Danny R. Spelbring

Accurate three-dimensional registration of CT, PET, and/or MR images of the brain.

A surface matching technique has been developed to register multiple imaging scans of the brain in three dimensions, with accuracy on the order of the image pixel sizes. Anatomic information visualized in X-ray CT and magnetic resonance images may be integrated with each other and with functional information from positron emission tomography. Anatomical structures and other volumes of interest may be mapped from one scan to another, and corresponding sections through multiple scans may be directly compared. This capability provides a novel quantitative method to address the fundamental problem of relating structure to function in the brain. Applications include basic and clinical problems in the neurosciences and delivery and assessment of brain tumor therapy.

Fast iterative algorithms for three‐dimensional inverse treatment planning

Three types of iterative algorithms, algebraic inverse treatment planning (AITP), simultaneous iterative inverse treatment planning (SIITP), and iterative least-square inverse treatment planning (ILSITP), differentiated according to their updating sequences, were generalized to three dimension with true beam geometry and dose model. A rapid ray-tracing approach was developed to optimize the primary beam components. Instead of recalculating the dose matrix at each iteration, the dose distribution was generated by scaling up or down the dose matrix elements of the previous iteration. This significantly increased the calculation speed. The iterative algorithms started with an initial intensity profile for each beam, specified by a two-dimensional pixel beam map of M elements. The calculation volume was divided into N voxels, and the calculation was done by repeatedly comparing the calculated and desired doses and adjusting the values of the beam map elements to minimize an objective function. In AITP, the iteration is performed voxel by voxel. For each voxel, the dose discrepancy was evaluated and the contributing pencil beams were updated. In ILSITP and SIITP, the iteration proceeded pencil beam by pencil beam instead of voxel by voxel. In all cases, the iteration procedure was repeated until the best possible dose distribution was achieved. The algorithms were applied to two examples and the results showed that the iterative techniques were able to produce superior isodose distributions.

A comparison of four patient immobilization devices in the treatment of prostate cancer patients with three dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

PURPOSE To determine the variability of patient positioning during three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer treated with no immobilization or one of four immunobilization devices, and to determine the effects of patient body habitus and pelvic circumference on patient movement with each individual inmobilization technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS To see whether our immobilization techniques have improved day-to-day patient movement, a retrospective analysis was carried out. A total of 62 patients treated at one facility on a single machine with 3D-CRT via a four-field box technique (anterior-posterior and opposed laterals) in the supine position with either no immobilization or one of four immobilization devices. Five groups of patients were compared: (a) group 1-no immobilization; (b) group 2-alpha cradle from the waist to upper thigh; (c) group 3-alpha cradle from waist to below the knees; (d) group 4-styrofoam leg immobilizer (below knees); and (e) group 5-aquaplast cast encompassing the entire abdomen and pelvis to midthigh with alpha cradle immobilization to their lower legs and feet. Prior to starting radiotherapy, portal films of all four treatment fields were obtained 1 day before treatment. Subsequently, portal films were then obtained at least once a week. Portal films were compared with the simulation films and appropriate changes were made and verified on the next day prior to treatment. A deviation of greater than 0.5 cm or greater was considered to be clincally significant in our analysis. We studied the difference among the types of immobilization and no immobilization by looking at the frequency of movements (overall, and on each of the three axes) that a patient had during the course of his treatment. Using a logistic regression model, the probability of overall and individual directional movement for each group was obtained. In addition, the effects of patient body habitus and pelvic circumference on movement were analyzed. RESULTS The maximum deviation was 2 cm and the median deviation was 1.2 cm. For each patient, the probability of movement ranged from 0 to 76%, with a mean of 39%. There was no significant difference seen in overall movement with any of the immobilzation devices compared to no immobilization, but there was less vertical (9 vs. 18%; p = 0.03) and AP (6 vs. 15%; p = 0.14) movement with the aquaplast than any other group. However, when examining the lateral direction, the aquaplast had significantly more movement (32 vs. 9%; p < 0.001). When accounting for body habitus and pelvic circumference, no immobilization device was effective in reducing movement in obese patients or in patients with pelvic circumference greater than 105 cm. The aquaplast group had a significantly increased amount of lateral movement with obesity (42 vs. 23%; p < 0.05), and with pelvic circumference >105 cm (33 vs. 29%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS There was no significant reduction in overall patient movement noted with any of the immobilization devices compared to no immobilization. The aquaplast group had reduced vertical and AP movement of greater than 0.5 cm. There was significantly more lateral movement with aquaplast appreciated in obese patients or patients with pelvic circumferences greater than 105 cm. The aquaplast immobilization appears to be useful in reducing movement in two very clinicaly important dimensions (AP and vertical). Despite our findings, other immobilization may still be useful especially in the treatment of nonobese patients. It is clear that the optimal immobilization technique and patient positioning are yet to be determined.

A method of analyzing rectal surface area irradiated and rectal complications in prostate conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE To develop a method of analyzing rectal surface area irradiated and rectal complications in prostate conformal radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Dose-surface histograms of the rectum, which state the rectal surface area irradiated to any given dose, were calculated for a group of 27 patients treated with a four-field box technique to a total (tumor minimum) dose ranging from 68 to 70 Gy. Occurrences of rectal toxicities as defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) were recorded and examined in terms of dose and rectal surface area irradiated. For a specified end point of rectal complication, the complication probability was analyzed as a function of dose irradiated to a fixed rectal area, and as a function of area receiving a fixed dose. Lymans model of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was used to fit the data. RESULTS The observed occurrences of rectal complications appear to depend on the rectal surface area irradiated to a given dose level. The patient distribution of each toxicity grade exhibits a maximum as a function of percentage surface area irradiated, and the maximum moves to higher values of percentage surface area as the toxicity grade increases. The dependence of the NTCP for the specified end point on dose and percentage surface area irradiated was fitted to Lymans NTCP model with a set of parameters. The curvature of the NTCP as a function of the surface area suggests that the rectum is a parallel structured organ. CONCLUSIONS The described method of analyzing rectal surface area irradiated yields interesting insight into understanding rectal complications in prostate conformal radiotherapy. Application of the method to a larger patient data set has the potential to facilitate the construction of a full dose-surface-complication relationship, which would be most useful in guiding clinical practice.

The potential for normal tissue dose reduction with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in conformal treatment planning for stage C prostate cancer

PURPOSE Preirradiation hormonal cytoreduction of prostate cancer has been proven to reduce exposure of normal structures by decreasing the size of the target volume. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis, however, does not always appear to demonstrate a strong positive benefit with the use of neoadjuvant hormone therapy. This study analyzes various other factors influencing dose to normal organs, which may determine the success or failure of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in achieving its goals. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with bulky clinical Stage C adenocarcinoma of the prostate were given 3 months of hormone treatment consisting of oral Flutamide and monthly Zoladex injections prior to irradiation. Computerized tomography (CT) scans of the pelvis were obtained both prior to and following hormonal treatment. Treatment plans were generated by three-dimensional (3D) conformal treatment planning. The change in the volume of the prostate was assessed along with the percentage of prescribed dose delivered to the rectum and bladder. Various factors such as prostate size, bladder/rectum size, and organ shape were studied. Both dose-volume histograms (DVH) and dose-surface area histograms (DSH) were used for analysis. RESULTS Six of seven patients had reduction in the size of their prostates. The mean volumes of the prostate before and after hormonal manipulation were 129.1 +/- 32.9 standard deviation (SD) cm3 and 73.0 +/- 29.5 SD cm3, respectively (p = 0.0059). The volume of rectum receiving 80% of the prescribed dose was reduced in five of seven patients from a mean of 83.2 to 59.9 cm3 (p = 0.045). The volume of bladder receiving 80% of the prescribed dose was also reduced in five out of seven patients from a mean of 74.5 to 40.2 cm3 (p = 0.098). Correlation between the size of the prostate and volume of rectum and bladder treated was not always consistent: greater reduction in prostate size did not necessarily result in large decreases in dose to bladder or rectum. The total size of the bladder and rectum were found to be important factors in normal tissue radiation exposure; the benefits of hormone therapy may be lost if the bladder and rectum are allowed to decrease in size. Also, the bladder may be prone to sagging into the pelvis of some patients following hormone therapy, resulting in a less optimal therapeutic ratio. CONCLUSION Reduction in prostate size by neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation does decrease the amount of normal tissue irradiated in most patients. However, the correlation between the reduction in prostate size and amount of rectum or bladder treated is not linear if other variables are not controlled. Factors such as the shape of the organs, as well as the distensible nature of the bladder and rectum, play major roles in dose to normal tissues. These facts may mask the benefits of cytoreduction and could be obstacles in realizing consistent benefits from preirradiation hormonal treatment in the clinical setting if they are ignored.

Dose-surface histograms as treatment planning tool for prostate conformal therapy

Dose-surface histograms are studied and compared with dose-volume histograms, as an evaluation tool for prostate treatment planning. For thin walled hollow organs, such as the rectum and bladder, the surface area irradiated is a more appropriate measure of the biological effect than the full volume. It is also more accurate and efficient to define the surface for a hollow structure and compute the surface area histograms. Application of the dose-surface histograms provide new insights into prostate treatment planning. A simple idealized geometry model demonstrates that the percentage surface area intersected by the geometric beam edge differs from the percentage volume intersected. For a group of prostate patients, it is shown that the dose-surface histograms yield substantially different results from the dose-volume histograms in ranking four-, six-, and, eight-field treatment plans and in calculating the fraction of the rectum irradiated to high dose. The difference in terms of surface area between these plans in the high-dose region is usually less than that in terms of the volume, and a reverse of plan ranking order can consequently occur. The percentage of organ surface irradiated to high dose is typically greater than the percentage volume by 5% to 10%. The use of the dose-surface histograms in analysis of organ motion and/or patient setup uncertainty, and analysis of rectal complications, is also discussed.

Beams eye view-based photon radiotherapy I

Geographic miss, dosimetric miss (underdosing), and proximity of the tumor to sensitive normal tissues are some of the causes of inadequate radiation dose delivery; this is one of many causes of failure after radiotherapy. In the past decade, computerized tomography (CT)-based treatment planning has helped to overcome some of these problems. Beams eye view (BEV)-based radiotherapy planning is an improvement over CT-based treatment planning that may further increase the therapeutic ratio. Since January 1988, we have treated 198 patients with BEV-based photon radiotherapy. About 40% of our patients treated with radical radiotherapy undergo BEV-based treatment, and about 70% of patients who undergo planning CT in the treatment position receive BEV-based radiotherapy. Our findings are as follows: (a) routine use of BEV-based RT (BEVRT) is possible in a busy radiation oncology department; (b) BEVRT improves geometric coverage of tumors; (c) BEVRT is extremely useful in the design of oblique portals; (d) time commitments for various members of the RT treatment-planning team are reasonable; (e) BEVRT helps individualize RT technique; (f) preliminary data suggest decreased acute toxicity with the use of BEVRT for prostate cancer patients. Whether these advantages will help to improve the outcome (i.e., improve local control and survival) and/or decrease the long-term toxicity is not yet known.

The use of beam's eye view volumetrics in the selection of non-coplanar radiation portals

In 3-dimensional treatment planning, beams eye view (BEV) is used as an interactive tool to define portal entry angles that exclude critical structures while fully encompassing the target volume. With beams eye view volumetrics (BEV volumetrics), the volume of intersected normal tissues is also calculated and is used as a quantitative tool to choose portal orientations that minimize normal tissue volumes irradiated. The axial beam entry angle and a polar angle (relative to the patient longitudinal axis) are specified to define the central axis orientation. Using BEV volumetrics, we have studied the quantities of normal tissues irradiated when treating tumors in the abdomen, thorax, and pelvis. The reduction of normal tissue irradiated is a strong function of site and patient-specific tumor size and location. Volumetrics combined with BEV is found to be useful in treatment planning because it (a) provides quantitative information needed in rationally choosing portal entry angles, (b) provides a near interactive speed approach to understanding the relative merits of different multiple field plans, and (c) compliments the information provided by the more time-consuming generation of dose volume histograms.

Beam's eye view volumetrics: An aid in rapid treatment plan development and evaluation

A well-designed treatment plan fully irradiates the target to the prescribed dose while minimizing radiation to adjacent critical structures. Beams eye view is an important component of treatment planning systems because it provides the operator with tools needed to achieve this goal. Through interactive manipulation of displays, the planner uses beams eye view to adequately cover the target volume while geometrically avoiding certain critical, normal structures. A factor not considered in current beams eye view programs is the fractional volume of each structure irradiated given a specified beam direction. We have incorporated a rapid volume calculation capability in our beams eye view program, and have applied it to provide a quantitative aid to treatment planning development and evaluation. Treatment planning of lung tumors has been studied using this tool. Volumes of lung and spinal cord treated as a function of portal angle may be calculated much more rapidly than dose volume histograms and yet provide quantitative indices which follow the trends of dose volume histograms as a function of field angle. Plots of normal tissue volume irradiated as a function of field angle identify the optimal angle to minimize irradiated volume of a structure at a glance. For multiple field plans, a bitmap approach identifies areas treated by various combinations of beams. Volumetrics combined with beams eye view are useful in treatment planning because they (a) provide quantitative information needed in choosing and optimizing portal entry angle (b) provide an interactive approach to understanding the relative merits of different multiple field plans and (c) complement the information provided by the more time consuming generation of dose volume histograms. The clinical application of this tool in treatment planning is presented.

Beam's eye view based prostate treatment planning: Is it useful?

Prostate cancer is a common malignancy often treated with radiation therapy. Treatment optimization may improve local control while reducing acute and long-term complications. We routinely obtained CT scans on prostate cancer patients in treatment position after simulation. We analyzed the impact and implications of using our 3-D Beams Eye View (BEV) capability on field definition and blocking for 12 consecutive patients. Conclusions include: (a) it is necessary to use multiple bony landmarks to align BEV images with simulator films; (b) it is difficult to enter volumes precisely, that is, the exact inferior extent of prostate; (c) Beams Eye View-based plans show more individual variability in field size and position than are allowed for by recommendations in the literature; and (d) in this small series we found no significant correlation between prostate volume and clinical staging. In addition, computerized Beams Eye View capability enables us to do normal tissue dosimetry. We have used Dose Volume Histograms (DVH) to study the impact of Beams Eye View on optimization of dose to the bladder and rectum while adequately treating the prostate, with or without the seminal vesicles. Dose Volume Histograms using Beams Eye View are compared with Dose Volume Histograms using target volumes from the literature. The results will be discussed, as well as the relative advantages of using Beams Eye View for prostate cancer on a routine basis.