Daniela Roncarolo

Lipid Transfer Protein: A Pan-Allergen in Plant-Derived Foods That Is Highly Resistant to Pepsin Digestion

Background: Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are small molecules of approximately 10 kD that demonstrate high stability. They have recently been identified as allergens in the Rosaceae subfamilies of the Prunoideae (peach, apricot, plum) and of the Pomoideae (apple). They belong to a family of structurally highly conserved proteins that are also present in non-Rosaceae vegetable foods. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the cross-reactivity to non-Rosaceae LTPs, and to study the role of protein stability in allergenicity. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with a positive SPT to Rosaceae fruit extracts enriched for LTP were characterized by interview and SPT. To investigate IgE cross-reactivity between Rosaceae and non-Rosaceae LTPs, RAST and RAST inhibition as well as ELISA and ELISA inhibition were performed, using whole food extracts and purified LTPs. Both purified natural LTPs (peach, carrot and broccoli) and Pichia pastoris recombinant LTPs (carrot and wheat) were included. Pepsin digestion was used to address the role of stability in the allergenicity of LTPs. Results: IgE antibodies to Rosaceae LTPs reacted to a broad range of vegetable foods, including Gramineae (cereals), Leguminosae (peanut), Juglandaceae (walnut), Anacardiaceae (pistachio), Brassicaceae (broccoli), Umbelliferae (carrot, celery), Solanaceae (tomato), Cucurbitaceae (melon), and Actinidiaceae (kiwi). Binding and inhibition studies with purified natural and recombinant LTPs confirmed their role in this cross-reactivity. Many of these cross-reactivities were accompanied by clinical food allergy, frequently including systemic reactions. Antibody binding to LTP was shown to be resistant to pepsin treatment of whole extract or purified LTP. Conclusion: LTP is a pan-allergen with a degree of cross-reactivity comparable to profilin. Due to its extreme resistance to pepsin digestion, LTP is a potentially severe food allergen.

Immunological cross-reactivity between lipid transfer proteins from botanically unrelated plant-derived foods: a clinical study.

Background: Lipid transfer proteins (LTP) are highly conserved and widely distributed throughout the plant kingdom. Recent studies demonstrated immunological cross‐reactivity between LTP from many botanically unrelated fruits and vegetables and concluded that LTP are pan‐allergens. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of such cross‐reactivity in a group of subjects monosensitized to LTP.

A case of allergy to beer showing cross-reactivity between lipid transfer proteins

BACKGROUND Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are highly conserved proteins present in a broad spectrum of fruits and vegetables that might represent a novel plant panallergen. OBJECTIVE To demonstrate that LTP is an important allergen in beer and that beer LTP cross-reacts with LTP from botanically unrelated plant-derived foods. METHODS Serum from a patient with clinical allergy to both beer and Rosaceae was studied for IgE reactivity to LTP to several vegetable foods by RAST, ELISA, immunoblot, and inhibition studies. RESULTS Patients serum showed a strong IgE reactivity to LTP purified from peach peel, carrot, and broccoli, and to a 10 kD protein in both apple and peach immunoblots, whereas no reactivity to birch cross-reactive allergens such as Bet v 1, profilin, or carbohydrates was found. In inhibition studies, preabsorption of serum with apple, walnut, hazelnut, peanut, corn, and rice caused a fall of 97%, 20%, 66%, 91%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, of its reactivity to peach LTP. Beer RAST fell from 1.8 IU/mL to <0.1 IU/mL when a patients serum was preabsorbed with recombinant carrot LTP. CONCLUSIONS LTP is a relevant allergen in beer. Beer LTP may cross-react with LTP from several other plant-derived foods.

Relationship between peach lipid transfer protein specific IgE levels and hypersensitivity to non-Rosaceae vegetable foods in patients allergic to lipid transfer protein

BACKGROUND Lipid transfer protein (LTP), the major allergen in Rosaceae in geographic areas where the prevalence of birch pollen allergy is low, is a widely cross-reacting pan-allergen, but the pattern of cross-reactivity to plant-derived foods botanically unrelated to Rosaceae shows much variability. OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between peach LTP specific IgE levels and cross-reactivity to several non-Rosaceae, plant-derived foods. METHODS IgE specific for peach LTP was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serum samples from 40 patients with Rosaceae allergy monosensitized to LTP. Patients were considered monosensitized to this protein in the absence of sensitization to other cross-reacting, plant-derived foods as shown by negative skin prick test (SPT) results with both birch and mugwort pollen. SPTs with commercial extracts of walnut, hazelnut, peanut, celery, maize, rice, tomato, orange, and onion were performed to detect possible immunologic cross-reactivity to these foods. RESULTS Patients with negative SPT results with non-Rosaceae foods showed significantly lower levels of IgE to peach LTP than patients showing skin reactivity to one or more non-Rosaceae foods (P < .001). A significant difference in specific IgE to peach LTP between patients with positive or negative SPT results was observed with each individual food (P < .001 in all cases). The level of IgE to peach LTP was strongly related to the number of positive SPT results with non-Rosaceae foods (r = 0.78; P < .001). Increasing levels of IgE to peach LTP were associated with skin reactivity to nuts (29/40 [72%]), peanut (27/40 [67%]), maize (16/39 [41%]), rice (14/39 [36%]), onion (13/37 [35%]), orange (9/32 [28%]), celery (11/40 [27%]), and tomato (8/39 [20%]). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that all allergenic determinants in LTP from vegetable foods other than peach cross-react with peach LTP determinants, whereas only some peach LTP epitopes cross-react with allergenic determinants on botanically unrelated, plant-derived foods. The high levels of IgE to peach LTP seem to reflect the presence of IgE targeting common allergenic determinants of LTP, causing cross-reactivity to botanically unrelated, vegetable foods. In LTP-allergic patients, increasing levels of IgE to peach LTP are paralleled by an increasing number of foods other than Rosaceae positive on SPT that cause clinical symptoms.

Detection of some safe plant-derived foods for LTP-allergic patients.

Background: Lipid transfer protein (LTP) is a widely cross-reacting plant pan-allergen. Adverse reactions to Rosaceae, tree nuts, peanut, beer, maize, mustard, asparagus, grapes, mulberry, cabbage, dates, orange, fig, kiwi, lupine, fennel, celery, tomato, eggplant, lettuce, chestnut and pineapple have been recorded. Objective: To detect vegetable foods to be regarded as safe for LTP-allergic patients. Methods: Tolerance/intolerance to a large spectrum of vegetable foods other than Rosaceae, tree nuts and peanut was assessed by interview in 49 subjects monosensitized to LTP and in three distinct groups of controls monosensitized to Bet v 1 (n = 24) or Bet v 2 (n = 18), or sensitized to both LTP and birch pollen (n = 16), all with a history of vegetable food allergy. Patients and controls underwent skin prick test (SPT) with a large spectrum of vegetable foods. The absence of IgE reactivity to foods that were negative in both clinical history and SPT was confirmed by immunoblot analysis and their clinical tolerance was finally assessed by open oral challenge (50 g per food). Results: All patients reported tolerance and showed negative SPT to carrot, potato, banana and melon; these foods scored positive in SPT and elicited clinical symptoms in a significant proportion of patients from all three control groups. All patients tolerated these four foods on oral challenge. Immunoblot analysis confirmed the lack of IgE reactivity to these foods by LTP-allergic patients. Conclusion: Carrot, potato, banana and melon seem safe for LTP-allergic patients. This finding may be helpful for a better management of allergy to LTP.

Respiratory Allergy to Lipid Transfer Protein

Background: Due to unclear reasons, allergy to lipid transfer protein (LTP) is frequent in Mediterranean countries but rare in Northern Europe. Objective: We report a paradigmatic case of primarily airborne sensitization to LTP that might explain the geographical distribution of this type of food allergy. Methods: A 21-year-old woman began having severe perennial rhinitis 6 months after she started working in a wholesale fruit storehouse in Southern Italy where large amounts of fruits, including peaches, were handled; symptoms subsided when she left the workplace for >5 days and relapsed as soon as she was back at work. Later on, she developed severe food allergies to peach, hazelnut, peanut, apricot, plum and tomato. The patient underwent a nasal challenge with peach peel extract, and IgE reactivity was assessed by immunoblot analysis. Results: In vivo and in vitro analyses showed sensitivity to LTP. The nasal challenge with peach peel extract (6 µg protein) induced acute, severe respiratory symptoms. On immunoblot with peach peel extract patient’s serum reacted uniquely against LTP, as demonstrated by inhibition assays with the recombinant peach protein. Conclusion: LTP may induce sensitization via the respiratory tract due to inhalation of air-dispersed food particles, and this may precede the onset of food allergy. If this way of sensitization were effective in the majority of LTP allergic patients (e.g. by exposure to peaches showing intact fuzz in areas where peaches are grown and directly sold on the market) our findings could explain the strange geographical distribution of this type of food allergy.

Effect of sublingual immunotherapy with grass monomeric allergoid on allergen-specific T-cell proliferation and interleukin 10 production

BACKGROUND Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is safe and efficacious in the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis. Although favorable clinical effects have been observed with controlled trials as early as a few months since the beginning of treatment, few biological changes induced by SLIT have been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE To investigate in grass-allergic patients the effect of a 2-month SLIT regimen, administered with a simplified protocol without up-dosing, on proliferation and production of cytokines characteristic of the regulatory T-cell phenotype (interleukin 10 [IL-10] and transforming growth factor beta [TGF-beta]) by allergen-specific T cells. METHODS Patients were recruited to the study in January 2006. SLIT was performed by self-administration and was continued for 60 days from February to April 2006. Eleven grass pollen-allergic patients with seasonal rhinitis were treated daily before the pollen season for 2 months with a modified allergen (monomeric allergoid) derived from a 3-grass pollen extract. Allergen-specific proliferation and production of IL-10 and TGF-beta were measured on peripheral blood mononuclear cells at baseline and treatment end. Tetanus toxoid served as the control antigen. RESULTS After SLIT, allergen-specific (P = .002) but not tetanus toxoid-specific proliferation decreased, whereas IL-10 transcription increased (P < .001). TGB-beta transcription was also increased after treatment, although not statistically significantly (P = .06). Changes in proliferation to allergen and in IL-10 transcription were correlated (r = -0.82, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS A short-term course of SLIT with modified allergen in grass-allergic patients is associated with the reduction of allergen-specific proliferation and with the up-regulation of the IL-10 regulatory cytokine.

Parietaria Profilin Shows Only Limited Cross-Reactivity with Birch and Grass Profilins

Background: In patients showing multiple reactivity to seasonal airborne allergens, a skin prick test (SPT) with Parietaria pollen scores frequently negative, suggesting that profilin from Parietaria might not share IgE-binding epitopes with profilin from botanically unrelated airborne allergens. This study investigated the immunologic cross-reactivity between profilins from Parietaria, grass and birch pollen. Methods: 36 patients hypersensitive to birch profilin, Bet v 2, underwent SPT with Parietaria, and IgE to both whole Parietaria pollen and Phleum profilin were sought in their sera by ELISA. In ELISA inhibition studies, IgE reactivity to Phleum profilin was measured before and after absorption of sera from Parietaria reactors with both whole Parietaria pollen extract, and Par j 1/Par j 2 fraction. Further, their IgE reactivity to whole Parietaria pollen was measured before and after absorption with the Par j 1/Par j 2 fraction. Results: All sera showed IgE reactivity to Phleum profilin. Only 14/36 (39%) patients had a positive SPT to Parietaria and 17/36 (47%) showed IgE to Parietaria. Absorption of sera from Parietaria reactors with whole Parietaria extract caused a marked reduction in IgE reactivity to grass profilin; in contrast, absorption of sera with the Par j 1/Par j 2 fraction did not exert any inhibitory effect on IgE reactivity to grass profilin. Absorption of sera with the Par j 1/Par j 2 fraction markedly reduced IgE reactivity to whole Parietaria extract in 8/9 cases. Conclusion: Less than 50% of patients sensitized to birch and grass profilin cross-react to Parietaria profilin. In most cases, cross-reactors are hypersensitive to major, specific Parietaria allergens as well. This findings may be of practical relevance when the prescription of specific immunotherapy is considered.

Allergy to nonspecific lipid transfer proteins in Rosaceae: a comparative study of different in vivo diagnostic methods.

BACKGROUND Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are the major allergens in patients sensitive to Rosaceae (apple, peach, apricot, cherry, plum, and pear) who are not allergic to birch pollen. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to find a sensitive, specific, and relatively easy method for detection of LTP-sensitive patients. METHODS We studied 36 persons who experienced oral allergy syndrome after the ingestion of fruits in the family Rosaceae. This study cohort was divided into two groups: 18 without allergy to birch pollen (patients) and 18 with birch pollen allergy (control subjects). All were tested by skin prick tests (SPTs) with fresh Golden Delicious apple, fresh peach, and extracts of peel and pulp from both fruits. Their specific IgE reactivities against peach peel extract were further investigated by immunoblot analysis. RESULTS All 18 subjects in the control group showed strongly positive skin reactions with both fresh apple and fresh peach, whereas no skin reactivity was found with extracts from peach peel, peach pulp, or apple pulp. Extract of apple peel produced positive skin reactions in 17 of 18 control subjects; however, the wheals were generally smaller than those induced by fresh fruits. Immunoblot analysis showed no reactivity for peach peel extract. In contrast, the SPTs with fresh fruits showed that some of the 18 patients had strongly positive reactions, but others had weak reactions or negative responses. Further, in a high proportion of the patients, consecutive SPT with fresh apple yielded inconsistent results. In all patients, SPTs with extracts from apple pulp and peach pulp were negative, whereas SPTs with peel extracts were strongly positive in all patients. In most patients, the wheal area induced by SPT with peel extracts was larger than that induced by SPTs with fresh fruits. Immunoblot analysis showed that serum specimens from all 18 patients reacted with a 10-kD protein in peach peel. This is the molecular mass of LTPs. CONCLUSIONS In birch pollen-allergic patients, the SPTs with fresh foods still remains the most reliable method of diagnosing vegetable food hypersensitivity. In contrast, in patients not allergic to birch pollen, the most reliable strategy for detection of patients sensitive to LTPs is skin prick testing with properly prepared fruit peel extracts. The loss of Bet v 1- and Bet v 2-like structures, which probably occurs during extraction, may facilitate immediate identification of the relevant allergen.

Allergenic Relevance of Cupressus arizonica Pollen Extract and Biological Characterization of the Allergoid

Background: Cupressaceae (cypress) pollens can cause pollinosis in winter. However, the lack of specific commercial extracts combined with the early pollination period of cypress trees make a precise diagnosis difficult. The need for a reliable and effective cypress extract for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes is increasingly felt. Methods: Mixed or single Cupressus arizonica, lusitanica and sempervirens pollen extracts precipitated with ammonium sulfate (PPT) were compared by direct RAST, RAST inhibition and SDS-PAGE techniques. The major allergen of C. arizonica (Cup a 1), purified by anion exchange chromatography, was checked by immunoblotting experiments before chemical modification, in parallel with a C. arizonica extract, with potassium cyanate (KCNO) to obtain a monomeric allergoid. The allergoid extract was characterized for its biological, chemico-physical and immunological features by RAST inhibition, SDS-PAGE and ELISA assays. Results: Direct RAST, RAST inhibition, and SDS-PAGE data indicated that the PPT C. arizonica pollen extract showed the most allergenic potential, and it can be considered representative of the Cupressus spp. Immunoblotting data confirmed Cup a 1 as a major allergen. RAST inhibition and ELISA showed that modified PPT C. arizonica extract had less IgE reactivity than the native, non-modified extract, while preserving the immunogenic capacity typical for an allergoid. Finally, the SDS-PAGE profile of Cup a 1 allergoid was similar to native Cup a 1 allergen, suggesting the modified C. arizonica extract shows the characteristics of a monomeric allergoid. Conclusions: The PPT C. arizonica pollen extract shows good in vitro diagnostic potential and its chemically modified form offers the features of a monomeric allergoid. It might therefore lend itself to the development of a product to be administered by the sublingual or oromucosal route for immunotherapy of individuals with cypress pollinosis.