Daniel Mimouni

Consensus statement on definitions of disease, end points, and therapeutic response for pemphigus

Our scientific knowledge of pemphigus has dramatically progressed in recent years. However, despite the availability of various therapeutic options for the treatment of inflammatory diseases, only a few multicenter controlled trials have helped to define effective therapies in pemphigus. A major obstacle in comparing therapeutic outcomes between centers is the lack of generally accepted definitions and measurements for the clinical evaluation of patients with pemphigus. Common terms and end points of pemphigus are needed so that experts in the field can accurately measure and assess disease extent, activity, severity, and therapeutic response, and thus facilitate and advance clinical trials. This consensus statement from the International Pemphigus Committee represents 2 years of collaborative efforts to attain mutually acceptable common definitions for pemphigus. These should assist in development of consistent reporting of outcomes in future studies.

Definitions and outcome measures for bullous pemphigoid: recommendations by an international panel of experts

Our scientific knowledge of bullous pemphigoid (BP) has dramatically progressed in recent years. However, despite the availability of various therapeutic options for the treatment of inflammatory diseases, only a few multicenter controlled trials have helped to define effective therapies in BP. A major obstacle in sharing multicenter-based evidences for therapeutic efforts is the lack of generally accepted definitions for the clinical evaluation of patients with BP. Common terms and end points of BP are needed so that experts in the field can accurately measure and assess disease extent, activity, severity, and therapeutic response, and thus facilitate and advance clinical trials. These recommendations from the International Pemphigoid Committee represent 2 years of collaborative efforts to attain mutually acceptable common definitions for BP and proposes a disease extent score, the BP Disease Area Index. These items should assist in the development of consistent reporting of outcomes in future BP reports and studies.

Does breastfeeding protect against allergic rhinitis during childhood? A meta-analysis of prospective studies

The effect of breastfeeding on the development of allergic rhinitis and other atopic conditions has been assessed in many studies but remains controversial. To elucidate this issue, a systematic review was conducted of prospective studies that evaluated the association between exclusive breastfeeding during the first 3 mo after birth and allergic rhinitis. The 1966‐2000 MEDLINE databases were searched and the reference lists of relevant articles were reviewed according to predetermined inclusion criteria. The methodological aspects of each study, duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding, outcome measures, control for potential confounding variables and other factors were assessed, and estimates of the association between breastfeeding and allergic rhinitis were abstracted independently by the investigators using a standardized approach. Six prospective studies met the inclusion criteria. The summary odds ratio for the protective effect of breastfeeding was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.54‐1.01). The effect estimate in studies of children with a family history of atopy was 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.48–1.58).

Are desmoglein autoantibodies essential for the immunopathogenesis of pemphigus vulgaris, or just ‘witnesses of disease'?

Abstract:  Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is fascinating to dermatologists, epithelial biologists and immunologists alike, as its pathogenesis has been clarified to a much greater extent than that of most other organ‐specific autoimmune diseases, and as it has provided abundant novel insights into desmoglein biology and pathology along the way. Historically, the most influential PV pathogenesis concept is that of Stanley and Amagai. This concept holds that autoantibodies against desmogleins are both essential and sufficient for epidermal blister formation (acantholysis) by impeding the normal functioning of these major adhesion proteins. However, as with most good theories, this landmark concept has left a number of intriguing and important questions open (or at least has not managed to answer these to everyones satisfaction). Moreover, selected dissenting voices in the literature have increasingly called attention to what may or may not be construed as inconsistencies in this dominant PV pathogenesis paradigm of the recent past. The present debate feature therefore bravely rises to the challenge of re‐examining the entire currently available evidence, as rationally and as undogmatically as possible, by provocatively asking a carefully selected congregation of experts (who have never before jointly published on this controversial topic!) to discuss how essential anti‐desmoglein autoantibodies really are in the immunopathogenesis of PV. Not surprisingly, some of our expert ‘witnesses’ in this animated debate propose diametrically opposed answers to this question. While doing so, incisive additional questions are raised that relate to the central one posed, and our attention is called to facts that may deserve more careful consideration than they have received so far. Together with the intriguing (often still very speculative) complementary or alternative pathogenesis scenarios proposed in the following pages, this offers welcome ‘food for thought’ as well as very specific suggestions for important future research directions – within and beyond the camp of PV aficionados. The editors trust that this attempt at a rational public debate of the full evidence that is currently at hand will constructively contribute to further dissecting the exciting – and clinically very relevant! – immunopathogenesis of PV in all its complexity.

Treating Pemphigus Vulgaris with Prednisone and Mycophenolate Mofetil: A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Non-blinded trials of pemphigus vulgaris suggest that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may be beneficial. In a prospective, multicenter trial, outpatients with mild or moderate pemphigus vulgaris were randomized to MMF (2 or 3 g day(-1)) plus oral corticosteroids or placebo plus oral corticosteroids for 52 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients in the placebo and combined MMF groups responding to treatment (absence of new, persistent oral or cutaneous lesions, and prednisone dose < or = 10 mg day(-1) from weeks 48 to 52). Of 96 randomized patients, 94 were given treatment and 75 completed the study. Treatment responses occurred in 40 of 58 patients (69.0%) in the combined MMF group and 23 of 36 (63.9%) in the placebo group (P=0.6558, 95% confidence interval -17.4 to 27.6). MMF-treated patients showed faster and more durable responses. In post hoc analyses, more patients taking MMF showed sustained responses for 3 or 6 months than did placebo patients. MMF was well tolerated. Although MMF did not show an advantage on the primary end point, there seemed to be a beneficial treatment effect on several secondary end points, including time to response and duration of response. Thus, MMF may be a potentially useful agent in patients with mild or moderate pemphigus vulgaris.

