Darryl Maher

Effects of Bacterially Synthesized Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients with Advanced Malignancy

STUDY OBJECTIVE To define the clinical and hematologic effects of subcutaneously administered bacterially synthesized recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF). DESIGN Single arm nonrandomized dose escalation study. PATIENTS Twenty-one patients with advanced malignancy who were not receiving concurrent myelosuppressive therapy. INTERVENTIONS Subcutaneous administration of rhGM-CSF by once-daily injection to groups of two to four patients at doses of 0.3 to 30 micrograms/kg body weight.d for 10 consecutive days. Some patients received a second 10-day period of daily rhGM-CSF treatment after a 10-day nontreatment interval followed by alternate-day treatment. Clinical status and hematologic values were monitored frequently. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS All doses of rhGM-CSF caused an immediate transient fall of 84% to 99% in circulating neutrophils, eosinophils, and monocytes. Continued daily dosing caused a leukocytosis of up to 10-fold with increases in numbers of circulating neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes. There appeared to be a plateau in the increase in neutrophils in the dose range 3 to 15 micrograms/kg.d. Marrow aspirates showed increased proportions of promyelocytes and myelocytes. Alternate-day injection of 15 micrograms/kg maintained a leukocytosis. At doses up to 15 micrograms/kg.d, rhGM-CSF was well tolerated but adverse effects included bone pains, myalgias, rashes, and liver dysfunction. At doses exceeding 15 micrograms/kg.d, pericarditis was a dose-limiting toxicity. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura was reactivated by rhGM-CSF in one patient. CONCLUSIONS Bacterially synthesized rhGM-CSF induces a leukocytosis in the dose range of 3 to 15 micrograms/kg.d. These doses are appropriate for phase II studies.

Treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia by subcutaneously administered granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with optimization of dose and duration of therapy.

In patients who have not received extensive prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, it has been previously demonstrated that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) abrogated the leukopenia following administration of melphalan (25 mg/m2). This study examined the necessity of a prechemotherapy period of G-CSF administration and the effect of varying the timing and duration of postchemotherapy G-CSF. Initially, patients received 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, and 10 micrograms/kg/d subcutaneously on days 1 to 5 and days 10 to 18. Melphalan was given on day 9. In the next portion of the study melphalan was administered on day 1 and G-CSF, 10 micrograms/kg/d, was administered by subcutaneous infusion on five schedules: (1) days 2 to 13; (2) days 8 to 13; (3) days 2 to 18; (4) days 8 to 18; (5) days -9 to -2 and 2 to 13. G-CSF produced a rapid and sustained elevation in neutrophil levels within 24 hours even when started 8 days after melphalan. This treatment was sufficient to abrogate the neutropenia in patients who had received no prior chemotherapy. It was not necessary to continue G-CSF for more than 7 days. G-CSF did not consistently alter the course of the thrombocytopenia that followed this dose of melphalan. G-CSF was well tolerated, although mild bone pain occurred and was reduced with acetaminophen. One of 22 patients developed cellulitis at an infusion site. We conclude that after melphalan chemotherapy, G-CSF may need to be given for only a short period to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, and that G-CSF induces a rapid rise in neutrophil levels even when started 8 days after melphalan administration.

Endogenous haemopoietic growth factors in neutropenia and infection

Summary Haemopoietic growth factors (HGFs) are being administered to patients with neutropenic fever; however, little is known about the endogenous HGF response in these patients. Specific assays were used to study four HGFs, granulocyte (G‐) CSF, granulocyte‐macrophage (GM‐) CSF, macrophage (M‐) CSF and interleukin (IL‐) 6 levels in the blood of patients with neutropenic fever (46 episodes). For comparison, levels were also measured in three control populations: normals (20), afebrile neutropenic (14), and bacteraemic but not neutropenic patients (20).

Rapid hematopoietic recovery after multicycle high-dose chemotherapy: enhancement of filgrastim-induced progenitor-cell mobilization by recombinant human stem-cell factor.

PURPOSE To assess the mobilization potential and safety of recombinant human stem-cell factor (SCF) when coadministered with filgrastim to untreated women with poor-prognosis breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible women had breast cancer with 10 or more positive axillary nodes, or estrogen receptor-negative tumor with 4 positive nodes, or stage III disease. Patients were randomized to receive SCF plus filgrastim or filgrastim alone. Filgrastim 12 microg/kg daily was administered for 6 days by continuous subcutaneous infusion. SCF was administered by daily subcutaneous injection at 5, 10, or 15 microg/kg concurrent with filgrastim for 7 days, or 10 microg/kg daily starting 3 days before filgrastim for a total of 10 days (SCF pretreatment). Apheresis was performed on days 5, 6, and 7 of filgrastim administration. Patients then had three cycles of epirubicin 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 every 28 days, each supported by one third of the apheresis product. RESULTS Sixty-two women were treated. Greater yields occurred in patients who received SCF 10 microg/kg daily plus filgastim than those who received filgrastim alone (P=.013 for CD34+ cells; P=.07 for granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells [GM-CFCs]). The difference was more marked with SCF-pretreatment than concurrent SCF. Fewer aphereses were required to reach the predetermined target of peripheral-blood progenitor/stem cells (PBPCs) in women who received SCF. SCF was generally well tolerated. Hematologic recovery was rapid after each of the three cycles of chemotherapy. There was no difference in recovery between the different treatment groups. CONCLUSION Mobilization of PBPCs by filgrastim is significantly enhanced by coadministration of SCF, and commencing SCF before filgrastim can optimize this effect. SCF has the potential to reduce the number of aphereses required to collect a target number of PBPCs.

