Daniel N. Masica

Fluoxetine and suicide: a meta-analysis of controlled trials of treatment for depression.

OBJECTIVE--A comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical trial data was performed to assess the possible association of fluoxetine and suicidality (suicidal acts and ideation). DESIGN--Retrospective analysis of pooled data from 17 double blind clinical trials in patients with major depressive disorder comparing fluoxetine (n = 1765) with a tricyclic antidepressant (n = 731) or placebo (n = 569), or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Multiple data sources were searched to identify patients with suicidal acts. Suicidal ideation was assessed with item 3 of the Hamilton depression rating scale, which systematically rates suicidality. Emergence of substantial suicidal ideation was defined as a change in the rating of this item from 0 or 1 at baseline to 3 or 4 during double blind treatment; worsening was defined as any increase from baseline; improvement was defined as a decrease from baseline at the last visit during the treatment. RESULTS--Suicidal acts did not differ significantly in comparisons of fluoxetine with placebo (0.2% v 0.2%, p = 0.494, Mantel-Haenszel adjusted incidence difference) and with tricyclic antidepressants (0.7% v 0.4%, p = 0.419). The pooled incidence of suicidal acts was 0.3% for fluoxetine, 0.2% for placebo, and 0.4% for tricyclic antidepressants, and fluoxetine did not differ significantly from either placebo (p = 0.533, Pearsons chi 2) or tricyclic antidepressants (p = 0.789). Suicidal ideation emerged marginally significantly less often with fluoxetine than with placebo (0.9% v 2.6%, p = 0.094) and numerically less often than with tricyclic antidepressants (1.7% v 3.6%, p = 0.102). The pooled incidence of emergence of substantial suicidal ideation was 1.2% for fluoxetine, 2.6% for placebo, and 3.6% for tricyclic antidepressants. The incidence was significantly lower with fluoxetine than with placebo (p = 0.042) and tricyclic antidepressants (p = 0.001). Any degree of worsening of suicidal ideation was similar with fluoxetine and placebo (15.4% v 17.9%, p = 0.196) and with fluoxetine and tricyclic antidepressants (15.6% v 16.3%, p = 0.793). The pooled incidence of worsening of suicidal ideation was 15.3% for fluoxetine, 17.9% for placebo, and 16.3% for tricyclic antidepressants. The incidence did not differ significantly with fluoxetine and placebo (p = 0.141) or tricyclic antidepressants (p = 0.542). Suicidal ideation improved significantly more with fluoxetine than with placebo (72.0% v 54.8%, p less than 0.001) and was similar to the improvement with tricyclic antidepressants (72.5% v 69.8%, p = 0.294). The pooled incidence of improvement of suicidal ideation was 72.2% for fluoxetine, 54.8% for placebo, and 69.8% for tricyclic antidepressants. The incidence with fluoxetine was significantly greater than with placebo (p less than 0.001) and did not differ from that with tricyclic antidepressants (p = 0.296). CONCLUSIONS--Data from these trials do not show that fluoxetine is associated with an increased risk of suicidal acts or emergence of substantial suicidal thoughts among depressed patients.

The US postmarketing surveillance study of adult osteosarcoma and teriparatide: Study design and findings from the first 7 years

The Osteosarcoma Surveillance Study, an ongoing 15‐year surveillance study initiated in 2003, is a postmarketing commitment to the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration to evaluate a potential association between teriparatide, rhPTH(1–34), a recombinant human parathyroid hormone analog (self‐injectable medication to treat osteoporosis), and development of osteosarcoma in response to a finding from preclinical (animal) studies. Incident cases of primary osteosarcoma diagnosed in adults (aged ≥40 years) on or after January 1, 2003, are identified through population‐based state, regional, and comprehensive cancer center registries in the US. Information on possible prior treatment with teriparatide, on demographics, and on risk factors is ascertained by patient or proxy telephone interview after patient consent. Between June 2004 and September 30, 2011, 1448 cases (diagnosed 2003 to 2009) were identified by participating cancer registries (estimated to be 62% of all adult cases in the US for that time period); 549 patients or proxies were interviewed. Interviewed patients were similar to noninterviewed patients with regard to mean age, sex, race, and geographical distribution and tumor type and site of tumor. Mean age of those interviewed was 61 years, 46% were female, 86% were white, and 77% were alive when the case was reported to the study investigators. Data collected in the study provide descriptive information on a large number of adults with osteosarcoma, an uncommon malignant bone tumor. After 7 years of the study, there were no osteosarcoma patients who had a prior history of teriparatide treatment. Thus, approximately halfway through this 15‐year study, the study has not detected a pattern indicative of a causal association between teriparatide treatment and osteosarcoma in humans.

