Dao-Zhong Jin

Integrated regulation of AMPA glutamate receptor phosphorylation in the striatum by dopamine and acetylcholine

ABSTRACT Dopamine (DA) and acetylcholine (ACh) signals converge onto protein kinase A (PKA) in medium spiny neurons of the striatum to control cellular and synaptic activities of these neurons, although underlying molecular mechanisms are less clear. Here we measured phosphorylation of the &agr;‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methylisoxazole‐4‐propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) at a PKA site (S845) as an indicator of AMPAR responses in adult rat brains in vivo to explore how DA and ACh interact to modulate AMPARs. We found that subtype‐selective activation of DA D1 receptors (D1Rs), D2 receptors (D2Rs), or muscarinic M4 receptors (M4Rs) induced specific patterns of GluA1 S845 responses in the striatum. These defined patterns support a local multitransmitter interaction model in which D2Rs inhibited an intrinsic inhibitory element mediated by M4Rs to enhance the D1R efficacy in modulating AMPARs. Consistent with this, selective enhancement of M4R activity by a positive allosteric modulator resumed the cholinergic inhibition of D1Rs. In addition, D1R and D2R coactivation recruited GluA1 and PKA preferentially to extrasynaptic sites. In sum, our in vivo data support an existence of a dynamic DA‐ACh balance in the striatum which actively modulates GluA1 AMPAR phosphorylation and trafficking. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled ‘Ionotropic glutamate receptors’. HIGHLIGHTSA dopamine (DA) D1 receptor agonist elevates GluA1 phosphorylation in the striatum.DA D2 receptors augment efficacy of the D1 receptor agonist.A positive modulator of muscarinic M4 receptors (M4R) inhibits D1/D2 synergy.D1/D2 synergy determines the number of GluA1 and PKA at extrasynaptic sites.

Group III metabotropic glutamate receptors and drug addiction

Neuroadaptations of glutamatergic transmission in the limbic reward circuitry are linked to persistent drug addiction. Accumulating data have demonstrated roles of ionotropic glutamate receptors and group I and II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in this event. Emerging evidence also identifies Gαi/o-coupled group III mGluRs (mGluR4/7/8 subtypes enriched in the limbic system) as direct substrates of drugs of abuse and active regulators of drug action. Auto- and heteroreceptors of mGluR4/7/8 reside predominantly on nerve terminals of glutamatergic corticostriatal and GABAergic striatopallidal pathways, respectively. These presynaptic receptors regulate basal and/or phasic release of respective transmitters to maintain basal ganglia homeostasis. In response to operant administration of common addictive drugs, such as psychostimulants (cocaine and amphetamine), alcohol and opiates, limbic group III mGluRs undergo drastic adaptations to contribute to the enduring remodeling of excitatory synapses and to usually suppress drug seeking behavior. As a result, a loss-of-function mutation (knockout) of individual group III receptor subtypes often promotes drug seeking. This review summarizes the data from recent studies on three group III receptor subtypes (mGluR4/7/8) expressed in the basal ganglia and analyzes their roles in the regulation of dopamine and glutamate signaling in the striatum and their participation in the addictive properties of three major classes of drugs (psychostimulants, alcohol, and opiates).

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 upregulates surface NMDA receptor expression in striatal neurons via CaMKII.

Metabotropic and ionotropic glutamate receptors are closely clustered in postsynaptic membranes and are believed to interact actively with each other to control excitatory synaptic transmission. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5), for example, has been well documented to potentiate ionotropic NMDA receptor activity, although underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the role of mGluR5 in regulating trafficking and subcellular distribution of NMDA receptors in adult rat striatal neurons. We found that the mGluR1/5 agonist DHPG concentration-dependently increased NMDA receptor GluN1 and GluN2B subunit expression in the surface membrane. Meanwhile, DHPG reduced GluN1 and GluN2B levels in the intracellular compartment. The effect of DHPG was blocked by an mGluR5 selective antagonist MTEP but not by an mGluR1 selective antagonist 3-MATIDA. Pretreatment with an inhibitor or a specific inhibitory peptide for synapse-enriched Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) also blocked the DHPG-stimulated redistribution of GluN1 and GluN2B. In addition, DHPG enhanced CaMKIIα activity and elevated GluN2B phosphorylation at a CaMKII-sensitive site (serine 1303). These results demonstrate that mGluR5 regulates trafficking of NMDA receptors in striatal neurons. Activation of mGluR5 appears to induce rapid trafficking of GluN1 and GluN2B to surface membranes through a signaling pathway involving CaMKII.

