Daniel Pope
University of Oregon
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Daniel Pope.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology | 2015
Gerard Saucier; Judith Kenner; Kathryn Iurino; Philippe Bou Malham; Zhuo Chen; Amber Gayle Thalmayer; Markus Kemmelmeier; William Tov; Rachid Boutti; Henok Metaferia; Banu Çankaya; Khairul Anwar Mastor; Kung Yu Hsu; Rongxian Wu; M. Maniruzzaman; Janvier Rugira; Ioannis Tsaousis; Oleg Sosnyuk; Jyoti Regmi Adhikary; Katarzyna Skrzypińska; Boonmee Poungpet; John Maltby; Maria Guadalupe C. Salanga; Adriana Racca; Atsushi Oshio; Elsie Italia; Anastassiya Kovaleva; Masanobu Nakatsugawa; Fabia Morales-Vives; Víctor M. Ruiz
We know that there are cross-cultural differences in psychological variables, such as individualism/collectivism. But it has not been clear which of these variables show relatively the greatest differences. The Survey of World Views project operated from the premise that such issues are best addressed in a diverse sampling of countries representing a majority of the world’s population, with a very large range of item-content. Data were collected online from 8,883 individuals (almost entirely college students based on local publicizing efforts) in 33 countries that constitute more than two third of the world’s population, using items drawn from measures of nearly 50 variables. This report focuses on the broadest patterns evident in item data. The largest differences were not in those contents most frequently emphasized in cross-cultural psychology (e.g., values, social axioms, cultural tightness), but instead in contents involving religion, regularity-norm behaviors, family roles and living arrangements, and ethnonationalism. Content not often studied cross-culturally (e.g., materialism, Machiavellianism, isms dimensions, moral foundations) demonstrated moderate-magnitude differences. Further studies are needed to refine such conclusions, but indications are that cross-cultural psychology may benefit from casting a wider net in terms of the psychological variables of focus.
The Journal of American History | 1998
Daniel Pope; Robert J. Duffy
Journal of Social Issues | 1991
Daniel Pope
Journal of The History of The Behavioral Sciences | 1981
Daniel Pope
Pacific Historical Review | 1990
Daniel Pope
Business History Review | 2004
Daniel Pope
Business History Review | 1983
Daniel Pope
The Journal of American History | 2017
Daniel Pope
Pacific Historical Review | 2011
Daniel Pope
The Journal of American History | 2010
Daniel Pope