Management of bullous pemphigoid: the European Dermatology Forum consensus in collaboration with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Bullous pemphigoid is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease of the skin and mucous membranes. This disease typically affects the elderly and presents with itch and localized or generalized bullous lesions. In up to 20% of affected patients, bullae may be completely absent, and only excoriations, prurigo‐like lesions, eczematous lesions, urticated lesions and/or infiltrated plaques are observed. The disease is significantly associated with neurological disorders. The morbidity of bullous pemphigoid and its impact on quality of life are significant. So far, a limited number of national treatment guidelines have been proposed, but no common European consensus has emerged. Our consensus for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid has been developed under the guidance of the European Dermatology Forum in collaboration with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. It summarizes evidence‐based and expert‐based recommendations.

Pemphigus. S2 Guideline for diagnosis and treatment – guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV)

Pemphigus encompasses a group of life‐threatening autoimmune bullous diseases characterized by blisters and erosions of the mucous membranes and skin. Before the era of immunosuppressive treatment, the prognosis of pemphigus was almost fatal. Due to its rarity, only few prospective controlled therapeutic trials are available.

Diagnosis and classification of pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid

Pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid represent the two major groups of autoimmune blistering diseases. Pemphigus has three major variants: pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus and paraneoplastic pemphigus and is characterized by autoantibodies directed against the cell surface of keratinocytes, producing acantholysis that in turn leads to intraepithelial blisters in the skin and/or mucous membranes. In bullous pemphigoid, the autoantibodies are present at the dermo-epidermal junction and attack the hemidesmosomes, causing subepidermal blister formation. The classification of the major variants of both the pemphigus group and bullous pemphigoid can be based on the combination of clinical, histopathological and immunopathological criteria. Many tools are available for the diagnosis of these entities including biopsy, direct and indirect immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting and ELISA. However, currently there are no generally accepted criteria for the diagnosis of these disorders. The present review provides a proposal for diagnostic criteria.

Successful treatment of pemphigus with biweekly 1-g infusions of rituximab: A retrospective study of 47 patients

BACKGROUND Rituximab is increasingly being appreciated as a remarkably effective treatment for pemphigus, mostly concomitantly with other immunosuppressive medications. The majority of studies have used a single cycle of rituximab with the same dosage as approved for the treatment of lymphomas, ie, 375 mg/m(2) weekly × 4 weeks. Rituximab is also approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, with a different dosing regimen: 1000 mg × 2, days 1 and 15. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the clinical response of patients with pemphigus to a single cycle of rituximab at the dosage used in rheumatoid arthritis. We also evaluated the response to repeated cycles of rituximab. METHODS A total of 47 patients with pemphigus who were treated with rituximab at a dosage of 1000 mg × 2, days 1 and 15, most with concurrent immunosuppressive medications, were retrospectively studied. RESULTS Remission rates after the first treatment cycle reached 76%. Repeating the treatment further increased the remission rates to 91%. There was a 22% relapse rate at a median time of 8 months, but 75% of relapsing patients achieved remission again with additional cycles. The side-effect profile was similar to previous reports, except for an immediate postinfusion pemphigus exacerbation in 4 patients. LIMITATIONS This was a retrospective study with a limited follow-up period. CONCLUSION The rheumatoid arthritis dosage of rituximab was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with pemphigus. Patients who fail to achieve remission after 1 cycle or patients who relapse seem to benefit from repeated rituximab cycles.

Is Childhood Vaccination Associated With Asthma? A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND. The possible link between immunization and atopic diseases has been under intense debate in the last decade. OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to systematically review the available evidence on the association of whole-cell pertussis and BCG vaccination with the risk of asthma in childhood and adolescence. METHODS. The major medical electronic databases (Medline, National Library of Medicine Gateway, and Cochrane Library) were searched, and reference lists of the relevant publications were reviewed for relevant birth-cohort studies and randomized, controlled trials from 1966 to March 2006. Only studies that directly compared vaccinated and unvaccinated children, validated vaccination status by medical charts, and used preset criteria to define asthma were included. Data were abstracted by using a standardized protocol and computerized report form. Results were analyzed by applying a fixed-effect or random-effect model, according to the heterogeneity of the studies. Sensitivity analyses by scoring criteria were performed. RESULTS. Seven studies of pertussis vaccination (with a total of 186663 patients) and 5 studies of BCG vaccination (with a total of 41479 patients) met our inclusion criteria. No statistically significant association was detected between either whole-cell pertussis or BCG vaccination and incidence rates of asthma during childhood and adolescence. This lack of a significant association proved to be robust on sensitivity analyses for BCG but not for pertussis vaccine. CONCLUSIONS. Currently available data, based on observational studies, do not support an association, provocative or protective, between receipt of the BCG or whole-cell pertussis vaccine and risk of asthma in childhood and adolescence.