Fluoxetine: a review of receptor and functional effects and their clinical implications

Downregulation of serotonin 5-HT1 receptors is the most frequently reported central nervous system neural effect of subchronic exposure to fluoxetine in rodents. However, downregulation of these receptors has not been universally demonstrated. Effects of subchronic exposure on 5-HT2 receptors are mixed. Fluoxetine exposure appears to have no effect on cholinergic muscarinic receptors. Effects on beta-adrenergic receptors are controversial, as only one laboratory has reported down-regulation. The majority of studies have failed to show an effect on beta-adrenergic-receptor-stimulated cAMP generation. Electrophysiologic studies support the concept that fluoxetine facilitates net serotonergic transmission through downregulation of presynaptic inhibitory autoreceptors. Data suggest that its subchronic specificity and selectivity distinguish fluoxetine from members of other classes of available antidepressants, making it a distinct therapeutic option.

Possible Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor-Serotonin Uptake Inhibitor Interaction: Fluoxetine Clinical Data and Preclinical Findings

The primary objective of this article is to review information pertinent to and emphasize the seriousness of a potential adverse monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI)-serotonin uptake inhibitor interaction by considering, within the context of preclinical data, clinical cases in which an MAOI and fluoxetine hydrochloride, a specific serotonin uptake inhibitor, were administered in close temporal proximity. Clinical cases were identified by a review of spontaneous adverse event reports submitted voluntarily to Eli Lilly and Company through its drug surveillance program and by a review of reports of MAOI interactions published in the scientific literature. A discussion of eight selected clinical cases of acute adverse reactions (seven with fatal outcomes; one with a favorable response after cyproheptadine therapy) reported to Eli Lilly and Company in which an MAOI was initiated concurrently or shortly after the discontinuation of fluoxetine and a review of preclinical data suggest a possible role of serotonin and/or serotonin-dopamine interactions in the hypermetabolic state that may occur when a serotonin uptake inhibitor and an MAOI are coadministered, although alternative etiologic processes are possible as well. Data reviewed reinforce the idea that the administration of an MAOI in close temporal proximity to fluoxetine is contraindicated.

Fluoxetine in tricyclic refractory major depressive disorder

Data regarding open-label treatment with fluoxetine following failure to respond to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or intolerance of TCA side effects, suggest a response rate between 51.4% and 62.1%, depending on the definition of TCA refractoriness employed. Double-blind study of this issue would extend these findings. Fluoxetine is well tolerated in patients unable to tolerate TCAs. Within this population, more than 80% of patients unable to tolerate TCAs found fluoxetine acceptable. Fluoxetine, as an alternative to polypharmaceutical augmentation, may represent a logical choice as the next step in therapy for a patient who has initially been treated with a TCA and has proven refractory or intolerant.

Fluoxetine: no association with suicidality in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Since (a) obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may involve serotonergic neural transmission abnormalities also though to be related to regulation of suicide and aggression, (b) comorbidity between OCD and depression is substantial, and (c) depression is a major risk factor for suicide, a comprehensive analysis of clinical trial data was undertaken to assess the potential association of fluoxetine, a serotonin uptake inhibitor, and suicidality (suicidal acts and ideation). Pooled data from clinical trials comparing fluoxetine (n = 266) and placebo (n = 89) in patients with DSM-IIIR OCD were analyzed retrospectively. No suicidal acts occurred during placebo lead-in or double-blind therapy. Mean Hamilton Depression Scale item 3 (suicide item) scores improved statistically significantly with fluoxetine compared with placebo. Worsening in suicidal ideation was statistically significantly more frequent with placebo than with fluoxetine. Emergence of substantial suicidal ideation (change in baseline item 3 score of 0 or 1 to 3 or 4) was numerically greater with placebo than with fluoxetine (3.6% vs. 1.7%; not statistically significant). The incidence of suicidality in fluoxetine-treated patients with OCD was low, compared favorably with rates in corresponding placebo-treated patients, and was well within the range of estimates in previous studies of patients with OCD. These controlled clinical trial results suggest no undue risk of suicidality in patients with OCD treated with fluoxetine.

Fluoxetine in medically stable, depressed geriatric patients : Effect on weight

This study assessed the effect of fluoxetine 20 mg/day on weight loss in older patients treated for major depression in a multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled, 6-week clinical trial. Thirty U.S. outpatient clinics affiliated with psychiatric programs participated in the study that involved 671 medically stable outpatients at least 60 years old who had normal cognition and met DSM-III-R criteria for major depression. Weight was recorded at weekly visits. As a measure of adiposity, patients were categorized into two groups, high and low/normal body mass index (BMI) groups. Analyses were done for each group. The high BMI group, but not the low/normal BMI group, had a statistically greater proportion of fluoxetine-treated patients who lost at least 5% of their baseline weight. Overall mean weight change for the fluoxetine-treated patients was about 1% compared with essentially no change for placebo-treated patients. Only one patients, who was treated with fluoxetine and in the low/normal BMI group, discontinued from the study because of weight loss. Although 5% weight loss occurred in more fluoxetine-treated than placebo-treated patients, most of the patients who lost weight had higher adiposity at baseline. There was not a statistically significant difference in the proportion of fluoxetine-treated and placebo-treated patients in the low/normal group who had at least 5% weight loss. Medically relevant weight loss in older patients treated with fluoxetine was uncommon.

