Daniela Giuliani

Integration of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of sentinel node in patients with cervical and endometrial cancer: our experience and literature review.

Objective The purpose of this study was to assess whether there is an additional value of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) over lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) alone for sentinel node (SN) mapping in endometrial and cervical cancer. Methods Ten women with clinically cervical stage IA2 to stage IB1 and 25 women with stage I endometrial cancer underwent preoperative LSG for SN mapping. Technetium Tc 99m albumin nanocolloid was injected submucosally at 4 points of the cervix. Patients underwent SPECT/CT emission-transmission study at least 3 hours after standard planar images. Methylene blue was injected into the cervix just before surgery under general anesthesia. All patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and radical regional nodal dissection. Hot and/or blue nodes were labeled as SNs. Results Conventional planar imaging detection rate was 50%, whereas the detection rate of at least one SN with SPECT/CT was 91% (32/35); bilateral detection was achieved in 7 (39%) of 18 women in planar and in 17 (53%) of 32 women in SPECT/CT imaging, respectively. Bilateral detection was achieved in 57% of women (20/35). Sentinel nodes were located in external and internal iliac nodes (66%), obturator nodes (5%), internal iliac nodes (11%), common iliac nodes (9%), and presacral nodes (9%). Lymph node involvement was identified in 5 patients (14%). Sentinel node correctly predicted lymph node involvement in all node-positive patients. Sentinel node sensitivity and negative predictive value of SPECT/CT were 100%. Conclusions Single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography seems to improve intraoperative identification of SNs and provides additional useful information about the anatomic location of SNs compared to planar LSG in cervical and endometrial cancer.

Lymphadenectomy in uterine low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: an analysis of 19 cases and a literature review.

Background: The role of lymphadenectomy in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is controversial. The risk of nodal metastases ranges from 0% to 44%, but data are inconclusive. The objective of this study and of the literature review was to investigate the incidence of nodal involvement in macroscopically early-stage tumors. Methods: All consecutive patients with histologically proven uterine low-grade ESS who underwent surgery in our institution were considered eligible for the analysis. Until July 2006, pelvic systematic lymphadenectomy was performed based on the physicians choice, whereas after July 2006, all women with apparent early-stage tumor underwent systematic pelvic nodes dissection. Results: From January 1985 to March 2009, 64 women were surgically treated and 19 underwent bilateral systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy. The median count of nodes removed was 20 (range, 11-30). Nodal involvement was depicted in 3 of 19 women but only in 1 in 16 (5%) women with apparent early-stage disease. Specifically, we did not find nodal metastases in 9 women with macroscopically early-stage tumors treated after July 2006. According to the literature review, the risk of nodal metastases is 5% (range, 0%-16%) in early-stage disease. Conclusions: There is no indication to offer a systematic lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage low-grade ESS according to our analysis and to the literature review. Retroperitoneal surgery should be limited in case of bulky nodal disease or in case of nodal recurrences.

Long-term results of fertility-sparing treatment compared with standard radical surgery for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer

Background:The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed to identify patients treated for early-stage EOC and to compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated with FSS and radical surgery (RS).Results:A total of 1031 patients were treated at two Institutions, 242 with FSS (group A) and 789 with RS (group B). Median duration of follow-up was 11.9 years. At univariate analyses, FSS was associated with decreased risk of relapse (P=0.002) and of tumour-related death (P=0.001). Multivariate analysis did not confirm the independent positive role of FSS neither on relapse-free interval (RFI) nor on cancer-specific survival (CSS). Tumour grade was associated with shorter RFI (P<0.001) and shorter CSS (P=0.001). The type of treatment did not influence CSS or RFI in any grade group. We also found a significant association between low-grade tumours and younger age.Conclusions:Fertility-sparing surgery is an adequate treatment for patients with stage I EOC. The clinical outcome of patients with G3 tumours, which is confirmed to be the most important prognostic factor, is not determined by the type of treatment received.

The impact on survival of two different staging strategies in apparent early stage endometrial cancer comparing sentinel lymph nodes mapping algorithm and selective lymphadenectomy: An Italian retrospective analysis of two reference centers

OBJECTIVE The role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer is still uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of two different strategies in apparent uterine confined disease by comparing sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and selective lymphadenectomy (LD). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed women with preoperative stage I endometrial cancer underwent surgical staging with either SLN mapping, or LD in two Italian centers. RESULTS Eight hundred and two women underwent surgical staging for preoperative stage I endometrial cancer were revised (145 Monza; 657 Rome). All patients underwent peritoneal washing, simple hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and nodal staging including SLN mapping, or LD. Overall 8229 lymph nodes were removed (1595 in Monza, 6634 in Rome). Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 33.1% and 52.4% in Monza and Rome, respectively (p<0.001). Patients with positive pelvic LN were 16.7% and 7.3%, in SLN and LD groups, respectively (p=0.002). Disease-free survival (DFS) curves did not showed a statistically significant difference between centers and strategies adopted (SLN mapping, LD, SLN+LD) with a HR of 0.87 (95% CI 0.63-2.16; p=0.475). CONCLUSIONS Survival outcomes were similar for both strategies. The SLN strategy allowed to identify a higher rate of stage IIIC1 disease even with a lower median number of lymph node removed in SLN group. Applying a SLN algorithm does not impair the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients. The clinical impact and management of low volume metastasis in high-risk patients should be further clarify.

Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Mapping in Cervical and Endometrial Malignancies: A Case-Control Study Comparing Two Near-Infrared Fluorescence Systems

STUDY OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to evaluate the intraoperative and perioperative surgical outcomes of 2 different florescence systems commonly used for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in women with early-stage cervical cancer or endometrial cancer. DESIGN Case-control study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING The Gynecology Oncology Surgical Unit of the San Gerardo Hospital, Italy. PATIENTS Thirty-four consecutive women with early stage-cervical cancer (stage IA-1B1) or apparent confined stage I endometrial cancer were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS Between October 2016 and May 2017, 34 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery with SLN mapping using indocyanine green dye: 22 women were mapped with the Storz 1S system (Karl Storz Endoscopy, Tuttlingen, Germany; Group A), whereas 12 women underwent planned surgery with the Novadaq PinPoint system (Novadaq, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; Group B). MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS We compared the surgical and perioperative outcomes of Group A and Group B. Patients in Group B had a shorter duration of the SLN mapping time than those in Group A (p = .0003). The median number of SLNs removed was 2 (range, 0-5) in Group A and 2 (range, 1-3) in Group B (p = .501). Bilateral mapping was 77.3% in Group A and 83.3% in Group B (p = .334), respectively. No differences were recorded in terms of body mass index, length of hospital stay, type of tumor, bilateral mapping, or number of lymph nodes removed. Body mass index was found to have no impact on the duration of the mapping (p = .353). CONCLUSION From our preliminary experience we can conclude that both fluorescence systems are valid and applicable for SLN detection in the case of early-stage cervical or endometrial cancer. The PinPoint system seems to allow surgeons easier and faster identification of the SLNs, particularly in endometrial cancer patients.