Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Daniel M. Newman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Daniel M. Newman.


The Journal of Urology | 1987

Comparison of Results and Morbidity of Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

James E. Lingeman; Thomas A. Coury; Daniel M. Newman; Richard J. Kahnoski; John H.O. Mertz; Phillip G. Mosbaugh; Ronald E. Steele; John R. Woods

Two new therapies, percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, are revolutionizing the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi. We report the success and morbidity rates in 110 patients undergoing percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and 982 patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Staghorn calculi were excluded from this series. The over-all success rate (free of stones plus small asymptomatic residual fragments) was comparable with both modalities (percutaneous nephrostolithotomy 98 per cent and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 95 per cent), although the presence of residual fragments was more common in kidneys treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (24 versus 7 per cent). Patient morbidity as measured by temperature elevation, length of postoperative stay, pain and blood loss was significantly less (p less than 0.05) with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy than with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Re-treatment rates were similar with both procedures, and tended to increase in relation to increasing stone size and stone number. Post-treatment ancillary procedures (cystoscopy and stone manipulation, and percutaneous nephrostomy) were used more frequently with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Because of its efficacy and low morbidity, we conclude that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the treatment of choice for upper urinary tract calculi less than 2 cm. in diameter. However, percutaneous nephrostolithotomy will continue to have a primary role in the management of larger stones and cystine stones, and it will be used as a secondary procedure after unsuccessful extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments. In addition, because of the complimentary nature of these 2 new technologies certain complex stones, such as staghorn calculi, may be handled best by a combination of the 2 techniques.


The Journal of Urology | 1986

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Experience in Children

Daniel M. Newman; Thomas A. Coury; James E. Lingeman; John H.O. Mertz; Phillip G. Mosbaugh; Ronald E. Steele; Peter M. Knapp

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment for calculi of the upper urinary tract was performed in 15 children between 3 and 17 years old. Success was achieved in 93 per cent of the cases (72 per cent were free of stone and 21 per cent had insignificant fragments). No major complications were encountered in the series.


The Journal of Urology | 1987

Management of upper ureteral calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

James E. Lingeman; William L. Shirrell; Daniel M. Newman; Phillip G. Mosbaugh; Ronald E. Steele; John R. Woods

The results of 471 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments in 465 patients with solitary ureteral stones managed by several different techniques are reported. In situ treatment was performed in 123 cases without instrumentation and in 47 after placement of a ureteral catheter. Retrograde stone manipulation was performed in 245 cases immediately before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and an additional 56 were manipulated with ureteral stent placement at least 1 week before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. The success rate was significantly greater if the stone was manipulated into the kidney before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Significantly less energy (p less than 0.0001) was required for complete disintegration if the stone was free floating in the kidney. The need for subsequent procedures was significantly less (p less than 0.0001) for stones manipulated successfully into the kidney. Complications were infrequent, with the most common being ureteral perforation in 5.1 per cent of the cases, all of which were managed conservatively. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the treatment of choice for proximal ureteral calculi because it is less morbid than percutaneous approaches and provides significantly better results than ureteroscopy. An attempt at manipulation of proximal ureteral calculi back into the kidney should be made before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.


The Journal of Urology | 1992

Evolution of the technique of combination therapy for staghorn calculi: a decreasing role for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

H. Shang Lam; James E. Lingeman; Phillip G. Mosbaugh; Ronald E. Steele; Peter M. Knapp; John W. Scott; Daniel M. Newman

Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy with or without extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has been extensively used in the management of staghorn calculi, with stone-free rates varying from 23 to 86%. Explanations for the variability of such results include differences in stone burden, differences in percutaneous techniques and an overreliance on ESWL. The results and changing trends in the relative roles of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and ESWL in the management of staghorn calculi at the Methodist Hospital of Indiana were examined. We reviewed 343 cases of staghorn calculi (partial and complete) with adequate followup data, which were managed with initial percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Cases were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (252 cases) from 1984 to 1987 when access was performed by a radiologist and group 2 (91 cases) from 1988 to 1990 when access was performed by a urologist. Although stones in group 2 tended to be larger, a decreasing dependence on ESWL was noted (64.7% in group 1 compared to 35.2% in group 2, p less than 0.001). Despite the larger stone size in group 2, stone-free rates were similar (83.3% in group 1, 86.8% in group 2). In groups 1 and 2 percutaneous nephrostolithotomy alone achieved stone-free rates of 91% and 91.5%, respectively. The stone-free rate with the combination approach was 79.1% and 78.1% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Technical refinements with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in group 2 include accurate and carefully selected accesses (superior pole in 36.3%) for best approach to the stone, multiple accesses (13.3%) and improved skills in flexible nephroscopy. Blood transfusion has not been required in group 2 compared with 11.1% in group 1. Mean hospital stay was 12.4 days in group 1 and 10.3 days in group 2 (percutaneous nephrostolithotomy alone, 7.2 days). With careful attention to percutaneous nephrostolithotomy techniques, complex renal stones can be successfully managed endourologically, reducing the need for combination ESWL. Complications previously associated with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy have decreased.


The Journal of Urology | 1976

Use of Radioisotope Scan in Evaluation of Intrascrotal Lesions

Thomas W. Riley; Phillip G. Mosbaugh; Jerry Coles; Daniel M. Newman; Eugene D. Van Hove; Larry L. Heck

There were 98 patients with a variety of intrascrotal lesions studied with a radioisotope 99mtechnetium-pertechnetate scanning technique. Retrospective analysis in 50 patients subjected to an operation revealed a 94 per cent accuracy of the scan in the differential diagnosis of testicular torsion and epididymitis as compared to a clinical accuracy of 48 per cent. In 7 patients with a scan diagnosis of epididymo-orchitis with abscess the diagnosis was confirmed during the operation or by followup examination. While the scan has been a simple, safe, rapid and reliable technique to differentiate acute and subacute lesions, it has proved to be of limited diagnostic significance in cases of chronic intrascrotal lesions and carcinoma.


The Journal of Urology | 1995

Shock Wave Lithoripsy with the Dornier MFL 5000 Lithotriptor Using an External Fixed Rate Signal

James E. Lingeman; Daniel M. Newman; Yoram I. Siegel; Thomas Eichhorn; Kirk L. Parr

PURPOSEnWe examine the effects of fixed rate shock wave administration on the cardiac rhythm and treatment efficacy of a tubless lithotriptor (Dornier MFL 5000*). A secondary goal was to examine the treatment efficacy of fixed shock wave administration compared to R wave triggered lithotripsy.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnIn this prospective study Holter monitoring was used before, during and after nonR wave triggered shock wave lithotripsy.nnnRESULTSnAn increase in premature ventricular contractions was noted during shock wave lithotripsy. However, there were no episodes of significant ventricular ectopia, ventricular tachycardia, asystole or heart block as a result of nonR wave triggered shock wave administration. NonR wave gated shock wave lithotripsy expedited patient treatment and (mean treatment time 46 +/- 21 minutes)., minimized the use of sedation during treatment and produced results similar to R wave gated shock wave lithotripsy with the MFL 5000 lithotriptor.nnnCONCLUSIONSnWith adequate precautions, fixed rate shock wave administration would appear to be a reasonable option to treat urolithiasis with the MFL 5000 lithotriptor as with other newer lithotriptors.


Archive | 1989

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using Only Intravenous Analgesia with an Unmodified Dornier HM3 Lithotripter

Daniel M. Newman; James E. Lingeman; Phillip G. Mosbaugh; Ronald E. Steele; Peter M. Knapp; Cindy L. Hutchinson

The original Dornier HM3 lithotripter required general or regional anesthesia for virtually all patients. Treatment at lower pressures can be accomplished with this machine by reducing the kilovoltage (kV) to 12 kV to 16 kV, allowing treatment using intravenous sedation alone. Many patients with single or multiple stones of low to medium volume can be successfully treated with this new technique. General or regional anesthesia is reserved for patients requiring auxiliary procedures (i.e., retrograde stone manipulation, placement of ureteral stents), for patients with large stone volume or dense stones, for patients with a known high incidence of retreatment, or by patient preference. One hundred fifteen patients treated with this new approach are compared to previous experience with the HM3 utilizing 18 kV to 24 kV and general or regional anesthesia.


Archive | 1989

Pediatric Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Long-Term Results and Effects on Renal Growth

Mark C. Adams; Daniel M. Newman; James E. Lingeman

The Domier HM3 lithotripter was used to treat 55 stone events in 44 pediatric patients. The mean patient age at treatment was 11.3 years, with the youngest patient being 13 months of age. Sixty-two extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL§) treatments were necessary for the 55 stone events at a mean of 1,186 shock waves (range, 250 to 2,100) at 19.6 kV (range, 16 to 26 kV). Follow-up was available for 95% of the treated stone events; 79% were stone free at three months, and 83% eventually became stone free. Risk factors for retained fragments in the pediatric population appear to be similar to those for adults. Renal growth of 14 treated renal units in 12 patients has been unimpaired after ESWL treatment.


Journal of Endourology | 1988

Two-Year Follow-up of Patients Treated with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

Daniel M. Newman; John W. Scott; James E. Lingeman


The Journal of Urology | 1967

Transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.

Daniel M. Newman; Lawrence E. Allen; W.M. Niles Wishard; Myron H. Nourse; John H.O. Mertz

Collaboration


Dive into the Daniel M. Newman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronald E. Steele

Houston Methodist Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John H.O. Mertz

Houston Methodist Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter M. Knapp

Houston Methodist Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John R. Woods

Houston Methodist Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John W. Scott

Houston Methodist Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas A. Coury

Houston Methodist Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arthur C. Jay

Houston Methodist Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge