Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Daniel J. Garland is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Daniel J. Garland.


Archive | 2000

Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement

Mica R. Endsley; Daniel J. Garland

Contents: Preface. Part I: Introduction and Overview. M.R. Endsley, Theoretical Underpinnings of Situation Awareness: A Critical Review. R.W. Pew, The State of Situation Awareness Measurement. Part II: Measurement Approaches. G. Klein, Analysis of Situation Awareness From Critical Incident Reports. M.D. Rodgers, R.H. Mogford, B. Strauch, Post Hoc Assessment of Situation Awareness in Air Traffic Control Incidents and Major Aircraft Accidents. D.G. Jones, Subjective Measures of Situation Awareness. H.H. Bell, D.R. Lyon, Using Observer Ratings to Assess Situation Awareness. M.R. Endsley, Direct Measurement of Situation Awareness: Validity and Use of SAGAT. G.F. Wilson, Strategies for Psychophysiological Assessment of Situation Awareness. A.R. Pritchett, R.J. Hansman, Use of Testable Responses for Performance-Based Measurement of Situation Awareness. C.D. Wickens, The Trade-Off of Design for Routine and Unexpected Performance: Implications of Situation Awareness. M.A. Vidulich, Testing the Sensitivity of Situation Awareness Metrics in Interface Evaluations. Part III: Special Topics in Situation Awareness. L.J. Gugerty, W.C. Tirre, Individual Differences in Situation Awareness. C.A. Bolstad, T.M. Hess, Situation Awareness and Aging. W. Shebilske, B.P. Goettl, D.J. Garland, Situation Awareness, Automaticity, and Training. C. Prince, E. Salas, Team Situation Awareness, Errors, and Crew Resource Management: Research Integration for Training Guidance. M.R. Endsley, M.M. Robertson, Training for Situation Awareness in Individuals and Teams.


Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting | 2000

Pilot Situation Awareness Training in General Aviation

Mica R. Endsley; Daniel J. Garland

While the majority of research on the topic of situation awareness has been focused on designing better systems, significant interest also exists in finding ways to improve SA through training. This paper describes an ongoing program that is directed at developing programs for training SA in general aviation pilots. Factors that have been found to pose problems for SA in pilots are reviewed and directions are established for creating programs for improving SA through training.


Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting | 2000

Situation Awareness Problems in General Aviation

Richard W. C. Shook; Marco Bandiero; John P. Coello; Daniel J. Garland; Mica R. Endsley

Situation awareness (SA) is widely recognized as critical to success in the aviation environment. Most research to date has focused on SA in highly experienced military or commercial airline pilots. Yet, general aviation (GA) pilots, usually far less experienced and trained, fall prey to the vast majority of aviation accidents. Fifty-eight experienced flight instructors completed a survey on SA problems in GA operations. It found a wide range of SA problems across GA pilots at various levels of experience and in all phases of flight, although some factors appear to become less problematic with experience. Areas where problems are the most acute are identified and recommendations are made for improving SA in GA pilots.


Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting | 1995

Free Flight: Human Factors Implications

Daniel J. Garland; David W. Abbott; V. David Hopkin; John A. Wise; Russell A. Benel; Phillip J. Smith

There is a real possibility that the air traffic control system in the United States will change radically in the next decade. One vision–“free flight” or “free routing”–is to move most of the responsibility for navigation and separation back to the cockpit and away from ground based air traffic systems. The basic notion of free flight is that each flight would be completely determined by the user, i.e. by some form of airline/pilot combination, and would not need to follow pre-defined airways or altitudes. The airlines would inform the air traffic system of each aircrafts intentions, but would not have to seek any prior air traffic approval. The job of the air traffic system would be to meet the users requirements, but not to suggest what those requirements should be. However, the air traffic system would be expected to collaborate with the airlines to ensure the safe passage of flights and to intervene when aircraft separation requirements are jeopardized or violated. Such a system would bring with it dramatic changes in the roles of all the human members of the aviation system, and as such, would have significant human factors impacts. The goal of this panel will be to identify and discuss some of those issues.


Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting | 1999

Space Human Factors Engineering Challenges in Long Duration Space Flight

Daniel J. Garland; Mica R. Endsley; June Ellison; Barrett S. Caldwell; Frances E. Mount

The focus of this panel is on identifying and discussing the critical human factors challenges facing long duration space flight. Living and working aboard the International Space Station (ISS) will build on the experience humans have had to date aboard the Shuttle and MIR. More extended missions, involving lunar and planetary missions to Mars are being planned. These missions will involve many human factors challenges regarding a number of issues on which more research is needed.


Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting | 1998

Undergraduate Human Factors Curriculum and Introductory Human Factors Course Content

Randall W. Gibb; Barrett S. Caldwell; Daniel J. Garland; Joseph H. Goldberg; Joseph C. Hickox; David G. Payne; Michael S. Wogalter

This panel provided a discussion format for six academic institutions to share their Human Factors (HF) curriculum and more specifically, to educate others on how they teach their introductory HF course. Each panelist addressed the following topics regarding their HF curriculum: foundation courses of the departments degree and specific HF courses offered. Then the panelists focused their discussions to their specific introductory HF course: philosophy; text book(s) used; course objectives; course syllabus flow; grading practices; and specific lesson exercises/labs.


Archive | 2009

Handbook of Aviation Human Factors

John A. Wise; V. David Hopkin; Daniel J. Garland


Archive | 1995

Experimental Analysis and Measurement of Situation Awareness

Daniel J. Garland; Mica R. Endsley


Archive | 2000

Modeling and Measuring Situation Awareness in the Infantry Operational Environment

Mica R. Endsley; Daniel J. Garland; Richard L. Wampler; Michael D. Matthews


Archive | 1994

Human Factors Certification of Advanced Aviation Technologies

John A. Wise; V. David Hopkin; Daniel J. Garland; L. W. Hennessy

Collaboration


Dive into the Daniel J. Garland's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mica R. Endsley

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael A. Vidulich

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael D. Matthews

United States Military Academy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter A. Hancock

University of Central Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge