Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Daniel Schlager is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Daniel Schlager.


World Journal of Urology | 2016

Clinical significance of residual fragments in 2015: impact, detection, and how to avoid them

Simon Hein; Arkadiusz Miernik; Konrad Wilhelm; Fabian Adams; Daniel Schlager; Thomas R. W. Herrmann; Jens Rassweiler; Martin Schoenthaler

PurposeResidual fragments are common after stone treatment. Little is known about clinical outcomes relevant to the patient. This comprehensive review of the literature highlights the impact of residual fragments, modes of detection, and treatment strategies to avoid residual fragments in shock wave therapy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.MethodsA comprehensive review of current literature was performed using PubMed®, MEDLINE®, Embase™, Ovid®, Google Scholar™, and the Cochrane Library. Publications relevant to the subject were retrieved and critically appraised.ResultsResidual fragments after treatment for urinary stones have a significant impact on a patient’s well-being and future course. (Ultra-) low-dose non-contrast computed tomography detects small residuals most reliably. In shock wave lithotripsy, adherence to basic principles helps to improve results. Various techniques and devices facilitate complete stone clearance in conventional and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and (flexible) ureteroscopy. Promising new technologies in shock waves, lasers, and robotics (and potentially microrobotics) are on the horizon.ConclusionsResidual fragments are relevant to patients. Contemporary treatment of urolithiasis should aim at complete stone clearance.


World Journal of Urology | 2016

Stereoscopic (3D) versus monoscopic (2D) laparoscopy: comparative study of performance using advanced HD optical systems in a surgical simulator model

Martin Schoenthaler; Daniel Schnell; Konrad Wilhelm; Daniel Schlager; Fabian Adams; Simon Hein; Ulrich Wetterauer; Arkadiusz Miernik

PurposeTo compare task performances of novices and experts using advanced high-definition 3D versus 2D optical systems in a surgical simulator model.MethodsFifty medical students (novices in laparoscopy) were randomly assigned to perform five standardized tasks adopted from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) curriculum in either a 2D or 3D laparoscopy simulator system. In addition, eight experts performed the same tasks. Task performances were evaluated using a validated scoring system of the SAGES/FLS program. Participants were asked to rate 16 items in a questionnaire.ResultsOverall task performance of novices was significantly better using stereoscopic visualization. Superiority of performances in 3D reached a level of significance for tasks peg transfer and precision cutting. No significant differences were noted in performances of experts when using either 2D or 3D. Overall performances of experts compared to novices were better in both 2D and 3D. Scorings in the questionnaires showed a tendency toward lower scores in the group of novices using 3D.ConclusionsStereoscopic imaging significantly improves performance of laparoscopic phantom tasks of novices. The current study confirms earlier data based on a large number of participants and a standardized task and scoring system. Participants felt more confident and comfortable when using a 3D laparoscopic system. However, the question remains open whether these findings translate into faster and safer operations in a clinical setting.


Urology | 2017

Ultralow Radiation Exposure During Flexible Ureteroscopy in Patients With Nephrolithiasis—How Far Can We Go?

Simon Hein; Martin Schoenthaler; Konrad Wilhelm; Daniel Schlager; Werner Vach; Ulrich Wetterauer; Arkadiusz Miernik

