Daniel Waterkamp

Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Outcomes are poor for patients with previously treated, advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody atezolizumab is clinically active against cancer, including NSCLC, especially cancers expressing PD-L1 on tumour cells, tumour-infiltrating immune cells, or both. We assessed efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus docetaxel in previously treated NSCLC, analysed by PD-L1 expression levels on tumour cells and tumour-infiltrating immune cells and in the intention-to-treat population. METHODS In this open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial, patients with NSCLC who progressed on post-platinum chemotherapy were recruited in 61 academic medical centres and community oncology practices across 13 countries in Europe and North America. Key inclusion criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), and adequate haematological and end-organ function. Patients were stratified by PD-L1 tumour-infiltrating immune cell status, histology, and previous lines of therapy, and randomly assigned (1:1) by permuted block randomisation (with a block size of four) using an interactive voice or web system to receive intravenous atezolizumab 1200 mg or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks. Baseline PD-L1 expression was scored by immunohistochemistry in tumour cells (as percentage of PD-L1-expressing tumour cells TC3≥50%, TC2≥5% and <50%, TC1≥1% and <5%, and TC0<1%) and tumour-infiltrating immune cells (as percentage of tumour area: IC3≥10%, IC2≥5% and <10%, IC1≥1% and <5%, and IC0<1%). The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population and PD-L1 subgroups at 173 deaths. Biomarkers were assessed in an exploratory analysis. We assessed safety in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01903993. FINDINGS Patients were enrolled between Aug 5, 2013, and March 31, 2014. 144 patients were randomly allocated to the atezolizumab group, and 143 to the docetaxel group. 142 patients received at least one dose of atezolizumab and 135 received docetaxel. Overall survival in the intention-to-treat population was 12·6 months (95% CI 9·7-16·4) for atezolizumab versus 9·7 months (8·6-12·0) for docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR] 0·73 [95% CI 0·53-0·99]; p=0·04). Increasing improvement in overall survival was associated with increasing PD-L1 expression (TC3 or IC3 HR 0·49 [0·22-1·07; p=0·068], TC2/3 or IC2/3 HR 0·54 [0·33-0·89; p=0·014], TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 HR 0·59 [0·40-0·85; p=0·005], TC0 and IC0 HR 1·04 [0·62-1·75; p=0·871]). In our exploratory analysis, patients with pre-existing immunity, defined by high T-effector-interferon-γ-associated gene expression, had improved overall survival with atezolizumab. 11 (8%) patients in the atezolizumab group discontinued because of adverse events versus 30 (22%) patients in the docetaxel group. 16 (11%) patients in the atezolizumab group versus 52 (39%) patients in the docetaxel group had treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events, and one (<1%) patient in the atezolizumab group versus three (2%) patients in the docetaxel group died from a treatment-related adverse event. INTERPRETATION Atezolizumab significantly improved survival compared with docetaxel in patients with previously treated NSCLC. Improvement correlated with PD-L1 immunohistochemistry expression on tumour cells and tumour-infiltrating immune cells, suggesting that PD-L1 expression is predictive for atezolizumab benefit. Atezolizumab was well tolerated, with a safety profile distinct from chemotherapy. FUNDING F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech Inc.

Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND Atezolizumab is a humanised antiprogrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-L1 and programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1 and B7-1 interactions, reinvigorating anticancer immunity. We assessed its efficacy and safety versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (OAK) in 194 academic or community oncology centres in 31 countries. We enrolled patients who had squamous or non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, were 18 years or older, had measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients had received one to two previous cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens (one or more platinum based combination therapies) for stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients with a history of autoimmune disease and those who had received previous treatments with docetaxel, CD137 agonists, anti-CTLA4, or therapies targeting the PD-L1 and PD-1 pathway were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenously receive either atezolizumab 1200 mg or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks by permuted block randomisation (block size of eight) via an interactive voice or web response system. Coprimary endpoints were overall survival in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and PD-L1-expression population TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 (≥1% PD-L1 on tumour cells or tumour-infiltrating immune cells). The primary efficacy analysis was done in the first 850 of 1225 enrolled patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02008227. FINDINGS Between March 11, 2014, and April 29, 2015, 1225 patients were recruited. In the primary population, 425 patients were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab and 425 patients were assigned to receive docetaxel. Overall survival was significantly longer with atezolizumab in the ITT and PD-L1-expression populations. In the ITT population, overall survival was improved with atezolizumab compared with docetaxel (median overall survival was 13·8 months [95% CI 11·8-15·7] vs 9·6 months [8·6-11·2]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·73 [95% CI 0·62-0·87], p=0·0003). Overall survival in the TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population was improved with atezolizumab (n=241) compared with docetaxel (n=222; median overall survival was 15·7 months [95% CI 12·6-18·0] with atezolizumab vs 10·3 months [8·8-12·0] with docetaxel; HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·58-0·93]; p=0·0102). Patients in the PD-L1 low or undetectable subgroup (TC0 and IC0) also had improved survival with atezolizumab (median overall survival 12·6 months vs 8·9 months; HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·59-0·96]). Overall survival improvement was similar in patients with squamous (HR 0·73 [95% CI 0·54-0·98]; n=112 in the atezolizumab group and n=110 in the docetaxel group) or non-squamous (0·73 [0·60-0·89]; n=313 and n=315) histology. Fewer patients had treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events with atezolizumab (90 [15%] of 609 patients) versus docetaxel (247 [43%] of 578 patients). One treatment-related death from a respiratory tract infection was reported in the docetaxel group. INTERPRETATION To our knowledge, OAK is the first randomised phase 3 study to report results of a PD-L1-targeted therapy, with atezolizumab treatment resulting in a clinically relevant improvement of overall survival versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer, regardless of PD-L1 expression or histology, with a favourable safety profile. FUNDING F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech, Inc.

Bevacizumab plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (AVEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND Elderly patients are often under-represented in clinical trials of metastatic colorectal cancer. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus capecitabine compared with capecitabine alone in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS For this open-label, randomised phase 3 trial, patients aged 70 years and older with previously untreated, unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer, who were not deemed to be candidates for oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based chemotherapy regimens, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio via an interactive voice-response system, stratified by performance status and geographical region. Treatment consisted of capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) orally twice a day on days 1-14) alone or with bevacizumab (7·5 mg/kg intravenously on day 1), given every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. Efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00484939. FINDINGS From July 9, 2007, to Dec 14, 2010, 280 patients with a median age of 76 years (range 70-87) were recruited from 40 sites across ten countries. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either bevacizumab plus capecitabine (n=140) or capecitabine only (n=140). Progression-free survival was significantly longer with bevacizumab and capecitabine than with capecitabine alone (median 9·1 months [95% CI 7·3-11·4] vs 5·1 months [4·2-6·3]; hazard ratio 0·53 [0·41-0·69]; p<0·0001). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 53 (40%) patients in the combination group and 30 (22%) in the capecitabine group, and treatment-related serious adverse events in 19 (14%) and 11 (8%) patients. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events of special interest for bevacizumab or chemotherapy were hand-foot syndrome (21 [16%] vs nine [7%]), diarrhoea (nine [7%] vs nine [7%]), and venous thromboembolic events (11 [8%] vs six [4%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in five patients in the combination group and four in the capecitabine group. The most common any-grade adverse event of special interest for bevacizumab was haemorrhage (34 [25%] vs nine [7%]). INTERPRETATION The combination of bevacizumab and capecitabine is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. FUNDING F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Pooled Analysis From Seven Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE his analysis pooled individual patient data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to more thoroughly examine clinical outcomes when adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patient data were pooled from the first-line AVF2107, NO16966, ARTIST, AVF0780, AVF2192, and AGITG MAX RCTs and the second-line E3200 RCT. All analyses were based on the intent-to-treat population. To assess differences in time-to-event variables by treatment (chemotherapy with or without placebo vs. chemotherapy plus bevacizumab), stratified random-effects (overall) and fixed-effects (subgroup comparisons) models were used to estimate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS The analysis population comprised 3,763 patients (1,773 chemotherapy with or without placebo; 1,990 chemotherapy plus bevacizumab). The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy was associated with statistically significant increases in overall survival (OS; HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90) and progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.46-0.71). The effects on OS and PFS across subgroups defined by chemotherapy backbone (oxaliplatin-based, irinotecan-based), extent of disease (liver metastases only, extensive disease), age (<65, ≥65 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0, ≥1), and KRAS status (wild-type, mutant) were consistent with the overall analysis. Incidence rates of grade ≥3 hypertension, proteinuria, bleeding, wound-healing complications, gastrointestinal perforations, and thromboembolic events were increased with bevacizumab treatment. CONCLUSION The use of bevacizumab with chemotherapy resulted in statistically significant increases in OS and PFS for patients with mCRC. The PFS benefit extended across the clinically relevant subgroups examined. The observed safety profile of bevacizumab was consistent with that reported in individual trials.

Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab enhances antigen-specific T-cell migration in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Anti-tumour immune activation by checkpoint inhibitors leads to durable responses in a variety of cancers, but combination approaches are required to extend this benefit beyond a subset of patients. In preclinical models tumour-derived VEGF limits immune cell activity while anti-VEGF augments intra-tumoral T-cell infiltration, potentially through vascular normalization and endothelial cell activation. This study investigates how VEGF blockade with bevacizumab could potentiate PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition with atezolizumab in mRCC. Tissue collections are before treatment, after bevacizumab and after the addition of atezolizumab. We discover that intra-tumoral CD8+ T cells increase following combination treatment. A related increase is found in intra-tumoral MHC-I, Th1 and T-effector markers, and chemokines, most notably CX3CL1 (fractalkine). We also discover that the fractalkine receptor increases on peripheral CD8+ T cells with treatment. Furthermore, trafficking lymphocyte increases are observed in tumors following bevacizumab and combination treatment. These data suggest that the anti-VEGF and anti-PD-L1 combination improves antigen-specific T-cell migration.

Bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX-6 or FOLFOXIRI in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer: the OLIVIA multinational randomised phase II trial

BACKGROUND For patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer, chemotherapy can downsize metastases and facilitate secondary resection. We assessed the efficacy of bevacizumab plus modified FOLFOX-6 (5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, oxaliplatin) or FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS OLIVIA was a multinational open-label phase II study conducted at 16 centres in Austria, France, Spain, and the UK. Patients with unresectable liver metastases were randomised to bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) plus mFOLFOX-6 [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), folinic acid 400 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) then 2400 mg/m(2) (46-h infusion)] or FOLFOXIRI [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), irinotecan 165 mg/m(2), folinic acid 200 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 3200 mg/m(2) (46-h infusion)] every 2 weeks. Unresectability was defined as ≥1 of the following criteria: no possibility of upfront R0/R1 resection of all lesions; <30% residual liver volume after resection; metastases in contact with major vessels of the remnant liver. Resectability was evaluated by multidisciplinary review. The primary end point was overall resection rate (R0/R1/R2). Efficacy end points were analysed by intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS In patients assigned to bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI (n = 41) or bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6 (n = 39), the overall resection rate was 61% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45% to 76%] and 49% (95% CI 32% to 65%), respectively (difference 12%; 95% CI -11% to 36%). R0 resection rates were 49% and 23%, respectively. Overall tumour response rates were 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) with bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI and 62% (95% CI 45% to 77%) with bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18·6 (95% CI 12.9-22.3) months and 11·5 (95% CI 9.6-13.6) months, respectively. The most common grade 3-5 adverse events were neutropenia (bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI, 50%; bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6, 35%) and diarrhoea (30% and 14%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI was associated with higher response and resection rates and prolonged PFS versus bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6 in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Toxicity was increased but manageable with bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI. CLINICALTRIALSGOV NCT00778102.

