Darren Reed

The rotator cuff muscles are activated at low levels during shoulder adduction: an experimental study

QUESTION During isometric shoulder adduction in normal subjects, do the rotator cuff muscles activate more than other shoulder muscles? Are the activation patterns influenced by shoulder abduction angle or load? DESIGN A within-participant, repeated measures experimental study. PARTICIPANTS 15 healthy adults. INTERVENTION Participants performed an isometric adduction exercise at 30°, 60°, and 90° abduction in the scapular plane and at 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% load. OUTCOME MEASURES During the exercises, a combination of indwelling and surface electromyographic recordings were taken from 11 shoulder muscles: supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, pectoralis major, teres major, latissimus dorsi, rhomboid major, serratus anterior, lower trapezius, upper trapezius, and deltoid. RESULTS At 100% load, mean rotator cuff activation levels were low (supraspinatus at 3% of its maximum voluntary contraction, infraspinatus 27%, and subscapularis 27%) and significantly less than the activation levels of rhomboid major (81%), latissimus dorsi (103%), and teres major (76%) (F₁₀,₁₄₀ = 15.5, p < 0.01). No significant difference in activity levels of the rotator cuff muscles were recorded when isometric adduction was performed at 30°, 60°, or 90° abduction (p > 0.89). Among the muscles activated above minimum levels (> 10% of maximum voluntary contraction), mean activation levels increased as load increased (F₃,₄₂ = 72.0, p < 0.01) CONCLUSION Since isometric adduction in normal subjects does not produce moderate to high activation levels in any of the rotator cuff muscles tested, these results do not support the use of shoulder adduction to identify rotator cuff muscle dysfunction or strengthen the rotator cuff muscles.

Assessing the validity of surface electromyography for recording muscle activation patterns from serratus anterior

PURPOSE No direct evidence exists to support the validity of using surface electrodes to record muscle activity from serratus anterior, an important and commonly investigated shoulder muscle. The aims of this study were to determine the validity of examining muscle activation patterns in serratus anterior using surface electromyography and to determine whether intramuscular electromyography is representative of serratus anterior muscle activity. METHODS Seven asymptomatic subjects performed dynamic and isometric shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and dynamic bench press plus tests. Surface electrodes were placed over serratus anterior and around intramuscular electrodes in serratus anterior. Load was ramped during isometric tests from 0% to 100% maximum load and dynamic tests were performed at 70% maximum load. EMG signals were normalised using five standard maximum voluntary contraction tests. RESULTS Surface electrodes significantly underestimated serratus anterior muscle activity compared with the intramuscular electrodes during dynamic flexion, dynamic abduction, isometric flexion, isometric abduction and bench press plus tests. All other test conditions showed no significant differences including the flexion normalisation test where maximum activation was recorded from both electrode types. Low correlation between signals was recorded using surface and intramuscular electrodes during concentric phases of dynamic abduction and flexion. CONCLUSIONS It is not valid to use surface electromyography to assess muscle activation levels in serratus anterior during isometric exercises where the electrodes are not placed at the angle of testing and dynamic exercises. Intramuscular electrodes are as representative of the serratus anterior muscle activity as surface electrodes.

Does supraspinatus initiate shoulder abduction

PURPOSE It is commonly stated that supraspinatus initiates abduction; however, there is no direct evidence to support this claim. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to determine whether supraspinatus initiates shoulder abduction by activating prior to movement and significantly earlier than other shoulder muscles and to determine if load or plane of movement influenced the recruitment timing of supraspinatus. METHODS Electromyographic recordings were taken from seven shoulder muscles of fourteen volunteers during shoulder abduction in the coronal and scapular planes and a plane 30° anterior to the scapular plane, at 25%, 50% and 75% of maximum load. Initial activation timing of a muscle was determined as the time at which the average activation (over a 25 ms moving window) was greater than three standard deviations above baseline measures. RESULTS All muscles tested were activated prior to movement onset. Subscapularis was activated significantly later than supraspinatus, infraspinatus, deltoid and upper trapezius, while supraspinatus, infraspinatus, upper trapezius, lower trapezius, serratus anterior and deltoid all had similar initial activation times. The effects of load or plane of movement were not significant. CONCLUSIONS Supraspinatus is recruited prior to movement of the humerus into abduction but not earlier than many other shoulder muscles, including infraspinatus, deltoid and axioscapular muscles. The common statement that supraspinatus initiates abduction is therefore, misleading.

Does load influence shoulder muscle recruitment patterns during scapular plane abduction

OBJECTIVES Load is used to increasingly challenge muscle function and has been shown to increase muscle activity levels with no change in activation patterns during shoulder flexion, extension, adduction and rotation. However, the effect of load during shoulder abduction, a movement commonly used in assessment of shoulder dysfunction and to improve shoulder function, has not been comprehensively examined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if load influences shoulder muscle activation patterns and levels during scapular plane abduction in normal subjects. DESIGN Experimental study. METHODS Fourteen volunteers performed shoulder abduction in the scapular plane at 25%, 50% and 75% of maximum load. Eight shoulder muscles were investigated using a combination of indwelling and surface electromyographic recordings: middle deltoid, infraspinatus, subscapularis, supraspinatus, serratus anterior, upper and lower trapezius and rhomboid major. RESULTS All muscles tested showed increasing average muscle activation levels with increasing load and strong correlations in the activation patterns between loads. CONCLUSIONS Increasing shoulder abduction load not only increases activity in middle deltoid but also in the rotator cuff (infraspinatus, subscapularis, supraspinatus) and axioscapular (serratus anterior, upper and lower trapezius, rhomboid major) muscles. The functional stabilising role of both the rotator cuff and axioscapular muscles is considered an important contribution to the increased activation levels in these muscle groups as they function to counterbalance potential translation forces produced by other muscles during shoulder abduction. The activation patterns of all shoulder muscle groups during abduction can be trained at low load and progressively challenged with increasing load.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Nepali versions of numerical pain rating scale and global rating of change

