Danielle C. M. van der Kaay

Adult Height in Short Children Born SGA Treated with Growth Hormone and Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Analog: Results of a Randomized, Dose-Response GH Trial

CONTEXT GH treatment is effective in improving height in short children born small for gestational age (SGA). GH is thought to have limited effect when started during adolescence. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate GH treatment efficacy in short SGA children when treatment was started during adolescence; to assess whether GH 2 mg/m(2) · d during puberty improves adult height (AH) compared with 1 mg/m(2) · d; and to assess whether an additional 2-yr postponement of puberty by GnRH analog (GnRHa) improves AH in children who are short at the start of puberty (<140 cm), with a poor AH expectation. PATIENTS AND DESIGN In this longitudinal, randomized, dose-response GH trial, we included 121 short SGA children (60 boys) at least 8 yr of age. We performed intention-to-treat analyses on all children and uncensored case analyses on 84 children who reached AH. Besides, we evaluated growth during 2 yr of combined GH/GnRHa and subsequent GH treatment until AH in a subgroup of 40 pubertal children with a height of less than 140 cm at the start. RESULTS Short SGA children started treatment at a median age of 11.2 yr, when 46% had already started puberty. Median height increased from -2.9 at start to -1.7 sd score (SDS) at AH (P < 0.001). Treatment with GH 2 vs. 1 mg/m(2) · d during puberty resulted in significantly better AH (P = 0.001), also after correction for gender, age at start, height SDS at start, treatment years before puberty, and target height SDS. AH was similar in children who started puberty at less than 140 cm and received GH/GnRHa, compared with children who started puberty greater than 140 cm and received GH only (P = 0.795). CONCLUSION When started in adolescence, GH treatment significantly improves AH in short SGA children, particularly with GH 2 mg/m(2) · d during puberty. When SGA children are short at the start of puberty, they can benefit from combined GH/GnRHa treatment.

Subclassification of Small for Gestational Age Children with Persistent Short Stature: Growth Patterns and Response to GH Treatment

Aim: We determined whether subclassification of short small for gestational age (SGA) children according to birth anthropometrics could delineate different patterns in gestation, delivery, postnatal growth, response to growth hormone (GH) treatment and parental height. Methods: 201 short SGA children were divided into three groups, SGAL, SGAL+W and SGAL+W+HC, according to birth length (L), weight (W) and head circumference (HC) ≤–2.00 standard deviation score (SDS). Results: SGAL+W+HC children were born after the shortest gestational age and more often by caesarean section than SGAL children (36.3 vs. 38.1 weeks, 68.4 vs. 24.4%). SGAL+W children had an intermediate pattern and experienced most gestational hypertension (p = 0.01). At birth, SGAL+W+HC children were shorter than SGAL or SGAL+W (–4.12 vs. –2.67 and –3.72 SDS, p ≤ 0.001). During the first 3 years of life, SGAL+W+HC children exhibited an increased growth in height (0.98 SDS) and HC (1.28 SDS) than SGAL (height, –0.06 SDS; HC, –0.30 SDS) and SGAL+W (height, 0.62 SDS; HC, –0.31 SDS). However, HC SDS remained smaller for SGAL+W+HC than the other groups at age 3. The groups did not differ in growth response during GH treatment. SGAL children tended to have shorter parents and target height than SGAL+W+HC children. Conclusions: Our study shows that subclassification of short SGA children might be a useful method for investigating SGA children as the subgroups revealed a different gestation, delivery and postnatal growth pattern. Response to GH treatment was not different between the groups.

Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-1: Serum Levels, Promoter Polymorphism, and Associations with Components of the Metabolic Syndrome in Short Subjects Born Small for Gestational Age

CONTEXT IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 is the only acute regulator of IGF-I bioavailability. Its production is suppressed by insulin, and low levels are associated with hyperinsulinemia and cardiovascular disease risk in adults. Data on IGFBP-1 levels in short, small for gestational age (SGA) subjects are scarce, and associations with IGFBP1 promoter single nucleotide polymorphisms have not been established. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to determine IGFBP-1 levels in short SGA subjects compared with those in controls, to assess genotype frequency of the -575 G/A single nucleotide polymorphism, and to determine its impact on IGFBP-1 levels. SUBJECTS A total of 272 short subjects born SGA and 330 subjects with normal stature (245 children, 85 young adults) participated in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES We measured fasting levels of IGFBP-1, IGF-I, insulin and lipid parameters, and body composition. RESULTS IGFBP-1 sd score (SDS) was comparable to controls in lean, short, SGA children but significantly lower in short SGA adults with normal fat mass (P < 0.001). IGFBP-1 SDS correlated significantly with insulin levels, systolic blood pressure SDS, and various lipid parameters. Baseline IGFBP-1 SDS was lowest in SGA children with -575 GG genotype and significantly higher in SGA children with one or two copies of the A allele. In response to a given insulin level, children with the AA genotype had a significantly higher IGFBP-1 SDS compared to children with the GG genotype. CONCLUSION Normal IGFBP-1 levels in lean, short, SGA children may reflect a normal metabolic state, despite reported hyperinsulinemia. IGFBP-1 is modulated by polymorphic variability and seems to be an additional player in the complex interaction between the IGF-IGFBP axis, glucose homeostasis, and lipid metabolism.

The effect of growth hormone treatment on metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors is similar in preterm and term short, small for gestational age children

Context  We previously reported that short, small for gestational age (SGA) children who were born preterm have a lower body fat percentage and a higher blood pressure, insulin secretion and disposition index than short SGA children born at term. Whether preterm birth also influences these parameters during GH treatment is unknown.

Bone mineral density and body composition in short children born SGA during growth hormone and gonadotropin releasing hormone analog treatment

CONTEXT Postponement of puberty by GnRH analog (GnRHa) in addition to GH treatment might increase adult height (AH) in short adolescents born small for gestational age (SGA). GnRHa treatment is thought to have negative effects on bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to assess the BMD of total body (BMD(TB)), lumbar spine (BMD(LS)), bone mineral apparent density lumbar spine (BMAD(LS)), lean body mass, fat mass, and fat distribution during GH treatment, with or without an additional 2 yr of GnRHa. PATIENTS AND DESIGN This was a prospective GH trial involving short SGA adolescents (≥8 yr). Eighty-eight children (50 girls) were treated until AH (GH randomized 1 or 2 mg/m(2) · d during puberty); 52 of these children received additional GnRHa. BMD and body composition were longitudinally assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS Baseline BMD(TB) sd score (SDS) and BMD(LS) SDS were significantly reduced (both P < 0.001), but BMAD(LS) SDS was comparable with zero (P = 0.129). BMD(TB) SDS and BMD(LS) SDS improved (both P < 0.001) from the start until AH, whereas BMAD(LS) SDS remained similar (P = 0.168). At AH, 93% of patients had a normal BMD(TB), 99% a normal BMD(LS), and 98% a normal BMAD(LS) (> -2 and < +2 SDS). From the start until AH, lean body mass SDS(height) and fat mass SDS increased significantly toward zero (both P <0.001). Multiple regression analyses showed that additional GnRHa treatment had no adverse effect on the changes in BMD and body composition during GH treatment, also after correction for influencing variables. CONCLUSION Untreated short SGA adolescents had reduced BMD(TB) and BMD(LS) but normal bone size-corrected BMAD(LS). During GH treatment, BMD(TB) and BMD(LS) increased significantly, leading to a normal adult BMD in almost all patients. Two years of GnRHa in addition to GH treatment had no adverse effect on BMD or body composition.

Does preterm birth influence the response to growth hormone treatment in short, small for gestational age children?

Objective  To investigate whether prematurity has an independent influence on the response to GH treatment in short, small for gestational age (SGA) children.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Short Children Born Small for Gestational Age: Effects of Growth Hormone Treatment and Postponement of Puberty

Aims: To investigate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in short children born small for gestational age (SGA) during growth hormone (GH) treatment and additional postponement of puberty by gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa). Methods: HRQoL was studied longitudinally during 2 years of treatment in 97 short SGA children (mean age 11.6 years at start). The children were divided into three groups: prepubertal GH-treated (prep-GH) children, pubertal GH-treated (pub-GH) children, and pubertal GH-treated children with additional GnRHa treatment (pub-GH/GnRHa). HRQoL was measured by generic (TACQOL) and short stature-specific (TACQOL-S) questionnaires. Results: The TACQOL-S showed that prep-GH children experienced significant HRQoL improvement on the subscales ‘contact with adults’, ‘body image’ and ‘vitality’, and pub-GH/GnRHa children on the subscales ‘contact with adults’, ‘contact with peers’ and ‘physical abilities’. Parents of prep-GH and pub-GH/GnRHa children reported significant HRQoL improvement on most TACQOL-S scales, whereas HRQoL improvement in pub-GH children reached significance for ‘future prospects’ only. The HRQoL gain was similar in the three groups, also after correction for confounders. The generic questionnaire TACQOL did not reveal any changes. Conclusions: HRQoL improved in prepubertal and pubertal short SGA children during GH treatment. Additional GnRHa treatment had no adverse effect on the HRQoL gain. Disorder-specific questionnaires were particularly appropriate to evaluate HRQoL in children treated for short stature.

Overnight Levels of Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Growth Hormone before and during Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogue Treatment in Short Boys Born Small for Gestational Age

Aims: To evaluate if 3 months of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) treatment results in sufficient suppression of pubertal luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) profile patterns in short pubertal small for gestational age (SGA) boys. To compare growth hormone (GH) profiles and fasting insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) levels after 3 months of GnRHa treatment with those at baseline. Methods: After measurement of baseline overnight profiles and IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels, 14 short pubertal SGA boys received leuprorelide acetate depots of 3.75 mg subcutaneously, every 4 weeks. Results: At baseline, mean GH levels were comparable with those of controls, whereas IGF-I and IGFBP-3 standard deviation scores (SDS) were significantly lower than zero SDS. After 3 months of GnRHa treatment, all boys showed clinical arrest of puberty. The area under the curve above zero, mean and maximum LH and FSH had significantly decreased to prepubertal levels. Peak LH during the GnRH agonist test, however, indicated insufficient pubertal suppression in 43% of boys. Overnight GH profile characteristics and IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels did not significantly change. Conclusions: Puberty was sufficiently suppressed by GnRHa treatment, as shown by the prepubertal LH and FSH profiles. After 3 months of GnRHa treatment, overnight GH profile characteristics had not significantly changed, reflecting that GH levels are comparable for prepubertal and early pubertal boys.

Metabolic Health in Short Children Born Small for Gestational Age Treated With Growth Hormone and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analog : Results of a Randomized, Dose-Response Trial

CONTEXT Previously we showed that pubertal children born small for gestational age (SGA) with a poor adult height (AH) expectation can benefit from treatment with GH 1 mg/m(2) per day (∼ 0.033 mg/kg/d) in combination with 2 years of GnRH analog (GnRHa) and even more so with a double GH dose. GnRHa treatment is thought to have negative effects on body composition and blood pressure. Long-term effects and GH-dose effects on metabolic health in children treated with combined GH/GnRHa are unknown. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate body composition, blood pressure, and lipid profile during GH treatment, either with or without 2 years of additional GnRHa. To assess whether GH 2 mg/m(2) per day (∼ 0.067 mg/kg/d) results in a similar or even more favorable metabolic health at AH than GH 1 mg/m(2) per day. METHODS This was a longitudinal, randomized, dose-response GH trial involving 107 short SGA children (58 girls) treated with GH until AH (GH randomized 1 or 2 mg/m(2)/d during puberty). Sixty-four children received additional GnRHa. At AH, metabolic parameters were compared between children treated with combined GH/GnRHa and those with only GH. The GH dose effect on metabolic health was evaluated in a subgroup of 47 children who started GH treatment in early puberty (randomized 1 or 2 mg/m(2)/d) with 2 years of GnRHa. RESULTS At AH, fat mass percentage (FM%) SD score (SDS), lean body mass (LBM) SDS, blood pressure SDS, and lipid profile were similar between children treated with combined GH/GnRHa and those with only GH. In the pubertal subgroup, FM% SDS was lower during treatment with GH 2 mg/m(2) per day. There was no GH dose-dependent effect on LBM SDS, blood pressure, and lipid profile. CONCLUSIONS Combined GH/GnRHa treatment has no long-term negative effects on metabolic health compared with only GH. Started in early puberty, a GH dose of 2 mg/m(2) per day results in a similar metabolic health at AH and a more favorable FM% than GH 1 mg/m(2) per day.

Randomized GH trial with two different dosages in combination with a GnRH analogue in short small for gestational age children: effects on metabolic profile and serum GH, IGF1, and IGFBP3 levels

BACKGROUND GnRH analogue (GnRHa) combined with GH treatment has been proposed to increase adult height. Effect on metabolic profile and GH, IGF1, and IGFBP3 levels in short small for gestational age (SGA) children is unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess fat mass and lean body mass SDS, percentage trunk fat, blood pressure (BP), insulin sensitivity (Si), beta-cell function (disposition index, DI), lipid profile, and GH, IGF1, and IGFBP3 levels during 2 years of combined treatment. SUBJECTS Forty-one pubertal short SGA children with a mean (+/-S.D.) age of 12.1 (+/-1.0) years. DESIGN Children received 3.75 mg of leuprolide acetate depot subcutaneously every 4 weeks, and they were randomly assigned to receive 1 mg (group A) or 2 mg (group B) of GH/m(2) per day. RESULTS Percentage trunk fat increased in both groups, but to a lower extent in group B. Lean body mass SDS increased only in group B. Changes in BP, Si, DI, and lipids were similar in both groups. Si significantly decreased, but DI remained unchanged. Lipids remained normal. GH and IGF1 levels were significantly higher in group B. CONCLUSION Our study is the first to report that 2 years of combined treatment with a GnRHa and either 1 or 2 mg GH/m(2) per day does not adversely affect body composition and metabolic profile of short SGA children who come under medical attention at the onset of puberty. There was a dose-dependent effect on fat mass SDS(height), percentage trunk fat, lean body mass SDS(height), and GH and IGF1 levels in favor of treatment with GnRHa and the higher GH dose of 2 mg/m(2) per day.