd and 4th International Planning Competitions. He served on the JAIR Advisory Board 2004–2007. Smith was recognized as a AAAI Fellow in 2005, and served on the AAAI Executive Council 2007–2010. KI Would you like to tell us about your journey to NASA and your personal motivation for this?
international joint conference on artificial intelligence | 2017
Pascal Bercher; Gregor Behnke; Daniel Höller; Susanne Biundo
Hierarchical task network (HTN) planning is wellknown for being an efficient planning approach. This is mainly due to the success of the HTN planning system SHOP2. However, its performance depends on hand-designed search control knowledge. At the time being, there are only very few domainindependent heuristics, which are designed for differing hierarchical planning formalisms. Here, we propose an admissible heuristic for standard HTN planning, which allows to find optimal solutions heuristically. It bases upon the so-called task decomposition graph (TDG), a data structure reflecting reachable parts of the task hierarchy. We show (both in theory and empirically) that rebuilding it during planning can improve heuristic accuracy thereby decreasing the explored search space. The evaluation further studies the heuristic both in terms of plan quality and coverage.
Künstliche Intelligenz | 2016
Susanne Biundo; Daniel Höller; Pascal Bercher
at present, we observe a rapid growth in the development of increasingly complex “intelligent” systems that serve users throughout all areas of their daily lives. They range from classical technical systems such as household appliances, cars, or consumer electronics through mobile apps and services to advanced service robots in various fields of application. While many of the rather conventional systems already provide multiple modalities to interact with, the most advanced are even equipped with cognitive abilities such as perception, cognition, and reasoning. However, the use of such complex technical systems and in particular the actual exploitation of their rich functionality remain challeng-
Companion Technology | 2017
Pascal Bercher; Daniel Höller; Gregor Behnke; Susanne Biundo
User-centered planning capabilities are core elements of Companion-Technology. They are used to implement the functional behavior of technical systems in a way that makes those systems Companion-able—able to serve users individually, to respect their actual requirements and needs, and to flexibly adapt to changes in their situation and environment. This chapter presents various techniques we have developed and integrated to realize user-centered planning. They are based on a hybrid planning approach that combines key principles also humans rely on when making plans: stepwise refining complex tasks into executable courses of action and considering causal relationships between actions. Since the generated plans impose only a partial order on actions, they allow for a highly flexible execution order as well. Planning for Companion-Systems may serve different purposes, depending on the application for which the system is created. Sometimes, plans are just like control programs and executed automatically in order to elicit the desired system behavior; but sometimes they are made for humans. In the latter case, plans have to be adequately presented and the definite execution order of actions has to coincide with the user’s requirements and expectations. Furthermore, the system should be able to smoothly cope with execution errors. To this end, the plan generation capabilities are complemented by mechanisms for plan presentation, execution monitoring, and plan repair.
Companion Technology | 2017
Pascal Bercher; Felix Richter; Thilo Hörnle; Thomas Geier; Daniel Höller; Gregor Behnke; Florian Nielsen; Frank Honold; Felix Schüssel; Stephan Reuter; Wolfgang Minker; Michael Weber; Klaus Dietmayer; Susanne Biundo
In many situations of daily life, such as in educational, work-related, or social contexts, one can observe an increasing demand for intelligent assistance systems. In this chapter, we show how such assistance can be provided in a wide range of application scenarios—based on the integration of user-centered planning with advanced dialog and interaction management capabilities. Our approach is demonstrated by a system that assists a user in the task of setting up a complex home theater. The theater consists of several hi-fi devices that need to be connected with each other using the available cables and adapters. In particular for technically inexperienced users, the task is quite challenging due to the high number of different ports of the devices and because the used cables might not be known to the user. Support is provided by presenting a detailed sequence of instructions that solves the task.
national conference on artificial intelligence | 2015
Pascal Bercher; Felix Richter; Thilo Hörnle; Thomas Geier; Daniel Höller; Gregor Behnke; Florian Nothdurft; Frank Honold; Wolfgang Minker; Michael Weber; Susanne Biundo
international conference on automated planning and scheduling | 2015
Gregor Behnke; Daniel Höller; Susanne Biundo
international conference on automated planning and scheduling | 2016
Daniel Höller; Gregor Behnke; Pascal Bercher; Susanne Biundo