Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Daniel W. Hommer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Daniel W. Hommer.


Neuroreport | 2001

Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI

Brian Knutson; Grace Fong; Charles M. Adams; Jerald L. Varner; Daniel W. Hommer

Reward processing involves both appetitive and consummatory phases. We sought to examine whether reward anticipation vs outcomes would recruit different regions of ventral forebrain circuitry using event-related fMRI. Nine healthy volunteers participated in a monetary incentive delays task in which they either responded to a cued target for monetary reward, responded to a cued target for no reward, or did not respond to a cued target during scanning. Multiple regression analyses indicated that while anticipation of reward vs non-reward activated foci in the ventral striatum, reward vs non-reward outcomes activated foci in the ventromedial frontal cortex. These findings suggest that reward anticipation and outcomes may differentially recruit distinct regions that lie along the trajectory of ascending dopamine projections.


NeuroImage | 2000

FMRI Visualization of Brain Activity during a Monetary Incentive Delay Task

Brian Knutson; Andrew Westdorp; Erica Kaiser; Daniel W. Hommer

Comparative studies have implicated striatal and mesial forebrain circuitry in the generation of autonomic, endocrine, and behavioral responses for incentives. Using blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging, we sought to visualize functional activation of these regions in 12 normal volunteers as they anticipated and responded for monetary incentives. Both individual and group analyses of time-series data revealed significant activation of striatal and mesial forebrain structures (including insula, caudate, putamen, and mesial prefrontal cortex) during trials involving both monetary rewards and punishments. In addition to these areas, during trials involving punishment, group analysis revealed activation foci in the anterior cingulate and thalamus. These results corroborate comparative studies which implicate striatal and mesial forebrain circuitry in the elaboration of incentive-driven behavior. This report also introduces a new paradigm for probing the functional integrity of this circuitry in humans.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2004

Incentive-Elicited Brain Activation in Adolescents: Similarities and Differences from Young Adults

James M. Bjork; Brian Knutson; Grace Fong; Daniel M. Caggiano; Shannon M. Bennett; Daniel W. Hommer

Brain motivational circuitry in human adolescence is poorly characterized. One theory holds that risky behavior in adolescence results in part from a relatively overactive ventral striatal (VS) motivational circuit that readily energizes approach toward salient appetitive cues. However, other evidence fosters a theory that this circuit is developmentally underactive, in which adolescents approach more robust incentives (such as risk taking or drug experimentation) to recruit this circuitry. To help resolve this, we compared brain activation in 12 adolescents (12-17 years of age) and 12 young adults (22-28 years of age) while they anticipated the opportunity to respond to obtain monetary gains as well as to avoid monetary losses. In both age groups, anticipation of potential gain activated portions of the VS, right insula, dorsal thalamus, and dorsal midbrain, where the magnitude of VS activation was sensitive to gain amount. Notification of gain outcomes (in contrast with missed gains) activated the mesial frontal cortex (mFC). Across all subjects, signal increase in the right nucleus accumbens during anticipation of responding for large gains independently correlated with both age and self-rated excitement about the high gain cue. In direct comparison, adolescents evidenced less recruitment of the right VS and right-extended amygdala while anticipating responding for gains (in contrast with anticipation of nongains) compared with young adults. However, brain activation after gain outcomes did not appreciably differ between age groups. These results suggest that adolescents selectively show reduced recruitment of motivational but not consummatory components of reward-directed behavior.


Molecular Psychiatry | 2011

A genetic determinant of the striatal dopamine response to alcohol in men

Vijay A. Ramchandani; John C. Umhau; Francisco Javier Pavón; Victor Ruiz-Velasco; Wojciech Margas; Hui Sun; Ruslan Damadzic; Robert L. Eskay; Michael Schoor; Annika Thorsell; Melanie L. Schwandt; Wolfgang H. Sommer; David T. George; Loren H. Parsons; Peter Herscovitch; Daniel W. Hommer; Markus Heilig

Excessive alcohol use, a major cause of morbidity and mortality, is less well understood than other addictive disorders. Dopamine release in ventral striatum is a common element of drug reward, but alcohol has an unusually complex pharmacology, and humans vary greatly in their alcohol responses. This variation is related to genetic susceptibility for alcoholism, which contributes more than half of alcoholism risk. Here, we report that a functional OPRM1 A118G polymorphism is a major determinant of striatal dopamine responses to alcohol. Social drinkers recruited based on OPRM1 genotype were challenged in separate sessions with alcohol and placebo under pharmacokinetically controlled conditions, and examined for striatal dopamine release using positron emission tomography and [11C]-raclopride displacement. A striatal dopamine response to alcohol was restricted to carriers of the minor 118G allele. To directly establish the causal role of OPRM1 A118G variation, we generated two humanized mouse lines, carrying the respective human sequence variant. Brain microdialysis showed a fourfold greater peak dopamine response to an alcohol challenge in h/mOPRM1-118GG than in h/mOPRM1-118AA mice. OPRM1 A118G variation is a genetic determinant of dopamine responses to alcohol, a mechanism by which it likely modulates alcohol reward.


