Daniel Thaysen-Petersen

Fractional laser-mediated photodynamic therapy of high-risk basal cell carcinomas – a randomized clinical trial

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is approved for selected nodular basal cell carcinomas (nBCC) but efficacy is reduced for large and thick tumours. Ablative fractional lasers (AFXL) facilitate uptake of methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL) and may thus improve PDT outcome.

Fractional laser-assisted drug uptake: impact of time-related topical application to achieve enhanced delivery

Ablative fractional laser (AFXL) is acknowledged to increase uptake of topically applied agents in skin. AFXL channels gradually close over time, which may impair this capability. The time frame for applying a drug after AFXL exposure remains to be established. The aim of this study, was to investigate the importance of time‐related topical application after AFXL exposure and to relate resultant uptake in skin with AFXL channel morphology and skin integrity.

Ablative fractional laser enhances MAL-induced PpIX accumulation: Impact of laser channel density, incubation time and drug concentration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Pretreatment of skin with ablative fractional laser enhances accumulation of topical provided photosensitizer, but essential information is lacking on the interaction between laser channel densities and pharmacokinetics. Hence our objectives were to investigate how protoporphyrin accumulation was affected by laser densities, incubation time and drug concentration. METHODS We conducted the study on the back of healthy male volunteers (n=11). Test areas were pretreated with 2940nm ablative fractional Er:YAG laser, 11.2mJ per laser channel using densities of 1, 2, 5, 10 and 15% (AFL 1-15%). Control areas received pretreatment with curettage or no pretreatment. Methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) was applied under occlusion in concentrations of 0, 80 and 160mg/g. MAL-induced protoporphyrin fluorescence was quantified with a handheld photometer after 0, 30, 60, 120 and 180min incubation. The individual fluorescence intensity reached from the highest density (15%) and longest MAL 160mg/g incubation time (180min) was selected as reference (100%) for other interventional measurements. RESULTS A low laser density of 1% markedly enhanced fluorescence intensities from 34% to 75% (no pretreatment vs. AFL 1%, MAL 160mg/g, 180min; p<0.001). Furthermore, fluorescence intensities increased substantially by enhancing densities up to 5% (p≤0.0195). Accumulation of protoporphyrins was accelerated by laser exposure. Thus, laser exposure of 5% density and a median incubation time of 80min MAL (range 46-133min) induced fluorescence levels similar to curettage and 180min incubation. Furthermore, MAL 80 and 160mg/g induced similar fluorescence intensities in skin exposed to laser densities of 1, 2 and 5% (p>0.0537, 30-180min). CONCLUSION MAL-induced protoporphyrin accumulation is augmented by enhancing AFL densities up to 5%. Further, this model indicates that incubation time as well as drug concentration of MAL may be reduced with laser pretreatment.

Early intervention with non-ablative fractional laser to improve cutaneous scarring—A randomized controlled trial on the impact of intervention time and fluence levels

Laser treatment in the early phases of wound healing may reduce scar formation. However, little is known on when in the early wound healing phases laser exposure most optimally should be provided and at which fluence levels. This study investigates the clinical effect of non‐ablative‐fractional‐laser (NAFL) performed at three early time points at a range of fluence levels versus untreated control scars.

Quantitative assessment of growing hair counts, thickness and colour during and after treatments with a low-fluence, home-device laser: a randomized controlled trial.

At‐home laser and intense pulsed‐light hair removal continues to grow in popularity and availability. A relatively limited body of evidence is available on the course of hair growth during and after low‐fluence laser usage.

Skin reactions after photodynamic therapy are unaffected by 839 nm photobiomodulation therapy: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, clinical trial

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is associated with erythema and edema. Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy may stimulate the skin recovery process. We investigated the potential of PBM to reduce PDT‐induced skin reactions.

Side effects from intense pulsed light: Importance of skin pigmentation, fluence level and ultraviolet radiation—A randomized controlled trial

Intense pulsed light (IPL) is a mainstream treatment for hair removal. Side effects after IPL are known, but risk factors remain to be investigated. The objective of this study was to assess the contribution of skin pigmentation, fluence level, and ultraviolet radiation (UVR) on IPL‐induced side effects.

