Darrell E. Anderson

Molecular targets for nutrients involved with cancer prevention.

Dietary nutrients can influence cancer risk by inhibiting or enhancing carcinogenesis through diverse mechanisms of action. The identification and elucidation of their sites of action have been a focus of nutrition and cancer research for more than four decades. Transforming nutrition and cancer research from a predominantly observational to a molecular approach offers exciting opportunities for truly identifying those who will and will not benefit from dietary intervention strategies. The emerging field of nutritional genomics, defined here as the study of any genetic or epigenetic interaction with a nutrient, will be key to this evolution. Unraveling which genetic upregulation or downregulation leads to subsequent phenotype changes will not be easy. There is evidence that genetic polymorphisms can influence the dynamics between nutrients and molecular targets and, thus, contribute to variation in response among individuals. Because many molecular targets will likely be identified, it may be necessary to credential nutrients, that is, to determine which specific nutrient-related genetic and epigenetic changes bring about phenotypic changes, to establish which interactions are the most important and under what circumstances. Vitamin D, calcium, folate, selenium, genistein, and resveratrol are highlighted, because they represent specific classes of nutrients and illustrate the need to credential various nutrients to understand their physiological significance in cancer prevention. As the science of nutrition unfolds, a clearer understanding will emerge about how nutrients can modulate cancer risk through molecular interactions and how foods might be changed by agronomic approaches and/or biotechnology. Undeniably, embracing new genomic technologies offers exciting opportunities for advances in the broad area of nutrition, especially those related to cancer prevention.Dietary nutrients can influence cancer risk by inhibiting or enhancing carcinogenesis through diverse mechanisms of action. The identification and elucidation of their sites of action have been a focus of nutrition and cancer research for more than four decades. Transforming nutrition and cancer research from a predominantly observational to a molecular approach offers exciting opportunities for truly identifying those who will and will not benefit from dietary intervention strategies. The emerging field of nutritional genomics, defined here as the study of any genetic or epigenetic interaction with a nutrient, will be key to this evolution. Unraveling which genetic upregulation or downregulation leads to subsequent phenotype changes will not be easy. There is evidence that genetic polymorphisms can influence the dynamics between nutrients and molecular targets and, thus, contribute to variation in response among individuals. Because many molecular targets will likely be identified, it may be necessary to credential nutrients, that is, to determine which specific nutrient-related genetic and epigenetic changes bring about phenotypic changes, to establish which interactions are the most important and under what circumstances. Vitamin D, calcium, folate, selenium, genistein, and resveratrol are highlighted, because they represent specific classes of nutrients and illustrate the need to credential various nutrients to understand their physiological significance in cancer prevention. As the science of nutrition unfolds, a clearer understanding will emerge about how nutrients can modulate cancer risk through molecular interactions and how foods might be changed by agronomic approaches and/or biotechnology. Undeniably, embracing new genomic technologies offers exciting opportunities for advances in the broad area of nutrition, especially those related to cancer prevention.

Micronutrients in cancer chemoprevention.

The selection of micronutrients, defined as essential and nonessential dietary components consumed in minute quantities, for testing in clinical chemoprevention trials is based on the totality of evidence arising from epidemiologic, in vitro, animal, and clinical studies. Those micronutrients that surface with chemopreventive potential, in terms of high efficacy and low toxicity, in early-phase clinical studies are then candidates for large-scale, randomized clinical chemoprevention trials with cancer endpoints. Micronutrients currently being examined in National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored phase I, II, or III chemoprevention trials for prostate, breast, and colon cancers include isoflavones, lycopene, selenized yeast, selenomethionine, selenium, vitamin E, perillyl alcohol, folic acid, vitamin D, calcium, and curcumin. The response to micronutrients may vary not only in magnitude but also in direction. This variation and response likely depend on individual genetic polymorphisms and/or interactions among dietary components that influence absorption, metabolism, or site of action. Research priorities include investigation of possible molecular targets for micronutrients and whether genetic and epigenetic events dictate direction and magnitude of the response.

Translating research into evidence-based practice: the National Cancer Institute Community Clinical Oncology Program.

The recent rapid acceleration of basic science is reshaping both our clinical research system and our healthcare delivery system. The pace and growing volume of medical discoveries are yielding exciting new opportunities, yet we continue to face old challenges to maintain research progress and effectively translate research into practice. The National Institutes of Health and individual government programs increasingly are emphasizing research agendas that involve evidence development, comparative‐effectiveness research among heterogeneous populations, translational research, and accelerating the translation of research into evidence‐based practice as well as building successful research networks to support these efforts. For more than 25 years, the National Cancer Institute Community Clinical Oncology Program has successfully extended research into the community and facilitated the translation of research into evidence‐based practice. By describing its keys to success, this article provides practical guidance to cancer‐focused, provider‐based research networks as well as those in other disciplines. Cancer 2010.

Molecular Markers for Early Detection

A common belief is that the earlier that cancer is detected, the better the chance exists for reduced mortality and morbidity. The advent of new and emerging molecular, genetic, and imaging technologies has broadened the possible strategies for early detection and prevention, but a beneficial impact on mortality needs to be supported by clinical evidence. Molecular markers are being identified that are enhancing our ability to predict and detect cancer before it develops and at the earliest signs of impending carcinogenic transformation. Of the innumerable molecular markers in development, a standalone early detection marker with acceptable sensitivity and specificity is available for bladder cancer, although for most cancer sites there are promising avenues of research that will likely produce results in the next decade. The perfect molecular marker would be one that is inherently related to the disease, specifically to the processes of malignant tumorigenesis or to the defense mechanisms of the individual. For example, mutations associated with increased cancer risk often produce gene products that interfere with tumor-suppressor pathways (eg, DNA repair or cell-cycle control) or support oncogenic pathways (eg, through genetic instability or silencing the apoptotic pathway). Finding molecular markers associated with these processes, and where in the process they produce their actions, can lead to interventions based on maintaining support for the normal process and interrupting the action of the products of the mutation. The search for molecular markers for cancer prevention and early detection presents a formidable challenge that requires a systematic and scientifically sound validation process. The search encompasses a broad range of scientific disciplines, including biochemistry, genetics, histology, immunology, informatic technologies, and epidemiology; strategies to identify and understand molecular markers are approached with multidisciplinary teams focused on understanding the mechanistic basis of cancer and the processes and pathways that underlie carcinogenesis.

Testing the Ability of Selenium and Vitamin E to Prevent Prostate Cancer in a Large Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial: The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial

Abstract The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) was conducted to assess the efficacy of selenium and vitamin E alone and in combination on the incidence of prostate cancer. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2×2 factorial design clinical trial, neither selenium nor vitamin E reduced the incidence of prostate cancer after seven years, and in fact, vitamin E was associated with a 17% increased risk of prostate cancer compared to placebo. The null findings were initially surprising given the preclinical and clinical evidence suggesting chemopreventive activity of selenium. These findings suggest that selenium and vitamin E do not prevent prostate cancer. Other potential explanations for the null findings include the agent formulation and dose, the characteristics of the cohort, and the study design. It is likely that only specific subpopulations may benefit from selenium supplementation; therefore, future studies should consider the baseline selenium status of the participants, age of the cohort, and genotype of specific selenoproteins, among other characteristics, in order to determine the activity of selenium in cancer prevention.