Journal of Neurochemistry | 2001

Effects of acute tryptophan depletion on plasma and cerebrospinal fluid tryptophan and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in normal volunteers.

Wendol Williams; Susan E. Shoaf; Daniel W. Hommer; Robert R. Rawlings; Markku Linnoila

Abstract: Brain serotonin synthesis and metabolism (turnover), as indicated by CSF concentrations of 5‐hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5‐HIAA), may depend on plasma concentrations of the essential amino acid L‐tryptophan (TRP). We investigated the biochemical effects of acute plasma TRP depletion (ATD) in normal volunteers undergoing a 36‐h CSF collection via lumbar drain. Six subjects who were in good health were put on a low‐TRP diet (160 mg/day) 24 h before lumbar puncture; this diet was continued for the first 22 h of the CSF collection. At hour 22, subjects ingested a TRP‐deficient 15‐amino acid drink shown previously to deplete plasma TRP. Total plasma TRP, free plasma TRP, and CSF TRP subsequently decreased 86.3, 86.5, and 92.3%, respectively. CSF 5‐HIAA decreased by 32.8%. Plasma total and free TRP concentrations were both decreased at ∼2 h following ingestion of the TRP‐free amino acid drink and were lowest ∼6 h after ATD; CSF TRP and 5‐HIAA were decreased at 2.5 h and ∼4 h after ATD, respectively. CSF TRP was lowest 8.0 h later. CSF 5‐HIAA continued to decrease 14 h after the TRP‐deficient amino acid drink was given.


PLOS ONE | 2010

Adolescents, Adults and Rewards: Comparing Motivational Neurocircuitry Recruitment Using fMRI

James M. Bjork; Ashley R. Smith; Gang Chen; Daniel W. Hommer

Background Adolescent risk-taking, including behaviors resulting in injury or death, has been attributed in part to maturational differences in mesolimbic incentive-motivational neurocircuitry, including ostensible oversensitivity of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) to rewards. Methodology/Principal Findings To test whether adolescents showed increased NAcc activation by cues for rewards, or by delivery of rewards, we scanned 24 adolescents (age 12–17) and 24 adults age (22–42) with functional magnetic resonance imaging while they performed a monetary incentive delay (MID) task. The MID task was configured to temporally disentangle potential reward or potential loss anticipation-related brain signal from reward or loss notification-related signal. Subjects saw cues signaling opportunities to win or avoid losing


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2008

Why We Like to Drink : A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Rewarding and Anxiolytic Effects of Alcohol

Jodi M. Gilman; Vijay A. Ramchandani; Megan B. Davis; James M. Bjork; Daniel W. Hommer

0,


IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging | 1998

Statistical analysis of functional MRI data in the wavelet domain

Urs E. Ruttimann; Michael Unser; Robert R. Rawlings; Daniel Rio; Nick F. Ramsey; Venkata S. Mattay; Daniel W. Hommer; Joseph A. Frank; Daniel R. Weinberger

.50, or


NeuroImage | 2008

Striatal sensitivity to reward deliveries and omissions in substance dependent patients.

James M. Bjork; Ashley R. Smith; Daniel W. Hommer

5 for responding quickly to a subsequent target. Subjects then viewed feedback of their trial success after a variable interval from cue presentation of between 6 to17 s. Adolescents showed reduced NAcc recruitment by reward-predictive cues compared to adult controls in a linear contrast with non-incentive cues, and in a volume-of-interest analysis of signal change in the NAcc. In contrast, adolescents showed little difference in striatal and frontocortical responsiveness to reward deliveries compared to adults. Conclusions/Significance In light of divergent developmental difference findings between neuroimaging incentive paradigms (as well as at different stages within the same task), these data suggest that maturational differences in incentive-motivational neurocircuitry: 1) may be sensitive to nuances of incentive tasks or stimuli, such as behavioral or learning contingencies, and 2) may be specific to the component of the instrumental behavior (such as anticipation versus notification).


Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | 2011

Imaging brain response to reward in addictive disorders

Daniel W. Hommer; James M. Bjork; Jodi M. Gilman

People typically drink alcohol to induce euphoria or reduce anxiety, and they frequently drink in social settings, yet the effect of alcohol on human brain circuits involved in reward and emotion has been explored only sparingly. We administered alcohol intravenously to social drinkers while brain response to visual threatening and nonthreatening facial stimuli was measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Alcohol robustly activated striatal reward circuits while attenuating response to fearful stimuli in visual and limbic regions. Self-ratings of intoxication correlated with striatal activation, suggesting that activation in this area may contribute to subjective experience of pleasure and reward during intoxication. These results show that the acute pharmacological rewarding and anxiolytic effects of alcohol can be measured with fMRI.

Collaboration


Dive into the Daniel W. Hommer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Reza Momenan

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert R. Rawlings

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Rio

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James M. Bjork

National Institute on Drug Abuse

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David T. George

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Pickar

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Grace Fong

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge