Daniel Wiedenmann

The influence of constrictivity on the effective transport properties of porous layers in electrolysis and fuel cells

The aim of the present investigation is to define microstructure parameters, which control the effective transport properties in porous materials for energy technology. Recent improvements in 3D-imaging (FIB-nanotomography, synchrotron X-ray tomography) and image analysis (skeletonization and graph analysis, transport simulations) open new possibilities for the study of microstructure effects. In this study, we describe novel procedures for a quantitative analysis of constrictivity, which characterizes the so-called bottleneck effect. In a first experimental part, methodological tests are performed using a porous (La,Sr)CoO3 material (SOFC cathode). The tests indicate that the proposed procedure for quantitative analysis of constrictivity gives reproducible results even for samples with inhomogeneous microstructures (cracks, gradient of porosity). In the second part, 3D analyses are combined with measurements of ionic conductivity by impedance spectroscopy. The investigations are preformed on membranes of electrolysis cells with porosities between 0.27 and 0.8. Surprisingly, the tortuosities remain nearly constant (1.6) for the entire range of porosity. In contrast, the constrictivities vary strongly and correlate well with the measured transport resistances. Hence, constrictivity represents the dominant microstructure parameter, which controls the effective transport properties in the analysed membrane materials. An empirical relationship is then derived for the calculation of effective transport properties based on phase volume fraction, tortuosity, and constrictivity.

Alumoåkermanite, (Ca,Na)₂(Al,Mg,Fe²⁺)(Si₂O₇), a new mineral from the active carbonatite-nephelinite-phonolite volcano Oldoinyo Lengai, northern Tanzania

Abstract Alumoåkermanite, (Ca,Na)2(Al,Mg,Fe2+)(Si2O7), is a new mineral member of the melilite group from the active carbonatite-nephelinite-phonolite volcano Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania. The mineral occurs as tabular phenocrysts and microphenocrysts in melilite-nephelinitic ashes and lapilli-tuffs. Alumoåkermanite is light brown in colour; it is transparent, with a vitreous lustre and the streak is white. Cleavages or partings are not observed. The mineral is brittle with an uneven fracture. The measured density is 2.96(2) g/cm3. The Mohs hardness is ~4.5−6. Alumoåkermanite is uniaxial (−) with ω = 1.635(1) and e = 1.624−1.626(1). In a 30 mm thin section (+N), the mineral has a yellow to orange interference colour, straight extinction and positive elongation, and is nonpleochroic. The average chemical formula of the mineral derived from electron microprobe analyses is: (Ca1.48Na0.50Sr0.02K0.01)∑2.01(Al0.44Mg0.30Fe2+0.17Fe3+0.07Mn0.01)∑0.99(Si1.99Al0.01O7). Alumoåkermanite is tetragonal, space group P4̅. 21m with a = 7.7661(4) Å, c = 5.0297(4) Å, V = 303.4(1) Å3 and Z = 2. The five strongest powder-diffraction lines [d in Å, (I/Io), hkl] are: 3.712, (13), (111); 3.075, (25), (201); 2.859, (100), (211); 2.456, (32), (311); 1.757, (19), (312). Single-crystal structure refinement (R1= 0.018) revealed structure topology typical of the melilite-group minerals, i.e. tetrahedral [(Al,Mg)(Si2O7)] sheets interleaved with layers of (CaNa) cations. The name reflects the chemical composition of the mineral.

CO2 hydrogenation on a metal hydride surface

The catalytic hydrogenation of CO(2) at the surface of a metal hydride and the corresponding surface segregation were investigated. The surface processes on Mg(2)NiH(4) were analyzed by in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) combined with thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS) and mass spectrometry (MS), and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS). CO(2) hydrogenation on the hydride surface during hydrogen desorption was analyzed by catalytic activity measurement with a flow reactor, a gas chromatograph (GC) and MS. We conclude that for the CO(2) methanation reaction, the dissociation of H(2) molecules at the surface is not the rate controlling step but the dissociative adsorption of CO(2) molecules on the hydride surface.