Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Daniel R. Barnes is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Daniel R. Barnes.


JAMA | 2017

Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Karoline B. Kuchenbaecker; John L. Hopper; Daniel R. Barnes; Kelly-Anne Phillips; T.M. Mooij; Marie-José Roos-Blom; Sarah Jervis; Flora E. van Leeuwen; Roger L. Milne; Nadine Andrieu; David E. Goldgar; Mary Beth Terry; Matti A. Rookus; Douglas F. Easton; Antonis C. Antoniou; Lesley McGuffog; D. Gareth Evans; Daniel Barrowdale; Debra Frost; Julian Adlard; Kai-Ren Ong; Louise Izatt; Marc Tischkowitz; Ros Eeles; Rosemarie Davidson; Shirley Hodgson; Steve Ellis; Catherine Noguès; Christine Lasset; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet

Importance The clinical management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers requires accurate, prospective cancer risk estimates. Objectives To estimate age-specific risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for mutation carriers and to evaluate risk modification by family cancer history and mutation location. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective cohort study of 6036 BRCA1 and 3820 BRCA2 female carriers (5046 unaffected and 4810 with breast or ovarian cancer or both at baseline) recruited in 1997-2011 through the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study, the Breast Cancer Family Registry and the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer, with ascertainment through family clinics (94%) and population-based studies (6%). The majority were from large national studies in the United Kingdom (EMBRACE), the Netherlands (HEBON), and France (GENEPSO). Follow-up ended December 2013; median follow-up was 5 years. Exposures BRCA1/2 mutations, family cancer history, and mutation location. Main Outcomes and Measures Annual incidences, standardized incidence ratios, and cumulative risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer. Results Among 3886 women (median age, 38 years; interquartile range [IQR], 30-46 years) eligible for the breast cancer analysis, 5066 women (median age, 38 years; IQR, 31-47 years) eligible for the ovarian cancer analysis, and 2213 women (median age, 47 years; IQR, 40-55 years) eligible for the contralateral breast cancer analysis, 426 were diagnosed with breast cancer, 109 with ovarian cancer, and 245 with contralateral breast cancer during follow-up. The cumulative breast cancer risk to age 80 years was 72% (95% CI, 65%-79%) for BRCA1 and 69% (95% CI, 61%-77%) for BRCA2 carriers. Breast cancer incidences increased rapidly in early adulthood until ages 30 to 40 years for BRCA1 and until ages 40 to 50 years for BRCA2 carriers, then remained at a similar, constant incidence (20-30 per 1000 person-years) until age 80 years. The cumulative ovarian cancer risk to age 80 years was 44% (95% CI, 36%-53%) for BRCA1 and 17% (95% CI, 11%-25%) for BRCA2 carriers. For contralateral breast cancer, the cumulative risk 20 years after breast cancer diagnosis was 40% (95% CI, 35%-45%) for BRCA1 and 26% (95% CI, 20%-33%) for BRCA2 carriers (hazard ratio [HR] for comparing BRCA2 vs BRCA1, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.82; P=.001 for difference). Breast cancer risk increased with increasing number of first- and second-degree relatives diagnosed as having breast cancer for both BRCA1 (HR for ≥2 vs 0 affected relatives, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.41-2.82; P<.001 for trend) and BRCA2 carriers (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.08-3.37; P=.02 for trend). Breast cancer risk was higher if mutations were located outside vs within the regions bounded by positions c.2282-c.4071 in BRCA1 (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.11-1.93; P=.007) and c.2831-c.6401 in BRCA2 (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.36-2.74; P<.001). Conclusions and Relevance These findings provide estimates of cancer risk based on BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier status using prospective data collection and demonstrate the potential importance of family history and mutation location in risk assessment.


PLOS Genetics | 2012

Exome sequencing identifies rare deleterious mutations in DNA repair genes FANCC and BLM as potential breast cancer susceptibility alleles.

Ella R. Thompson; Maria A. Doyle; Georgina L. Ryland; Simone M. Rowley; David Y. H. Choong; Richard W. Tothill; Heather Thorne; kConFab; Daniel R. Barnes; Jason Li; Jason Ellul; Gayle Philip; Yoland C. Antill; Paul A. James; Alison H. Trainer; Gillian Mitchell; Ian G. Campbell