Abstract P2-11-06: Safety and clinical activity of atezolizumab (anti-PDL1) in combination with nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is associated with poor prognosis, and chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment. Cancer immunotherapy represents a promising treatment approach for mTNBC, which is characterized by a high mutation rate, increased levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and high programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression levels. Atezolizumab (atezo; MPDL3280A) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that can restore tumor-specific T-cell immunity by inhibiting the binding of PD-L1 to PD-1. Atezo has demonstrated durable responses as monotherapy in mTNBC (Emens et al, AACR 2015). In addition, high objective response rates (ORRs) and durable responses have been observed with atezo plus chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (Liu et al, ASCO 2015). This study is the first combination trial of a checkpoint inhibitor with chemotherapy in patients with mTNBC. Methods: This arm of a multicenter, multi-arm Phase Ib study (NCT01633970) evaluated atezo in combination with weekly nab-paclitaxel in patients with mTNBC. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, with secondary endpoints of PK and clinical activity. Key eligibility criteria included measurable disease, ECOG PS 0/1 and ≤ 2 prior cytotoxic regimens. Patients received atezo 800 mg q2w (days 1 and 15) with nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 q1w (days 1, 8 and 15) for 3 weeks in 4-week cycles, continued until loss of clinical benefit. If nab-paclitaxel was discontinued due to toxicity, atezo could be continued as monotherapy. ORR was assessed by RECIST v1.1. PD-L1 expression was scored at 4 diagnostic levels based on PD-L1 staining on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells with the SP142 immunohistochemistry assay. Results: As of February 10, 2015, 11 patients were evaluable for safety. All patients were women with a median age of 58 y (range, 32-75 y). No unexpected or dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The median duration of safety follow-up was 79 days (range, 27-182 days). The efficacy-evaluable population consisted of 5 patients who had ≥ 1 scan and ≥ 3 months follow-up. Four PRs and 1 SD were observed. By the next data cutoff of June 15, 2015, 21 patients will have been enrolled (7 in the safety cohort and 14 in the expansion cohort). All patients in the expansion cohort were required to undergo serial biopsies for correlative analyses. Approximately 21 and 19 patients will be evaluable for safety and efficacy, respectively. Updated safety, efficacy and biomarker data will be presented. Conclusions: Preliminary results indicate that the combination of atezo plus nab-paclitaxel is tolerable with promising activity in patients with mTNBC. Based on these results and the observed activity of single-agent atezo in these patients, the combination of atezo and nab-paclitaxel is being evaluated in a Phase III study (NCT02425891) of patients with previously untreated mTNBC. Sponsor: Genentech, Inc. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01633970. Citation Format: Adams S, Diamond J, Hamilton E, Pohlmann P, Tolaney S, Molinero L, Zou W, Liu B, Waterkamp D, Funke R, Powderly J. Safety and clinical activity of atezolizumab (anti-PDL1) in combination with nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-06.

1049OSAFETY AND EFFICACY OF MPDL3280A (ANTI-PDL1) IN COMBINATION WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) AND/OR CHEMOTHERAPY (CHEMO) IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED OR METASTATIC SOLID TUMORS

ABSTRACT Aim: PD-L1 mediates cancer immune evasion, and blocking PD-L1 represents a cancer immunotherapy strategy that can restore tumor-specific T-cell immunity. MPDL3280A, a human monoclonal antibody containing an engineered Fc-domain, targets PD-L1, preventing binding to its receptors PD-1 and B7.1 on activated T cells. MPDL3280A does not disrupt the PD-L2/PD-1 interaction, which may mitigate autoimmune lung toxicity. As VEGF blockade is proposed to synergize with immunotherapy, and certain chemos may augment immune responses, we examined MPDL3280A with bev and/or chemo. Methods: This open-label, multicenter phase Ib study evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of MPDL3280A with bev (Arm A, refractory tumors or 1L renal cell carcinoma [RCC]) and bev + FOLFOX (Arm B, oxaliplatin-naive tumors) in pts with locally advanced or metastatic solid malignancies. Pts received MPDL3280A 20 mg/kg q3w (Arm A) or 15 mg/kg q2w (Arm B), and bev 15 mg/kg q3w (Arm A) or 10 mg/kg q2w (Arm B). Chemo was given at standard doses. Objective responses were assessed by RECIST 1.1. Results: As of Jan 21, 2014, 33 pts in Arm A and 29 pts in Arm B were treated; Arm A 1L RCC patients had short follow-up. Most pts had CRC (39% and 79% in Arms A and B, respectively). Grade 3/4 AEs regardless of attribution occurred in 42% of Arm A pts, including abdominal pain, hyperbilirubinemia, pneumonia and tumor pain (6% each), and in 52% of Arm B pts, including neutropenia (31%) and diarrhea (14%). No MPDL3280A-related infusion reactions occurred. SAEs occurred in 30% and 17% of pts in Arms A and B, respectively. RECIST responses were observed in 3 Arm A pts (CRC, melanoma, breast cancer) and 11 Arm B pts (10 CRC, 1 breast cancer). One Arm B pt (RCC) had a CR. Updated results will be presented. Conclusions: MPDL3280A + bev ± chemo was well tolerated and no unexpected toxicity was observed. Responses were observed in a variety of tumors. Further evaluation of MPDL3280A combination regimens in pts with advanced or metastatic solid tumors is warranted. Disclosure: C. Lieu: Sanofi Aventis consultant; J.D. Powderly: : Leadership position: Biologics Human Application Lab. Advisor: Genentech, BMS, Amplimmune, and Merck. BMS. Research funding: Genentech, BMS, Amplimmune, Merck, AstraZeneca, ImClone, and Eli Lilly. Speaker and advisor: BMS; H. Hochster: Genentech consultant; R. Funke, C. Rossi and D. Waterkamp: is an employee of Genentech, Inc.;H. Hurwitz: Research funding from Genentech, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Sanofi, Regeneron, GlaxoSmithKline, and Amgen. Advisor to Genentech, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Sanofi, Regeneron, GlaxoSmithKline, and Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Real-world treatment patterns for patients receiving second-line and third-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review of recently published studies

Most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor prognosis and receive limited benefit from conventional treatments, especially in later lines of therapy. In recent years, several novel therapies have been approved for second- and third-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. In light of these approvals, it is valuable to understand the uptake of these new treatments in routine clinical practice and their impact on patient care. A systematic literature search was conducted in multiple scientific databases to identify observational cohort studies published between January 2010 and March 2017 that described second- or third-line treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC. A qualitative data synthesis was performed because a meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of the study populations. A total of 12 different study cohorts in 15 articles were identified. In these cohorts, single-agent chemotherapy was the most commonly administered treatment in both the second- and third-line settings. In the 5 studies that described survival from the time of second-line treatment initiation, median overall survival ranged from 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.8–5.7) to 12.8 months (95% CI, 10.7–14.5). There was limited information on the use of biomarker-directed therapy in these patient populations. This systematic literature review offers insights into the adoption of novel therapies into routine clinical practice for second- and third-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This information provides a valuable real-world context for the impact of recently approved treatments for advanced NSCLC.

Abstract 2651: Clinical activity and immune correlates from a phase Ib study evaluating atezolizumab (anti-PDL1) in combination with FOLFOX and bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) in metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Genetic and epigenetic alterations can distinguish cancer cells from their normal counterparts, allowing tumors to be recognized as foreign by the immune system. The immune system9s ability to detect and destroy these abnormal cells is the foundation of cancer immunotherapy. In order for this to occur immune cells must traffic and persist in the tumors. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1; also called B7-H1 or CD274), which is expressed on many cancer and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, plays an important part in blocking immune-mediated tumor cell destruction by binding B7.1 (CD80) and programmed death-1 (PD-1), which is a negative regulator of T-lymphocyte activation. PD-L1 blockade has previously been shown to increase CD8+ T cell infiltration and PD-L1 protein levels, as well as the expression levels of immune genes in tumors. Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) is a secreted factor that specifically acts on endothelial cells to stimulate angiogenesis and has also been shown to exert immunosuppressive effects. Although some cytotoxic agents have been proposed to induce immunogenic cell death, the effects of chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy on the tumor immune milieu have not been extensively studied. This study was designed to evaluate the safety, activity and biomarkers of combined FOLFOX treatment combined with PD-L1 and VEGF-A inhibition in 1L colorectal (CRC) patients using the humanized antibodies atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) and bevacizumab (anti-VEGF-A), respectively. RECIST (v1.1) responses by the cutoff date of 09/01/2015 were observed in 52% (95% CI 30.6-73.2) of the patients (n = 23) with a median progression free survival of 14.1 months (95% CI 8.7-17.1) and a median duration of response of 11.4 months (95% CI 7.6-15.9). No unexpected toxicities were observed. We found that CD8+ T cells and PD-L1 expression by IHC were increased in tumors following administration of FOLFOX alone as well as after combined administration of FOLFOX, atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Elevations in cytotoxic T-cell signatures (e.g. CD8A, IFNγ, GZMB, EOMES) with treatment were also noted in several of the patient tumors. Patients with elevations in tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells consistent with increased expression of cytotoxic T-cell signatures and PD-L1 exhibited sustained responses or prolonged disease control. These data suggest that the combination of FOLFOX, atezolizumab, and bevacizumab promote immune-related activity in CRC potentially resulting in enhanced efficacy. Citation Format: Jeffrey Wallin, Michael J. Pishvaian, Genevive Hernandez, Mahesh Yadav, Suchit Jhunjhunwala, Lelia Delamarre, Xian He, John Powderly, Christopher Lieu, S Gail Eckhardt, Herbert Hurwitz, Howard S. Hochster, Janet Murphy, Vincent Leveque, Edward Cha, Roel Funke, Daniel Waterkamp, Priti Hegde, Johanna Bendell. Clinical activity and immune correlates from a phase Ib study evaluating atezolizumab (anti-PDL1) in combination with FOLFOX and bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2651.