Regulation of synaptic MAPK/ERK phosphorylation in the rat striatum and medial prefrontal cortex by dopamine and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Dopamine and acetylcholine are two principal transmitters in the striatum and are usually balanced to modulate local neural activity and to maintain striatal homeostasis. This study investigates the role of dopamine and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the regulation of a central signaling protein, i.e., the mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK). We focus on the synaptic pool of MAPKs because of the fact that these kinases reside in peripheral synaptic structures in addition to their somatic locations. We show that a systemic injection of dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) agonist SKF81297 enhances phosphorylation of extracellular signal‐regulated kinases (ERKs), a prototypic subclass of MAPKs, in the adult rat striatum. Similar results were observed in another dopamine‐responsive region, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). The dopamine D2 receptor agonist quinpirole had no such effects. Pretreatment with a positive allosteric modulator (PAM) of muscarinic acetylcholine M4 receptors (M4Rs), VU0152100, attenuated the D1R agonist‐stimulated ERK phosphorylation in the two regions, whereas the PAM itself did not alter basal ERK phosphorylation. All drug treatments had no effect on phosphorylation of c‐Jun N‐terminal kinases (JNKs), another MAPK subclass, in the striatum and mPFC. These results demonstrate that dopamine and acetylcholine are integrated to control synaptic ERK but not JNK activation in striatal and mPFC neurons in vivo. Activation of M4Rs exerts an inhibitory effect on the D1R‐mediated upregulation of synaptic ERK phosphorylation.

Dynamic increases in AMPA receptor phosphorylation in the rat hippocampus in response to amphetamine

Increasing evidence supports the critical role of α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) glutamate receptors in psychostimulant action. These receptors are regulated via a phosphorylation‐dependent mechanism in their trafficking, distribution, and function. The hippocampus is a brain structure important for learning and memory and is emerging as a critical site for processing psychostimulant effects. To determine whether the hippocampal pool of AMPA receptors is regulated by stimulants, we investigated and characterized the impact of amphetamine (AMPH) on phosphorylation of AMPA receptors in the adult rat hippocampus in vivo. We found that AMPH markedly increased phosphorylation of AMPA receptor GluA1 subunits at serine 845 (S845) in the hippocampus. The effect of AMPH was dose dependent. A single dose of AMPH induced a rapid and transient increase in S845 phosphorylation. Among different hippocampal subfields, AMPH primarily elevated S845 phosphorylation in the Cornu Ammonis area 1 and dentate gyrus. In contrast to S845, serine 831 phosphorylation of GluA1 and serine 880 phosphorylation of GluA2 were not altered by AMPH. In addition, surface expression of hippocampal GluA1 was up‐regulated, while the amount of intracellular GluA1 fraction was concurrently reduced in response to AMPH. GluA2 protein levels in either the surface or intracellular pool were insensitive to AMPH. These data demonstrate that the AMPA receptor in the hippocampus is sensitive to dopamine stimulation. Acute AMPH administration induces dose‐, time‐, site‐, and subunit‐dependent phosphorylation of AMPA receptors and facilitates surface trafficking of GluA1 AMPA receptors in hippocampal neurons in vivo.

An Essential Role of Fyn in the Modulation of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 1 in Neurons

Abstract Fyn is a member of the Src family of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases and is broadly expressed in the CNS. As a synapse-enriched kinase, Fyn interacts with and phosphorylates local substrates to regulate synaptic transmission and plasticity, although our knowledge of specific targets of Fyn at synaptic sites remains incomplete and the accurate role of Fyn in regulating synaptic proteins is poorly understood. In this study, we initiated an effort to explore the interaction of Fyn with a metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR). We found that recombinant Fyn directly binds to mGluR1a at a consensus binding motif located in the intracellular C-terminus (CT) of mGluR1a in vitro. Similarly, endogenous Fyn interacts with mGluR1a in adult rat cerebellar neurons in vivo. Active Fyn phosphorylates mGluR1a at a conserved tyrosine residue in the CT region. In cerebellar neurons and transfected HEK293T cells, the Fyn-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of mGluR1a is constitutively active and acts to facilitate the surface expression of mGluR1a and to potentiate the mGluR1a postreceptor signaling. These results support mGluR1a to be a novel substrate of Fyn. Fyn, by binding to and phosphorylating mGluR1a, potentiates surface expression and signaling of the receptors.

Regulation of Phosphorylation of AMPA Glutamate Receptors by Muscarinic M4 Receptors in the Striatum In vivo

The acetylcholine muscarinic 4 (M4) receptor is a principal muscarinic receptor subtype present in the striatum. Notably, Gαi/o-coupled M4 receptors and Gαs/Golf-coupled dopamine D1 receptors are coexpressed in striatonigral projection neurons and are thought to interact with each other to regulate neuronal excitability, although underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the role of M4 receptors in the regulation of phosphorylation of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors in the rat normal and dopamine-stimulated striatum in vivo. We found that a systemic injection of a M4 antagonist tropicamide increased AMPA receptor GluA1 subunit phosphorylation at a protein kinase A-dependent site (S845) in the striatum. The tropicamide-induced S845 phosphorylation was rapid, reversible, and dose-dependent and occurred in the two subdivisions of the striatum, i.e., the caudate putamen and nucleus accumbens. Coadministration of subthreshold doses of tropicamide and a D1 agonist SKF81297 induced a significant increase in S845 phosphorylation. Coadministered tropicamide and a dopamine psychostimulant amphetamine at their subthreshold doses also elevated S845 phosphorylation. Tropicamide alone or coinjected with SKF81297 or amphetamine had no effect on GluA1 phosphorylation at S831. Tropicamide did not affect GluA2 phosphorylation at S880. These results reveal a selective inhibitory linkage from M4 receptors to GluA1 in S845 phosphorylation in striatal neurons. Blockade of the M4-mediated inhibition significantly augments constitutive and dopamine-stimulated GluA1 S845 phosphorylation.