Plasma granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor levels in critical illness including sepsis and septic shock: relation to disease severity, multiple organ dysfunction, and mortality.

Objective To define the circulating levels of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) during critical illness and to determine their relationship to the severity of illness as measured by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, the development of multiple organ dysfunction, or mortality. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting University hospital intensive care unit. Patients A total of 82 critically ill adult patients in four clinically defined groups, namely septic shock (n = 29), sepsis without shock (n = 17), shock without sepsis (n = 22), and nonseptic, nonshock controls (n = 14). Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results During day 1 of septic shock, peak plasma levels of G-CSF, interleukin (IL)-6, and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), but not GM-CSF, were greater than in sepsis or shock alone (p < .001), and were correlated among themselves (rs = 0.44–0.77;p < .02) and with the APACHE II score (rs = 0.25–0.40;p = .03 to .18). G-CSF, IL-6, and LIF, and sepsis, shock, septic shock, and APACHE II scores were strongly associated with organ dysfunction or 5-day mortality by univariate analysis. However, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that only septic shock remained significantly associated with organ dysfunction and only APACHE II scores and shock with 5-day mortality. Similarly, peak G-CSF, IL-6, and LIF were poorly predictive of 30-day mortality. Conclusions Plasma levels of G-CSF, IL-6, and LIF are greatly elevated in critical illness, including septic shock, and are correlated with one another and with the severity of illness. However, they are not independently predictive of mortality, or the development of multiple organ dysfunction. GM-CSF was rarely elevated, suggesting different roles for G-CSF and GM-CSF in human septic shock.

Multicycle High-Dose Chemotherapy and Filgrastim-Mobilized Peripheral-Blood Progenitor Cells in Women With High-Risk Stage II or III Breast Cancer: Five-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE To determine the safety and efficacy of multiple cycles of dose-intensive, nonablative chemotherapy in women with poor-prognosis breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women with stage II breast cancer and 10 or more involved nodes or four or more involved nodes and estrogen receptor-negative tumors and women with stage III disease received three cycles of epirubicin 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2, with progenitor cell and filgrastim support every 28 days (n = 79) or 21 days (n = 20). Patients were reviewed at least twice yearly thereafter. Twenty-six patients had bone marrow and apheresis collections assessed for the presence of micrometastatic tumor cells. RESULTS Ninety-nine women (median age, 43 years; range, 24 to 60 years) were treated. Ninety-two completed all three cycles of chemotherapy. The major toxicity was severe, reversible myelosuppression that was more prolonged with successive cycles, and this did not differ between patients given treatment every 28 days and those treated every 21 days. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 176 (61%) of 287 cycles. Severe mucositis (grade 3 or 4) occurred in 23% of cycles but tended to be short-lived and was reversible. The cardiac ejection fraction fell by a median of 4% during treatment, and three patients developed evidence of cardiac failure after chemotherapy. Two patients (2%) died of acute toxicity. Three of 26 patients had evidence of circulating micrometastatic tumor cells. The actuarial distant disease-free and overall survival rates at 60-month follow-up were 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53% to 75%) and 67% (95% CI, 56% to 78%), respectively. CONCLUSION Multiple cycles of dose-intensive, nonablative chemotherapy is a feasible and safe approach. Disease control and survival are similar to those in other studies of myeloablative chemotherapy in poor-prognosis breast cancer. The regimen is being evaluated in a randomized trial of the International Breast Cancer Study Group.