BackgroundPain intensity and patients’ impression of global improvement are widely used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical practice and research. They are commonly assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Global Rating of Change (GROC) questionnaires. The GROC is essential as an anchor for evaluating the psychometric properties of PROMs. Both of these PROMs are translated to many languages and have shown excellent psychometric properties. Their availability in Nepali would facilitate pain research and cross-cultural comparison of research findings. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to translate and cross-culturally adapt the NPRS and GROC into Nepali and to assess the psychometric properties of the Nepali version of the NPRS (NPRS-NP).MethodsAfter translating and cross-culturally adapting the NPRS and GROC into Nepali using recommended guidelines, NPRS-NP was administered to 104 individuals with musculoskeletal pain twice. The Nepali version of the GROC (GROC-NP) was administered at the follow-up for anchor-based assessment. (1) Test-retest reliability and minimum detectable change (MDC) among the stable group, (2) construct validity (by single sample t-test within the improved group and independent sample t-test between groups), and (3) concurrent validity were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to determine the responsiveness of the NPRS-NP using the area under the curve (AUC), and minimum important changes (MIC) for small, medium and large improvements.ResultsSignificant cultural adaptations were required to obtain relevant Nepali versions of both the NPRS and GROC. The NPRS-NP showed excellent test-retest reliability and a MDC of 1.13 points. NPRS-NP demonstrated a good construct validity by significant within-group difference in mean of NPRS score- t(63)= 7.57, P < 0.001 and statistically significant difference of mean score- t(98)= -4.24, P < .001 between the stable and improved groups. It demonstrated moderate concurrent correlation with the GROC-NP; r = 0.43, P < 0.01. Responsiveness of the NPRS-NP was shown at three levels with AUC = 0.68–0.82, and MIC = 1.17–1.33.ConclusionsThe NPRS and GROC were successfully translated and culturally adapted into Nepali. The NPRS-NP demonstrated good reliability, validity and responsiveness in assessing musculoskeletal pain intensity in a Nepali population.

Is subscapularis recruited in a similar manner during shoulder internal rotation exercises and belly press and lift off tests

OBJECTIVES Although the belly press and lift off tests are recommended to assess subscapularis function, shoulder internal rotation (IR) exercises performed in other shoulder positions are more commonly used to restore subscapularis function. It is not known if shoulder IR exercises specifically activate subscapularis to the same degree as the lift off and belly press tests, and thus have the potential to effect subscapularis strength gains. Therefore, the aim was to compare subscapularis activation levels with those of other shoulder internal rotator muscles during the belly press and lift off tests and shoulder IR exercise positions. DESIGN Original research. METHODS Twenty asymptomatic volunteers performed maximal isometric contractions during the belly press and lift off tests and shoulder IR performed at 90° and 0° abduction in an upright position and supported at 90° abduction in supine. Muscle activation levels were recorded using a combination of indwelling and surface electrodes. Data were normalized to maximum voluntary contractions and averaged. RESULTS Moderate average subscapularis activation levels were recorded during all shoulder IR tasks examined with no significant difference between tasks (p=0.18). The belly press test was the only IR task in which subscapularis activation levels were significantly higher than all other shoulder internal rotator muscles (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Shoulder IR exercises activate subscapularis to similar moderate levels as the belly press and lift off tests and therefore, have similar potential to strengthen subscapularis. However, the belly press test, with significantly higher subscapularis activation than other shoulder internal rotators, more specifically targets subscapularis.

Shoulder muscle activation patterns and levels differ between open and closed-chain abduction

OBJECTIVES Open and closed-chain abduction of the shoulder are commonly used in rehabilitation and exercise programs to assess and/or improve shoulder muscle function. However, it is not known if shoulder muscle activation patterns differ between these two exercises. Therefore the purpose of this study was to compare muscle activation patterns during closed-chain shoulder abduction performed using a shoulder press machine with open-chain abduction using free weights. DESIGN Experimental study. METHODS Open and closed-chain abduction were performed by 15 and 14 subjects respectively at low (25%), medium (50%) and high (75%) load. Surface and indwelling electrodes were used to record the activation pattern of seven shoulder muscles during the concentric phase of each exercise. Data were normalised to maximum voluntary contractions (MVC), time normalised and compared over the common range of motion (40°-140° abduction). RESULTS Only the activation pattern of middle deltoid had a strong positive correlation between exercises (r≥0.65, p<0.05) with similar activation levels at all loads (35%, 50% and 60% MVC, p=1.0). All other muscles tested had inconsistent, low or negative correlations between exercises. Significantly lower average activation levels were recorded during closed-chain abduction for subscapularis at all loads, upper trapezius at medium and high loads and infraspinatus and lower trapezius at high load (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS Open-chain abduction is required to facilitate the stabilising role of the rotator cuff and axioscapular muscles, in response to middle deltoid activity. Closed-chain exercises may enable full range shoulder abduction earlier in rehabilitation programs, with an inherent stability and less demand on the rotator cuff.