Dasantha Jayamanne

Survival improvements with adjuvant therapy in patients with glioblastoma

Evaluate survival of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) managed with adjuvant intensity modulated radiation therapy and temozolomide since the introduction of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (EORTC‐NCIC) protocol.

Utilizing 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) to define suspected nonenhancing tumor for radiation therapy planning of glioblastoma

AIM The authors sought to evaluate the impact of 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) on radiation therapy planning for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma (GBM) and the presence of suspected nonenhancing tumors compared with standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with GBM and contrast-enhanced MRI scans showing regions suspicious of nonenhancing tumor underwent postoperative FET-PET before commencing radiation therapy. Two clinical target volumes (CTVs) were created using pre- and postoperative MRI: MRI fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences (CTVFLAIR) and MRI contrast sequences with an expansion on the surgical cavity (CTVSx). FET-PET was used to create biological tumor volumes (BTVs) by encompassing FET-avid regions, forming BTVFLAIR and BTVSx. Volumetric analyses were conducted between CTVs and respective BTVs using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The volume increase with addition of FET was analyzed with respect to BTVFLAIR and BTVSx. Presence of focal gadolinium contrast enhancement within previously nonenhancing tumor or within the FET-avid region was noted on MRI scans at 1 and 3 months after radiation therapy. RESULTS Twenty-six patients were identified retrospectively from our database, of whom 24 had demonstrable FET uptake. The median CTVFLAIR, CTVSx, BTVFLAIR, and BTVSx were 57.1 mL (range, 1.1-217.4), 83.6 mL (range, 27.2-275.8), 62.8 mL (range, 1.1-307.3), and 94.7 mL (range, 27.2-285.5), respectively. When FET-PET was used, there was a mean increase in volume of 26.8% from CTVFLAIR to BTVFLAIR and 20.6% from CTVSx to BTVSx. A statistically significant difference was noted on Wilcoxon signed-rank test when assessing volumetric change between CTVFLAIR and BTVFLAIR (P < .0001) and CTVSx and BTVSx (P < .0001). Six of 24 patients (25%) with FET avidity before radiation therapy showed focal gadolinium enhancement within the radiation therapy portal. CONCLUSIONS FET-PET may help improve delineation of GBM in cases with a suspected nonenhancing component. This may result in improved radiation therapy target delineation and reduce the risk of potential geographical miss. SUMMARY We investigated the impact of 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) on radiation therapy planning for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma (GBM) and a suspected nonenhancing tumor compared with standard magnetic resonance imaging. We performed volumetric analyses between clinical target volumes and respective biological target volumes using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. FET-PET may help improve delineation of GBM in cases with a suspected nonenhancing component and reduce the risk of potential geographical miss.

FET PET in the evaluation of indeterminate brain lesions on MRI: Differentiating glioma from other non-neoplastic causes – A pilot study

We aimed to determine the utility of FET PET in the management of indeterminate CNS lesions found on MRI. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with FET PET at a single tertiary institution from 2011 to 2015. FET PET images were processed using usual methods and measurements taken including SUVmax, TBRmax, and analysis of dynamic series where available (Kipeak, Vdpeak, as well as tumor:background ratio for these variables). Correlation studies were performed using ANOVA between cohorts of high-grade histology, low-grade histology, and benign histology/stable on observation. Thirty-five patients were included, of whom 34 were suitable for analysis with median follow-up of 5 months. The positive predictive value of FET PET in this cohort was 83.3%. FET SUVmax differentiated between patients with high-grade (mean SUV 3.38, 95% CI 2.21-4.55), low-grade (1.88, 95% CI 1.33-2.43) and benign/observation (1.42, 95% CI 1.13-1.71) cohorts (p = 0.0003). Similarly, tumour to brain ratio was significant (p < 0.0001). Kipeak distinguished between high grade and observation cohorts (p = 0.036), as did KiTBR (p = 0.025). Vd peak was not significantly different in these two cohorts (p = 0.057) but Vd TBR was (p = 0.041). In conclusion, FET PET demonstrated a high positive predictive value for glioma in patients with indeterminate brain lesions on MRI. The combination of negative FET and negative FDG PET scans may predict an indolent clinical course. Confirmatory trials are needed to establish the potential value of FET PET in guiding surgical management in this cohort.

Optimising Outcomes for Glioblastoma through Subspecialisation in a Regional Cancer Centre

Delivery of highly sophisticated, and subspecialised, management protocols for glioblastoma in low volume rural and regional areas creates potential issues for equivalent quality of care. This study aims to demonstrate the impact on clinical quality indicators through the development of a novel model of care delivering an outsourced subspecialised neuro-oncology service in a regional centre compared with the large volume metropolitan centre. Three hundred and fifty-two patients with glioblastoma were managed under the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (EORTC-NCIC) Protocol, and survival outcome was assessed in relation to potential prognostic factors and the geographical site of treatment, before and after opening of a regional cancer centre. The median overall survival was 17 months (95% CI: 15.5–18.5), with more favourable outcome with age less than 50 years (p < 0.001), near-total resection (p < 0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status 0, 1 (p < 0.001), and presence of O-6 methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation (p = 0.001). There was no difference in survival outcome for patients managed at the regional centre, compared with metropolitan centre (p = 0.35). Similarly, no difference was seen with clinical quality process indicators of clinical trial involvement, rates of repeat craniotomy, use of bevacizumab and re-irradiation. This model of neuro-oncology subspecialisation allowed equivalent outcomes to be achieved within a regional cancer centre compared to large volume metropolitan centre.

Low Rate of Subsequent Whole Brain Radiotherapy Following a Policy of Local Therapy with MRI Surveillance for Central Nervous System Oligometastases

Background: Palliative Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) for cerebral metastases has potential morbidity and in large randomized studies has not shown a clear survival benefit. This study audits the outcome of patients with cerebral oligometastatic disease (which we defined as 1-4 lesions on MRI) who were managed with an active policy avoiding WBRT utilising local therapies and MRI surveillance. Methods: A clinical audit was performed of 31 patients with cerebral oligometastases referred for radiation therapy at the Northern Sydney Cancer Centre between July 2009 and December 2012. Patients were offered management with a programme of local therapy (neurosurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery or intensity modulated radiotherapy, or combined modality therapy) followed by protocol based MRI surveillance. Systemic therapy was delivered as indicated for extra-cranial disease. Data on patient, tumour and treatment factors was collected using a prospective database. Results: Median follow-up for surviving patients is 23 months. Compliance with MRI surveillance was good (87%). 21 patients had CNS progression, of which 12 were detected by MRI surveillance without symptoms. Median CNS progression free survival was 11 months (95% CI: 4.9 - 17.1 months). Only 5 patients (16%) received WBRT at relapse. 16 patients died during follow-up with a median survival of 20 months (95% CI: 10.6 – 29.4 months), with cause of death attributable to CNS disease in 6 patients. Conclusion: WBRT Avoidance with MRI surveillance is an acceptable management policy after local therapy for patients diagnosed with cerebral oligometastases. In our study, the rate of CNS progression was acceptable, it was not associated with increased mortality due to uncontrolled CNS disease and WBRT was avoided in the majority of these patients.