Dariusz Żurawek

Mesolimbic dopamine D2 receptor plasticity contributes to stress resilience in rats subjected to chronic mild stress

RationaleFew studies have investigated neurobiological and biochemical differences between stress-resilient and stress-vulnerable experimental animals.ObjectivesWe investigated alterations in mesolimbic dopamine D2 receptor density and mRNA expression level in stressed rats at two time points, i.e. after 2 and 5 weeks of chronic mild stress (CMS).MethodsWe used the chronic mild stress paradigm because it is a well-established animal model of depression. Two groups of stressed rats were distinguished during CMS experiments: (1) stress reactive (70 %), which displayed a decrease in the drinking of a palatable sucrose solution during the stress regimen, and (2) stress resilient (30 %), which exhibited an unaltered drinking profile when compared with the unchallenged control group. [3H]Domperidone was used as a ligand to label dopamine D2 receptors, and a mixture of three specific oligonucleotides was used to evaluate dopamine D2 receptor mRNA changes in various regions of the rat brain.ResultsCMS strongly affected the mesolimbic dopamine circuit in stress-resilient group after 2 weeks and stress-reactive group of rats after 5 weeks which exhibited a decrease in the level of dopamine D2 receptor protein without alterations in D2 mRNA expression. Stress-resilient animals, but not stress-reactive animals, effectively adapted to the extended stress and coped with it. The increase in D2 mRNA expression returned the dopamine D2 receptor density to control levels in stress-resilient rats after 5 weeks of CMS, but not in stress-reactive animals.ConclusionsThese results clearly demonstrate that, despite earlier blunting, the activation of dopamine receptor biosynthesis in the dopamine mesoaccumbens system in stress-resilient rats is involved in active coping with stressful experiences, and it exhibits a delay in time.

Prolactin and its receptors in the chronic mild stress rat model of depression.

Prolactin (PRL) exhibits many physiological functions with wide effects on the central nervous system including stress responses. Our study aimed to investigate the effect of chronic unpredictable mild stress (CMS) - which is a good animal model of depression - on PRL receptor (PRLR) expression in the rat brain. Rats were exposed to CMS for two weeks and subsequently to CMS in combination with imipramine (IMI) treatment for five consecutive weeks. Behavioral deficit measured in anhedonic animals is a reduced intake of sucrose solution. Two weeks of CMS procedure allowed the selection of animals reactive to stress and displaying anhedonia, and the group which is considered as stress-non-reactive as far as behavioral measures are concerned. In this group the elevated level of PRL in plasma was observed, decrease in dopamine release in the hypothalamus, increase in [(125)I]PRL binding to PRLR in the choroid plexus, increase of mRNA encoding the long form of PRLR in the arcuate nucleus and the decrease of mRNA encoding its short form, and decrease in the mRNA encoding dopamine D2 receptor. All these alterations indicate these parameters as involved in the phenomenon of stress-resilience. The prolongation of the CMS procedure for additional five weeks shows the form of habituation to the stressful conditions. The most interesting result, however, was the up-regulation of PRLR in the choroid plexus of rats subjected to full CMS procedure combined with treatment with IMI, which may speak in favor of the role of this receptor in the mechanisms of antidepressant action.

Involvement of prolactin and somatostatin in depression and the mechanism of action of antidepressant drugs

Neuropeptides have been implicated in the physiology and pathophysiology of stress responses and therefore may play an important role in the pathogenesis of affective disorders such as Major Depression Disorder (MDD). The data presented in this mini-review demonstrate the role of prolactin (PRL) and somatostatin (STT) in the pathology and pharmacotherapy of MDD, focusing particularly on the response to antidepressant treatment, and compare the available data with the results obtained in our laboratory using the well-validated chronic mild stress (CMS) animal model of MDD. Despite the availability of many pharmacological therapies for depression, ca. 35% patients remain treatment resistant. This clinical situation is also true for rats subjected to CMS; some animals do not respond to antidepressant therapy and are considered treatment resistant. The most interesting results presented in this mini-review concern the changes in PRL and SST receptors in the brains of rats subjected to the full CMS procedure and IMI treatment and demonstrate the role of these receptors in the mechanisms of antidepressant action. The possible interaction between SST and PRL, the involvement of the D2 dopamine receptor, and their direct protein-protein interactions are also discussed, with the conclusion that these two neurohormones play an important role in the mechanism of resilience after stress as well as in the mechanism of action of antidepressant drugs.

