Daniel Spalink
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Daniel Spalink.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences | 2015
Thomas J. Givnish; Daniel Spalink; Mercedes Ames; Stephanie P. Lyon; Steven J. Hunter; Alejandro Zuluaga; William J. D. Iles; Mark A. Clements; Mary T. K. Arroyo; Jim Leebens-Mack; Lorena Endara; Ricardo Kriebel; Kurt M. Neubig; W. Mark Whitten; Norris H. Williams; Kenneth M. Cameron
Orchids are the most diverse family of angiosperms, with over 25 000 species, more than mammals, birds and reptiles combined. Tests of hypotheses to account for such diversity have been stymied by the lack of a fully resolved broad-scale phylogeny. Here, we provide such a phylogeny, based on 75 chloroplast genes for 39 species representing all orchid subfamilies and 16 of 17 tribes, time-calibrated against 17 angiosperm fossils. A supermatrix analysis places an additional 144 species based on three plastid genes. Orchids appear to have arisen roughly 112 million years ago (Mya); the subfamilies Orchidoideae and Epidendroideae diverged from each other at the end of the Cretaceous; and the eight tribes and three previously unplaced subtribes of the upper epidendroids diverged rapidly from each other between 37.9 and 30.8 Mya. Orchids appear to have undergone one significant acceleration of net species diversification in the orchidoids, and two accelerations and one deceleration in the upper epidendroids. Consistent with theory, such accelerations were correlated with the evolution of pollinia, the epiphytic habit, CAM photosynthesis, tropical distribution (especially in extensive cordilleras), and pollination via Lepidoptera or euglossine bees. Deceit pollination appears to have elevated the number of orchid species by one-half but not via acceleration of the rate of net diversification. The highest rate of net species diversification within the orchids (0.382 sp sp−1 My−1) is 6.8 times that at the Asparagales crown.
Cladistics | 2016
Thomas J. Givnish; Alejandro Zuluaga; Isabel Marques; Vivienne K. Y. Lam; Marybel Soto Gomez; William J. D. Iles; Mercedes Ames; Daniel Spalink; Jackson R. Moeller; Barbara G. Briggs; Stephanie P. Lyon; Dennis W. Stevenson; Wendy B. Zomlefer; Sean W. Graham
We present the first phylogenomic analysis of relationships among all ten families of Liliales, based on 75 plastid genes from 35 species in 29 genera, and 97 additional plastomes stratified across angiosperm lineages. We used a supermatrix approach to extend our analysis to 58 of 64 genera of Liliales, and calibrated the resulting phylogeny against 17 fossil dates to produce a new timeline for monocot evolution. Liliales diverged from other monocots 124 Mya and began splitting into separate families 113 Mya. Our data support an Australian origin for Liliales, with close relationships between three pairs of lineages (Corsiaceae/Campynemataceae, Philesiaceae/Ripogonaceae, tribes Alstroemerieae/Luzuriageae) in South America and Australia or New Zealand reflecting teleconnections of these areas via Antarctica. Long‐distance dispersal (LDD) across the Pacific and Tasman Sea led to re‐invasion of New Zealand by two lineages (Luzuriaga, Ripogonum); LDD allowed Campynemanthe to colonize New Caledonia after its submergence until 37 Mya. LDD permitted Colchicaceae to invade East Asia and Africa from Australia, and re‐invade Africa from Australia. Periodic desert greening permitted Gloriosa and Iphigenia to colonize Southeast Asia overland from Africa, and Androcymbium–Colchicum to invade the Mediterranean from South Africa. Melanthiaceae and Liliaceae crossed the Bering land‐bridge several times from the Miocene to the Pleistocene.
Ecology and Evolution | 2016
Rebecca Y. Kartzinel; Daniel Spalink; Donald M. Waller; Thomas J. Givnish
Abstract The amphicarpic annual legume Amphicarpaea bracteata is unusual in producing aerial and subterranean cleistogamous flowers that always self‐fertilize and, less commonly, aerial chasmogamous flowers that outcross. Although both morphologic and genetic variants are known in this highly selfing species, debate continues over whether this variation is continuous, reflecting the segregation of standing genetic variation, or discontinuous, reflecting distinct taxa that rarely intercross. We characterized SNP variation in 128 individuals in southern Wisconsin to assess within‐ and among‐population variation at 3928 SNPs. We also assessed genotype and leaf morphology in an additional 76 individuals to connect phenotypic variation with genetic variation. Genetic variation maps onto three strongly divergent and highly inbred genetic groups showing little relation to site location. Each group has a distinct phenotype, but the divergence of these groups differs from the varietal divisions previously identified based on morphological characters. Like previous authors, we argue that the taxonomy of this species should be revised. Despite extensive sympatry, estimates of among‐group migration rates are low, and hybrid individuals were at low frequency (<2%) in our dataset. Restricted gene flow likely results from high selfing rates and partial reproductive incompatibility as evidenced by the U‐shaped distribution of pairwise F ST values reflecting “islands” of genomic divergence. These islands may be associated with hybrid incompatibility loci that arose in allopatry. The coexistence of lineages within sites may reflect density‐dependent attack by species‐specific strains of pathogenic fungi and/or root‐nodulating bacteria specializing on distinct genotypes.
Journal of Systematics and Evolution | 2018
Daniel Spalink; Jocelyn Pender; Marcial Escudero; Andrew L. Hipp; Eric H. Roalson; Julian R. Starr; Marcia J. Waterway; Lynn Bohs; Kenneth J. Sytsma
Systematically quantifying diversity across landscapes is necessary to understand how clade history and ecological heterogeneity contribute to the origin, distribution, and maintenance of biodiversity. Here, we chart the spatial structure of diversity among all species in the sedge family (Cyperaceae) throughout the USA and Canada. We first identify areas of remarkable species richness, phylogenetic diversity, and functional trait diversity, and highlight regions of conservation priority. We then test predictions about the spatial structure of this diversity based on the historical biogeography of the family. Incorporating a phylogeny, over 400 000 herbarium records, and a database of functional traits mined from online floras, we find that species richness and functional trait diversity peak in the Northeastern USA, while phylogenetic diversity peaks along the Gulf of Mexico. Floristic turnover among assemblages increases significantly with distance, but phylogenetic turnover is twice as rapid along latitudinal gradients as along longitudinal gradients. These patterns reflect the expected distribution of Cyperaceae, which originated in the tropics but radiated in temperate regions. We identify assemblages with an abundance of rare, range‐restricted lineages, and assemblages composed of species generally lacking from diverse regions. We argue that both of these metrics are useful for developing targeted conservation strategies. We use the data generated here to establish future research priorities, including the testing of a series of hypotheses regarding the distribution of chromosome numbers, photosynthetic pathways, and resource partitioning in sedges.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution | 2016
Brent A. Berger; Ricardo Kriebel; Daniel Spalink; Kenneth J. Sytsma
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society | 2015
Marcia J. Waterway; Karen L. Wilson; Bruce A. Ford; Julian R. Starr; Xiao‐Feng Jin; Shuren Zhang; Sebastian Gebauer; Matthias H. Hoffmann; Berit Gehrke; Okihito Yano; Takuji Hoshino; Tomomi Masaki; Kerry A. Ford; Kyong Sook Chung; J. Jung; Sangtae Kim; M. Escudero; Modesto Luceño; Enrique Maguilla; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Mónica Míguez; Tamara Villaverde; Ana Molina; David Simpson; Leo P. Bruederle; Marlene Hahn; Andrew L. Hipp; P. E. Rothrock; Anton A. Reznicek; Robert F. C. Naczi
Journal of Biogeography | 2016
Thomas J. Givnish; Daniel Spalink; Mercedes Ames; Stephanie P. Lyon; Steven J. Hunter; Alejandro Zuluaga; Alfonso Doucette; Giovanny Giraldo Caro; James McDaniel; Mark A. Clements; Mary T. K. Arroyo; Lorena Endara; Ricardo Kriebel; Norris H. Williams; Kenneth M. Cameron
Biological Journal of The Linnean Society | 2014
Kenneth J. Sytsma; Daniel Spalink; Brent A. Berger
Journal of Biogeography | 2016
Daniel Spalink; Bryan T. Drew; Matthew C. Pace; John G. Zaborsky; Julian R. Starr; Kenneth M. Cameron; Thomas J. Givnish; Kenneth J. Sytsma
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society | 2014
Étienne Léveillé-Bourret; Claire N. Gilmour; Julian R. Starr; Robert F. C. Naczi; Daniel Spalink; Kenneth J. Sytsma