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility and clinical performance of a novel surgeon technique and protocol targeting ultralow fluoroscopy usage in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS All RIRS procedures between 2009 and 2015 for 10- to 20-mm renal calculi performed by the same 2 experienced urologists were eligible. All procedures were performed using a highly standardized step-by-step RIRS technique. This technique was modified by the ultralow radiation exposure RIRS protocol; herein, as much as possible of the standardized steps were performed without radiation control targeting ultralow fluoroscopy usage. Primary end points were fluoroscopy time and dose area product. Secondary end points were stone-free rate (SFR) and intraoperative complications according to Satava classification. End points were evaluated using scatter plots and linear regression model. RESULTS Overall, 174 procedures were assessed. Over the study period, fluoroscopy time and dose area product could be reduced from 167.7 s/318.4 cGy/cm2 in 2009 to 7.4 s/6.4 cGy/cm2 in 2015 (P <.001). SFR (66.7% in 2009; 100% in 2015) and complications (Satava 1 and 2: 28.5% and 4.8%, respectively) improved P <.1), and the surgical duration was reduced (91 minutes and 65 minutes, respectively, P <.001). CONCLUSION Our findings revealed a continuous reduction of the amount of radiation used by the implementation of a novel ultralow X-ray usage protocol. SFR, complications, and surgical duration all improved, demonstrating that the novel protocol is as effective as current methods. Exposure to ionizing radiation can be significantly reduced if the presented protocol is followed strictly.


BJUI | 2016

Level of evidence, sponsorship, conflict of interest policy and commercial impact of PubMed‐listed clinical urolithiasis‐related trials in 2014

Martin Schoenthaler; Arkadiusz Miernik; Konrad Wilhelm; Daniel Schlager; D.S. Schoeb; Fabian Adams; Philipp Dahm; Simon Hein

To evaluate published trials on urolithiasis regarding level of evidence, type of sponsorship and declared conflicts of interest (COIs), and to elucidate a potential commercial impact.


The Journal of Urology | 2018

Experimental evaluation of human renal kidney stone spectra for intraoperative stone-tissue-instrument analysis using autofluorescence

Jan Schütz; Arkadiusz Miernik; Albrecht Brandenburg; Daniel Schlager

Purpose: The precision and safety of laser lithotripsy in the upper urinary tract is solely controlled by the surgeon. To our knowledge laser systems with integrated real-time analysis of target tissues are not available. An intelligent laser system with automated target differentiation and laser feedback control would provide tremendous improvement in patient safety and surgical precision. We evaluated the technical, medical and physical conditions for real-time analysis using fluorescence for future development of a new laser for lithotripsy. Materials and Methods: We collected data on the fluorescence spectra of 82 native human calculi covering the 8 most relevant subtypes compared to the spectra of endoscope components, the organic porcine urinary tract and pure samples of urinary stone compositions. Data analysis was performed to determine differences in sample signal intensities and emission wavelengths. Results: All native stones showed a significant fluorescence signal compared to porcine urinary tract tissue or endoscope components. The amplitude of the fluorescence signal varied by a factor of 75. The weakest signal of stone material was 3.6-fold larger than the strongest signal of pig kidney tissue (mean ± SD 0.038 ± 0.043 vs 0.00058 ± 0.00058 arbitrary units). No fluorescence signal was observed for endoscope components. Fluorescence amplitude and spectral curve form were found to be unrelated to stone type. Conclusions: Our study provides essential information on the spectral differentiation of tissue, urinary stones and relevant endoscope components. The measurements indicate that differentiation by fluorescence is possible for all relevant stone types.


PLOS ONE | 2018

Robotic waterjet wound debridement – Workflow adaption for clinical application and systematic evaluation of a novel technology

D.S. Schoeb; Julian Klodmann; Daniel Schlager; Philippe Muller; Arkadiusz Miernik; Thomas Bahls

Objective We evaluated the clinical potential of a novel robotic system for autonomous performance of waterjet wound debridement. Summary background data Within the last decade, waterjet wound debridement has proven to be a valid alternative to the conventional approach using sharp spoons and scalpel. Methods The DLR MIRO robot using the DLR MICA instrument for robotic surgery was adapted for actuation of an ERBEJET 2 flexible endoscopic waterjet probe. Waterjet debridement of various wound shapes and sizes using a porcine skin model was compared between this novel robotic system and a control group of human medical professionals with regard to wound area cleaned by the waterjet, off-target area, and procedural time. Results After the wound area was registered in the robotic system, it automatically generated a cleaning path and performed debridement based on generated surface model. While the robotic system demonstrated a significant advantage for the covered wound area (p = 0.031), the average off-target area was not significantly different from human controls. Human participants had high variability in cleaning quality across users and trials, while the robotic system provided stable results. Overall procedural time was significantly lower in trials performed by humans. Conclusions Robotic waterjet wound debridement is a promising new technological approach compared to the current clinical standard of interventional wound therapy, providing higher efficiency and quality of wound cleaning compared to human performance. Additional trials on more complicated wound shapes and in vivo tissue are necessary to more thoroughly evaluate the clinical potential of this technology.


Archive | 2018

Validating automated kidney stone volumetry in computed tomography and mathematical correlation with estimated stone volume based on diameter

Konrad Wilhelm; Arkadiusz Miernik; Simon Hein; Daniel Schlager; Fabian Adams; Matthias Benndorf; Benjamin Fritz; Mathias Langer; Albrecht Hesse; Martin Schoenthaler; Jakob Neubauer

Abstract Objectives: To validate AutoMated UroLithiasis Evaluation Tool (AMULET) software for kidney stone volumetry and compare its performance to standard clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Maximum diameter and volume of 96 urinary stones were measured as reference standard by three independent urologists. The same stones were positioned in an anthropomorphic phantom and CT scans acquired in standard settings. Three independent radiologists blinded to the reference values took manual measurements of the maximum diameter and automatic measurements of maximum diameter and volume. An “expected volume” was calculated based on manual diameter measurements using the formula: \documentclass{aastex}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{bm}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{pifont}\usepackage{stmaryrd}\usepackage{textcomp}\usepackage{portland, xspace}\usepackage{amsmath, amsxtra}\usepackage{upgreek}\pagestyle{empty}\DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6}\begin{document}


Journal of Endourology | 2018

Validating Automated Kidney Stone Volumetry in CT and Mathematical Correlation with Estimated Stone Volume Based on Diameter

Konrad Wilhelm; Arkadiusz Miernik; Simon Hein; Daniel Schlager; Fabian Adams; Matthias Benndorf; Benjamin Fritz; Mathias Langer; Albrecht Hesse; Martin Schoenthaler; Jakob Neubauer


World Journal of Urology | 2017

Surgical therapy of prostatitis: a systematic review

D.S. Schoeb; Daniel Schlager; Martin Boeker; Ulrich Wetterauer; Martin Schoenthaler; Thomas Herrmann; Arkadiusz Miernik

V = \frac ...


Urologia Internationalis | 2017

Is Endoscopic Vasectomy Just a Dream: An ex vivo Study on Feasibility and Reliability of Endoluminal Occlusion of Porcine Vas Deferens

Daniel Schlager; Moritz Maas; Simon Hein; Fabian Adams; Martin Schoenthaler; Bjoern Spittau; Ulrich Wetterauer; Arkadiusz Miernik

Abstract Objectives: To validate AutoMated UroLithiasis Evaluation Tool (AMULET) software for kidney stone volumetry and compare its performance to standard clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Maximum diameter and volume of 96 urinary stones were measured as reference standard by three independent urologists. The same stones were positioned in an anthropomorphic phantom and CT scans acquired in standard settings. Three independent radiologists blinded to the reference values took manual measurements of the maximum diameter and automatic measurements of maximum diameter and volume. An “expected volume” was calculated based on manual diameter measurements using the formula: \documentclass{aastex}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{bm}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{pifont}\usepackage{stmaryrd}\usepackage{textcomp}\usepackage{portland, xspace}\usepackage{amsmath, amsxtra}\usepackage{upgreek}\pagestyle{empty}\DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6}\begin{document}

Collaboration


Dive into the Daniel Schlager's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Simon Hein

University of Freiburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Konrad Wilhelm

University Medical Center Freiburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D.S. Schoeb

University of Freiburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Albrecht Hesse

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge