Darryl M. Hoffman

Radial artery conduits improve long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND The second best conduit for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is unclear. We sought to determine if the use of a second arterial conduit, the radial artery (RA), would improve long-term survival after CABG using the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) and saphenous vein (SV). METHODS We compared the 14-year outcomes in propensity-matched patients undergoing isolated, primary CABG using the LITA, RA, and SV versus CABG using the LITA and only SV. In all, 826 patients from each group had similar propensity-matched demographics and multiple variables. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality obtained using the Social Security Death Index. RESULTS Perioperative outcomes including in hospital mortality (0.1% for the RA patients and 0.2% for the SV patients) were similar. Kaplan-Meier survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 98.3%, 93.9%, and 83.1% for the RA group versus 97.2%, 88.7%, and 74.3% for the SV group (log rank, p = 0.0011). Cox proportional hazards models showed a lower all-cause mortality in the RA group (hazard ratio 0.72, confidence interval: 0.56 to 0.92, p = 0.0084). Ten-year survivals showed a 52% increased mortality for the SV patients (25.7%) versus the RA patients (16.9%; p = 0.0011). For symptomatic patients, RA patency was 80.7%, which was not different than the LITA patency rate of 86.4% but was superior to the SV patency rate of 46.7% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Using the LITA, SV, and a RA conduit for CABG results in significantly improved long-term survival compared with using the LITA and SV. The use of two arterial conduits offers a clear and lasting survival advantage, likely due to the improved patency of RA grafts. We conclude that RA conduits should be more widely utilized during CABG.

Arterial Grafts Protect the Native Coronary Vessels From Atherosclerotic Disease Progression

BACKGROUND We sought to examine the effect of different conduits on the progression of atherosclerosis in previously revascularized coronary territories. METHODS Between 1995 and 2010, 4,960 patients were discharged alive after primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with a left internal thoracic artery (LITA) conduit and additional conduits as needed: radial artery (RA) or saphenous vein graft (SVG), or both. Seven hundred seventy-two patients had coronary angiography for recurrent symptoms an average of 5.5±3.5 years after CABG (range, 0.1-16 years). Cumulative graft patency and disease progression in the native vessels was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival method. The log-rank test was used to assess differences of disease progression per territory between different types of conduits. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier-estimated 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall disease progression in territories with patent LITAs was 0.01%, 4%, and 8%, respectively; with patent RA grafts, it was 0.01%, 6%, and 11%, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.157); and with patent SVGs it was 3%, 19%, and 43%, respectively (log-rank test; p<0.0001). Disease progression in grafted native coronary arteries in the anterior territory with patent LITA-to-left anterior descending (LAD) artery was 8%, and with patent RA grafts versus patent SVGs to the diagonal branches of LAD artery was 10% and 40%, respectively (log-rank test; p<0.0001). Disease progression in grafted native coronary arteries to the lateral territory with a patent RA graft was 11% versus 50% with a patent SVG (log-rank test; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS RA and LITA grafting has a strong protective effect against progression of native coronary artery disease in previously grafted vessels. Multiple arterial grafting may improve long-term survival by preventing progression of atherosclerosis in the native coronary vessels.

Time-Varying Survival Benefit of Radial Artery Versus Vein Grafting: A Multiinstitutional Analysis

BACKGROUND A survival benefit of radial artery use versus saphenous vein grafting in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been reported. We aimed to elucidate the relative radial artery survival benefit as a function of time after surgery from two independent CABG series. METHODS We compared 0- to 15-year survival with radial artery versus saphenous vein grafting in isolated, nonsalvage primary CABG with left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending from two institutions: Ohio (radial artery [n=2,361; 61 years]; saphenous vein [n=2,547; 67 years]), and New York (radial artery [n=1,970; 58 years]; saphenous vein [n=2,974; 69 years]). Separate multivariate radial artery-use propensity models based on demographic, preoperative factors, intraoperative variables, and completeness of revascularization data were computed and used to derive propensity- and sex-matched CABG cohorts (1,799 [Ohio] and 995 [New York] pairs). A three-phase (early and late) mortality model was fit to Kaplan-Meier mortality estimates and used to derive relative radial artery versus saphenous vein hazard functions. RESULTS Radial artery use patterns and patient risk profiles differed substantially for New York and Ohio, with the New York radial artery cohort significantly younger and more male. Within-institution matched graft-type cohorts were well matched. Cumulative mortality was significantly better for radial artery at both institutions (p < 0.001 both). All mortality-time data were well described by the three-phase model, and the derived relative hazard functions were qualitatively and quantitatively similar for New York and Ohio, exhibiting maximal benefit between 0.5 and 5 years. CONCLUSIONS Despite substantial differences in radial artery use patterns during a 15-year period, our analysis in large propensity-matched radial artery and saphenous vein cohorts yielded remarkably similar, time-varying radial artery to saphenous vein survival benefit at both institutions. These converging findings based on two independent patient series extend currently available objective evidence in support of a radial artery survival advantage in CABG.

Left atrial dissection: etiology and treatment.

BACKGROUND Left atrial dissection (LatD) is a rare entity most commonly associated with mitral valve surgery. We have reviewed our experience with 4 patients to better define the etiology and the treatment of LatD. METHODS From 1991 to 2012, 4 patients experienced LatD after surgery (1 of 6,302, or 0.02%, of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting patients and 3 of 1,895, or 0.16%, of mitral valve patients). Patient and perioperative data and management were reviewed. RESULTS Two patients were women, and ages ranged from 49 to 80 years. Three patients underwent mitral procedures (two replacements with coronary artery bypass grafting and one repair) for mitral regurgitation. One patient underwent emergent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a left main dissection during percutaneous coronary intervention. Three LatDs were found during surgery, and one LatD was found 12 days after mitral repair and was successfully treated nonoperatively. The LatD was located along the posterior atrial wall originating from the atrioventricular junction in all cases and obstructed mitral valve inflow. Operative repair focused on the evacuation of hematoma, obliteration of the false lumen, and repair of the entry injury. No mortality occurred. CONCLUSIONS Left atrial dissection is a rare complication of cardiac surgery, probably related to a contained atrioventricular separation allowing pressurized blood to separate the layers of the posterior left atrium. Prompt intraoperative diagnosis, obliterating the false cavity, and addressing the entry point are essential. In contrast, a nonoperative approach in a stable patient with a delayed LatD suggests healing of the dissection, and atrial remodeling occurs.

Malignant B-Cell Lymphoma Arising in a Large, Left Atrial Myxoma

A case of large cardiac myxoma associated with primary B cell lymphoma is described in a patient presenting with acute obstructive left heart failure. Emergent surgical removal was performed along with mitral valve repair.

Routine Myocardial Revascularization with the Radial Artery: A Multicenter Experience

Abstract Background: Current literature documents use of the radial artery (RA) for myocardial revascularization only as an alternative conduit in cases where the saphenous veins have been previously harvested or are unsuitable for use. Large‐scale routine clinical use of the RA as the conduit of choice has not been reported. Methods: This prospective study evaluated the harvest of the RA from 933 patients and the subsequent use of the conduit as a preferred coronary artery bypass graft second only to the left internal thoracic artery in 930 of these patients. Results: Unilateral RA harvest was performed in 786 patients and 147 patients had bilateral RA harvest. A total of 1080 RAs were harvested; 214 (19.8%) originated from the dominant forearm. There was a mean of 3.30 ± 0.93 grafts per patient of which 2.43 ± 0.83 were arterial grafts. The mean number of RA grafts was 1.43 ± 0.53. Operative mortality was 2.3% with none due to the RA graft(s). There was no ischemia nor motor dysfunction in the operated hands. Thirty‐two (3.4%) patients experienced transient thenar dysesthesia that resolved in 1 day to 6 weeks. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that routine total or near total arterial myocardial revascularization may be achieved safely and effectively with the use of one or both RAs in conjunction with the internal thoracic artery.

Multiple arterial bypass grafting should be routine

OBJECTIVE We sought to estimate the reduction in deaths and the number of additional person-years of life that could potentially be gained by nationwide adoption of routine multiple arterial bypass grafting (MABG). METHODS Propensity matching on 4883 patients undergoing primary, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) from January 1995 to June 2011, resulted in 1023 matched pairs of LITA-radial artery and LITA-saphenous vein patients. Kaplan-Meier estimated survivals were used to calculate the potential number of lives that could be saved based on a 20% and an 80% rate of MABG, compared with the national 10% rate, when applied to a hypothetical national sample of 200,000 similar patients. RESULTS Our overall MABG rate was 40% with >80% rate for the past 3 years. Kaplan-Meier estimated 10-year survival was better for LITA-radial artery patients (83.1%) compared with LITA-saphenous vein patients (75.7%) (log rank test, P < .001). When compared with the current national 10% MABG rate, a 20% and an 80% MABG rate could potentially result in 1400 and 10,000 fewer annual deaths, respectively, among a hypothetical national cohort, yielding >9000 and >64,000 person-years of life over a 10-year period. CONCLUSIONS An 80% rate of MABG has the potential to prevent more than 10,000 deaths annually and add >64,000 person-years of life over the course of 10 years. The use of a second arterial graft during CABG should be routine in the majority of patients undergoing CABG.

Optimal Conduit for Diabetic Patients: Propensity Analysis of Radial and Right Internal Thoracic Arteries

BACKGROUND Multiple arterial grafts, in addition to the left internal thoracic artery, improve long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); yet, the use of this procedure remains low for both the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) and the radial artery (RA). To identify the optimal arterial conduit to deploy for revascularization of diabetic patients, we compared the outcomes for RA and RITA grafts to the circumflex coronary. METHODS From January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2011, 908 consecutive diabetic patients underwent first-time, isolated CABG (99% on-pump), 659 with the RA and 502 with the RITA, respectively, in two affiliated hospitals. Data were prospectively collected, and late mortality was determined from the Social Security Death Index. Propensity matching, based on preoperative and operative variables, identified 202 matched pairs from each group. RESULTS Long-term survival was similar for matched patients. Mortality, myocardial infarction, reoperation for bleeding, stroke, sepsis, and renal failure were not significantly different between groups. However, deep sternal wound infection (p<0.035) and respiratory failure (p<0.048) favored the RA group, in which the total major adverse events were significantly fewer (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS In diabetic patients undergoing multivessel revascularization with either RA or RITA grafts to the circumflex coronary, long-term survival is similar. However, RA patients experienced significantly fewer respiratory or sternal wound adverse events. The RA is the preferred conduit to extend to more diabetic patients the recognized survival benefit of a multiple arterial graft strategy.

Left atrial dissection: an almost unknown entity

Left atrial dissection is an exceedingly rare but potentially fatal complication of cardiac surgery. It is most commonly associated with mitral valve surgery, including both replacement and repair, with a reported incidence rate of 0.16%. However, other cardiac surgical or catheter-based interventional procedures are also known as potential predisposing factors. The time of presentation from the cause of dissection varies extremely, ranging from immediate occurrence up to 20 years later. The dissection forms a large cavity between the endocardium and epicardium of the left atrium, causing obliteration of the left atrial cavity and resultant haemodynamic compromise, which almost always requires immediate surgical intervention. In contrast, left atrial dissection without haemodynamic instability can often be managed non-operatively with satisfactory outcomes. This article reviews this rare but relevant clinical entity to further elucidate the incidence, pathogenesis, clinical course, management and outcome of left atrial dissection.

Maintaining quality of care 24/7 in a nontrauma surgical intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND Most surgical critical care literature reflects practices at trauma centers and tertiary hospitals. Surgical critical care needs and practices may be quite different at nontrauma center teaching hospitals. As acute care surgery develops as a component of surgical critical care and trauma, the opportunities and challenges of the nontrauma centers should be considered. METHODS In 2001, a new surgical critical care service was created for an 800-bed urban teaching hospital with a 12-bed surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Consults, daily rounds, daily notes, and adherence to best practices were standardized over the next 9 years for a team of postgraduate year-1 and -2 surgical residents, physician assistants and surgical intensivists. The Fundamentals of Critical Care Support course was given as basic introduction, and published guidelines for ventilators, hemodynamics, cardiac, infections, and nutrition management were implemented. A “beyond FCCS” curriculum was repeated every resident rotation. A 12-bed stepdown unit was developed for the more stable patients, mostly run by SICU physician assistants with SICU attending coverage. The first 5 years, night coverage was by the daytime intensivist from home. The last 4 years, night coverage was in-unit surgical intensivists or cardiac surgeons. RESULTS Data for 13,020 patients drawn from 152,154 operations over 9 years is reported. Surgery grew 89% to 24,000 cases/year in 2010. Half the patients were general, gastrointestinal oncology, or vascular surgery. Ninety-two percent were perioperative. The 8% nonoperative patients were mostly gastrointestinal bleeding, abdominal pain, or pancreatitis. In the first year, annual SICU mortality decreased from an average of 4.5% the 5 previous years to 1.96% (2002) and remained 1.75% (2003), 2.1% (2004), 1.9% (2005), 1.5% (2006), 1.5% (2007), 2.2% (2008), 2.4% (2009), and 2.1% (2010). CONCLUSION Annual mortality immediately improved at a busy nontrauma hospital with rapid, structured consultation by the SICU team, comprehensive daily rounds guided by critical care best practices, and daytime in-unit surgical intensivists. Low mortality was maintained over 9 years as surgery volume nearly doubled but did not improve further with 24/7 in-unit coverage by surgical intensivists and cardiac surgeons. The process of care in an SICU may be more important than 24 hour a day, 7 days a week intensivists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level II.