Differential stress response in rats subjected to chronic mild stress is accompanied by changes in CRH-family gene expression at the pituitary level

The purpose of this study was to examine molecular markers of the stress response at the pituitary and peripheral levels in animals that responded differently to chronic mild stress (CMS). Rats were subjected to 2-weeks CMS and symptoms of anhedonia was measured by the consumption of 1% sucrose solution. mRNA levels of CRH-family neuropeptides (Crh-corticotropin-releasing hormone, Ucn1-urocortin 1, Ucn2-urocortin 2, Ucn3-urocortin 3), CRH receptors (Crhr1-corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1, Crhr2-corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 2) and Crhbp (corticotropin-releasing factor binding protein) in the pituitaries of rats were determined with real-time PCR. Plasma levels of ACTH (adrenocorticotropin), CRH and urocortins were measured with ELISA assays. CMS procedure led to the development of anhedonia manifested by the decreased sucrose consumption (stress-reactive, SR, stress-susceptible group). Additionally, the group of animals not exhibiting any signs of anhedonia (stress non-reactive, SNR, stress-resilient group) and the group characterized by the increased sucrose consumption (stress invert-reactive group SIR) were selected. The significant increases in ACTH plasma level accompanied by the decreases in the pituitary gene expression of the Crh, Ucn2 and Ucn3 in both stress non-reactive and stress invert-reactive groups were observed. The only molecular change observed in stress-reactive group was the increase in UCN2 plasma level. The differentiated behavioral stress responses were reflected by gene expression changes in the pituitary. Alterations in the mRNA levels of Crh, Ucn2 and Ucn3 in the pituitary might confirm the paracrine and/or autocrine effects of these peptides in stress response. The opposite behavioral effect between SNR vs. SIR groups and the surprising similarity at gene expression and plasma ACTH levels in these two groups may suggest the discrepancy between molecular and behavioral stress responses; however, there results might indicate to similarity underlying different ways to cope with stress conditions.

Potential role of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) heterodimerization in neuropsychiatric disorders: A focus on depression

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of membrane proteins in the human genome and are the target of approximately half of all therapeutic drugs. For many years, GPCRs were thought to exist and function as monomeric units. However, during the past two decades, substantial biochemical, structural and functional evidence have indicated that GPCRs can associate and form heteromers that exhibit functional properties distinct from the corresponding monomers. The understanding of the unique pharmacological and functional properties of such heteromers is a major challenge for neuroscience, particularly given the abundant evidence suggesting that GPCR heteromers may play a crucial role in neuropsychiatric disorders. Herein, we present current data on the role of GPCR heterodimerization in neuropsychiatric disorders, with a focus on its potential implications in depression. The presented examples of pairs of receptors, with their specific pharmacological and functional properties, are likely to lead to novel effective strategies in antidepressant drug development. The currently available techniques for studying GPCR heterodimerization, both in vitro as well as in situ in native tissue, are also described.

Antidepressants promote formation of heterocomplexes of dopamine D2 and somatostatin subtype 5 receptors in the mouse striatum

The interaction between the dopaminergic and somatostatinergic systems is considered to play a potential role in mood regulation. Chronic administration of antidepressants influences release of both neurotransmitters. The molecular basis of the functional cooperation may stem from the physical interaction of somatostatin receptor subtypes and dopamine D2 receptors since they colocalize in striatal interneurons and were shown to undergo ligand-dependent heterodimerization in heterologous expression systems. In present study we adapted in situ proximity ligation assay to investigate the occurrence of D2-Sst5 receptor heterocomplexes, and their possible alterations in the striatum of mice treated acutely and repeatedly (21days) with antidepressant drugs of different pharmacological profiles (escitalopram and desipramine). Additionally we analysed number of heterocomplexes in primary striatal neuronal cultures incubated with both antidepressant drugs for 1h and 6days. The studies revealed that antidepressants increase formation of D2-Sst5 receptors heterodimers. These findings provide interesting evidence that dopamine D2 and somatostatin Sst5 heterodimers may be considered as potential mediators of antidepressant effects, since the heterodimerization of these receptors occurs in native brain tissue as well as in primary striatal neuronal cultures where receptors are expressed at physiological levels.

Basal prolactin levels in rat plasma correlates with response to antidepressant treatment in animal model of depression

Prolactin (PRL) has been shown to be altered by psychotropic drugs, including antidepressant drugs (ADs). Many studies have focused on the response to antidepressant treatment (especially related to the serotonergic system) using the fenfluramine test (PRF), however some data suggest lack of correlation between PRF and prediction of clinical response to ADs. In our study we have investigated the hypothesis that basal plasma level of prolactin is a better predictor of antidepressant treatment. We have used Chronic Mild Stress (CMS) - the animal model of depression. Rats are exposed to CMS in combination with imipramine (IMI) treatment for 5 consecutive weeks. Blood samples were collected from the rat tail vein three times: before the CMS procedure, after 2 weeks of stress and after the complete CMS procedure (after 5 weeks of stress and IMI treatment). The PRL level in plasma was determined using the commercially available ELISA kit. In CMS, anhedonia in rats is manifested by reduced consumption of sucrose solution while administration of antidepressant drugs reverses anhedonia. Some animals (ca.30%) did not respond to antidepressant therapy and were considered treatment-resistant. There was no correlation between basal PRL levels and stress response, however, from the results obtained by Spearman Rank Correlation analysis we have observed a significant negative correlation between basal PRL levels before the CMS procedure and behavioral response to IMI administration. The obtained results indicate that the basal PRL level in rat plasma correlates with a good response to treatment in the animal model of depression.

Effects of imipramine on cytokines panel in the rats serum during the drug treatment and discontinuation

&NA; Time dependent sensitization (TDS) ‐ phenomenon described originally by Chiodo and Antelman (1980) in context of dopamine receptors, refers to cascade of events that continue to develop in the organism, after the initiating stimulus is no longer available. Treatment could be recognized as such a initiating stimulus (in case of depression, example of electroconvulsive therapy would be obvious, but some aspects of pharmacotherapy too). The process leads to improvement, but, on the other hand, phenomena of kindling in recurrent depression is well known (more relapses and therapies make heavier and longer lasting subsequent episodes). Hence our interest in delayed effects of treatment. Here we report alterations in rat immune system after Imipramine (IMI) treatment cessation. Wistar male rats were treated with IMI (10 mg/kg i.p. in 2 ml/kg of saline) repeatedly for 21 days or once ‐ on the last day of drug administration period. Then the 3 weeks discontinuation phase begun, during which, at certain time points (3 h, 72 h, 7days, 21days) the trunk blood was collected. Tissue concentrations of IMI and its metabolite desipramine (DMI), as well as ACTH and various cytokines were measured. The IMI and DMI was detectable only 3 h after the last i.p. injection of the drug. Ever since the second time point (72 h of discontinuation) the levels of either compound were below detection threshold.There was no significant changes in ACTH levels between rat groups, although IMI seemed to attenuate alterations of the hormone level comparing to control groups. We observed differences between groups regarding certain cytokines at certain time points. Namely: at 72 h of discontinuation IL‐2 and IL‐4 were elevated in sera of rats treated with IMI acutely; at 7d of discontinuation levels of IL‐1&agr;, IL‐5, IL‐10 and IL‐12 were affected in both acutely and chronically treated animals. Presented data support, regarding some cytokines in serum, the TDS theory. Furthermore they refer to important aspect of antidepressants (ADs) action – antidepressant discontinuation syndrome (ADS). The most frequently, ADS has been described in context of ADs‐disrupted monoamine homeostasis. Here, the other principle (i.e. immunomodulation) of the syndrome is proposed.

Effect of desipramine on gene expression in the mouse frontal cortex – Microarray study

BACKGROUND These studies aimed to identify the genes differentially expressed in the frontal cortex of mice treated repeatedly with either saline or desipramine (DMI). METHODS Differences in gene expression in the mouse frontal cortex were studied using a whole-genome microarray approach. RESULTS The analyses revealed a group of 88 transcripts (18 genes) that were differentially expressed between the mice treated with saline and those treated with DMI. These genes include Spnb2, Mef2c, Ncam1, Hsp90ab1, Kif1b, Ddx6 and Gsk3b, which were connected in the gene relationship network. CONCLUSIONS It appears that one week of DMI administration measurably altered the expression of a small number of genes, including genes connected with neuroplasticity and cytoskeletal changes, the regulation of calcium levels in the cell or translation processes.

Understanding GPCR dimerization

Initially G protein-coupled receptors, GPCRs, were thought to act as monomers, but recently strong evidence has been gathered indicating that they are capable of forming homo- and heterodimers or higher order oligomeric complexes, and that the dimerization phenomenon can modulate the pharmacological response and function of these receptors. In this chapter we point to the great potential of alternative therapeutic approach targeted at GPCR dimers, which is especially important in the field of neuropsychopharmacology. We also included a brief description of methods used for studying the phenomenon of GPCR oligomerization, with particular attention paid to the proximity ligation assay, PLA, the procedure which allows the study of interactions between receptors not only in vitro but also in vivo, with good anatomical resolution, what is especially important in the studies of various GPCRs involved in central neurotransmission.