Repeated treatments with ingenol mebutate for prophylaxis of UV-induced squamous cell carcinoma in hairless mice

BACKGROUND AND AIM The incidence of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) is increasing, and effective chemopreventative strategies are needed. We hypothesized that repeated treatments with ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) would postpone development of SCC in hairless mice, and that application of a corticosteroid would reduce IngMeb-induced local skin responses (LSRs) without affecting tumor postponement. METHODS Hairless mice (n=150; 6 groups á 25 mice) were irradiated with solar simulated ultraviolet radiation (UVR) until SCC developed. During UV-irradiation and before tumor development, five single treatments (Tx) with IngMeb were given at four-week intervals (days 21, 49, 77, 105, 133). Clobetasol propionate (CP) was applied once daily for 5days prior to IngMeb, as well as 6h and 1day post treatment. Tumor formation was evaluated weekly for 52weeks. LSR (scale 0-24) were assessed at baseline, 1h, 6h, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, and 7days after each IngMeb treatment. RESULTS IngMeb significantly delayed tumor development compared to UVR alone (UVR day 168 vs. UVR+IngMeb day 189; p=0.025). LSR included erythema, flaking, crusting, bleeding, vesiculation, and ulceration. The composite LSR-scores were of moderate intensity in non-UV irradiated skin (max LSR IngMeb Tx 1-5: 1.5-2.5) and more pronounced in photodamaged skin (max LSR Tx 5; IngMeb 1.5 vs. UVR+IngMeb 1.8; p<0.001). LSR intensity correlated with tumor development by means of greater composite LSR-score resulted in longer tumor-free survival (r(2)=0.257, p<0.001). Contrary to our hypothesis, concurrent CP increased LSR (max LSR Tx 1-5: UVR+CP+IngMeb 3.2-4.9 vs. UVR+IngMeb 1.3-2.2, p<0.001) and postponed tumor development compared to IngMeb alone (UVR+CP+IngMeb day 217 vs. UVR+IngMeb day 189, p<0.001). CONCLUSION Repeated field-directed treatments with IngMeb delay development of UV-induced SCC in hairless mice, and increased IngMeb induced LSRs correlated with improved clinical outcomes. The findings highlight the potential of IngMeb as a prophylactic remedy for SCC in humans.

The role of natural and UV‐induced skin pigmentation on low‐fluence IPL‐induced side effects: A randomized controlled trial

The risk of adverse skin effects following light‐based hair removal is greater in pigmented skin based on the theory of selective photothermolysis. Thus sunlight‐induced pigment i.e., facultative pigmentation, increases the risk of adverse skin effects, perhaps disproportionately. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of constitutive and facultative skin pigmentation on low‐fluence intense pulsed light (IPL)‐induced adverse skin effects.

Repeated Treatments with Ingenol Mebutate Prevents Progression of UV-Induced Photodamage in Hairless Mice

Background and Aim Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis. In this study, we hypothesized that repeated treatments with IngMeb may prevent progression of UV-induced photodamage, and that concurrent application of a corticosteroid may reduce IngMeb-induced local skin responses (LSR). Methods Hairless mice (n = 60; 3 groups of 20 mice) were irradiated with solar simulated ultraviolet radiation (UVR) throughout the study. Five single treatments with IngMeb were given at 4-week intervals (Days 21, 49, 77, 105, and 133). Clobetasol propionate (CP) was applied once daily for 5 days prior to each IngMeb application, as well as 6 h and 1 day post treatment. One week after IngMeb treatment No. 1, 3, and 5 (Days 28, 84, and 140), biopsies from four mice in each group were collected for histological evaluation of UV-damage on a standardized UV-damage scale (0–12). LSR (0–24) were assessed once daily (Days 1–7) after each IngMeb treatment. Results IngMeb prevented progression of photodamage in terms of keratosis grade, epidermal hypertrophy, dysplasia, and dermal actinic damage with a lower composite UV-damage score on day 140 (UVR 10.25 vs. UVR+IngMeb 6.00, p = 0.002) compared to UVR alone. IngMeb induced LSR, including erythema, flaking, crusting, bleeding, vesiculation, and ulceration. Concurrent CP increased LSR (max LSR Tx 1–5: UVR+IngMeb+CP 3.6–5.5 vs. UVR+IngMeb 2.6–4.3) and provided better prevention of photodamage compared to IngMeb alone (Day 140: UVR+IngMeb 6.00 vs. UVR+IngMeb+CP 3.00 p < 0.001). Conclusion Repeated field-directed treatments with IngMeb prevent progression of cutaneous photodamage in hairless mice, while CP cannot be used to alleviate IngMeb-induced LSR. The findings suggest that IngMeb may potentially serve as a prophylactic treatment for UV-induced tumors.