Despite intensive efforts using linkage and candidate gene approaches, the genetic etiology for the majority of families with a multi-generational breast cancer predisposition is unknown. In this study, we used whole-exome sequencing of thirty-three individuals from 15 breast cancer families to identify potential predisposing genes. Our analysis identified families with heterozygous, deleterious mutations in the DNA repair genes FANCC and BLM, which are responsible for the autosomal recessive disorders Fanconi Anemia and Bloom syndrome. In total, screening of all exons in these genes in 438 breast cancer families identified three with truncating mutations in FANCC and two with truncating mutations in BLM. Additional screening of FANCC mutation hotspot exons identified one pathogenic mutation among an additional 957 breast cancer families. Importantly, none of the deleterious mutations were identified among 464 healthy controls and are not reported in the 1,000 Genomes data. Given the rarity of Fanconi Anemia and Bloom syndrome disorders among Caucasian populations, the finding of multiple deleterious mutations in these critical DNA repair genes among high-risk breast cancer families is intriguing and suggestive of a predisposing role. Our data demonstrate the utility of intra-family exome-sequencing approaches to uncover cancer predisposition genes, but highlight the major challenge of definitively validating candidates where the incidence of sporadic disease is high, germline mutations are not fully penetrant, and individual predisposition genes may only account for a tiny proportion of breast cancer families.


Nature Genetics | 2017

Fifteen new risk loci for coronary artery disease highlight arterial-wall-specific mechanisms

Joanna M. M. Howson; Wei Zhao; Daniel R. Barnes; Weang Kee Ho; Robin Young; Dirk S. Paul; Lindsay L. Waite; Daniel F. Freitag; Eric Fauman; Elias Salfati; Benjamin B. Sun; John D. Eicher; Andrew D. Johnson; Wayne H-H Sheu; Sune F. Nielsen; Wei-Yu Lin; Praveen Surendran; Anders Mälarstig; Jemma B. Wilk; Anne Tybjærg-Hansen; Katrine L. Rasmussen; Pia R. Kamstrup; Panos Deloukas; Jeanette Erdmann; Sekar Kathiresan; Nilesh J. Samani; Heribert Schunkert; Hugh Watkins; CARDIoGRAMplusC D; Ron Do

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although 58 genomic regions have been associated with CAD thus far, most of the heritability is unexplained, indicating that additional susceptibility loci await identification. An efficient discovery strategy may be larger-scale evaluation of promising associations suggested by genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Hence, we genotyped 56,309 participants using a targeted gene array derived from earlier GWAS results and performed meta-analysis of results with 194,427 participants previously genotyped, totaling 88,192 CAD cases and 162,544 controls. We identified 25 new SNP–CAD associations (P < 5 × 10−8, in fixed-effects meta-analysis) from 15 genomic regions, including SNPs in or near genes involved in cellular adhesion, leukocyte migration and atherosclerosis (PECAM1, rs1867624), coagulation and inflammation (PROCR, rs867186 (p.Ser219Gly)) and vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation (LMOD1, rs2820315). Correlation of these regions with cell-type-specific gene expression and plasma protein levels sheds light on potential disease mechanisms.


Human Mutation | 2011

The rs2910164:G>C SNP in the MIR146A gene is not associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Amandine Garcia; David G. Cox; Laure Barjhoux; Carole Verny-Pierre; Daniel R. Barnes; Antonis C. Antoniou; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Olga M. Sinilnikova; Sylvie Mazoyer

The rs2910164:G>C SNP is located in the gene for miR‐146a, a microRNA that binds the 3′ UTR of the BRCA1 transcript. Preliminary data based on the analysis of a small number of cases suggested that this single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) might be associated with the age of onset of familial breast and ovarian cancer. This effect was not confirmed on a large series of familial breast cancer cases negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. We show here a lack of association of the rs2910164:G>C SNP with breast cancer risk in a series of 1,166 BRCA1 and 560 BRCA2 mutation carriers. In conclusion, the polymorphism in the miR‐146a gene is unlikely to be of substantial significance regarding breast cancer risk. Hum Mutat 32:1–4, 2011.


Genetic Epidemiology | 2012

Evaluation of association methods for analysing modifiers of disease risk in carriers of high-risk mutations.

Daniel R. Barnes; Andrew Lee; Embrace Investigators; kConFab Investigators; Douglas F. Easton; Antonis C. Antoniou

There is considerable evidence indicating that disease risk in carriers of high‐risk mutations (e.g. BRCA1 and BRCA2) varies by other genetic factors. Such mutations tend to be rare in the population and studies of genetic modifiers of risk have focused on sampling mutation carriers through clinical genetics centres. Genetic testing targets affected individuals from high‐risk families, making ascertainment of mutation carriers non‐random with respect to disease phenotype. Standard analytical methods can lead to biased estimates of associations. Methods proposed to address this problem include a weighted‐cohort (WC) and retrospective likelihood (RL) approach. Their performance has not been evaluated systematically. We evaluate these methods by simulation and extend the RL to analysing associations of two diseases simultaneously (competing risks RL—CRRL). The standard cohort approach (Cox regression) yielded the most biased risk ratio (RR) estimates (relative bias—RB: −25% to −17%) and had the lowest power. The WC and RL approaches provided similar RR estimates, were least biased (RB: −2.6% to 2.5%), and had the lowest mean‐squared errors. The RL method generally had more power than WC. When analysing associations with two diseases, ignoring a potential association with one disease leads to inflated type I errors for inferences with respect to the second disease and biased RR estimates. The CRRL generally gave unbiased RR estimates for both disease risks and had correct nominal type I errors. These methods are illustrated by analyses of genetic modifiers of breast and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.


