Daniel Seiler

Dendritic Cell Surface Calreticulin Is a Receptor for NY-ESO-1: Direct Interactions between Tumor-Associated Antigen and the Innate Immune System

How the immune system recognizes endogenously arising tumors and elicits adaptive immune responses against nonmutated tumor-associated Ags is poorly understood. In search of intrinsic factors contributing to the immunogenicity of the tumor-associated Ag NY-ESO-1, we found that the NY-ESO-1 protein binds to the surface of immature dendritic cells (DC), macrophages, and monocytes, but not to that of B cells or T cells. Using immunoprecipitation coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, we isolated DC surface calreticulin as the receptor for NY-ESO-1. Calreticulin Abs blocked NY-ESO-1 binding on immature DC and its cross-presentation to CD8+ T cells in vitro. Calreticulin/NY-ESO-1 interactions provide a direct link between NY-ESO-1, the innate immune system, and, potentially, the adaptive immune response against NY-ESO-1.

Pathological stage distribution in patients treated with radical prostatectomy reflecting the need for protocol‐based active surveillance: results from a contemporary European patient cohort

Study Type – Therapy (case series)

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Is Safe in Patients with Prostate Cancer and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms—A Retrospective Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the outcome of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the known presence of prostate cancer (PCa) and concomitant lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively identified 62 patients who underwent HoLEP for LUTS in the known presence of PCa at our center. Perioperative data were assessed including complications, functional outcomes, and quality of life (QoL). Giving respect to different disease characteristics, patients were stratified according to treatment strategy setting into palliative (I), radiation (II), and surveillance (III) groups and compared accordingly. RESULTS Median follow-up (FU) of the entire study cohort was 27 months (range 2-65 mos). Medians of functional parameters (International Prostate Symptom Score): 18.5 vs 4.5, QoL: 4 vs 1, maximal flow rate: 9.0 vs 18.8 mL/s and residual urine: 100 vs 0 mL, all P<0.05) improved significantly in all groups. Perioperative complications were low and without any statistically significant difference between the groups. Postoperatively, voiding was successful in 90.3% of all patients; at last FU, 17% had some degree of urinary incontinence. Treatment strategy groups showed comparable functional outcomes after HoLEP. CONCLUSION In the presence of PCa and LUTS, HoLEP represents a feasible, safe, and effective treatment option for patients unfit or without indication for radical prostatectomy. This applies as well in a palliative situation of advanced, obstructive PCa as for patients with LUTS who are scheduled for radiation therapy or surveillance in presumably indolent disease.