Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Daniël O. Warmerdam is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Daniël O. Warmerdam.


Journal of Cell Biology | 2009

Heterochromatin protein 1 is recruited to various types of DNA damage

Martijn S. Luijsterburg; Christoffel Dinant; Hannes Lans; Jan Stap; Elzbieta Wiernasz; Saskia Lagerwerf; Daniël O. Warmerdam; Michael Lindh; Maartje C. Brink; Jurek Dobrucki; Jacob A. Aten; Maria Fousteri; Gert Jansen; Nico P. Dantuma; Wim Vermeulen; Leon H.F. Mullenders; Adriaan B. Houtsmuller; Pernette J. Verschure; Roel van Driel

Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family members are chromatin-associated proteins involved in transcription, replication, and chromatin organization. We show that HP1 isoforms HP1-α, HP1-β, and HP1-γ are recruited to ultraviolet (UV)-induced DNA damage and double-strand breaks (DSBs) in human cells. This response to DNA damage requires the chromo shadow domain of HP1 and is independent of H3K9 trimethylation and proteins that detect UV damage and DSBs. Loss of HP1 results in high sensitivity to UV light and ionizing radiation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, indicating that HP1 proteins are essential components of DNA damage response (DDR) systems. Analysis of single and double HP1 mutants in nematodes suggests that HP1 homologues have both unique and overlapping functions in the DDR. Our results show that HP1 proteins are important for DNA repair and may function to reorganize chromatin in response to damage.


Nature | 2015

REV7 counteracts DNA double-strand break resection and affects PARP inhibition

Guotai Xu; J. Ross Chapman; Inger Brandsma; Jingsong Yuan; Martin Mistrik; Peter Bouwman; Jirina Bartkova; Ewa Gogola; Daniël O. Warmerdam; Marco Barazas; Janneke E. Jaspers; Kenji Watanabe; Mark Pieterse; Ariena Kersbergen; Wendy Sol; Patrick H. N. Celie; Philip C. Schouten; Bram van den Broek; Ahmed M. Salman; Marja Nieuwland; Iris de Rink; Jorma J. de Ronde; Kees Jalink; Simon J. Boulton; Junjie Chen; Dik C. van Gent; Jiri Bartek; Jos Jonkers; Piet Borst; Sven Rottenberg

Error-free repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is achieved by homologous recombination (HR), and BRCA1 is an important factor for this repair pathway. In the absence of BRCA1-mediated HR, the administration of PARP inhibitors induces synthetic lethality of tumour cells of patients with breast or ovarian cancers. Despite the benefit of this tailored therapy, drug resistance can occur by HR restoration. Genetic reversion of BRCA1-inactivating mutations can be the underlying mechanism of drug resistance, but this does not explain resistance in all cases. In particular, little is known about BRCA1-independent restoration of HR. Here we show that loss of REV7 (also known as MAD2L2) in mouse and human cell lines re-establishes CTIP-dependent end resection of DSBs in BRCA1-deficient cells, leading to HR restoration and PARP inhibitor resistance, which is reversed by ATM kinase inhibition. REV7 is recruited to DSBs in a manner dependent on the H2AX–MDC1–RNF8–RNF168–53BP1 chromatin pathway, and seems to block HR and promote end joining in addition to its regulatory role in DNA damage tolerance. Finally, we establish that REV7 blocks DSB resection to promote non-homologous end-joining during immunoglobulin class switch recombination. Our results reveal an unexpected crucial function of REV7 downstream of 53BP1 in coordinating pathological DSB repair pathway choices in BRCA1-deficient cells.


Nature | 2015

The core spliceosome as target and effector of non-canonical ATM signalling

Maria Tresini; Daniël O. Warmerdam; Petros Kolovos; Loes Snijder; Mischa G. Vrouwe; Jeroen Demmers; Wilfred van IJcken; Frank Grosveld; René H. Medema; Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers; Leon H.F. Mullenders; Wim Vermeulen; Jurgen A. Marteijn

In response to DNA damage, tissue homoeostasis is ensured by protein networks promoting DNA repair, cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. DNA damage response signalling pathways coordinate these processes, partly by propagating gene-expression-modulating signals. DNA damage influences not only the abundance of messenger RNAs, but also their coding information through alternative splicing. Here we show that transcription-blocking DNA lesions promote chromatin displacement of late-stage spliceosomes and initiate a positive feedback loop centred on the signalling kinase ATM. We propose that initial spliceosome displacement and subsequent R-loop formation is triggered by pausing of RNA polymerase at DNA lesions. In turn, R-loops activate ATM, which signals to impede spliceosome organization further and augment ultraviolet-irradiation-triggered alternative splicing at the genome-wide level. Our findings define R-loop-dependent ATM activation by transcription-blocking lesions as an important event in the DNA damage response of non-replicating cells, and highlight a key role for spliceosome displacement in this process.


Journal of Cell Biology | 2010

Stochastic and reversible assembly of a multiprotein DNA repair complex ensures accurate target site recognition and efficient repair

Martijn S. Luijsterburg; Gesa von Bornstaedt; Audrey M. Gourdin; Antonio Z. Politi; Martijn J. Moné; Daniël O. Warmerdam; Joachim Goedhart; Wim Vermeulen; Roel van Driel; Thomas Höfer

Computational modeling and quantitative analysis show that although accumulation of repair complexes can take hours, the individual components rapidly exchange between the nucleoplasm and DNA damage sites.


Mutation Research-reviews in Mutation Research | 2010

Dealing with DNA damage: relationships between checkpoint and repair pathways.

Daniël O. Warmerdam; Roland Kanaar

Cell cycle checkpoint activation and DNA repair pathways govern genomic stability after genotoxic stress. Genotoxic insult results in activation of an interwoven network of DNA damage checkpoints and DNA repair pathways. Post-translational modifications on a number of proteins involved in both checkpoint activation and DNA repair play an important role in this cellular response. Genotoxic stress can induce a wide variety of DNA lesions. Among these DNA alterations are double-stranded breaks and single-stranded DNA gaps. Repair of these DNA alterations requires damage recognition and resection. Here we discuss how DNA repair and DNA damage checkpoints cooperate and deal with DNA damage. Processing of DNA lesions by structure-specific nucleases results in DNA-protein intermediates, which form the basis for checkpoint activation and DNA repair. Post-translational modifications like phosphorylation and ubiquitination modulate the DNA damage response in a spatial and temporal manner. Cell cycle-dependent regulation additionally plays a key role in the regulation of both DNA repair and checkpoint activation. We highlight recent advances in in vivo imaging that greatly expand our knowledge on the relationships between DNA damage checkpoints and DNA repair.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2006

Recruitment of the nucleotide excision repair endonuclease XPG to sites of UV-induced DNA damage depends on functional TFIIH.

Angelika Zotter; Martijn S. Luijsterburg; Daniël O. Warmerdam; Shehu M. Ibrahim; Alex L. Nigg; Wiggert A. van Cappellen; Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers; Roel van Driel; Wim Vermeulen; Adriaan B. Houtsmuller

ABSTRACT The structure-specific endonuclease XPG is an indispensable core protein of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) machinery. XPG cleaves the DNA strand at the 3′ side of the DNA damage. XPG binding stabilizes the NER preincision complex and is essential for the 5′ incision by the ERCC1/XPF endonuclease. We have studied the dynamic role of XPG in its different cellular functions in living cells. We have created mammalian cell lines that lack functional endogenous XPG and stably express enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP)-tagged XPG. Life cell imaging shows that in undamaged cells XPG-eGFP is uniformly distributed throughout the cell nucleus, diffuses freely, and is not stably associated with other nuclear proteins. XPG is recruited to UV-damaged DNA with a half-life of 200 s and is bound for 4 min in NER complexes. Recruitment requires functional TFIIH, although some TFIIH mutants allow slow XPG recruitment. Remarkably, binding of XPG to damaged DNA does not require the DDB2 protein, which is thought to enhance damage recognition by NER factor XPC. Together, our data present a comprehensive view of the in vivo behavior of a protein that is involved in a complex chromatin-associated process.


Frontiers in Bioscience | 2010

Mechanisms of ATR-mediated checkpoint signalling

Veronique A. J. Smits; Daniël O. Warmerdam; Yusé Martín; Raimundo Freire

Cell cycle checkpoints maintain genomic integrity by delaying cell division in the presence of DNA damage or replication problems. A crucial player in this process is the ATR kinase. The rapid localisation of ATR to sites of genotoxic stress and the central role of this kinase in the checkpoint response lead to the suggestion that ATR functions as a sensor of DNA lesions. After activation, ATR phosphorylates and activates the effector kinase Chk1, thereby causing an inhibition in cell cycle progression. However, this would not be possible without the existence of many other proteins operating in this pathway. Here we review current progress in our understanding of the regulatory factors involved in the ATR-mediated checkpoint response, as well as resumption of cell cycle progression upon repair of the damage, thereby focussing on the mechanisms in mammalian cells.