EBioMedicine | 2016

Meta-analysis of Genome Wide Association Studies Identifies Genetic Markers of Late Toxicity Following Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Sarah L. Kerns; Leila Dorling; Laura Fachal; Søren M. Bentzen; Paul Pharoah; Daniel R. Barnes; Antonio Gómez-Caamaño; Ana Carballo; David P. Dearnaley; Paula Peleteiro; S. Gulliford; Emma Hall; Kyriaki Michailidou; Angel Carracedo; Michael Sia; Richard G. Stock; Nelson N. Stone; Matthew R. Sydes; Jonathan Tyrer; Shahana Ahmed; Matthew Parliament; Harry Ostrer; Barry S. Rosenstein; Ana Vega; N.G. Burnet; Alison M. Dunning; Gillian C. Barnett; Catharine M L West

Nearly 50% of cancer patients undergo radiotherapy. Late radiotherapy toxicity affects quality-of-life in long-term cancer survivors and risk of side-effects in a minority limits doses prescribed to the majority of patients. Development of a test predicting risk of toxicity could benefit many cancer patients. We aimed to meta-analyze individual level data from four genome-wide association studies from prostate cancer radiotherapy cohorts including 1564 men to identify genetic markers of toxicity. Prospectively assessed two-year toxicity endpoints (urinary frequency, decreased urine stream, rectal bleeding, overall toxicity) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associations were tested using multivariable regression, adjusting for clinical and patient-related risk factors. A fixed-effects meta-analysis identified two SNPs: rs17599026 on 5q31.2 with urinary frequency (odds ratio [OR] 3.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08–4.69, p-value 4.16 × 10− 8) and rs7720298 on 5p15.2 with decreased urine stream (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.90–3.86, p-value = 3.21 × 10− 8). These SNPs lie within genes that are expressed in tissues adversely affected by pelvic radiotherapy including bladder, kidney, rectum and small intestine. The results show that heterogeneous radiotherapy cohorts can be combined to identify new moderate-penetrance genetic variants associated with radiotherapy toxicity. The work provides a basis for larger collaborative efforts to identify enough variants for a future test involving polygenic risk profiling.


Diabetes | 2012

Impact of Common Variation in Bone-Related Genes on Type 2 Diabetes and Related Traits

Liana K. Billings; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Rachel J. Ackerman; Josée Dupuis; Benjamin F. Voight; Laura J. Rasmussen-Torvik; Serge Hercberg; Mark Lathrop; Daniel R. Barnes; Claudia Langenberg; Jennie Hui; Mao Fu; Nabila Bouatia-Naji; Cécile Lecoeur; Ping An; Patrik K. E. Magnusson; Ida Surakka; Samuli Ripatti; Lene Christiansen; Christine Dalgård; Lasse Folkersen; Elin Grundberg; Per Eriksson; Jaakko Kaprio; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik; Nancy L. Pedersen; Ingrid B. Borecki; Michael A. Province; Beverley Balkau; Philippe Froguel

Exploring genetic pleiotropy can provide clues to a mechanism underlying the observed epidemiological association between type 2 diabetes and heightened fracture risk. We examined genetic variants associated with bone mineral density (BMD) for association with type 2 diabetes and glycemic traits in large well-phenotyped and -genotyped consortia. We undertook follow-up analysis in ∼19,000 individuals and assessed gene expression. We queried single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with BMD at levels of genome-wide significance, variants in linkage disequilibrium (r2 > 0.5), and BMD candidate genes. SNP rs6867040, at the ITGA1 locus, was associated with a 0.0166 mmol/L (0.004) increase in fasting glucose per C allele in the combined analysis. Genetic variants in the ITGA1 locus were associated with its expression in the liver but not in adipose tissue. ITGA1 variants appeared among the top loci associated with type 2 diabetes, fasting insulin, β-cell function by homeostasis model assessment, and 2-h post–oral glucose tolerance test glucose and insulin levels. ITGA1 has demonstrated genetic pleiotropy in prior studies, and its suggested role in liver fibrosis, insulin secretion, and bone healing lends credence to its contribution to both osteoporosis and type 2 diabetes. These findings further underscore the link between skeletal and glucose metabolism and highlight a locus to direct future investigations.


Obesity | 2013

Prediction of measured weight from self-reported weight was not improved after stratification by body mass index.

Anne M. May; Daniel R. Barnes; Nita G. Forouhi; Robert Luben; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas J. Wareham; Petra H. Peeters; Stephen J. Sharp

Self‐reported weight may underestimate measured weight. Researchers have tried to reduce the error using statistical models to predict weight from self‐reported weight. We investigate whether deriving equations within separate BMI categories improves the prediction of weight compared with an equation derived regardless of an individuals BMI.


Journal of Medical Genetics | 2018

Tumour risks and genotype–phenotype correlations associated with germline variants in succinate dehydrogenase subunit genes SDHB, SDHC and SDHD

Katrina A. Andrews; David B. Ascher; Douglas E. V. Pires; Daniel R. Barnes; Lindsey Vialard; Ruth Casey; Nicola Bradshaw; Julian Adlard; Simon Aylwin; Paul Brennan; Carole Brewer; Trevor Cole; Jackie Cook; Rosemarie Davidson; Alan Donaldson; Alan Fryer; Lynn Greenhalgh; Shirley Hodgson; Richard Irving; Fiona Lalloo; Michelle McConachie; Vivienne McConnell; Patrick J. Morrison; Victoria Murday; Soo-Mi Park; Helen L. Simpson; Katie Snape; Susan Stewart; Susan Tomkins; Yvonne Wallis

Background Germline pathogenic variants in SDHB/SDHC/SDHD are the most frequent causes of inherited phaeochromocytomas/paragangliomas. Insufficient information regarding penetrance and phenotypic variability hinders optimum management of mutation carriers. We estimate penetrance for symptomatic tumours and elucidate genotype–phenotype correlations in a large cohort of SDHB/SDHC/SDHD mutation carriers. Methods A retrospective survey of 1832 individuals referred for genetic testing due to a personal or family history of phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma. 876 patients (401 previously reported) had a germline mutation in SDHB/SDHC/SDHD (n=673/43/160). Tumour risks were correlated with in silico structural prediction analyses. Results Tumour risks analysis provided novel penetrance estimates and genotype–phenotype correlations. In addition to tumour type susceptibility differences for individual genes, we confirmed that the SDHD:p.Pro81Leu mutation has a distinct phenotype and identified increased age-related tumour risks with highly destabilising SDHB missense mutations. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the penetrance (cumulative risk of clinically apparent tumours) in SDHB and (paternally inherited) SDHD mutation-positive non-probands (n=371/67 with detailed clinical information) by age 60 years was 21.8% (95% CI 15.2% to 27.9%) and 43.2% (95% CI 25.4% to 56.7%), respectively. Risk of malignant disease at age 60 years in non-proband SDHB mutation carriers was 4.2%(95% CI 1.1% to 7.2%). With retrospective cohort analysis to adjust for ascertainment, cumulative tumour risks for SDHB mutation carriers at ages 60 years and 80 years were 23.9% (95% CI 20.9% to 27.4%) and 30.6% (95% CI 26.8% to 34.7%). Conclusions Overall risks of clinically apparent tumours for SDHB mutation carriers are substantially lower than initially estimated and will improve counselling of affected families. Specific genotype–tumour risk associations provides a basis for novel investigative strategies into succinate dehydrogenase-related mechanisms of tumourigenesis and the development of personalised management for SDHB/SDHC/SDHD mutation carriers.


European Journal of Human Genetics | 2014

Attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis manifests as autosomal dominant late-onset colorectal cancer

Abdulla Ibrahim; Daniel R. Barnes; Jacqueline Dunlop; Daniel Barrowdale; Antonis C. Antoniou; Jonathan Berg

Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk is well defined for families of patients with classical familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). However, the risk for those with an attenuated form of FAP is less well characterised. In this study, we estimated CRC risks for carriers of a novel germline mutation in the APC gene that causes attenuated FAP (AFAP). We performed genetic testing on 53 individuals from seven AFAP families harbouring an identical APC:c.288T>A mutation. Using a modified segregation analysis, we estimated relative and absolute CRC risks for mutation carriers. Twenty-three individuals harboured the disease causing mutation. CRC occurred in 28 individuals (mean 61.7 years, range 32–80 years). The estimated CRC relative risks for mutation carriers aged 60–69 and ≥70 years were 19 (95% CI: 1.77–204.08) and 45 (95% CI: 11.32–180.10), respectively, while the absolute CRC lifetime risk for men was 94% (95% CI: 67.5–99.9%), and for women, 84% (95% CI: 50.9–99.0%). This study shows that AFAP can manifest as autosomal dominant late-onset CRC. These findings highlight a subgroup of inherited CRCs that require new criteria for identification and surveillance.

Collaboration


Dive into the Daniel R. Barnes's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Debra Frost

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julian Adlard

St James's University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kay-Tee Khaw

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Luben

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ros Eeles

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge