David A. Curson
University of Roehampton
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David A. Curson.
Drug Safety | 1994
Thomas R. E. Barnes; David A. Curson
SummaryThe main advantage of depot antipsychotic medication is that it overcomes the problem of covert noncompliance. Patients receiving depot treatment who refuse their injection or fail to receive it for any other reason can be immediately identified and appropriate action taken. In the context of a carefully monitored management programme, depot treatment can have a major impact on compliance and, consequently, the risk of relapse and hospitalisation can be reduced.Another major advantage is that the considerable individual variation in bioavailability and metabolism with oral antipsychotic drugs is markedly reduced with depot treatment. A better correlation between the dose administered and the concentration of medication found in blood or plasma is achieved with depot treatment, and thus, the clinician has greater control over the amount of drug being delivered to the site of activity.A further benefit of depot treatment is the achievement of stable plasma concentrations over long periods, allowing injections to be given every few weeks. However, this also represents a potential disadvantage in that there is a lack of flexibility of administration. Should adverse effects develop, the drug cannot be rapidly withdrawn. Furthermore, adjustment to the optimal dose becomes a long term strategy. The controlled studies of low dose maintenance therapy with depot treatment suggest that it can take months or years for the consequences of dose reduction, in terms of increased risk of relapse, to become manifest.When weighing up the risks and benefits of long term antipsychotic treatment for the individual patient with schizophrenia, the clinician must take into account the nature, severity and frequency of past relapses, and the degree of distress and disability related to any adverse effects. However, the clinical decision to prescribe either a depot or an oral antipsychotic for maintenance treatment will probably rest largely on an assessment of the risk of poor compliance in the particular patient. There is no convincing evidence that the range, nature or severity of adverse effects reported with depot treatment is significantly different from that seen with oral treatment, and depot treatment has been shown to be as good or better than oral medication in preventing or postponing relapse. Furthermore, when adjusting the dose or frequency of depot injection, to improve control of psychotic symptoms or reduce adverse effects, the clinician can be confident that the dose prescribed is the dose being received by the patient.
Schizophrenia Research | 1999
David A. Curson; Peter J. Duke; Carol Harvey; Christos Pantelis; Thomas R. E. Barnes
In a previous large epidemiological survey of patients with strictly defined schizophrenia in the London borough of Camden, we extracted four behavioural syndromes (Social withdrawal, Thought disturbance, Anti-social behaviour and Depressed behaviour) by factor analysis of MRC Social Behaviour Schedule (SBS) data. These syndromes had significant differential relationships to symptoms assessed using the Manchester Scale (MS), symptom-derived syndromes, and social functioning variables. A second inner-London epidemiological survey of schizophrenia in South Westminster using identical methodology found the same four behavioural syndromes with identical core component items. The same four behavioural syndromes were extracted, whether applying strict Feighner diagnostic criteria (n=112) or broader DSM-III-R criteria (n=198). The four syndromes extracted from the Feighner positive sample showed relationships to symptoms and social functioning variables similar to those found in the original Camden study. However, the symptom-derived factors were not the same and did not conform to the three recognised symptom-based syndromes of schizophrenia. This successful replication suggests that assessment of the four behavioural syndromes of schizophrenia offers a different perspective on disability and a potentially relevant measure in clinical practice, clinical trials and studies of the neuropsychology and pathophysiology of schizophrenia.
British Journal of Psychiatry | 1989
Thomas R. E. Barnes; David A. Curson; Peter F. Liddle; Meena Patel
British Journal of Psychiatry | 1997
Jeremy Speller; Thomas R. E. Barnes; David A. Curson; Christos Pantelis; J.L. Alberts
British Journal of Psychiatry | 1996
Carol Harvey; David A. Curson; Christos Pantelis; J. Taylor; T.R.E. Barnes
British Journal of Psychiatry | 1992
David A. Curson; Christos Pantelis; Jan Ward; Thomas R. E. Barnes
The British journal of psychiatry. Supplement | 1989
Thomas R. E. Barnes; Peter F. Liddle; David A. Curson; Meena Patel
Schizophrenia Research | 1992
T.R.E. Barnes; Jeremy Speller; David A. Curson; Christos Pantelis; J.L. Alberts
The Psychiatrist | 1993
Steven Milne; David A. Curson; Alcuin Wilkie; Christos Pantelis
Schizophrenia Research | 1996
Carol Harvey; David A. Curson; Christos Pantelis; J. Taylor; T.R.E. Barnes