Daniel J. Buckley
University College Dublin
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Daniel J. Buckley.
Acta Chiropterologica | 2012
Emma S. M. Boston; Sébastien J. Puechmaille; David D. Scott; Daniel J. Buckley; Mathieu G. Lundy; Ian Montgomery; Paulo A. Prodöhl; Emma C. Teeling
Non-invasive population genetics has become a valuable tool in ecology and conservation biology, allowing genetic studies of wild populations without the need to catch, handle or even observe the study subjects directly. We address some of the concerns regarding the limitations of using non-invasive samples by comparing the quality of population genetic information gained through DNA extracted from faecal samples and biopsy samples of two elusive bat species, Myotis mystacinus and Myotis nattereri. We demonstrate that DNA extracted from faeces and tissue samples gives comparable results for frequency based population genetic analyses, despite the occurrence of genotyping errors when using faecal DNA. We conclude that non-invasive genetic sampling for population genetic analysis in bats is viable, and although more labour-intensive and expensive, it is an alternative to tissue sampling, which is particularly pertinent when specimens are rare, endangered or difficult to capture.
Journal of the Royal Society Interface | 2012
Mathieu G. Lundy; Alan Harrison; Daniel J. Buckley; Emma S. M. Boston; David D. Scott; Emma C. Teeling; W. Ian Montgomery; Jonathan D. R. Houghton
Using the foraging movements of an insectivorous bat, Myotis mystacinus, we describe temporal switching of foraging behaviour in response to resource availability. These observations conform to predictions of optimized search under the Lévy flight paradigm. However, we suggest that this occurs as a result of a preference behaviour and knowledge of resource distribution. Preferential behaviour and knowledge of a familiar area generate distinct movement patterns as resource availability changes on short temporal scales. The behavioural response of predators to changes in prey fields can elicit different functional responses, which are considered to be central in the development of stable predator–prey communities. Recognizing how the foraging movements of an animal relate to environmental conditions also elucidates the evolution of optimized search and the prevalence of discrete strategies in natural systems. Applying techniques that use changes in the frequency distribution of movements facilitates exploration of the processes that underpin behavioural changes.
Bioacoustics-the International Journal of Animal Sound and Its Recording | 2011
Mathieu G. Lundy; Emma C. Teeling; Emma S. M. Boston; David Scott; Daniel J. Buckley; Paulo A. Prodöhl; Ferdia Marnell; Ian Montgomery
ABSTRACT Bats of the genus Myotis cannot be identified reliably using conventional acoustic analyses. Here we use morphology of echolocation calls to discriminate between Myotis spp. This method may be used to identify unknown roosts to species level. Echolocation calls of M. daubentonii, M. mystacinus and M. nattereri, were recorded in emergence flights from roosts. Images of echolocation calls were extracted for morphological analysis performed in SHAPE, a program that transforms two-dimensional outline data into Elliptic Fourier Descriptors. Species typical call shapes were described with Mahalanobis models. Discriminant Function Analyses (DFA) were applied with Mahalanobis scores of typical shape alone and with a spectral call parameter, maximum frequency. DFA achieved an overall correct classification rate of 88.9% using typical outline shapes alone. Correct classification of 100% of both M. daubentonii and M. mystacinus was achieved by both typical call outlines. For M. nattereri, 79.6% of calls were correctly classified by call morphology, but the addition of maximum frequency improved this to 96.3%. Shape analyses provide a quick and easy method of distinguishing Myotis species under field conditions and could be extended to include other species of bats that share conventional acoustic parameters.
Acta Chiropterologica | 2010
Emma S. M. Boston; Daniel J. Buckley; Michaël Bekaert; Yann Gager; Mathieu G. Lundy; David D. Scott; Paulo A. Prodöhl; W. Ian Montgomery; Ferdia Marnell; Emma C. Teeling
The recent identification of Myotis brandtii in Ireland raised the possibility that many roosts previously identified as M. mystacinus had the potential of being misidentified M. brandtii. Thus, the distribution and population estimates for M. mystacinus may have been over-estimated, while M. brandtii may have been under-estimated. Results from an all Ireland genetic survey of known M. mystacinus maternity roosts confirm that no long term misidentification has taken place. All specimens caught and sampled were M. mystacinus. Additonally, no further records of M. brandtii were found during six nights of woodland trapping using the acoustic lure. While the status of M. mystacinus in Ireland is now listed as ‘least concern’ in the Irish Red List, M. brandtii is listed as ‘data deficient’ and cannot currently be considered a resident species
Conservation Genetics Resources | 2011
Emma S. M. Boston; Nicola Hanrahan; Sébastien J. Puechmaille; Manuel Ruedi; Daniel J. Buckley; Mathieu G. Lundy; David D. Scott; Paulo A. Prodöhl; William Montgomery; Emma C. Teeling
The development of a quick PCR-based method to distinguish European cryptic Myotis spp., Myotis mystacinus, Myotis brandtii and Myotis alcathoe is described. Primers were designed around species-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP’s) in the ND1 mitochondrial gene, and a pair of control primers was designed in the 12S mitochondrial gene. A multiplex of seven primer combinations produces clear species-specific bands using gel electrophoresis. Robustness of the method was tested on 33 M. mystacinus, 16 M. brandtii and 15 M. alcathoe samples from across the European range of these species. The method worked well on faecal samples collected from maternity roosts of M. mystacinus. The test is intended to aid collection of data on these species through a rapid and easy identification method with the ability to use DNA obtained from a range of sources including faecal matter.
European Journal of Wildlife Research | 2013
Daniel J. Buckley; Mathieu Lundy
Predicting the potential invaded range of a non-native species is an important tool for conservation biology. The ferret (Mustela putorius furo) is a known invasive species outside its native range and has recently been confirmed as a feral species in Ireland. To determine the current distribution of feral populations, an all-island survey was conducted during 2006–2008. Using the results of this survey, a landscape modelling approach, using presence-only data was applied to predict the potential future range of this species in Ireland, given the availability of suitable habitat. The results suggest that Ireland appears to be potentially highly suitable for ferrets and, therefore, the possible ecological impacts of this species in Ireland are discussed.
Population Ecology | 2018
David D. Scott; Emma S. M. Boston; Mathieu G. Lundy; Daniel J. Buckley; Yann Gager; Callum J. Chaplain; Emma C. Teeling; William Montgomery; Paulo A. Prodöhl
Given their cryptic behaviour, it is often difficult to establish kinship within microchiropteran maternity colonies. This limits understanding of group formation within this highly social group. Following a concerted effort to comprehensively sample a Natterer’s bat (Myotis nattereri) maternity colony over two consecutive summers, we employed microsatellite DNA profiling to examine genetic relatedness among individuals. Resulting data were used to ascertain female kinship, parentage, mating strategies, and philopatry. Overall, despite evidence of female philopatry, relatedness was low both for adult females and juveniles of both sexes. The majority of individuals within the colony were found to be unrelated or distantly related. However, parentage analysis indicates the existence of a number of maternal lineages (e.g., grandmother, mother, or daughter). There was no evidence suggesting that males born within the colony are mating with females of the same colony. Thus, in this species, males appear to be the dispersive sex. In the Natterer’s bat, colony formation is likely to be based on the benefits of group living, rather than kin selection.
Basic and Applied Ecology | 2012
Mathieu G. Lundy; Daniel J. Buckley; Emma S. M. Boston; David D. Scott; Paulo A. Prodöhl; Ferdia Marnell; Emma C. Teeling; W. Ian Montgomery
Mammalian Biology | 2013
Daniel J. Buckley; Mathieu G. Lundy; Emma S. M. Boston; David D. Scott; Yann Gager; Paulo A. Prodöhl; Ferdia Marnell; W. Ian Montgomery; Emma C. Teeling
Conservation Genetics Resources | 2013
David D. Scott; Seán Fitzpatrick; Deborah A. Bailie; Emma S. M. Boston; Mathieu G. Lundy; Daniel J. Buckley; Emma C. Teeling; W. Ian Montgomery; Paulo A. Prodöhl