KRN8602 (MX2-Hydrochloride): An Active New Agent for the Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma

PURPOSE To assess the efficacy and toxicity of KRN8602 when administered as an intravenous bolus to patients with recurrent high-grade malignant glioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with recurrent or persistent anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma multiforme who had not received recent chemotherapy or radiotherapy and were of good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score < or = 2) were treated with an intravenous bolus of 40 mg/m(2) KRN8602 every 28 days. Tumor responses were assessed radiologically and clinically after every second cycle of therapy. Treatment was continued until documented progression or a total of six cycles. RESULTS A median of three cycles (range, one to six cycles) of KRN8602 was administered to 55 patients, 49 of whom received at least two cycles and were, therefore, assessable for response. The overall response rate (disease stabilization or better) was 43% (95% confidence interval, 29% to 58%). There were three complete responses, one partial response, seven minor responses, and 10 patients with stable disease. The median time to progression was 2 months (range, 1.5 to 37 months) and overall survival was 11 months (range, 1.5 to 40 months). Neutropenia was the most common toxicity, although it was generally of brief duration, and there were only seven episodes of febrile neutropenia in 176 cycles delivered. Nonhematologic toxicity was mostly gastrointestinal (nausea and vomiting, diarrhea) and events were grade 2 or lower except for a single episode of grade 3 vomiting. CONCLUSION KRN8602 is an active new agent with minimal toxicity in the treatment of relapsed or refractory high-grade glioma. Further studies with KRN8602 in combination with other cytotoxics and in adjuvant treatment of gliomas are warranted.

The use of hyperimmune serum for severe influenza infections

Background and Purpose:Although use of hyperimmune serum to treat patients with severe influenza infection, infections resistant to antiviral drugs, or as an interim therapy during a pandemic is frequently proposed, there have been no randomized case-control trials to investigate its efficacy. Reports of the use of hyperimmune serum in human influenza infection are sporadic and studies in animal models are limited. Methods:Ferrets exposed to an otherwise lethal dose of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 were used as a model of severe human disease. Hyperimmune serum was administered 24 hrs before virus exposure, during early fever, or at the onset of initial clinical signs of influenza (lethargy, lack of appetite) to reflect clinically relevant intervention points. Animals were monitored for 14 days after challenge and assessed for local and constitutional signs of influenza as measured by survival, weight loss, activity scores, viral shedding, and seroconversion. Results:All animals administered hyperimmune serum homologous to the challenge virus before challenge survived the infection with no significant morbidity. The majority of animals receiving hyperimmune serum after virus exposure and during early fever survived the period of observation but showed significant morbidity and prolonged convalescence. The majority of animals that received serum later in the disease course died of acute infection. Conclusion:In highly pathogenic systemic influenza infections, the window for successful intervention by administration of hyperimmune serum may be narrow.

T cell recognition of melanoma antigens in association with HLA-A1 on allogeneic melanoma cells

Previous studies have shown that recognition of melanoma by cytotoxic T lymphocytes may be restricted by HLA-A1, A2 and other HLA antigens. The present study examined the cytotoxic specificity and major histocompatibility complex restriction of cloned cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) isolated from a patient with the HLA phenotype A3,31 who had been immunized with a vaccine prepared from HLA-A1,3 melanoma cells. Cytotoxic assays against HLA-typed allogeneic melanoma cells indicated that cloned CTL from the patient were able to kill allogeneic melanoma cells expressing HLA-A1 but not other HLA-A1-positive cells. Studies on a representative clone indicated that proliferation and cytokine (tumour necrosis factor α) production in response to melanoma cells was also associated with HLA-A1 on melanoma cells. Response to the melanoma cells was associated with interleukin-4 (IL-4) rather than IL-2 production. The antigen recognized in the context of HLA-A1 on allogeneic melanoma cells was detected in cytotoxic assays on cells from 9 of 12 HLA-A1+ melanoma cell lines and did not appear to be the product of the MAGE-1 or-3 genes. These findings suggest that T cells can recognize melanoma antigens in the context of alloantigens and that allogeneic vaccines containing “immunodominant” alloantigens may generate CTL that are ineffective against autologous melanoma. The study does not, however, exclude the possibility that CTL with specificity to the latter may be activated by allogeneic vaccines, and further studies are needed to answer this question.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of KRN8602 alone and with filgrastim in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE To determine the recommended dose, toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics of KRN8602 (MX2-hydrochloride), a novel morpholino anthracycline with potent cytotoxicity against anthracycline-sensitive and resistant experimental tumors in vitro and in vivo. PATIENTS AND METHODS KRN8602 was administered alone in increasing doses to patients with advanced cancer or high-grade gliomas until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in three or more of five patients treated in a dose level. Because neutropenia was dose limiting, further escalation was investigated with filgrastim support. RESULTS Fifty-six assessable patients completed at least one cycle of chemotherapy. The recommended dose of KRN8602 alone was 40 mg/m2. Dose escalation was limited by neutropenia. The recommended dose of KRN8602 with filgrastim was 70 mg/m2, and limiting toxicities were neutropenia, diarrhea, and vomiting. The most commonly experienced nonhematologic toxicity was nausea and vomiting. Alopecia and mucositis were infrequent and mild. Pharmacokinetic parameters showed substantial variation, although the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration both increased with dose. There was no relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicity. CONCLUSION KRN8602 at doses of 40 mg/m2 when administered alone and 70 mg/m2 when administered with filgrastim appeared to be manageable. The major DLTs were neutropenia and, at higher doses, diarrhea and vomiting. The efficacy of this drug is currently being tested in phase II studies.