Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Daniel I. O'Neill is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Daniel I. O'Neill.


The Review of Politics | 1999

MULTICULTURAL LIBERALS AND THE RUSHDIE AFFAIR : A CRITIQUE OF KYMLICKA, TAYLOR, AND WALZER

Daniel I. O'Neill

This article critically analyzes the work of Will Kymlicka, Charles Taylor, and Michael Walzer, three of the most important contemporary political philosophers writing on issues of multiculturalism. It uses the Rushdie affair, and each theorists interpretation of it, as the basis for an immanent critique of “multicultural liberalism,” a theory defined by the dual commitment to cultural rights for minority groups and certain core liberal principles, defended in different ways by Kymlicka, Taylor, and Walzer. It is principally concerned with Kymlicka, whose work is one of the most influential attempts to respond to communitarian criticisms that “atomistic” liberalism is inhospitable to community and culture. The article argues that Kymlickas defense of “multicultural citizenship” is deeply problematic from the perspective of the Rushdie affair. It then considers Taylor and Walzer similarly, as representatives of the communitarian strain of multicultural liberal argument, and likewise finds their positions unconvincing. The article concludes with the suggestion that the Rushdie affair points to a potentially unresolvable tension at the heart of all three attempts to defend multicultural liberalism.


Journal of the History of Ideas | 2007

John Adams versus Mary Wollstonecraft on the French Revolution and Democracy

Daniel I. O'Neill

This article is the first in-depth analysis of the direct intellectual engagement between one of Americas most important Founding Fathers, John Adams, and the work of the leading modern feminist, Mary Wollstonecraft. It draws on the first complete transcription of Adamss marginalia in his copy of Wollstonecrafts French Revolution to argue that these two thinkers disagreed profoundly in their respective assessments of the watershed event of political modernity due to their divergent interpretations of the relationship between human nature, history, and Revolutionary violence on the one hand, and the appropriate structure of political and social institutions on the other.


Archive | 2016

Ideals and ideologies : a reader

Terence Ball; Richard Dagger; Daniel I. O'Neill

1. The Concept of Ideology 2. The Democratic Ideal: Historical and Philosophical Foundations 3. Liberalism 4. Conservatism 5. Socialism and Communism After Marx 6. Fascism 8. Liberation Ideologies and the Politics of Identity 9. Green Politics: Ecology as Ideology 10. Radical Islamism


Archive | 2007

The Burke-Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy

Daniel I. O'Neill


Archive | 2008

Illusion of Consent: Engaging with Carole Pateman

Daniel I. O'Neill; Mary Lyndon Shanley; Iris Marion Young


Archive | 2016

Edmund Burke and the Conservative Logic of Empire

Daniel I. O'Neill


Archive | 2007

The Burke-Wollstonecraft Debate

Daniel I. O'Neill


Polity | 2004

Burke on Democracy as the Death of Western Civilization

Daniel I. O'Neill


History of Political Thought | 2002

Shifting the Scottish paradigm: the discourse of morals and manners in Mary Wollstonecraft's French Revolution

Daniel I. O'Neill


Journal of the History of Ideas | 2012

Revisiting the Middle Way: The Logic of the History of Ideas after More Than a Decade

Daniel I. O'Neill

Collaboration


Dive into the Daniel I. O'Neill's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Medearis

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Terence Ball

Arizona State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne Phillips

London School of Economics and Political Science

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge