Danuta Nowakowska

Comparison of Selected Kinematic Facebows Applied to Mandibular Tracing

The study focused on the comparison between mechanical and computerized registration methods used by the two selected kinematic facebows. The material consisted of 35 women aged 18 to 35, studied using the Gerber Dynamic Facebow and the computerized ARCUSdigma II axiograph. To compare the devices the condylar path inclination (CPI) was recorded according to the Campers line, enabling the acquisition of easily comparable values based on which the devices were objectively and subjectively analyzed. Statistics was performed for the obtained data. The study showed that the values for the CPI registrated by the ARCUSdigma II are significantly higher than those obtained by using the Gerber Dynamic Facebow. The significant difference in the records of the CPI is most likely a result of the differences in the registration techniques assumptions. ARCUSdigma II provides the user with more diagnostic options than Gerber Dynamic Facebow. Mechanical facebow handling has a higher risk of hand-measuring errors in tracing procedure. Due to high discrepancy of achieved results from different systems the authors recommend to use articulator compatible with facebow whose measurement has been done.

Combination of therapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin with electroporation in human ovarian carcinoma model in vitro

High electric field, applied to plasma membrane, affects organization of the lipid molecules, generating transient hydrophilic electropores. The application of the cell membrane electroporation in combination with cytotoxic drugs could increase the drug transport into cells. This approach is known as electrochemotherapy (ECT). Our work shows new data concerning the influence of electrochemical reaction with cisplatin or with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on cancer ovarian cells resistant to standard therapy with cisplatin, in comparison to ECT effect on human primary fibroblasts. We investigated the effect of electroporation and electrochemotherapy with 5-FU and cisplatin on human ovarian clear-cell carcinoma cell line (OvBH-1) and epithelial ovarian carcinoma cell line (SKOV-3) - both resistant to cisplatin typically used in ovarian cancers. As control cells, human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) from primary culture were used. Electropermeabilization efficiency was determined by FACS analysis with iodide propidium. Efficiency of electrochemotherapy was evaluated with viability assay. The cytotoxic effect was dependent on the electroporation parameters and on drug concentration. Electroporation alone only insignificantly decreased cells proliferation in OvBH-1 line; SKOV-3 line was more sensitive to the electrical field. Electrochemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-FU showed promising effects on both ovarian cell lines with recovery of normal cells revealed after 72 hours.

Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM No consensus exists as to the compatibility of chemical agents used with gingival displacement methods with different impression materials. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of conventional and experimental gingival displacement agents on the polymerization time of polyvinyl siloxane impression elastomers. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study comprised 10 gingival displacement agents, including 5 conventional astringents (10%, 20%, and 25% aluminum chloride, 25% aluminum sulfate, and 15.5% ferric sulfate) and 5 experimental adrenergics (0.1% and 0.01% HCl-epinephrine, 0.05% HCl-tetrahydrozoline, 0.05% HCl-oxymetazoline, and 10% HCl-phenylephrine). The polymerization time of 240 specimens (weight 3.3 g) of 4 polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression elastomers, type 3 (Colorise Thermochromic, Hydrorise, Express, and Take 1 Advanced), after mixing with 20 μL of each displacement agent, was measured with a viscometer. The 24 specimens from the control group were polymerized without contact with the displacement agents. The studies were performed at 23°C and 37°C (± 0.1°C). RESULTS A polymerization time compatibility index (PTCI) was devised, where the polymerization time of PVS mixed with the displacement agents was expressed as the percentage of the standard polymerization time of the impression material. The PTCI values at 23°C were higher than those at 37°C for both groups of displacement agents. At 37°C, the experimental displacement agents achieved higher PTCI values than the conventional agents. CONCLUSIONS All of the evaluated displacement agents at laboratory and intraoral temperatures induced changes in the polymerization time of PVS. Therefore, chemical displacement agents should not come into direct contact with PVS impression materials.

The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents

PURPOSE The compatibility of chemical gingival margin displacement agents with polyether impression materials has not been determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the setting time of polyether impression elastomers after contact with conventional and experimental gingival displacement agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study compared the setting time of two polyether impression materials: medium body (Impregum Penta Soft) and light body (Impregum Garant L DuoSoft) after contact with 10 gingival displacement agents, including 5 conventional astringents (10%, 20%, and 25% aluminum chloride, 25% aluminum sulfate, and 15.5% ferric sulfate) and 5 experimental adrenergics (0.1% and 0.01% HCl-epinephrine, 0.05% HCl-tetrahydrozoline, 0.05% HCl-oxymetazoline, and 10% HCl-phenylephrine). As many as 120 specimens (60 light body and 60 medium body) were mixed with 20 μl of each of 10 gingival displacement agents, and the time to achieve maximum viscosity was measured with a viscometer. The setting times of these specimens were compared with the control group of 12 specimens, which were polymerized without contact with the displacement agents. The experiments were performed in two environments: 23°C and 37°C (± 0.1°C). Individual and average polymerization time compatibility indices (PTCI) were calculated. Data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). RESULTS The evaluated chemical displacement agents from both groups changed the setting time of light- and medium-body PE. The negative individual PTCI values achieved astringent (20% aluminum chloride) with two PE in both temperature environments. The average PTCI values of the experimental displacement agents at laboratory and intraoral temperatures were significantly higher than the conventional agents. CONCLUSIONS The present findings suggest that experimental retraction agents can be recommended clinically as gingival margin displacement agents with minimal effects on the setting time of medium- and light-body polyether impression materials; however, direct contact of chemical displacement agents and polyether impression materials can be avoided.

The influence of retraction agents on cytoskeleton reorganization and oxidative stress in primary human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs)

OBJECTIVE Contemporary gingival retraction chemicals are not without disagreeable side-effects; there appears to be no best gingival retraction agent. The aim of this research was to select the most biocompatible retraction agents based on examination of the parameters of oxidative stress in fibroblasts derived from human primary cell culture. DESIGN In this in vitro study we evaluated parameters of oxidative stress after treatment with retraction agents. Visine, Afrin, Neosynephrin, Strazolin and Adrenaline were the commercial products studied as gingival retraction agents. Additionally we examined three experimental agents. We determined lipid peroxidation and protein damage and monitored changes in cellular cytoskeleton proteins. Proliferative and survival efficiency were also evaluated. RESULTS Oxidative changes included by evaluated retraction agents were at the lowest level in the case of the experimental gels. Also cytoskeleton observations suggest that the experimental agents did not degrade the cellular structure of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs). CONCLUSIONS The current study was performed because of a need to project new nontoxic and save retraction agents for peridontological therapeutic usage. We suggest that the new investigational gels are most biocompatible with periodontal tissues and can be applied as new vasoconstrictor chemical retraction agents.