Daniel N. Robinson
Columbia University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Daniel N. Robinson.
Journal of the Optical Society of America | 1968
Daniel N. Robinson
Subjects were given combinations of two and three brief concentric flashes of equal luminance under backward masking conditions. Intervals between the first (TF) and second (CF) flashes were 10, 20, 50, 75, 100, and 200 msec. When third flashes (DF) were present, they were separated from CF by the same intervals. Two modes of presentation were employed: binocular presentations in which all flashes were presented to both eyes and interocular presentations in which TF and CF were presented to the left eye and DF to the right. With binocular view, the backward masking of CF by DF resulted in the disinhibition of TF, otherwise masked by CF under two-flash conditions. Disinhibition was not obtained under interocular presentations. A major conclusion is that recurrent influences within the human retina are not preserved more centrally (retrochiasmally) in the visual system.
Science | 1967
Daniel N. Robinson
Past research addressed to the minimum temporal separation necessary for the judgment of visual stimulus order has failed to control peripheral adaptation and masking effects. The present study employed pairs of brief stimuli with each member presented to a separate eye; that is, dichoptic presentations. Under these conditions, minimum separations for the correct discrimination of order were found to be far less than those obtained in experiments in which both stimuli were presented to the same eye or to both eyes.
Perceptual and Motor Skills | 1963
Jerome Siegel; Daniel N. Robinson
Eight signal-to-noise ratios and four target accelerations were systematically varied in an attempt to determine functional relationships between these parameters and measures of time-on-target, frequency of target loss and the average duration of each loss on an A-scope compensatory tracking task. Nine Si were required to maintain a triangular pulse in the center of a stationary notch by manipulating a velocity controlled handwheel. The results indicated that visual noise had a pronounced effect upon time-on-target, but the effects of target acceleration were negligible. However, target acceleration had a pronounced effect upon frequency of losing target track and both parameters affected average duration of a loss. The results are discussed in terms of analyzing system performance.
History of Psychology | 2003
Daniel N. Robinson
Amidst the voluminous correspondence between Thomas Jefferson and John Adams are several letters pertaining to the material basis of mental life. These reveal in a most suggestive way the substantial differences between them. Well informed on prevailing scientific and philosophical perspectives, Jefferson and Adams used the issue to express their positions on the nature and limits of knowledge, the relative authority of scientific methods and speculations, and the larger question of human perfectibility. At the same time, their exchanges illuminate the prevailing and divergent perspectives on human psychology adopted by major leaders of thought in the New World.
Perceptual and Motor Skills | 1963
Jerome Siegel; Daniel N. Robinson
Visual noise and temporal requirements of a compensatory tracking task were varied in order to determine time-on-target proficiency. Nine Ss were each given 32 trials in counterbalanced order, with problems varying as to visual noise and target acceleration. The display consisted of an A-scope with Ss task being to maintain a triangular pulse in the center of a stationary notch by manipulating a velocity controlled handwheel. The results were plotted as a family of curves describing probable success as a function of visual noise and task time allowed. Probability of success became greater as the time requirements became less severe, and when time requirements became more severe, not only did probability of success diminish, but the differential effects of noise became more pronounced. The authors suggested this approach as a method of predicting subsequent tracking behavior.
Perceptual and Motor Skills | 1964
Daniel N. Robinson
A small depth enhancement in tracking high acceleration targets (0.6 g) at a signal-to-noise ratio of 0.0 db was observed for increased intensity disparity between the eyes. Parametric study is needed.
Science | 1966
Daniel N. Robinson
Science | 1967
Donald H. Thor; Daniel N. Robinson
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology | 2003
Daniel N. Robinson
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology | 2000
Daniel N. Robinson