Pharmacological modulation of AMPA receptor phosphorylation by dopamine and muscarinic receptor agents in the rat medial prefrontal cortex

ABSTRACT Two key transmitters in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), dopamine and acetylcholine, are believed to interact with each other to modulate local glutamatergic transmission, although molecular mechanisms underlying their crosstalk are poorly understood. Here we investigated effects of pharmacological manipulations of dopamine and muscarinic receptors on phosphorylation of &agr;‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors in the adult rat mPFC in vivo. We found that an agonist selective for G&agr;s‐coupled dopamine D1 receptors, SKF81297, increased AMPA receptor GluA1 subunit phosphorylation at a protein kinase A‐sensitive site (S845), while SKF81297 had no effect on GluA1 phosphorylation at S831. An agonist for G&agr;i/o‐coupled dopamine D2 receptors, quinpirole, also increased S845 but not S831 phosphorylation. When coinjected, the two agonists induced an additive increase in S845 phosphorylation. The D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 blocked the SKF81297/quinpirole‐stimulated S845 phosphorylation. The D2 antagonist eticlopride also partially blocked S845 responses to SKF81297/quinpirole. VU0152100, a positive allosteric modulator selective for G&agr;i/o‐coupled muscarinic M4 receptors, reduced the S845 phosphorylation induced by SKF81297 and quinpirole injected alone or together. In contrast, coinjection of subthreshold doses of tropicamide, an M4 antagonist, and SKF81297 facilitated S845 phosphorylation. Additionally, coadministered SFK81297 and quinpirole increased the abundance of mPFC GluA1 at extrasynaptic sites. These data reveal that both D1 and D2 receptors upregulate GluA1 phosphorylation in mPFC neurons probably via a direct and indirect mechanism, respectively. The indirect mechanism involves M4 receptors which generally counteract the effect of dopamine on GluA1 phosphorylation.

Inhibition of basal and amphetamine-stimulated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation in the rat forebrain by muscarinic acetylcholine M4 receptors

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), especially its extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) subfamily, is a group of kinases enriched in the mammalian brain. While ERK is central to cell signaling and neural activities, the regulation of ERK by transmitters is poorly understood. In this study, the role of acetylcholine in the regulation of ERK was investigated in adult rat striatum in vivo. We focused on muscarinic M1 and M4 receptors, two principal muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptor subtypes in the striatum. A systemic injection of the M1-preferring antagonist telenzepine did not alter ERK phosphorylation in the two subdivisions of the striatum, the caudate putamen and nucleus accumbens. Similarly, telenzepine did not affect ERK phosphorylation in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), hippocampus, and cerebellum. Moreover, telenzepine had no effect on the ERK phosphorylation induced by dopamine stimulation with the psychostimulant amphetamine. In contrast to telenzepine, the M4-preferring antagonist tropicamide consistently increased ERK phosphorylation in the striatum and mPFC. This increase was rapid and transient. Tropicamide and amphetamine when coadministered at subthreshold doses induced a significant increase in ERK phosphorylation. These results demonstrate that mACh receptors exert a subtype-specific modulation of ERK in striatal and mPFC neurons. While the M1 receptor antagonist has no effect on ERK phosphorylation, M4 receptors inhibit constitutive and dopamine-stimulated ERK phosphorylation in these dopamine-innervated brain regions.

Amphetamine elevates phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) in the rat forebrain via activating dopamine D1 and D2 receptors

Psychostimulants have an impact on protein synthesis, although underlying molecular mechanisms are unclear. Eukaryotic initiation factor 2α-subunit (eIF2α) is a key player in initiation of protein translation and is regulated by phosphorylation. While this factor is sensitive to changing synaptic input and is critical for synaptic plasticity, its sensitivity to stimulants is poorly understood. Here we systematically characterized responses of eIF2α to a systemic administration of the stimulant amphetamine (AMPH) in dopamine responsive regions of adult rat brains. Intraperitoneal injection of AMPH at 5mg/kg increased eIF2α phosphorylation at serine 51 in the striatum. This increase was transient. In the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), AMPH induced a relatively delayed phosphorylation of the factor. Pretreatment with a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 blocked the AMPH-stimulated eIF2α phosphorylation in both the striatum and mPFC. Similarly, a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist eticlopride reduced the effect of AMPH in the two regions. Two antagonists alone did not alter basal eIF2α phosphorylation. AMPH and two antagonists did not change the amount of total eIF2α proteins in both regions. These results demonstrate the sensitivity of eIF2α to stimulant exposure. AMPH possesses the ability to stimulate eIF2α phosphorylation in striatal and mPFC neurons in vivo in a D1 and D2 receptor-dependent manner.