Daniel J. Gagné

Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation

Background: Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia (LRPEH) is a feasible and effective technique. There have been some recent concerns regarding possible high recurrence rates following laparoscopic repair. Methods: We reviewed our experience with LRPEH from 5/1996 to 8/2002. Large paraesophageal hernia (PEH) was defined by the presence of more than one-third of the stomach in the thoracic cavity. Principles of repair included reduction of the hernia, excision of the sac, approximation of the crura, and fundoplication. Pre- and postoperative symptoms were evaluated utilizing visual analogue scores (VAS) on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Patients were followed with VAS and barium esophagram studies. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Results: A total of 166 patients with a mean age of 68 years underwent LRPEH. PEH were type II (n = 43), type III (n = 104), and type IV (n = 19). Mean operative time was 160 min. Fundoplications were Nissen (127), Toupet (23), Dor (1), and Nissen-Collis (1). Fourteen patients underwent a gastropexy. One patient required early reoperation to repair an esophageal leak. Mean hospital stay was 3.9 days. At 24 months postoperatively there was statistically significant improvement in the mean symptom scores: heartburn from 6.8 to 0.5, regurgitation from 5.9 to 0.3, dysphagia from 4.0 to 0.5, chest pain from 3.7 to 0.3. Radiographic surveillance was obtained in 120 patients (72%) at a mean of 15 months postoperatively. Six patients (5%) had radiographic evidence of a recurrent paraesophageal hernia (two required surgery), 24 patients (20%) had a sliding hernia (two required surgery), and four patients (3.3%) had wrap failure (all four required surgery). Reoperation was required in 10 patients (6%); two for symptomatic recurrent PEH (1.2%), four for recurrent reflux symptoms (2.4%), and four for dysphagia (2.4%). Patients with abnormal postoperative barium esophagram studies who did not require reoperation have remained asymptomatic at a mean follow up of 14 months. Conclusion: LPEHR is a safe and effective treatment for PEH. Postoperative radiographic abnormalities, such as a small sliding hernia, are often seen. The clinical importance of these findings is questionable, since only a small percentage of patients require reoperation. True PEH recurrences are uncommon and frequently asymptomatic.

Outcome analysis of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity

Background: Morbid obesity has been described as a continuing epidemic affecting a growing portion of our population. We report an outcome analysis of our early experience with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in the treatment of morbid obesity. Methods: Two surgeons performed 116 consecutive LRYGBs at a single institution, creating a 25-ml pouch and a 90- to 150-cm Roux limb. The prospectively collected data included patient demographics, comorbidities, postoperative weight loss, and complications. Results: All eight conversions to an open procedure occurred early during the experience of the surgeons. The mean operating room time for the first 50 cases was 272 min, which decreased to 198 min with experience. The mean length of hospital stay was 3 days. There were 34 complications in 27 patients (23.3%), 14 of which (12%) required reoperation. At 18 months postoperatively, the patients had lost 77% of their excess weight, and their body mass index had decreased from a mean of 49.3 to 32.6 kg/m2. As a result of LRYGB, 25% of the patients were rendered completely free of any pharmacologic treatment for their preexisting comorbidities. Conclusions: Although technically challenging, LRYGB can be performed safely with excellent long-term results. The mean operating room time and conversion rate improved with experience. As this study showed, LRYGB achieves an excellent rate of weight loss and improvement in preoperative comorbidities with a minimal length of hospital stay and an acceptable complication rate.

Intravenous iron replacement for persistent iron deficiency anemia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND Iron deficiency is a major postoperative complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Oral replacement can fail to correct the deficiency. Thus, recourse to parenteral iron administration might be necessary. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a standardized 2 g intravenous iron dextran infusion in the treatment of iron deficiency after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. The setting was a university-affiliated community hospital in the United States. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 23 patients at our institution who had received 2 g of iron dextran intravenously for recalcitrant iron deficiency after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. We obtained the demographic data and the complete blood count and serum iron studies obtained before treatment and at outpatient visits after infusion. RESULTS Before treatment, all 23 patients were iron deficient (average ferritin 6 ng/mL) and anemic (average hemoglobin 9.4 g/dL). By 3 months, the average ferritin and hemoglobin had increased to 269 ng/mL and 12.3 g/dL, respectively. The hemoglobin levels remained stable throughout the follow-up period. The iron stores were adequately replaced in most patients. Four patients required a repeat infusion by 1 year, because the ferritin levels had decreased to <15 ng/mL. The probability of remaining in an iron replete state was 84.6% (95% confidence interval 78-91.2%). One patient required warm compresses for superficial phlebitis. No other significant adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION Intravenous administration of 2 g of iron dextran corrects the anemia and repletes the iron stores for ≥1 year in most patients. This therapy is safe, tolerable, efficient, and effective.

Clinical outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery for patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

BackgroundThe prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is higher among subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to assess the effect of IBS on the postoperative outcome of antireflux surgery.MethodsFor this study, 102 patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication were screened preoperatively for IBS with the Rome II criteria. There were 32 patients in the IBS group and 70 patients in the non-IBS group. Most of the patients (97%) (31 of 32 IBS and 68 of 70 non-IBS patients) had both pre- and postoperative IBS evaluation. A visual analog GERD-specific scoring scale was used to evaluate GERD symptoms prospectively.ResultsIn both groups, GERD symptom scores were statistically improved postoperatively. Of the 31 IBS patients 25 (80.6%) showed a reduction in their symptoms below the Rome II criteria for IBS diagnosis postoperatively.ConclusionIrritable bowel syndrome does not have a negative effect on the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surgical correction of GERD may improve the severity of irritable bowel symptoms.

Perforation in the Bypassed Stomach following Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Access to the bypassed stomach is difficult following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). The bypassed stomach is not readily available for endoscopic or radiographic evaluation. Diagnosis and treatment of peptic ulcer disease and its complications in the excluded stomach becomes difficult. We present a case of perforation in the bypassed stomach following LRYGBP secondary to peptic ulcer disease.

Validity and Interrater Reliability of a Regional Mock Oral Board Examination

BACKGROUND There have been decreasing pass rates recently on the American Board of Surgery Certifying Examination (ABSCE). General surgery residents from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, the West Penn Allegheny Health System, the Conemaugh Health System, and Mercy Hospital participate in a mock oral board examination, which is similar to the ABSCE. The aims of the study are to compare examinee performance on the mock oral boards with the ABSCE and to evaluate the interrater reliability of examiner pairs. METHODS In this retrospective study from 2003 to 2010, outcomes on the mock oral boards and the first attempt of the ABSCE for chief residents were compared for the 4 regional residency programs. Interrater reliability for examiner pairs was evaluated with agreement and kappa statistics. Nonparametric statistics were performed, with α = 0.05. RESULTS A total of 32 of 38 (84.2%) chief residents passed the mock oral boards. The median score for each of the 3 rooms was 6 (clear pass). A total of 37 of 38 (97.4%) residents passed the ABSCE. The sensitivity of the mock oral boards was 83.8%, with a positive predictive value of 96.9%, and an accuracy of 81.6%. A total of 25 of 47 (53.2%) examiner pairs were from the same residency institution, whereas 22 of 47 (46.8%) were from different institutions. The median agreement was 100% (interquartile range (IQR) [100% - 100%]). The median kappa statistic was 1.00 (IQR [0.38-1.00]). The Mann-Whitney U tests showed no difference in agreement or kappa for examiner pairs from the same or from different institutions (p> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The mock oral boards have substantial sensitivity and positive predictive value in relation to the ABSCE. There are also very high levels of interrater agreement and interrater reliability. This regional mock oral board examination is valuable for ABSCE preparation.