Initial experience with teriparatide in the United States.

ABSTRACT Teriparatide has been commercially available in the United States (US) for over 3 years. This summary spans the early experience with this therapy. As of December 31, 2005, over 235 000 patients had filled a prescription for teriparatide world-wide. Data collected from July to December 2004, from 15 000 retail pharmacies in the US, indicated that the mean age of patients was 67.5 years, and more recent data collected from January through October 2005 indicated that 90% of patients were female. According to market research conducted with prescribing physicians from February through March of 2005, it is estimated that over 80% of patients receiving prescriptions for teriparatide had already experienced one or more prior fractures. Since teriparatide is administered subcutaneously, it is important that patients receive training on the use of the teriparatide injection device (i.e., the pen device). Educational programs are available for those who have been prescribed teriparatide therapy. Patients may also contact a customer care program regarding a variety of topics, including pen device use. Based on patient feedback, design changes have been implemented in the pen device to facilitate optimal use. Updates have also been made to the prescribing information to reflect the post-marketing surveillance experience. Adverse experiences reported to date have been consistent with the current product label and with cumulative teriparatide clinical trial experience. As of December 31, 2005 no reports of pathology-confirmed osteosarcoma have been received for individuals who have been treated with teriparatide, either with the commercially available drug or in clinical trials. We are unaware of any reports of osteosarcoma in association with other preparations of teriparatide, or other peptides of parathyroid hormone, either in the setting of clinical trials or from marketed drug experience.

Loracarbef Versus Clarithromycin in Children with Acute Otitis Media with Effusion

Two multicenter, randomized, single-masked, parallel-group studies compared loracarbef and clarithromycin with regard to efficacy, tolerability, and patient acceptance. Three hundred thirty-four children aged 6 months to 3 years with acute otitis media with effusion received loracarbef (15 mg/kg) or clarithromycin (7.5 mg/kg) orally twice daily for 10 days. Patients were assessed for the presence of the diagnostic signs and symptoms of otitis media with effusion by physical examination and pneumatic otoscopy at 48 hours pretreatment, 3 to 5 days after initiation of treatment, 0 to 3 days after the final dose (posttreatment), and 14 to 21 days later (termination). Symptoms were assigned numeric values. Symptomatic response was assessed at the posttherapy and termination visits. Tolerability was determined by assessing adverse events, and a patient acceptance survey was completed by each patients caregiver. The combined results of these 2 studies showed that the efficacy and tolerability of loracarbef were comparable to those of clarithromycin. Adverse events were reported by 46.4% of loracarbef patients and 41.0% of clarithromycin patients, with no statistically significant difference between groups. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 57.9% of loracarbef patients were cured at the termination of the study, compared with 55.7% of clarithromycin patients. Improvement was seen in 4.1% of loracarbef patients and 2.7% of clarithromycin patients. Results of the patient acceptance survey showed a clear preference for loracarbef over clarithromycin. Difficulties with administration of treatment were reported by 36.3% of clarithromycin caregivers, compared with 7.8% of loracarbef caregivers (P < 0.001). A desire to stop treatment was reported by 23.8% of clarithromycin caregivers, compared with 7.8% of loracarbef caregivers (P < 0.001). Taste and texture issues were most frequently cited as reasons for nonacceptance.

Fluoxetine Not Associated With Increased Violence or Aggression in Controlled Clinical Trials

AbstractBecause of interest in the possible occurrence of violent 01 aggressive behavior with serotonin-enhancing drugs, three subpools of controlled clinical trial data were evaluated: fluoxetine (n = 2615) versus placebo (n = 1377) (18 trials; depression, bulimia nervosa, obesity, alcoholism, smoking cessation); fluoxetine (n = 441) versus tricyclic antidepressants (n = 445) (ten trials; depression); and fluoxetine (n = 309) versus tricyclic antidepressants (n = 308) versus placebo (n = 297) (three trials; depression, including adjustment disorder). Adverse event terms possibly involving physically assaultive acts toward another (antisocial reaction, hostility, and personality disorder, together termed the “aggression cluster”) were reviewed. Across all indications, a statistically significantly smaller proportion of fluoxetine-treated patients than placebo-treated patients experienced one or more of the events (0.15% versus 0.65%, respectively). Placebo-treated patients were four times more likely to e...