Journal of Cell Science | 2008

ATR and Rad17 collaborate in modulating Rad9 localisation at sites of DNA damage

Annette L. Medhurst; Daniël O. Warmerdam; Ildem Akerman; Edward H. Verwayen; Roland Kanaar; Veronique A. J. Smits; Nicholas D. Lakin

The cell cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is phosphorylated and activated by ATR in response to DNA damage and is crucial for initiating the DNA damage response. A number of factors act in concert with ATR to facilitate Chk1 phosphorylation, including Rad17-RFC, the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complex, TopBP1 and Claspin. Rad17 is required for loading of Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 (9-1-1) onto sites of DNA damage. Although phosphorylation of Rad17 by ATR is required for checkpoint function, how this affects 9-1-1 regulation remains unclear. We report that exposure of cells to DNA damage or replication stress results in Rad17-dependent immobilisation of Rad9 into nuclear foci. Furthermore, expression of mutant Rad17 that cannot be phosphorylated by ATR (Rad17AA), or downregulation of ATR, results in a decreased number of cells that display Rad9 foci. Photobleaching experiments reveal an increase in the dynamic behaviour of Rad9 within remaining foci in the absence of ATR or following expression of Rad17AA. Together, these data suggest a model in which Rad17 and ATR collaborate in regulating Rad9 localisation and association at sites of DNA damage.


Cell Cycle | 2009

Cell cycle-dependent processing of DNA lesions controls localization of Rad9 to sites of genotoxic stress.

Daniël O. Warmerdam; Raimundo Freire; Roland Kanaar; Veronique A. J. Smits

The Rad9/Rad1/Hus1 complex functions to facilitate the ATR-mediated phosphorylation of several substrates that control the checkpoint arrest induced by DNA damage. Here we show that in response to genotoxic stress induced by different types of damaging agents, Rad9 rapidly relocalized to sites of single stranded DNA, as visualized by discrete nuclear foci that co-localize with RPA. UV light-induced Rad9 foci also colocalized with TopBP1 and γ-H2AX. Interestingly, Rad9 foci were predominately formed in G1 and S phase after UV light, while treatment of cells with ionizing radiation (IR) resulted in accumulation of Rad9 into foci in S and G2. Photobleaching experiments in living cells revealed that the Rad9 protein is highly mobile in undamaged cells. However, genotoxic stress induced the immobilization of a large proportion of the protein. The proportion of Rad9 immobilization was larger in S phase and the accumulation to sites of locally damaged areas induced by UV-laser irradiation was faster during DNA replication. Inactivation of nucleotide excision repair by knock down of XPA and XPC resulted in a decrease of G1 phase cells that displayed Rad9 foci in response to UV light, whereas IR-induced Rad9 foci were not affected. In contrast, downregulation of CtIP, which promotes DSB resection, abrogated the IR-induced Rad9 foci. These findings show that due to processing of DNA lesions into a common intermediate, which occurs in a cell cycle-dependent manner, Rad9 is able to respond to different types of genotoxic stress.


Cell Reports | 2016

Breaks in the 45S rDNA Lead to Recombination-Mediated Loss of Repeats

Daniël O. Warmerdam; Jeroen van den Berg; René H. Medema

rDNA repeats constitute the most heavily transcribed region in the human genome. Tumors frequently display elevated levels of recombination in rDNA, indicating that the repeats are a liability to the genomic integrity of a cell. However, little is known about how cells deal with DNA double-stranded breaks in rDNA. Using selective endonucleases, we show that human cells are highly sensitive to breaks in 45S but not the 5S rDNA repeats. We find that homologous recombination inhibits repair of breaks in 45S rDNA, and this results in repeat loss. We identify the structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 5 (SMC5) as contributing to recombination-mediated repair of rDNA breaks. Together, our data demonstrate that SMC5-mediated recombination can lead to error-prone repair of 45S rDNA repeats, resulting in their loss and thereby reducing cellular viability.

Collaboration


Dive into the Daniël O. Warmerdam's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roland Kanaar

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Veronique A. J. Smits

Hospital Universitario de Canarias

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

René H. Medema

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wim Vermeulen

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martijn S. Luijsterburg

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bram van den Broek

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jurgen A. Marteijn

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge