Daniel J. Marek
University of Minnesota
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Daniel J. Marek.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | 2006
Michael Zlowodzki; Mohit Bhandari; Daniel J. Marek; Peter A. Cole; Philip J. Kregor
Background The incidence of distal femur fractures is approximately 37 per 100,000 person-years.1 Typically, distal femur fractures are caused by a high-energy injury mechanism in young men or a low-energy mechanism in elderly women.2 Managing these fractures can be a challenging task. Most surgeons agree that distal femur fractures need to be treated operatively to achieve optimal patient outcomes. The articular fracture component is usually treated with open reduction and internal lag screw fixation or external tension wire fixation (Illizarov). However, there is no consensus on the type of implant for the fixation of the metaphyseal–diaphyseal fracture component. Objective The aim of this study is to systematically summarize and compare the results of different fixation techniques (traditional compression plating, antegrade nailing, retrograde nailing, submuscular locked internal fixation, and external fixation) in the operative management of acute nonperiprosthetic distal femur fractures (AO/OTA type 33A and C) and the characteristics of the fractures for each treatment (articular/nonarticular and open/closed). Additionally an attempt was made to evaluate the impact of surgical experience on nonunion rate, fixation failure rate, deep infection rate, and secondary surgical procedure rate. In the context of this article compression plating relates to techniques/implants that require compression of the implant to the femoral shaft—it does not relate to interfragmentary compression.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2009
Bryan M. Armitage; Coen A. Wijdicks; Ivan S. Tarkin; Lisa K. Schroder; Daniel J. Marek; Michael Zlowodzki; Peter A. Cole
BACKGROUND Fractures of the scapula involve a unique and challenging set of considerations, which must be understood to provide optimal treatment. The primary goal of this study was to create a frequency map of a series of surgically treated scapular fractures that specifically involved the scapular body and/or neck. METHODS A prospective database was used in the collection of consecutive radiographic imaging studies of patients undergoing operative treatment of scapular fractures. Scanned three-dimensional computed tomography images were superimposed and oriented to fit a model scapular template. Size dimensions were normalized by aligning specific scapular landmarks. Fracture lines were identified and traced over the combined three-dimensional computed tomography model to create a scapular fracture map. RESULTS Of ninety fractures that met the criteria for inclusion, 68% involved the inferior aspect of the glenoid neck and 71% involved the superior vertebral border. Seventeen percent of the patterns included articular extension, and 22% of the fractures entered the spinoglenoid notch. Of fractures involving the inferior aspect of the glenoid neck at the lateral scapular border, 84% traversed medially to exit just inferior to the medial extent of the scapular spine, and 59% of these inferior neck fractures also had propagation to the inferior third of the vertebral border. Among the fractures involving the spinoglenoid notch, the most common pattern was demonstrated by coexisting fracture lines; 60% of the fractures of the spinoglenoid notch exited just inferior to the glenoid, 65% extended to the superior-medial vertebral border, and 45% extended to the inferior-medial vertebral border. In contrast, articular fractures did not follow predictable patterns; they demonstrated the greatest variability in trajectory, which was almost random, and there was a wide distribution of exit points along the vertebral border. CONCLUSIONS Surgically treated scapular fractures display very common patterns. The most common pattern is the lateral border fracture immediately inferior to the glenoid, which extends to the superior vertebral border in more than two-thirds of cases. A smaller proportion of scapular fractures enter the spinoglenoid notch or the articular surface. There is great variation in the patterns of fractures involving the articular surface.
Critical Care Medicine | 2002
John R. Hotchkiss; Dana A. Simonson; Daniel J. Marek; John J. Marini; David J. Dries
ObjectiveTo present electron micrographs of lung tissue obtained from a patient exposed to high ventilatory pressures in the context of pulmonary dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. DesignCase report. SettingAdult intensive care unit of a university-affiliated teaching hospital. PatientsA patient exposed to high-pressure mechanical ventilation during support for acute respiratory distress syndrome; the acute respiratory distress syndrome in this case was secondary to septic shock. Measurements and Main ResultsScanning electron micrographs of lung tissue, focusing on the internal alveolar surfaces. FindingsMultiple gross disruptions of the alveolar walls, suggestive of stress fractures. ConclusionHigh-pressure mechanical ventilation may promote fracturing of the alveolar blood:airspace barrier.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research | 2009
Daniel J. Marek; V. Franklin Sechriest; Marc F. Swiontkowski; Peter A. Cole
We present the first reported treatment failure of a reconstructed scapula body that proceeded to nonunion. This is a unique case report of an otherwise healthy patient who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of a scapula fracture nonunion, which is very rare. Failure of internal fixation in this application has not been reported, and, to our knowledge, this is only the fifth case report of a scapula body nonunion that was reconstructed. Of 159 reported cases of open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of scapula neck and body fractures (with or without intraarticular glenoid fractures), there is not one reported case of a nonunion. Our case is described in detail, including the method of surgical reconstruction, and a review of the literature regarding surgical treatment of scapula nonunions after nonoperative treatment also is presented.
Journal of Arthroplasty | 2007
V. Franklin Sechriest; Richard F. Kyle; Daniel J. Marek; Jesse D. Spates; Khaled J. Saleh; Michael A. Kuskowski
American Journal of Physiology-regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology | 2002
Yvonne M. Ulrich-Lai; Daniel J. Marek; William C. Engeland
/data/revues/00029610/v190i1/S0002961005004770/ | 2011
Daniel J. Marek; G Edward Copeland; Michael Zlowodzki; Peter Cole
/data/revues/00029610/v190i1/S0002961005004770/ | 2011
Daniel J. Marek; G Edward Copeland; Michael Zlowodzki; Peter Cole
Archive | 2009
Peter Cole; Bryan M. Armitage; Coen A. Wijdicks; Ivan S. Tarkin; Lisa K. Schroder; Daniel J. Marek; Michael Zlowodzki
Archive | 2009
Daniel J. Marek; V. Franklin Sechriest; Marc F. Swiontkowski; Peter A. Cole